For the COVID conspiracy nut jobs
2,943 Views |
43 Replies |
Last: 8 days ago by historian
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Check out the comments on the post. Lots of con as well as the pro. That will give you the cliff notes on opposition to the dr's views on your link.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
You left out soccer fans.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
They can mock the people who utter "conspiracy" all they want.LIB,MR BEARS said:You left out soccer fans.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
But when you look at how liberals approached it, why wouldn't people have questions about it?
DT was accused of not taking it seriously at first. And he was demonized for it. Even though JB also was telling the people not to worry about it either.
Then it started spreading. Things didn't look good. DT started curtailing and/or closely monitoring flights coming in from Asia. He was called the "r" word by the left. (And oh yeah, remember how they later said he did nothing to stop it?). NP ran out to SF and start playing kissy kissy with the locals, without a mask, in Chinatown, probably just to spite DT.
As the virus started to really take hold, the liberals wanted a shutdown of the country. Even though they were the ones so often caught running around without a mask, letting their kids go to their private schools, while the rest of America was being demonized for not wearing a mask.
Then they blamed DT for the economy.
CA was in lockdown from the get go. FL wasn't. CA had a lot of deaths. So did FL. But FL's percentage was not that much worse. And their economy was still fine. Ours wasn't. This while our governor was caught a couple of times out hobnobbing with friends. Without a mask.
We thought covid was a highly concerning problem, governor.
Then there were the questions surrounding the true causes of deaths. My neighbor is a retired fireman and said his buddies had quite a few stories where deaths were listed as covid, when it was something entirely different that took the life of the patient/victim. But because he or she had covid in their body, that was listed as the cause of death.
I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there were way too many questions out there.
Yes, people died. But how much truth did we really get from it? It was understandable that people had questions.
And in closing, let's not forget operation warp speed. When a vaccine was developed under DT's administration. But JB and KH said they wouldn't take anything that came about under DT.
But funny how after JB won the presidency, suddenly he was all about the vaccine! And was even suggesting some mandatory vaccine idea that he floated.
The libs played politics with covid, as well as the vaccine, since day one. There's no reason why people wouldn't question it.
yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Except when you study the numbers, as has been done many times, and realize the vaccine saved a ton of lives.TrojanMoondoggie said:They can mock the people who utter "conspiracy" all they want.LIB,MR BEARS said:You left out soccer fans.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
But when you look at how liberals approached it, why wouldn't people have questions about it?
DT was accused of not taking it seriously at first. And he was demonized for it. Even though JB also was telling the people not to worry about it either.
Then it started spreading. Things didn't look good. DT started curtailing and/or closely monitoring flights coming in from Asia. He was called the "r" word by the left. (And oh yeah, remember how they later said he did nothing to stop it?). NP ran out to SF and start playing kissy kissy with the locals, without a mask, in Chinatown, probably just to spite DT.
As the virus started to really take hold, the liberals wanted a shutdown of the country. Even though they were the ones so often caught running around without a mask, letting their kids go to their private schools, while the rest of America was being demonized for not wearing a mask.
Then they blamed DT for the economy.
CA was in lockdown from the get go. FL wasn't. CA had a lot of deaths. So did FL. But FL's percentage was not that much worse. And their economy was still fine. Ours wasn't. This while our governor was caught a couple of times out hobnobbing with friends. Without a mask.
We thought covid was a highly concerning problem, governor.
Then there were the questions surrounding the true causes of deaths. My neighbor is a retired fireman and said his buddies had quite a few stories where deaths were listed as covid, when it was something entirely different that took the life of the patient/victim. But because he or she had covid in their body, that was listed as the cause of death.
I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there were way too many questions out there.
Yes, people died. But how much truth did we really get from it? It was understandable that people had questions.
And in closing, let's not forget operation warp speed. When a vaccine was developed under DT's administration. But JB and KH said they wouldn't take anything that came about under DT.
But funny how after JB won the presidency, suddenly he was all about the vaccine! And was even suggesting some mandatory vaccine idea that he floated.
The libs played politics with covid, as well as the vaccine, since day one. There's no reason why people wouldn't question it.
