FEMA employee orders: skip Trump supporters

8,578 Views | 166 Replies | Last: 22 days ago by ShooterTX
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Update: FEMA worker that gave the order fired. And she goes on record saying that she was told by her superiors. Havent actually heard the audio on it, but this means it was a trickle down order. Gonna really blow FEMA apart
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is what "unity" looks like.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:


The chit is about to hit the wind turbine!
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:


Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:


Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.

Quote:

Washington told DailyMail.com she is seeking an attorney and is 'at risk' as a result of the backlash she's received. 'I have information that proves FEMA is lying,' she said.

In a podcast appearance last night, she went further claiming more FEMA employees are guilty of the same bias, but that she is the only one being hung out to dry.

The FEMA boss who was fired after ordering volunteers not to approach homes displaying Trump signs in Florida after Hurricane Milton has insisted her edict 'was not isolated' and also happened in North Carolina.

Speaking out for the first time since she was fired, Marn'i Washington accused the Federal Emergency Management Agency of 'lying' about the scandal, and making her the scapegoat of a wider practice.

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap said:

BearFan33 said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:


Marn'i not falling on the sword. Gonna be big problems for FEMA with the new administration coming in.

Quote:

Washington told DailyMail.com she is seeking an attorney and is 'at risk' as a result of the backlash she's received. 'I have information that proves FEMA is lying,' she said.

In a podcast appearance last night, she went further claiming more FEMA employees are guilty of the same bias, but that she is the only one being hung out to dry.

The FEMA boss who was fired after ordering volunteers not to approach homes displaying Trump signs in Florida after Hurricane Milton has insisted her edict 'was not isolated' and also happened in North Carolina.

Speaking out for the first time since she was fired, Marn'i Washington accused the Federal Emergency Management Agency of 'lying' about the scandal, and making her the scapegoat of a wider practice.



Of course

No one believes she went out and said "Don't help Trump voters" on her own

She got that stuff from somewhere in the chain of command above her.

And now they are cutting her lose to take the fall for a policy that obviously came down from on higher up
BearFan33
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Judging from this lady's comments, FEMA higher ups are going to claim that those mean trump supporters threatened FEMA workers and so they made a blanket policy to not endanger their employees by helping people that looked scary (even thought that is their job). That may have worked with the Biden administration but is not going to work with the incoming administration.

It's a lame excuse on the surface and is probably a lie at its core.
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BearFan33 said:

Judging from this lady's comments, FEMA higher ups are going to claim that those mean trump supporters threatened FEMA workers and so they made a blanket policy to not endanger their employees by helping people that looked scary (even thought that is their job). That may have worked with the Biden administration but is not going to work with the incoming administration.

It's a lame excuse on the surface and is probably a lie at its core.
Dems would be better served to have their investigation and determination now rather than waiting until Trump's team is in place.

Doing it now, they could probably get away with some terminations, fines and short-term sentences that Biden could pardon. Waiting till Trump is in place is going to add up to some serious time, fines and terminations with nobody to pardon them.

The only way dems could benefit with a delay would be if they could use it to blame the disfunction on Trumps cuts and firings. They would need a major emergency to occur in the midst of the hearings for that.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Sam Lowry said:

It's not nothing! I'm just saying we don't need an ideological purge of the whole agency like some are advocating.
do you think it's worth investigating whether or not this was a one time occurrence and following the evidence wherever it leads?
Sure. All I'm saying is we don't need a political purge.

Sam has left the conversation

Or, so it seems.
Assassin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump needs to put Vance on something big. How about taking FEMA down to the studs, moving it to a CENTRAL location in the US, like Texas, and restructuring it with folks that could be from both sides of the aisle, not in a district that votes 95% for the left.
Facebook Groups at; Memories of... Dallas, Texas, Football in Texas, Texas Music, Memories From a Texas Window and Dallas History Guild. Come visit!
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is shocked the perp is a Didn't Earn It hire?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The fired employee says it was actually widespread. She says they encountered a lot of conflict at houses with Trump signs, and basically their policy is avoidance. Says it is not just the 1 team, that it is everywhere.

