Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

That's what the hearings were about. Compiling evidence. Testimony, payments etc. The report is based upon evidence.

---

fubar said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

That's what the hearings were about. Compiling evidence. Testimony, payments etc. The report is based upon evidence.

---

The Bi-partisan report, for those who want to believe this is a Dem conspiracy.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

The report is based upon evidence.

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

fubar said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

That's what the hearings were about. Compiling evidence. Testimony, payments etc. The report is based upon evidence.

---

The Bi-partisan report, for those who want to believe this is a Dem conspiracy.

---

Its no "dem conspiracy" but it broke down on partisan lines

House committee voted against it at first...on party lines

https://www.axios.com/2024/11/20/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-report

Later on two Republicans (going against the wished of the Committee leader and the leader of the House) then joined with the Democrats to release it.

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/23/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-committee-joyce-garbarino


Joyce (R-Ohio) and Garbarino (R-N.Y.) have also had a lot of friction if Gaetz (R-Florida) in the past so there could be a little big of back room revenge going on here as well.


We also don't know know who was in charge of gathering the evidence on this committee.

(for instance there have been other committee investigations in the past that ended up being very misleading....because it was all about what people they were talking to...just for reference)

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

The report is based upon evidence.

---

That evidence can also often just be hearsay and oral reports from people (and not include oral reports from other people that might contradict it)

(not defending or attacking this specific case)

But have we forgetting about all the misleading Congressional Committee investigations in our History?

There is a reason people are not convicted in a Court of Law based on a mere Congressional Committee investigation....they are political by their very nature and not exactly interested in getting to the truth so much as a politically convenient conclusion

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

fubar said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

That's what the hearings were about. Compiling evidence. Testimony, payments etc. The report is based upon evidence.

---

The Bi-partisan report, for those who want to believe this is a Dem conspiracy.

---

Its no "dem conspiracy" but it broke down on partisan lines

House committee voted against it at first...on party lines

https://www.axios.com/2024/11/20/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-report

Later on two Republicans (going against the wished of the Committee leader and the leader of the House) then joined with the Democrats to release it.

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/23/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-committee-joyce-garbarino


Joyce (R-Ohio) and Garbarino (R-N.Y.) have also had a lot of friction if Gaetz (R-Florida) in the past so there could be a little big of back room revenge going on here as well.


We also don't know know who was in charge of gathering the evidence on this committee.

(for instance there have been other committee investigations in the past that ended up being very misleading....because it was all about what people they were talking to...just for reference)

---

Gaetz had an opportunity to comply with subpoenas to clear it all up if he was innocent.

---

Mothra said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?

---

Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.

---

it's pointing out hypocrisy.

---

Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats

---

Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Just the kind of guy with all the qualifications Trump wants in an AG.

---

Wangchung said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?

---

Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.

---

it's pointing out hypocrisy.

---

Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats

---

Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.

---

Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.

---

Wangchung said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?

---

Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.

---

it's pointing out hypocrisy.

---

Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats

---

Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.

---

Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.

---

Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?

---

I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.

---

Mothra said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

LIB,MR BEARS said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?

---

Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.

---

it's pointing out hypocrisy.

---

Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats

---

Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.

---

Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.

---

Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?

---

I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.

---

Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.

---

Aliceinbubbleland said:

---

The fact that Trump knew all of this and tried to have him appointed as AG speaks volumes about Trump and MAGA.

About half of American voters don't give a **** about rape, drugs or ethics.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

The report is based upon evidence.

---

That evidence can also often just be hearsay and oral reports from people (and not include oral reports from other people that might contradict it)

(not defending or attacking this specific case)

But have we forgetting about all the misleading Congressional Committee investigations in our History?

There is a reason people are not convicted in a Court of Law based on a mere Congressional Committee investigation....they are political by their very nature and not exactly interested in getting to the truth so much as a politically convenient conclusion

---

I guess you said the same thing about other congressional inquiries too. Gaetz had the opportunity to appear before the committee to clear it all up. No doubt he's the kind of guy who should be AG in a Trump administration.

---

Mothra said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Just the kind of guy with all the qualifications Trump wants in an AG.

---

And you know what's truly incredible about it? He's still 100 fold better than the disaster that was Biden.

But we all know you don't care about horrible democrats and their policies

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

The report is based upon evidence.

---

That evidence can also often just be hearsay and oral reports from people (and not include oral reports from other people that might contradict it)

(not defending or attacking this specific case)

But have we forgetting about all the misleading Congressional Committee investigations in our History?

There is a reason people are not convicted in a Court of Law based on a mere Congressional Committee investigation....they are political by their very nature and not exactly interested in getting to the truth so much as a politically convenient conclusion

---

I guess you said the same thing about other congressional inquiries too. Gaetz had the opportunity to appear before the committee to clear it all up. No doubt he's the kind of guy who should be AG in a Trump administration.

---

Only if he was a mentally i'll man in a dress he'd have the single qualification to be a Biden.

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?

---

None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?

---

I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.

---

You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.

---

huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.

---

"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?

---

None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?

---

I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.

---

You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.

---

huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.

---

"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?

---

just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?

---

None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?

---

I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.

---

You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.

---

huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.

---

"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?

---

just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.