SFBPC, what position of mine do you think the personal anecdote from this TikTok doctor debunked? Please name the position.Tempus Edax Rerum said:yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Let me help you...
1) I've never argued the COVID vaccine didn't help stem the death rate or hospitalization.
2) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine didn't provide some benefit to people.
3) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine did more harm than good.
What I have argued is the vast majority of healthy people and children didn't need a COVID vaccine, and this is borne out by the evidence. Healthy kids and young to middle-aged adults generally didn't die from COVID. The long term effects of the vaccine are to be determined. I've also argued that we could have dealt with the disease differently and it probably would have resulted in far less deaths.
Now, please tell us what pharmaceutical company do you work for?
Oh please do tell how you would have handled it to result in far less deaths. Again, you ignore the data Dr. Idz presented showing children and healthy people did need the vaccine.Mothra said:SFBPC, what position of mine do you think the personal anecdote from this TikTok doctor debunked? Please name the position.Tempus Edax Rerum said:yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Let me help you...
1) I've never argued the COVID vaccine didn't help stem the death rate or hospitalization.
2) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine didn't provide some benefit to people.
3) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine did more harm than good.
What I have argued is the vast majority of healthy people and children didn't need a COVID vaccine, and this is borne out by the evidence. Healthy kids and young to middle-aged adults generally didn't die from COVID. The long term effects of the vaccine are to be determined. I've also argued that we could have dealt with the disease differently and it probably would have resulted in far less deaths.
Now, please tell us what pharmaceutical company do you work for?
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Except when you study the numbers, as has been done many times, and realize the vaccine saved a ton of lives.TrojanMoondoggie said:They can mock the people who utter "conspiracy" all they want.LIB,MR BEARS said:You left out soccer fans.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
But when you look at how liberals approached it, why wouldn't people have questions about it?
DT was accused of not taking it seriously at first. And he was demonized for it. Even though JB also was telling the people not to worry about it either.
Then it started spreading. Things didn't look good. DT started curtailing and/or closely monitoring flights coming in from Asia. He was called the "r" word by the left. (And oh yeah, remember how they later said he did nothing to stop it?). NP ran out to SF and start playing kissy kissy with the locals, without a mask, in Chinatown, probably just to spite DT.
As the virus started to really take hold, the liberals wanted a shutdown of the country. Even though they were the ones so often caught running around without a mask, letting their kids go to their private schools, while the rest of America was being demonized for not wearing a mask.
Then they blamed DT for the economy.
CA was in lockdown from the get go. FL wasn't. CA had a lot of deaths. So did FL. But FL's percentage was not that much worse. And their economy was still fine. Ours wasn't. This while our governor was caught a couple of times out hobnobbing with friends. Without a mask.
We thought covid was a highly concerning problem, governor.
Then there were the questions surrounding the true causes of deaths. My neighbor is a retired fireman and said his buddies had quite a few stories where deaths were listed as covid, when it was something entirely different that took the life of the patient/victim. But because he or she had covid in their body, that was listed as the cause of death.
I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there were way too many questions out there.
Yes, people died. But how much truth did we really get from it? It was understandable that people had questions.
And in closing, let's not forget operation warp speed. When a vaccine was developed under DT's administration. But JB and KH said they wouldn't take anything that came about under DT.
But funny how after JB won the presidency, suddenly he was all about the vaccine! And was even suggesting some mandatory vaccine idea that he floated.
The libs played politics with covid, as well as the vaccine, since day one. There's no reason why people wouldn't question it.
Pffft. Nah. More likely it killed more than helped.
It's really simple. Check the 10-q's of the public ally traded cemetery companies. You'll find the answers you need.
So many so easily duped. But so much money made off the dupes I guess it's ok but bothers my sensibilities but don't mind making it off the fools
PS MRNA delisted from NDX lolol. ThT was a huge winner both ways
So many so easily duped. But so much money made off the dupes I guess it's ok but bothers my sensibilities but don't mind making it off the fools
PS MRNA delisted from NDX lolol. ThT was a huge winner both ways
Ya'll should have your own virtual lunch meeting where you can show off your new masks.
