Because we need a thread about Trump's choices for the new administration

16,351 Views | 379 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by boognish_bear
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?


“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:



The trash is taking itself out.


Smart timing.

Biden's hatchet man positioning himself for a preemptive pardon.



FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

muddybrazos said:



The trash is taking itself out.


Smart timing.

Biden's hatchet man positioning himself for a preemptive pardon.




Didn't Trump appoint Wray? Wray worked for Trump for 3 years, why didn't Trump fire him last time, if he was so bad.

Pardon? For what? I think you guys are mistaking not doing what somebody wants for illegal. I bet there is no pardon and there are no charges against Wray.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

muddybrazos said:



The trash is taking itself out.


Smart timing.

Biden's hatchet man positioning himself for a preemptive pardon.




Didn't Trump appoint Wray? Wray worked for Trump for 3 years, why didn't Trump fire him last time, if he was so bad.

Pardon? For what? I think you guys are mistaking not doing what somebody wants for illegal. I bet there is no pardon and there are no charges against Wray.
In answer to "Pardon? For what?"

https://www.iheart.com/content/glenn-beck-blog-why-the-fbis-mar-a-lago-classified-documents-photo-is-a-sham/
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please


Nearly bankrupting 2 non-profits = disqualified

Consecutive failed audits = (crickets chirping)
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

muddybrazos said:



The trash is taking itself out.


Smart timing.

Biden's hatchet man positioning himself for a preemptive pardon.




Didn't Trump appoint Wray? Wray worked for Trump for 3 years, why didn't Trump fire him last time, if he was so bad.

Pardon? For what? I think you guys are mistaking not doing what somebody wants for illegal. I bet there is no pardon and there are no charges against Wray.


Have you never known people to change ?

Alter their personal ambitions, ethics or attitudes ?

I have always noticed differences with individuals after you provide them an opportunity to make their first million.

Trump has indicated he will not make it his priority to seek retribution; that 'success' will be his revenge.

However if there are two individual's Trump might commit Dem like acts of 'lawfare' against ; it will be against the heads of the FBI and DOJ.

By God if they had raided my house with 30 armed agents in the middle of the night and tore my place apart ; I certainly would.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?



Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.
Waco1947 ,la
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?



Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.
denial aint just a river in egypt
“The Internet is just a world passing around notes in a classroom.”

Jon Stewart
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

KaiBear said:

muddybrazos said:



The trash is taking itself out.


Smart timing.

Biden's hatchet man positioning himself for a preemptive pardon.




Didn't Trump appoint Wray? Wray worked for Trump for 3 years, why didn't Trump fire him last time, if he was so bad.

Pardon? For what? I think you guys are mistaking not doing what somebody wants for illegal. I bet there is no pardon and there are no charges against Wray.


Have you never known people to change ?

Alter their personal ambitions, ethics or attitudes ?

I have always noticed differences with individuals after you provide them an opportunity to make their first million.

Trump has indicated he will not make it his priority to seek retribution; that 'success' will be his revenge.

However if there are two individual's Trump might commit Dem like acts of 'lawfare' against ; it will be against the heads of the FBI and DOJ.

By God if they had raided my house with 30 armed agents in the middle of the night and tore my place apart ; I certainly would.
Certainly, people can change and I'm all for 2nd chances. Again, please show me from a work history in anyway make him qualified. Because he is a Trump butt boy isn't a resume.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.
You presume the current need is for a better manager. That's not the need = DOD is full of managers. Trump apparently thinks DOD needs a leader who can change the culture, specifically to rebuild warrior culture. That would suggest Pete's management or military experience are not the decisive criteria. Seems clear to me that that the two reasons he got the nod are: shared vision on what the problems are, and communication skills. Trump needs someone he can trust has commitment to the agenda and even more importantly to communicate it. to drive it thru the Pentagon and (perhaps most important of all) defend it in the media. If one accepts the premise that such is the mission, then Hegseth seems like a top tier hire.

The job skills you cite are not irrelevant but can be addressed at the deputy level.



historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?



Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.


