It's like the world forgot Bill Clinton and Kobe Bryant are rapists.
Trump needs to address and make trade deals with our #1 and #2 trading partners , Canada and Mexico. Much higher prices for vehicles and produce loom large.redfish961 said:
I have seen a few instances noted here where the tariff issue may have caused problems, but personally I have seen none of it (Waco, Tx).
In my blue collar world, numbers are down as far as every day expenses are concerned....Gas, groceries, etc.
I know of nobody that has went out of business and I deal with quite a few material suppliers along with contractors (construction).
What has made it more difficult is competition from illegals...$12 an hour is impossible to compete with for skilled labor, especially when they aren't "skilled".
I don't really have a good command of national economic policies so I don't have much of an opinion there.
What are some seeing that I am not?
The economy looks better to me at the moment.
What am I missing?
I do not disagree with his personal traits. The only saving grace was she was legal, very low bar I know. I am not saying he should be on Mt Rushmore. He did a good job as President working with Congress and leaving us in a good position. His personal demons were problematic.historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:FLBear5630 said:I know everyone here hates Clinton. I was not a fan when he was elected, but looking back. He did a good job with the Budget. He and Newt got it done.historian said:
I wish there was a way to prevent anyone on Capitol hill from getting paid until the budget is balanced. That would guarantee a balanced budget in no time!
I don't hate Clinton but I strongly dislike them both and never trusted them. I don't think he deserves much of the credit for the economic successes he witnessed. They were the result of policies he hated. I will grant that he was capable of pragmatism and compromise far more than any Dem leader since then, except maybe a few in Congress in the early years of this century.
When you say either, Newt? Because Hillary and Bill are two SEPARATE politicians. Bill was a competent Administrator that knew when to cut loses, even if he didn't like it. I respect that. Hillary is a scumbag.
We rate Presidents by what they left. Clinton left a surplus and a balanced budget. Clinton left Bush a good situation. So, I have to give him high marks.
Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator. His greatest legacy as president is having sex in the Oval Office with a woman almost the age of his daughter. It's been pretty much confirmed that he went to Epstein's island repeatedly.
As for politics, he made "Wag the Dog" into a reality (instead of merely a Hollywood thing), vetoed welfare reform twice before signing it, benefitted from the Reagan boom and the end of the Cold War although he did nothing to achieve either (mostly the same for Bush 41), did nothing to stop Osama bin Laden & other terrorists and actually encouraged them through his weaknesses, gave us the Ruby Ridge & Waco disasters, are possibly the most corrupt political figures in US history (despite stiff competition from the Bush's, Obama's, Biden's, Pelosi's, & others), and so much more.
I put Bill & Hillary together because they are collaborators in almost everything they've done over the past 30 years.
boognish_bear said:Ben Shapiro on Qatar gifting Trump a plane: "Taking sacks of goodies from people who support Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, Al Jazeera, that's not America first....If you want President Trump to succeed, this kind of skeezy stuff needs to stop." pic.twitter.com/fZGGf6iM8N
— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) May 12, 2025
FLBear5630 said:I do not disagree with his personal traits. The only saving grace was she was legal, very low bar I know. I am not saying he should be on Mt Rushmore. He did a good job as President working with Congress and leaving us in a good position. His personal demons were problematic.historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:FLBear5630 said:I know everyone here hates Clinton. I was not a fan when he was elected, but looking back. He did a good job with the Budget. He and Newt got it done.historian said:
I wish there was a way to prevent anyone on Capitol hill from getting paid until the budget is balanced. That would guarantee a balanced budget in no time!
I don't hate Clinton but I strongly dislike them both and never trusted them. I don't think he deserves much of the credit for the economic successes he witnessed. They were the result of policies he hated. I will grant that he was capable of pragmatism and compromise far more than any Dem leader since then, except maybe a few in Congress in the early years of this century.
When you say either, Newt? Because Hillary and Bill are two SEPARATE politicians. Bill was a competent Administrator that knew when to cut loses, even if he didn't like it. I respect that. Hillary is a scumbag.
We rate Presidents by what they left. Clinton left a surplus and a balanced budget. Clinton left Bush a good situation. So, I have to give him high marks.
Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator. His greatest legacy as president is having sex in the Oval Office with a woman almost the age of his daughter. It's been pretty much confirmed that he went to Epstein's island repeatedly.