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/fired-fema-employee-says-instructions-skip-trump-homes-were-part-colossal-avoidance-policy.amp

While I can believe any government employee will encounter a lot of *******s at houses with Trump signs (not all, just many) it should not be a thing that they would skip them when providing aid. Hope they get to the bottom of this.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

The fired employee says it was actually widespread. She says they encountered a lot of conflict at houses with Trump signs, and basically their policy is avoidance. Says it is not just the 1 team, that it is everywhere.
.



I'm shocked to see you on here defending a Federal government bureaucracy discriminating against American citizens using flimsy excuses about "safety".

I mean I'm not actually shocked but still….lol
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

The fired employee says it was actually widespread. She says they encountered a lot of conflict at houses with Trump signs, and basically their policy is avoidance. Says it is not just the 1 team, that it is everywhere.
I'm shocked to see you on here defending a Federal government bureaucracy discriminating against American citizens using flimsy excuses about "safety".

I mean I'm not actually shocked but still….lol
Read again, and with enough comprehension you will see that I am not defending it, but saying it is an issue that should be fixed. Maybe go slowly?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.

FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.

FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Do you have evidence for the claim that Trump
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word
maybe a woman made the claim and it is therefore accepted as fact.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.

Also, interesting that you start calling these North Carolina residents "*******s"

Maybe have some compassion for people who have just been through a major trauma?

Guys and gals who just saw there homes and lives destroyed....maybe lost family members or dear friends who died.

Maybe their businesses were ruined and finances crushed

[-The catastrophic flooding and destruction caused by Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina likely caused at least a record $53 billion in damages and recovery needs, Gov. Roy Cooper's administration said Wednesday.
-More than 100,000 homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Helene across Western North Carolina. That includes apartment buildings, single family homes and trailers across the region, and this impacts an estimated 200,000+ people.
-At least 227 people died as a result of Hurricane Helene, with the majority of the deaths occurring in North Carolina]
.

These people had just been through hell....and here you are calling them names.

Maybe you are the *******....

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.

FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Do you have evidence for the claim that Trump
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.

Ask FEMA or read the link i posted. I think Fox interviewed her, and I'm paraphrasing what was reported.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word

It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.

Also, interesting that you start calling these North Carolina residents "*******s"

Maybe have some compassion for people who have just been through a major trauma?

Guys and gals who just saw there homes and lives destroyed....maybe lost family members or dear friends who died.

Maybe their businesses were ruined and finances crushed

[-The catastrophic flooding and destruction caused by Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina likely caused at least a record $53 billion in damages and recovery needs, Gov. Roy Cooper's administration said Wednesday.
-More than 100,000 homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Helene across Western North Carolina. That includes apartment buildings, single family homes and trailers across the region, and this impacts an estimated 200,000+ people.
-At least 227 people died as a result of Hurricane Helene, with the majority of the deaths occurring in North Carolina]
.

These people had just been through hell....and here you are calling them names.

Maybe you are the *******....



People confronting federal employees tasked with giving aid, many of them armed, are asshokes. No sympathy.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.

FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Do you have evidence for the claim that Trump
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.

Ask FEMA or read the link i posted. I think Fox interviewed her, and I'm paraphrasing what was reported.
So no evidence. Got it.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that. Skipping homes with political signs is a clear violation of many rights.

FEMA will have to accept that they might indeed encounter conflict with one political party more than the other, and that it might slow their aid down. They will just have to live with that.
Do you have evidence for the claim that Trump
supporters were causing them problems? Because to the rest of us it sounds just like the claim that white supremacy is the number one threat to the safety of Americans.

Ask FEMA or read the link i posted. I think Fox interviewed her, and I'm paraphrasing what was reported.
So no evidence. Got it.

Were you expecting me to have seen something myself? You have a problem with me quoting the employee in question? I was clear that I was quoting her, not offering first hand experience.

Boy the bar is high when feathers are being ruffled.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened, but also the federal government has a responsibility even to *******s, and their policy needs to reflect that.

Also, interesting that you start calling these North Carolina residents "*******s"

Maybe have some compassion for people who have just been through a major trauma?