Do you have any grasp , just what a mediocre life you have led; the people you have damaged ?

historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

That question could be asked of any candidate and the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




Good match: election denying propagandist heading our propaganda unit.
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.


You need to retitle your thread to

Welcome to the Oligarchy
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please
Tell us Mr. Expert what are the qualifications for Secretary of DOD?

I'm sure Hegseth will be more effective than the current Token, who was missing for weeks and no one noticed.

BTW - did you find a place to replace your beeper?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

boognish_bear said:




Good match: election denying propagandist heading our propaganda unit.
Trump appointed Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams?

Did you read that on banned TikTok?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You are begging the question
1) "Trump apparently thinks DOD needs a leader who can change the culture, Is Pete a leader who can change a culture. In his previous stops with Vet group he failed to change anything

specifically to rebuild warrior culture. By what criteria do you judge a warrior culture? I think SEAL teams would beg to differ.
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?



Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.


Do you have any grasp , just what a mediocre life you have led; the people you have damaged ?


Hate does not serve you. Follow the first and greatest commandment and you will live.
Waco1947 ,la
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
wonder if dale has been considered for any post in the new trump admin???

PA.

- UL

... and, as usual, TIA.

Go Bears!
Are you a man or a mouse!? - F. D.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.
we are NOT talking about Trump or anyone else.. You MAGA clowns are so proficient in deflection. You did not answer the question. How is Petey Qualified to run the govt's largest bureaucracy?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

J.R. said:

whiterock said:

Oldbear83 said:

historian said:

J.R. said:

historian said:

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.
are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.
Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................
I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.
His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.
all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.
that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.
we are NOT talking about Trump or anyone else.. You MAGA clowns are so proficient in deflection. You did not answer the question. How is Petey Qualified to run the govt's largest bureaucracy?
Tell us the qualifications Beeper Boy, and we'll tell you whether he has them .... oh yeah, specifics is your Kryptonite.

Remind us how the current Token is qualified ... the Token who was missing for weeks and no one noticed.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

KaiBear said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

historian said:

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.
Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?



Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.


Do you have any grasp , just what a mediocre life you have led; the people you have damaged ?


Hate does not serve you. Follow the first and greatest commandment and you will live.
You have advocated the murder of the unborn for years......intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process.

You have exhibited blatant racism for years....intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process.

Dont even have the confidence to disclose exactly where you supposedly got your theology degree. Most likely because you have lied to your little circle that you obtained it at Baylor; when you have admitted here ( finally ) that in fact you did not.

Your hypocrisy knows no bounds.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

You are begging the question
1) "Trump apparently thinks DOD needs a leader who can change the culture, Is Pete a leader who can change a culture. In his previous stops with Vet group he failed to change anything

specifically to rebuild warrior culture. By what criteria do you judge a warrior culture? I think SEAL teams would beg to differ.
What do you think 47, is a person that runs an entity into the ground unfit for the position whether it's a non-profit, the DOD, the US budget or an old, historic Methodist church?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

You are begging the question
1) "Trump apparently thinks DOD needs a leader who can change the culture, Is Pete a leader who can change a culture. In his previous stops with Vet group he failed to change anything

specifically to rebuild warrior culture. By what criteria do you judge a warrior culture? I think SEAL teams would beg to differ.
Weak.

Seal Teams are the epitome of warrior culture.
Men wearing dresses are not.


FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Waco1947 said:

You are begging the question
1) "Trump apparently thinks DOD needs a leader who can change the culture, Is Pete a leader who can change a culture. In his previous stops with Vet group he failed to change anything

specifically to rebuild warrior culture. By what criteria do you judge a warrior culture? I think SEAL teams would beg to differ.
Weak.

Seal Teams are the epitome of warrior culture.
Men wearing dresses are not.



It is a TEAM culture. We seem to forget that...
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I love how Beeper Boy runs from questions ... like all Democrats, he's a freaking rhegard. Not sure what's worse, Jr's hatred of Jews or Waco's love of little boys.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

quash said:

boognish_bear said:




Good match: election denying propagandist heading our propaganda unit.
Trump appointed Hillary Clinton and Stacey Abrams?

Did you read that on banned TikTok?

It's on blek TikTok
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.