As for politics, he made "Wag the Dog" into a reality (instead of merely a Hollywood thing), vetoed welfare reform twice before signing it, benefitted from the Reagan boom and the end of the Cold War although he did nothing to achieve either (mostly the same for Bush 41), did nothing to stop Osama bin Laden & other terrorists and actually encouraged them through his weaknesses, gave us the Ruby Ridge & Waco disasters, are possibly the most corrupt political figures in US history (despite stiff competition from the Bush's, Obama's, Biden's, Pelosi's, & others), and so much more.
I put Bill & Hillary together because they are collaborators in almost everything they've done over the past 30 years.
Not sure Bill Clinton would even be considered a Democrat in 2025. He was the last President to balance the budget.EatMoreSalmon said:FLBear5630 said:I do not disagree with his personal traits. The only saving grace was she was legal, very low bar I know. I am not saying he should be on Mt Rushmore. He did a good job as President working with Congress and leaving us in a good position. His personal demons were problematic.historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:FLBear5630 said:I know everyone here hates Clinton. I was not a fan when he was elected, but looking back. He did a good job with the Budget. He and Newt got it done.historian said:
I wish there was a way to prevent anyone on Capitol hill from getting paid until the budget is balanced. That would guarantee a balanced budget in no time!
I don't hate Clinton but I strongly dislike them both and never trusted them. I don't think he deserves much of the credit for the economic successes he witnessed. They were the result of policies he hated. I will grant that he was capable of pragmatism and compromise far more than any Dem leader since then, except maybe a few in Congress in the early years of this century.
When you say either, Newt? Because Hillary and Bill are two SEPARATE politicians. Bill was a competent Administrator that knew when to cut loses, even if he didn't like it. I respect that. Hillary is a scumbag.
We rate Presidents by what they left. Clinton left a surplus and a balanced budget. Clinton left Bush a good situation. So, I have to give him high marks.
Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator. His greatest legacy as president is having sex in the Oval Office with a woman almost the age of his daughter. It's been pretty much confirmed that he went to Epstein's island repeatedly.
As for politics, he made "Wag the Dog" into a reality (instead of merely a Hollywood thing), vetoed welfare reform twice before signing it, benefitted from the Reagan boom and the end of the Cold War although he did nothing to achieve either (mostly the same for Bush 41), did nothing to stop Osama bin Laden & other terrorists and actually encouraged them through his weaknesses, gave us the Ruby Ridge & Waco disasters, are possibly the most corrupt political figures in US history (despite stiff competition from the Bush's, Obama's, Biden's, Pelosi's, & others), and so much more.
I put Bill & Hillary together because they are collaborators in almost everything they've done over the past 30 years.
Clinton left us with the beginning of the modern DNC.
Trump Accepts Generous Gift Of Imperial-Class Star Destroyer From Emperor Palpatine https://t.co/fWCfpdzFuW pic.twitter.com/udV6MeY2er
— The Babylon Bee (@TheBabylonBee) May 12, 2025
The majority of United Methodists voted for Trump.
— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) May 12, 2025
So did the majority of Evangelical Lutherans.
And Presbyterian Church USA.
As far as I can tell, the only majority white "major" Protestant denomination that clearly leans Democratic:
The Episcopal Church. pic.twitter.com/QuBwYYhPvU
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:Not sure Bill Clinton would even be considered a Democrat in 2025. He was the last President to balance the budget.EatMoreSalmon said:FLBear5630 said:I do not disagree with his personal traits. The only saving grace was she was legal, very low bar I know. I am not saying he should be on Mt Rushmore. He did a good job as President working with Congress and leaving us in a good position. His personal demons were problematic.historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:FLBear5630 said:I know everyone here hates Clinton. I was not a fan when he was elected, but looking back. He did a good job with the Budget. He and Newt got it done.historian said:
I wish there was a way to prevent anyone on Capitol hill from getting paid until the budget is balanced. That would guarantee a balanced budget in no time!
I don't hate Clinton but I strongly dislike them both and never trusted them. I don't think he deserves much of the credit for the economic successes he witnessed. They were the result of policies he hated. I will grant that he was capable of pragmatism and compromise far more than any Dem leader since then, except maybe a few in Congress in the early years of this century.
When you say either, Newt? Because Hillary and Bill are two SEPARATE politicians. Bill was a competent Administrator that knew when to cut loses, even if he didn't like it. I respect that. Hillary is a scumbag.
We rate Presidents by what they left. Clinton left a surplus and a balanced budget. Clinton left Bush a good situation. So, I have to give him high marks.