Harrison Bergeron said:
Ya'll should have your own virtual lunch meeting where you can show off your new masks.
You are a liar. There is no data supporting the position that healthy children needed the vaccine. Your 28-year-old TikTok "doctor," who is a mere registered nutritionist and dietitian in the UK, presented no evidence supporting that position. Only .4 of the COVID deaths worldwide were people under 20, and of those deaths, data suggests most if not all had a co-morbidity. In fact, there isn't a single piece of data evidencing a healthy child, without co-morbidities, dying of COVID.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Oh please do tell how you would have handled it to result in far less deaths. Again, you ignore the data Dr. Idz presented showing children and healthy people did need the vaccine.Mothra said:SFBPC, what position of mine do you think the personal anecdote from this TikTok doctor debunked? Please name the position.Tempus Edax Rerum said:yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Let me help you...
1) I've never argued the COVID vaccine didn't help stem the death rate or hospitalization.
2) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine didn't provide some benefit to people.
3) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine did more harm than good.
What I have argued is the vast majority of healthy people and children didn't need a COVID vaccine, and this is borne out by the evidence. Healthy kids and young to middle-aged adults generally didn't die from COVID. The long term effects of the vaccine are to be determined. I've also argued that we could have dealt with the disease differently and it probably would have resulted in far less deaths.
Now, please tell us what pharmaceutical company do you work for?
https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/covid-19/
The only "evidence" presented for vaccinating children is they "may" become seriously ill if they get COVID. That's it. "May."
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/covid-19-vaccines-for-kids/art-20513332#:~:text=Back%20to%20top-,If%20children%20don't%20frequently%20experience%20severe%20illness%20with%20COVID,virus%20that%20causes%20COVID%2D19%20.
See how easy it was to debunk your TikTok nutritionist, SFBPC? Now, you got any actual evidence supporting the position that healthy kids needed the vaccine? Perhaps you can find another video on TikTok.
BTW, I noticed you didn't answer the question. What pharmaceutical company do you work for?
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
BTW, who is the dumb **** liking this bot's posts? Got to be oso, Sam, Florida, or LIQR, right? Reveal yourself, if you have the guts!
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Oh please do tell how you would have handled it to result in far less deaths. Again, you ignore the data Dr. Idz presented showing children and healthy people did need the vaccine.Mothra said:SFBPC, what position of mine do you think the personal anecdote from this TikTok doctor debunked? Please name the position.Tempus Edax Rerum said:yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Let me help you...
1) I've never argued the COVID vaccine didn't help stem the death rate or hospitalization.
2) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine didn't provide some benefit to people.
3) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine did more harm than good.
What I have argued is the vast majority of healthy people and children didn't need a COVID vaccine, and this is borne out by the evidence. Healthy kids and young to middle-aged adults generally didn't die from COVID. The long term effects of the vaccine are to be determined. I've also argued that we could have dealt with the disease differently and it probably would have resulted in far less deaths.
Now, please tell us what pharmaceutical company do you work for?
Not hired Fauci. Not funded Fauci's gain of function program.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Except when you study the numbers, as has been done many times, and realize the vaccine saved a ton of lives.TrojanMoondoggie said:They can mock the people who utter "conspiracy" all they want.LIB,MR BEARS said:You left out soccer fans.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:Typical response when you can't refute it. I'm still waiting on Mothra to refute this.TinFoilHatPreacherBear said:
Is this a link where liberals finally admit that the China virus was more likely lab released? Seems like that's the new understanding.
Or is this the link showing Fauci's relationship with the Wuhan lab?
Or other? If so, Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry, I don't do Instagram, that's a women's, gays, metrosexuals, and social media goobs platform. Cliff's Notes please.
Sorry. missed it on the first read. Good list.
But when you look at how liberals approached it, why wouldn't people have questions about it?
DT was accused of not taking it seriously at first. And he was demonized for it. Even though JB also was telling the people not to worry about it either.