Guys and gals who just saw there homes and lives destroyed....maybe lost family members or dear friends who died.

Maybe their businesses were ruined and finances crushed

[-The catastrophic flooding and destruction caused by Hurricane Helene in western North Carolina likely caused at least a record $53 billion in damages and recovery needs, Gov. Roy Cooper's administration said Wednesday.
-More than 100,000 homes were damaged or destroyed by Hurricane Helene across Western North Carolina. That includes apartment buildings, single family homes and trailers across the region, and this impacts an estimated 200,000+ people.
-At least 227 people died as a result of Hurricane Helene, with the majority of the deaths occurring in North Carolina]
.

These people had just been through hell....and here you are calling them names.

Maybe you are the *******....



No sympathy.

We can see that

Maybe one day you will get the chance to experience the trauma and hardship these fellow Americans went through.

Until then....why not try being quiet and not spewing venom
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word

It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?

No it does not

But we can tell you love to stereotype according to your own bias and bigotry

I think a poor area in NC or a poor urban area in New Orleans are going to both have a lot of hurt and stressed out people in a massive disaster like this.

Just because one group might vote Red and the other Blue does not tell us much about how they would react to a Federal Employee or that if they did react in a less than polite manner that politics has anything to do with it.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word

It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?

No it does not

But we can tell you love to stereotype according to your own bias and bigotry

I think a poor area in NC or a poor urban area in New Orleans are going to both have a lot of hurt and stressed out people in a massive disaster like this.

Just because one group might vote Red and the other Blue does not tell us much about how they would react to a Federal Employee or that if they did react in a less than polite manner that politics has anything to do with it.

Doesn't that debunk your whole narrative? Democrats the party of big government, maga Repubs the party of blowing the whole thing up?

Look, people on both sides are extremely emotional right now. You all need some time to settle down. I post on another forum that is largely a progressive echo chamber, and their posting is similar to yours, just inverse politics. No point in pretending we can have a rational discussion right now.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Redbrickbear said:

Porteroso said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Sam Lowry said:

Wangchung said:

Ah yes, the same administration that claimed white supremacy was the number one danger to Americans is now saying they refused to help Trump supporters in times of disaster because Trump supporters are dangerous.
TIL that Trump supporters didn't receive any help from FEMA.
TIL FEMA workers didn't skip homes with Trump signs in front at the direction of their superiors...
The directive was wrong, even if it was for safety purposes, but I don't see the conspiracy y'all are making it out to be.
Of course you wouldn't.
It isn't a conspiracy. They encountered a lot of conflict at homes with Trump signs, so they applied their policy of avoidance to get help to as many people as fast as possible.

Had Trump supporters not been such *******s, it wouldn't have happened,

Where is your proof they encountered "a lot of conflict" at homes with Trump signs?

Are we talking 1 incident with 1 guy that was then used to discriminate against all Trump voters in the region that needed help?

Interesting that you just take them at their word

It seems more than believable that MAGAs would want conflict with federal employees on their doorstep. Does it not to you?

No it does not

But we can tell you love to stereotype according to your own bias and bigotry

I think a poor area in NC or a poor urban area in New Orleans are going to both have a lot of hurt and stressed out people in a massive disaster like this.

Just because one group might vote Red and the other Blue does not tell us much about how they would react to a Federal Employee or that if they did react in a less than polite manner that politics has anything to do with it.
maga Repubs the party of blowing the whole thing up?

Look, people on both sides are extremely emotional right now. You all need some time to settle down. I post on another forum that is largely a progressive echo chamber, and their posting is similar to yours, just inverse politics. No point in pretending we can have a rational discussion right now.

You continue to invent narratives in your head...that is part of the problem

I have never said "blow it all up" and neither has the Republican party

But for some reason you have a lot of hate in your heart for MAGA types.

So much so that you will believe any unsubstantiated rumor about NC rural people who like Trump

Not only do you not spend the time to get the facts about a certain situation....you let your imagination and your bigotry run wild.

So much so that you call these people "*******s" without even knowing them.

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.