Bill Clinton was and is a sexual predator. His greatest legacy as president is having sex in the Oval Office with a woman almost the age of his daughter. It's been pretty much confirmed that he went to Epstein's island repeatedly.
As for politics, he made "Wag the Dog" into a reality (instead of merely a Hollywood thing), vetoed welfare reform twice before signing it, benefitted from the Reagan boom and the end of the Cold War although he did nothing to achieve either (mostly the same for Bush 41), did nothing to stop Osama bin Laden & other terrorists and actually encouraged them through his weaknesses, gave us the Ruby Ridge & Waco disasters, are possibly the most corrupt political figures in US history (despite stiff competition from the Bush's, Obama's, Biden's, Pelosi's, & others), and so much more.
I put Bill & Hillary together because they are collaborators in almost everything they've done over the past 30 years.
Clinton left us with the beginning of the modern DNC.
Donald Trump is asking to raise the debt ceiling by $4 trillion. That tells me it is business as usual in Washington D.C. It appears Trump has NO intention of reducing overall spending. Not good.
boognish_bear said:The majority of United Methodists voted for Trump.
— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) May 12, 2025
So did the majority of Evangelical Lutherans.
And Presbyterian Church USA.
As far as I can tell, the only majority white "major" Protestant denomination that clearly leans Democratic:
The Episcopal Church. pic.twitter.com/QuBwYYhPvU
Kinda wild as the ELCA is notoriously woke.boognish_bear said:The majority of United Methodists voted for Trump.
— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) May 12, 2025
So did the majority of Evangelical Lutherans.
And Presbyterian Church USA.
As far as I can tell, the only majority white "major" Protestant denomination that clearly leans Democratic:
The Episcopal Church. pic.twitter.com/QuBwYYhPvU
California Gov. Gavin Newsom tells cities to ban homeless encampments https://t.co/3LXbkXfZqA
— Axios (@axios) May 13, 2025
BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
Assassin said:Kinda wild as the ELCA is notoriously woke.boognish_bear said:The majority of United Methodists voted for Trump.
— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) May 12, 2025
So did the majority of Evangelical Lutherans.
And Presbyterian Church USA.
As far as I can tell, the only majority white "major" Protestant denomination that clearly leans Democratic:
The Episcopal Church. pic.twitter.com/QuBwYYhPvU
boognish_bear said:
Who dis?California Gov. Gavin Newsom tells cities to ban homeless encampments https://t.co/3LXbkXfZqA
— Axios (@axios) May 13, 2025
There are some pretty clear delineations between groups like the ELCA and the Missouri Synod for Lutherans, United Methodist vs Global Methodist, etc. Seems like every Christian group has a "woke" spinoff grouphistorian said:Assassin said:Kinda wild as the ELCA is notoriously woke.boognish_bear said:The majority of United Methodists voted for Trump.
— Ryan Burge 📊 (@ryanburge) May 12, 2025
So did the majority of Evangelical Lutherans.
And Presbyterian Church USA.
As far as I can tell, the only majority white "major" Protestant denomination that clearly leans Democratic:
The Episcopal Church. pic.twitter.com/QuBwYYhPvU
All of the major denominations are notoriously woke. That's why real Christian's are abandoning them. Even the SBC seems to be moving in that direction although I think they have staved off the latest attempt to turn them to the dark side.
historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
FLBear5630 said:historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
You will give credit if you like the person. Also, you will give the person a pass, if you like them. If you dont it does not matter. Trump is a changed man. Even though if you look at how he governed. He has spent like Biden, not worked with Congress, and not come close to balancing the budget. Clinton did all the things you profess to want. But...
Porteroso said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
You will give credit if you like the person. Also, you will give the person a pass, if you like them. If you dont it does not matter. Trump is a changed man. Even though if you look at how he governed. He has spent like Biden, not worked with Congress, and not come close to balancing the budget. Clinton did all the things you profess to want. But...
Yeah, which of us gives how much credit is 100% irrelevant, we are just shooting the **** here. Fact is, Clinton was the last fiscally conservative President. He was not proposing huge imbalanced budgets that Congress had to cut and balance, he was absolutely a part of the balanced budget.
It is healthy to be able to compartmentalize a bit. Be able to acknowledge that Clinton did some good over here, some bad over there. Otherwise we just see the bad, and turn into tribal zealots who are just plain ole haters of the enemy.