Then it started spreading. Things didn't look good. DT started curtailing and/or closely monitoring flights coming in from Asia. He was called the "r" word by the left. (And oh yeah, remember how they later said he did nothing to stop it?). NP ran out to SF and start playing kissy kissy with the locals, without a mask, in Chinatown, probably just to spite DT.
As the virus started to really take hold, the liberals wanted a shutdown of the country. Even though they were the ones so often caught running around without a mask, letting their kids go to their private schools, while the rest of America was being demonized for not wearing a mask.
Then they blamed DT for the economy.
CA was in lockdown from the get go. FL wasn't. CA had a lot of deaths. So did FL. But FL's percentage was not that much worse. And their economy was still fine. Ours wasn't. This while our governor was caught a couple of times out hobnobbing with friends. Without a mask.
We thought covid was a highly concerning problem, governor.
Then there were the questions surrounding the true causes of deaths. My neighbor is a retired fireman and said his buddies had quite a few stories where deaths were listed as covid, when it was something entirely different that took the life of the patient/victim. But because he or she had covid in their body, that was listed as the cause of death.
I'm not a conspiracy guy, but there were way too many questions out there.
Yes, people died. But how much truth did we really get from it? It was understandable that people had questions.
And in closing, let's not forget operation warp speed. When a vaccine was developed under DT's administration. But JB and KH said they wouldn't take anything that came about under DT.
But funny how after JB won the presidency, suddenly he was all about the vaccine! And was even suggesting some mandatory vaccine idea that he floated.
The libs played politics with covid, as well as the vaccine, since day one. There's no reason why people wouldn't question it.
If it did, then DT should have been reelected on that fact alone. After all, he oversaw the warp speed development of this vaccine, correct?
Yet liberals complained about how he handled the situation. And some of the more prominent left leaning people in DC questioned the vaccine itself. Undoubtedly because DT was at the helm at the time.
But of course after they took back the White House their whole attitude changed. It went from questioning the vaccine, to everyone needs to get the vaccine, to darned near mandating the vaccine.
Sorry, the libs had their confused hands all over this.
It's perfectly okay to question it. Without being a conspiracy monger.
The libs themselves gave us reason to question it.
Tempus Redax Rerum, Mothra has has exposed you as the Kevin Steele of posters with this thread. I suggest you assume a new ID .
Actually, I wasn't fair. Kevin Steele won 9 games at Baylor. You haven't sniffed nine
wins with your posting on mRNA yet. My apologies Kevin.
Actually, I wasn't fair. Kevin Steele won 9 games at Baylor. You haven't sniffed nine
wins with your posting on mRNA yet. My apologies Kevin.
Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.
In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
You mean misinformation like this?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-04-16/fda-deletes-viral-ivermectin-not-a-horse-tweet-opens-door-for-misinformation
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-04-16/fda-deletes-viral-ivermectin-not-a-horse-tweet-opens-door-for-misinformation
Tempus Edax Rerum said:Harrison Bergeron said:
Ya'll should have your own virtual lunch meeting where you can show off your new masks.
so yall took a jab before each bite?
Mothra said:You are a liar. There is no data supporting the position that healthy children needed the vaccine. Your 28-year-old TikTok "doctor," who is a mere registered nutritionist and dietitian in the UK, presented no evidence supporting that position. Only .4 of the COVID deaths worldwide were people under 20, and of those deaths, data suggests most if not all had a co-morbidity. In fact, there isn't a single piece of data evidencing a healthy child, without co-morbidities, dying of COVID.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Oh please do tell how you would have handled it to result in far less deaths. Again, you ignore the data Dr. Idz presented showing children and healthy people did need the vaccine.Mothra said:SFBPC, what position of mine do you think the personal anecdote from this TikTok doctor debunked? Please name the position.Tempus Edax Rerum said:yeah, that's how I'd respond when I had my A$$ handed to me too.Mothra said:
Hey SFB pin-cushion! Good to hear from you!
What booster are you on? Gotta be number 9 or 10, right? Still wearing the mask out in public?
Let me help you...
1) I've never argued the COVID vaccine didn't help stem the death rate or hospitalization.
2) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine didn't provide some benefit to people.
