Ellens move to England has not gone as planned. Her new English manor was in a flood plain. The second floor is still wet

This is why you lost....you have lost liberals like Martina Navratilova with this nonsense

"Non Transgendered Women"

NYT- you stink. We are women, not NOT TRANSGENDER WOMEN. Just WOMEN will do in the future. https://t.co/xJZNJvS6O1

— Martina Navratilova (@Martina) November 29, 2024

Real women!
Get the fake women out of women's spaces.

Successful National Science Foundation grants have seen a massive increase in language related to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion. In some fields, such words are used in over 50% of successful grants!

This is something that the Trump administration can hopefully fix. pic.twitter.com/1oibO5uOAF

— Richard Hanania (@RichardHanania) December 1, 2024

BREAKING: Edison, NJ Town Council bans American flags at meetings.

An angry resident protests by waving his American flag. Security removes him. pic.twitter.com/UJOhXVAuDE

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) December 2, 2024

Activists on the left are very mad about my work dismantling wokeness and DEI in corporate America. They keep telling me to shut up and "center" Black voices so we compiled a video of Black creators reacting to my work. I hope my haters enjoy "centering" these Black voices! 🙂 pic.twitter.com/hYl5rerSzI

— Robby Starbuck (@robbystarbuck) December 3, 2024

How far will the trans insanity go? Here is one answer:

https://notthebee.com/article/this-is-a-real-headline

Alito calmly side-stepping as he sweeps the cape aside with one hand while raising the other to insert the estoque down deep between the shoulder blades.

Justice Alito asking if trans status is immutable is one of the greatest legal questions I've ever seen.

Civil Rights exist solely based upon immutable human traits.

Gender fluidity, by definition, is not immutable.

Pure brilliance by Alito today.

— Mark McEathron (@Mark_McEathron) December 4, 2024

whiterock said:

---

Alito calmly side-stepping as he sweeps the cape aside with one hand while raising the other to insert the estoque down deep between the shoulder blades.

---

Quote:

---

Some observers told me they expected a 6-3 ruling, down ideological lines. Others thought that the sometimes libertarian-minded judges might shy away from regulating medical care to this extent. There will be no decision for many months and when it does come, it won't be definitive. Rather, it will affect how lower courts scrutinise the claim of sex discrimination. But it could have huge implications. If the court decides that transgender people are a protected class, it will be very hard to pass a ban on treatments for them, or any regulations which privilege biological sex over gender identity, in sports or elsewhere.

That's unlikely, as the court hasn't created a new protected class in many years, declining to define either the elderly or disabled people as such. But the justices could decide that the onus is on states to prove they're not discriminating based on sex, making it harder to uphold bans.
If all that sounds anticlimactic, then consider the other historic aspect of the day. It may be the first time the American media came face to face with the many feminist, lesbian, gay, and even trans adults in favour of banning paediatric gender medicine.

---

More:

Quote:

---

These people were trying to draw attention away from the Left-Right framing that the American press applies to this story, and towards the fact that the vast majority of children with early-onset gender dysphoria grow out of those feelings by the end of puberty. They were revealing the feminist objection to men identifying as women and demanded entry to women's spaces and sports. They were showing the American public that there remains much of this story they haven't been told.

Whether the American media takes this opportunity to reassess the long-running narrative beyond the Left-Right framing that conservatives ban gender-affirming care because of bigotry and liberals support it because of kindness remains to be seen. Inside the courthouse press room, I asked journalists from Vanity Fair, NBC, and other liberal outlets if they'd seen the rally of lesbians, gays, and feminists in support of the ban. "Oh, the anti-trans rally, yes," they uniformly quipped. In taking this stance, they were every bit as closed off to other points of view as the justices had been.

---

It won't be news to you that the mainstream media lie without compunction about this stuff. You shouldn't assume, though, that they are lying consciously. They also lie to themselves. I read a piece recently, which I can't find now, in which researchers found that when ordinary people have the actual facts of childhood transition explained to them that is, what it medically entails, and the fact that the vast majority of children and minors with gender dysphoria resolve it by the time they are 20 or so support for trans "care" for minors drops precipitously. This is exactly the kind of information that our media, and the medical-industrial complex, deny to the public.

When Donald Trump assumes office, I hope and pray that the US Government will go very hard against this evil. Given how narrow the GOP House majority will be in the new Congress, it is probably too much to expect Congress to legislate against it, unless there are more sensible Democrats, like Rep. Seth Moulton of Massachusetts, willing to vote to protect children than there are squish Republicans who defect. Of course I think there should be strong anti-trans legislation across the board, but it is probably not possible at this point. But we can at least stop the sexual mutilation of children, and can prosecute doctors and medical industry executives who facilitated this horror. Can't we?]

whiterock said:

---

Alito calmly side-stepping as he sweeps the cape aside with one hand while raising the other to insert the estoque down deep between the shoulder blades.