FLBear5630 said:historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
You will give credit if you like the person. Also, you will give the person a pass, if you like them. If you dont it does not matter. Trump is a changed man. Even though if you look at how he governed. He has spent like Biden, not worked with Congress, and not come close to balancing the budget. Clinton did all the things you profess to want. But...
Incredableboognish_bear said:BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman broke protocol by personally greeting President Trump on the tarmac, rather than sending a lower-ranking royal as is customary.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) May 13, 2025
President Trump received a horse escort as his motorcade arrived at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh.
The visit… pic.twitter.com/5y7KYr07fI
Harris would be doing a better job.Assassin said:Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman broke protocol by personally greeting President Trump on the tarmac, rather than sending a lower-ranking royal as is customary.
— Shadow of Ezra (@ShadowofEzra) May 13, 2025
President Trump received a horse escort as his motorcade arrived at the Saudi Royal Court in Riyadh.
The visit… pic.twitter.com/5y7KYr07fI
🚨 HOLY SMOKES: Trump takes a blow torch to the neocons and interventionists while speaking to the Saudis. This is a VICTORY speech over globalism.
— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 13, 2025
"It's crucial for the wider world to know this great transformation has not come from Western interventionists, or flying people… pic.twitter.com/mN0Q9pbhWP
KaiBear said:Incredableboognish_bear said:BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
That much of our society is so flagrantly racist towards white people is the result of decades of dishonest propaganda from the entertainment industry, leftist teachers and especially the legacy media.
South Africa f'd around and will find out.
— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) May 12, 2025
White farmers currently produce:
95.3% of their corn
98.7 % of their wheat
97.6 % of their cotton
97.2 % of their citrus
99% of their potatoes
91.4% of their tomatoes
96.9% of their soybean
95.8% of their poultry
66% of their cattle…
Cool. By the way, I didn't vote for Clinton. My discussions on him are looking back. In the moment, it was turmoil. I also think Bush Sr got screwed by history. Bush Jr was bad. 9/11 saved him and 2008 was bad. Obama did nothing in 8 years, but apologize. Disgrace. Trump??? Good Ideas, but like everything else he does not finish well... I am holding my breath, he keeps pushing things - like the plane. Why???historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
You will give credit if you like the person. Also, you will give the person a pass, if you like them. If you dont it does not matter. Trump is a changed man. Even though if you look at how he governed. He has spent like Biden, not worked with Congress, and not come close to balancing the budget. Clinton did all the things you profess to want. But...
Historically, I will give credit to people I don't like. It's the only honest way to go.
JUST IN: 🇸🇦🇺🇸 Saudi Arabia to invest $600 billion in the United States.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) May 13, 2025
It would be nice if they would just round it up to 1 trillion...boognish_bear said:
That's a lot of BsJUST IN: 🇸🇦🇺🇸 Saudi Arabia to invest $600 billion in the United States.
— Watcher.Guru (@WatcherGuru) May 13, 2025
historian said:FLBear5630 said:historian said:
My point is that Clinton's "accomplishments" had little to do with him and more to do with others and with circumstances. I will give credit where credit is due. Clinton deserves very little.
You will give credit if you like the person. Also, you will give the person a pass, if you like them. If you dont it does not matter. Trump is a changed man. Even though if you look at how he governed. He has spent like Biden, not worked with Congress, and not come close to balancing the budget. Clinton did all the things you profess to want. But...
Historically, I will give credit to people I don't like. It's the only honest way to go.
KaiBear said:Incredableboognish_bear said:BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
That much of our society is so flagrantly racist towards white people is the result of decades of dishonest propaganda from the entertainment industry, leftist teachers and especially the legacy media.
KaiBear said:Incredableboognish_bear said:BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
That much of our society is so flagrantly racist towards white people is the result of decades of dishonest propaganda from the entertainment industry, leftist teachers and especially the legacy media.
Porteroso said:KaiBear said:Incredableboognish_bear said:BREAKING: The Episcopal Church has announced it will end its decades-old partnership with the government to resettle refugees, citing moral opposition to resettling white Afrikaners from South Africa who have been classified as refugees by the Trump admin. https://t.co/fj7Ktt5f30
— Jack Jenkins (@jackmjenkins) May 12, 2025
That much of our society is so flagrantly racist towards white people is the result of decades of dishonest propaganda from the entertainment industry, leftist teachers and especially the legacy media.
What do you think about mostly whites leap frogging over black refugees who have waited for months and years? Can you understand why it certainly seems racist to other people, just the opposite type of racism?