3) I've never argued that the COVID vaccine did more harm than good.
What I have argued is the vast majority of healthy people and children didn't need a COVID vaccine, and this is borne out by the evidence. Healthy kids and young to middle-aged adults generally didn't die from COVID. The long term effects of the vaccine are to be determined. I've also argued that we could have dealt with the disease differently and it probably would have resulted in far less deaths.
Now, please tell us what pharmaceutical company do you work for?
https://data.unicef.org/topic/child-survival/covid-19/
The only "evidence" presented for vaccinating children is they "may" become seriously ill if they get COVID. That's it. "May."
https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/coronavirus/in-depth/covid-19-vaccines-for-kids/art-20513332#:~:text=Back%20to%20top-,If%20children%20don't%20frequently%20experience%20severe%20illness%20with%20COVID,virus%20that%20causes%20COVID%2D19%20.
See how easy it was to debunk your TikTok nutritionist, SFBPC? Now, you got any actual evidence supporting the position that healthy kids needed the vaccine? Perhaps you can find another video on TikTok.
BTW, I noticed you didn't answer the question. What pharmaceutical company do you work for?
Game, set and match.
Well done sir.
Bauctalk said:
You mean misinformation like this?
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2024-04-16/fda-deletes-viral-ivermectin-not-a-horse-tweet-opens-door-for-misinformation
Someone's been debunked.
Covid was all about 2 things:
1. Stealing an election
2. Making big pharma billions on jab sales
No bureaucrat should ever tell a doctor how to treat their patients. The $1 IVM pill would have stopped the $8,000 jab... they had to do everything in their power to shut it down, including their misinformation campaign.
I was all in on Covid vaccinations for people who needed them, over 50 for certain.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Only a f'ing idiot really believes healthy children between the ages of 8-18 NEEDED the vaccination.
The death rate from that group is so incredibly low, since we like to tout stats, only a vaccine fanatic would support it.
Also the convoluted reasoning that kids spread it more than other groups has been debunked.
If you wanted to stop the spread isolating young adults would have been the optimal thing to do. Obviously that was not a possibility.Quote:
These findings indicate that adults aged 20-34 and 35-49 continue to be the only age groups that contribute disproportionally to COVID-19 spread relative to their size in the population. CDC
Also all these old Karens who were filmed being dragged out of shopping centers because they didn't want to wear a mask was simply virtue signaling. Young adults are the only who enhanced the spread.
Hey I'm not against a vaccine, there are groups, especially those over age 65 who were greatly helped by it, but why inject a healthy kid with a vaccine that hadn't had the normal 5+ years of vetting, when it would do little for that group.
And why in hell is someone touting some Tic Tok "Doc" who is no expert on this in any way.
Forest Bueller_bf said:I was all in on Covid vaccinations for people who needed them, over 50 for certain.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Only a f'ing idiot really believes healthy children between the ages of 8-18 NEEDED the vaccination.
The death rate from that group is so incredibly low, since we like to tout stats, only a vaccine fanatic would support it.
Also the convoluted reasoning that kids spread it more than other groups has been debunked.Quote:
These findings indicate that adults aged 20-34 and 35-49 continue to be the only age groups that contribute disproportionally to COVID-19 spread relative to their size in the population. CDC
And why in hell is someone touting some Tic Tok "Doc" who is no expert on this in any way.
Because sometimes pharmaceutical stocks under perform. When they do and an individual realizes they have too large of a percentage of holdings in pharmaceuticals, they say and do stupid things to try and impact the stock-everything from creating a pandemic down to manipulating fears with disinformation.
Forest Bueller_bf said:I was all in on Covid vaccinations for people who needed them, over 50 for certain.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Only a f'ing idiot really believes healthy children between the ages of 8-18 NEEDED the vaccination.
The death rate from that group is so incredibly low, since we like to tout stats, only a vaccine fanatic would support it.