Justice Alito asking if trans status is immutable is one of the greatest legal questions I've ever seen.

Civil Rights exist solely based upon immutable human traits.

Gender fluidity, by definition, is not immutable.

Pure brilliance by Alito today.

— Mark McEathron (@Mark_McEathron) December 4, 2024

---

Would u mind explaining that? ... I'm not strong on legaleese.

Oh wow. Basically got them to realize they have no special civil rights.

This is not just stupid, it's evil.

Hair grows back, body parts don't

Justice Sotomayor compared "unwanted breasts" to "unwanted hair" when discussing double mastectomies being performed on girls, before cracking a joke.#USvsSkrmetti pic.twitter.com/E2e7TtZN9P

— Genevieve Gluck (@WomenReadWomen) December 4, 2024

Married A Horn said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Alito calmly side-stepping as he sweeps the cape aside with one hand while raising the other to insert the estoque down deep between the shoulder blades.

Justice Alito asking if trans status is immutable is one of the greatest legal questions I've ever seen.

Civil Rights exist solely based upon immutable human traits.

Gender fluidity, by definition, is not immutable.

Pure brilliance by Alito today.

— Mark McEathron (@Mark_McEathron) December 4, 2024

---

Would u mind explaining that? ... I'm not strong on legaleese.

---

Gwen Stefani did the absolute worst thing a celebrity could do...

Gwen Stefani?! Jesus Christ… pic.twitter.com/o0dKHDx27V

— Christian Nightmares (@ChristnNitemare) December 6, 2024

The UK government has announced plans to offer cash incentives to the relatives of elderly citizens who opt to be euthanized.

According to a disturbing report in the Telegraph, “terminally ill pensioners could end their lives earlier to spare loved ones six-figure tax bills… pic.twitter.com/UWhtwJrimZ

— “Sudden And Unexpected” (@toobaffled) December 5, 2024

chilling.

Doctor friend once told me this - "We have forgotten how to die. Half the money that will be spent on healthcare in a lifetime will be spent in the last 6 months of it."

Somehow, we've got to address that. I don't like the above solution at all, but the conversation hasta start somewhere.

FLBear5630 said:

---

whiterock said:

---

chilling.

Doctor friend once told me this - "We have forgotten how to die. Half the money that will be spent on healthcare in a lifetime will be spent in the last 6 months of it."

Somehow, we've got to address that. I don't like the above solution at all, but the conversation hasta start somewhere.

---

I remember my Dad's Aunt dying at 68 in 1969. Everyone saying she had a long life and at least she got to live her life. I am now 61, I am not sure I agree with them.

---

Man there's a lot of truth to that. You don't care that much what happens to the old people until you start to become one. Eek

whiterock said:

---

chilling.

Doctor friend once told me this - "We have forgotten how to die. Half the money that will be spent on healthcare in a lifetime will be spent in the last 6 months of it."

Somehow, we've got to address that. I don't like the above solution at all, but the conversation hasta start somewhere.

---

And in other news, life insurance doesn't pay out until your dead (for most).

So yeah, seems like the costs being heavily skewed towards old age is how it should be, because when the average person is young, the body does all the work and needs little assistance. When you are old, that's when you need the help the most. Health insurance companies know this. They still manage to make their money. The US finds money for everything under the sun in taxes, so maybe let's look elsewhere before just flipping off our seniors.

"Just go ahead and die already", that really seems like nothing more than corporate propaganda. I assure you the ones benefiting from saving the country some money won't be doing the same for themselves.

Duh. pic.twitter.com/BL7LiHVdjP

— Billboard Chris 🇨🇦🇺🇸 (@BillboardChris) December 7, 2024

TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

chilling.

Doctor friend once told me this - "We have forgotten how to die. Half the money that will be spent on healthcare in a lifetime will be spent in the last 6 months of it."

Somehow, we've got to address that. I don't like the above solution at all, but the conversation hasta start somewhere.

---

And in other news, life insurance doesn't pay out until your dead (for most).

So yeah, seems like the costs being heavily skewed towards old age is how it should be, because when the average person is young, the body does all the work and needs little assistance. When you are old, that's when you need the help the most. Health insurance companies know this. They still manage to make their money. The US finds money for everything under the sun in taxes, so maybe let's look elsewhere before just flipping off our seniors.

"Just go ahead and die already", that really seems like nothing more than corporate propaganda. I assure you the ones benefiting from saving the country some money won't be doing the same for themselves.

---

You miss the point. The question is not that old people don't deserve care. It's that we spend too much on people who are dying. HALF of the total. And that money is not spent by insurance companies. It's spent by taxpayers. (Medicare).


I'm 64 and have an 88yr old mother, so it's not like I'm not currently in the bubble I'm speaking about.

It's tough being a white woman in a 1st world country!

Swedish politicians just posted this for the "oppressed" women of America: pic.twitter.com/10uhuw29iF

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) December 7, 2024