---

Yoi give the most emotional responses to people who treat you the same way you treat them. Newsflash; you aren't special. You don't get to insult people and run your mouth and then act aghast when it gets returned your direction. Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Your SicEm365 experience will greatly improve if you can learn it.

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?

---

None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?

---

I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.

---

You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.

---

huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.

---

"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?

---

just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.

---

Yoi give the most emotional responses to people who treat you the same way you treat them. Newsflash; you aren't special. You don't get to insult people and run your mouth and then act aghast when it gets returned your direction. Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Your SicEm365 experience will greatly improve if you can learn it.

---

you and your ilk have turned this forum into a cesspool. and you would be how old? Curious what you do for a living if you're still not in college. don't know who would hire you.

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

fubar said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

That's what the hearings were about. Compiling evidence. Testimony, payments etc. The report is based upon evidence.

---

The Bi-partisan report, for those who want to believe this is a Dem conspiracy.

---

Its no "dem conspiracy" but it broke down on partisan lines

House committee voted against it at first...on party lines

https://www.axios.com/2024/11/20/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-report

Later on two Republicans (going against the wished of the Committee leader and the leader of the House) then joined with the Democrats to release it.

https://www.axios.com/2024/12/23/matt-gaetz-house-ethics-committee-joyce-garbarino


Joyce (R-Ohio) and Garbarino (R-N.Y.) have also had a lot of friction if Gaetz (R-Florida) in the past so there could be a little big of back room revenge going on here as well.


We also don't know know who was in charge of gathering the evidence on this committee.

(for instance there have been other committee investigations in the past that ended up being very misleading....because it was all about what people they were talking to...just for reference)

---

Gaetz had an opportunity to comply with subpoenas to clear it all up if he was innocent.

---

sombear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

Vast majority of GOP moderates will bail at the first sign of choppy water, no matter how flimsy the allegations. No stomach for the fight at all. Which of course guarantees character assassination via allegation of anyone who is effective.

INSANE: House Report On Matt Gaetz Relies On Witnesses Even The Corrupt DOJ Found Completely Lacked Any Credibility Whatsoever https://t.co/KEYb2yBgVU

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) December 23, 2024

---

Not true at all. Media and Dems have tried character assassination against every major GOP political figure since Reagan, and the party has stayed mostly unified. Who did the "moderates" ever prematurely bail on?

---

whiterock said:

---

sombear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

Vast majority of GOP moderates will bail at the first sign of choppy water, no matter how flimsy the allegations. No stomach for the fight at all. Which of course guarantees character assassination via allegation of anyone who is effective.

INSANE: House Report On Matt Gaetz Relies On Witnesses Even The Corrupt DOJ Found Completely Lacked Any Credibility Whatsoever https://t.co/KEYb2yBgVU

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) December 23, 2024

---

Not true at all. Media and Dems have tried character assassination against every major GOP political figure since Reagan, and the party has stayed mostly unified. Who did the "moderates" ever prematurely bail on?

---

LOL

ever heard of Donald Trump?

---

sombear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

sombear said:

---

whiterock said:

---

sombear said:

---

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.

---

Vast majority of GOP moderates will bail at the first sign of choppy water, no matter how flimsy the allegations. No stomach for the fight at all. Which of course guarantees character assassination via allegation of anyone who is effective.

INSANE: House Report On Matt Gaetz Relies On Witnesses Even The Corrupt DOJ Found Completely Lacked Any Credibility Whatsoever https://t.co/KEYb2yBgVU

— Mollie (@MZHemingway) December 23, 2024

---

Not true at all. Media and Dems have tried character assassination against every major GOP political figure since Reagan, and the party has stayed mostly unified. Who did the "moderates" ever prematurely bail on?

---

LOL

ever heard of Donald Trump?

---

Well, your post painted with a far broader brush.

As for Trump, whether you agree with it or not (I know you don't) can you not understand the backlash?

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

TexasScientist said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

So all the same allegations they couldn't produce any evidence for previously?

---

The report is based upon evidence.

---

That evidence can also often just be hearsay and oral reports from people (and not include oral reports from other people that might contradict it)

(not defending or attacking this specific case)

But have we forgetting about all the misleading Congressional Committee investigations in our History?

There is a reason people are not convicted in a Court of Law based on a mere Congressional Committee investigation....they are political by their very nature and not exactly interested in getting to the truth so much as a politically convenient conclusion

---

I guess you said the same thing about other congressional inquiries too. Gaetz had the opportunity to appear before the committee to clear it all up. No doubt he's the kind of guy who should be AG in a Trump administration.

---

Only if he was a mentally i'll man in a dress he'd have the single qualification to be a Biden.

---

That's irrelevant. Trump is the one making the appointments.

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Wangchung said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?

---

None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?

---

I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.

---

You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.

---

huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.

---

"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?

---

just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.

---

Yoi give the most emotional responses to people who treat you the same way you treat them. Newsflash; you aren't special. You don't get to insult people and run your mouth and then act aghast when it gets returned your direction. Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Your SicEm365 experience will greatly improve if you can learn it.

---

you and your ilk have turned this forum into a cesspool. and you would be how old? Curious what you do for a living if you're still not in college. don't know who would hire you.

---