Also the convoluted reasoning that kids spread it more than other groups has been debunked.If you wanted to stop the spread isolating young adults would have been the optimal thing to do. Obviously that was not a possibility.Quote:
These findings indicate that adults aged 20-34 and 35-49 continue to be the only age groups that contribute disproportionally to COVID-19 spread relative to their size in the population. CDC
Also all these old Karens who were filmed being dragged out of shopping centers because they didn't want to wear a mask was simply virtue signaling. Young adults are the only who enhanced the spread.
Hey I'm not against a vaccine, there are groups, especially those over age 65 who were greatly helped by it, but why inject a healthy kid with a vaccine that hadn't had the normal 5+ years of vetting, when it would do little for that group.
And why in hell is someone touting some Tic Tok "Doc" who is no expert on this in any way.
Because it wasn't about keeping kids healthy... it was about keeping big pharma's bank accounts healthy.
I am as interested in the kickbacks from the jab to politicians as much as I am the epstein island list.
Don't count on seeing either. There are too many powerful people on both sides of the aisle to let that happen.Married A Horn said:Forest Bueller_bf said:I was all in on Covid vaccinations for people who needed them, over 50 for certain.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Only a f'ing idiot really believes healthy children between the ages of 8-18 NEEDED the vaccination.
The death rate from that group is so incredibly low, since we like to tout stats, only a vaccine fanatic would support it.
Also the convoluted reasoning that kids spread it more than other groups has been debunked.If you wanted to stop the spread isolating young adults would have been the optimal thing to do. Obviously that was not a possibility.Quote:
These findings indicate that adults aged 20-34 and 35-49 continue to be the only age groups that contribute disproportionally to COVID-19 spread relative to their size in the population. CDC
Also all these old Karens who were filmed being dragged out of shopping centers because they didn't want to wear a mask was simply virtue signaling. Young adults are the only who enhanced the spread.
Hey I'm not against a vaccine, there are groups, especially those over age 65 who were greatly helped by it, but why inject a healthy kid with a vaccine that hadn't had the normal 5+ years of vetting, when it would do little for that group.
And why in hell is someone touting some Tic Tok "Doc" who is no expert on this in any way.
Because it wasn't about keeping kids healthy... it was about keeping big pharma's bank accounts healthy.
I am as interested in the kickbacks from the jab to politicians as much as I am the epstein island list.
Agree. I can still wish, though.
Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.
In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?Mothra said:Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.
In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
You might want to watch this and learn someting.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:And again you fail to go through the studies he linked and specifically state what he got wrong. Funny how you accept RFK, Jrs. bat **** crazy post yet you ignore how much money he rakes in spreading his false crap, why is that?Mothra said:Not to the satisfaction of the FTC, which is why they cited him, numnuts. It's called a conflict of interest, **** for brains. But good to know your cool with taking a 28-year old TikTok nutritionist paid by the sugar industry's word for it. You always were a complete idiot.Tempus Edax Rerum said:Uh, actually he did disclose it moron. You just didn't see it. He made very little money doing it and in fact all the research he sited, backs him up, dumba$$. Stick to the science and stop trying to dodge.Mothra said:
BTW, your TikTok "doctor" is one of 12 "influencers" being slapped with a warning label by the US government for receiving payment by the lobbying firms for the sugar industry and not disclosing same. In other words, Dr. Idz was paid by American beverage for his take on aspartame being perfectly safe, and encouraging drinking soft drinks and consuming sugary products.
https://www.ftc.gov/news-events/news/press-releases/2023/11/ftc-warns-two-trade-associations-dozen-influencers-about-social-media-posts-promoting-consumption
Wonder how much Pfizer paid him for his takes on COVID?
Man it is easy to debunk your bull***** You are really bad at this.
Feel free to go the the science he sited and tell me where he messed up. I'll be waiting.
In the meantime I am waiting for the FTC to force dumbass anti-vaccine influencers who is sponsoring them. I have yet to see it.
There is no science saying kids needed the jab. The links I presented debunked that position. Sorry.
You might want to watch this and learn someting.
Wait, you are asking people to go through each of the studies cited by your tick tocker and then tell you what the tick tocker got wrong?
This assumes that the underlying studies are correct to begin with - which they rarely are.
If you really want to learn something about "studies," pick up a copy of Doubt is their Product, by David Michaels.
