The FBI is claiming there isn't enough evidence to make arrests, but if you posted the exact wording of some of these emails as though it was your own, police would instantly turn up at your house
— Council Estate Media (@cem_uk_) February 8, 2026
* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days
237,676 Views |
2825 Replies |
Last: 9 hrs ago by boognish_bear
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 9, 2026
No kidding … https://t.co/1GA5gHU9Lr
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 9, 2026
Time for Trump to distance from Bannon
Bannon is evil https://t.co/pQOO0hlaf2
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 9, 2026
Pedophilia is horrible. Being rapped as a minor by Steve Bannon? Id set myself on fire.
boognish_bear said:
Time for Trump to distance from BannonBannon is evil https://t.co/pQOO0hlaf2
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 9, 2026
Bannon is the one calling the shots!
Be glad you didn't see the rapping on that All-Anglo-Saxon Halftime Show last night.Mitch Blood Green said:
Pedophilia is horrible. Being rapped as a minor by Steve Bannon? Id set myself on fire.
Sam Lowry said:Mitch Blood Green said:
Pedophilia is horrible. Being rapped as a minor by Steve Bannon? Id set myself on fire.
Be glad you didn't see the rapping on that All-Anglo-Saxon Halftime Show last night.
Tell you what, the GOP should embrace the Hispanic culture. That is the future of the GOP, if there is one after Trump's ICE policy.
Why? Look at the population growth. Where is the growth coming from? And of those populations, which has the attributes the GOP says it values? Hispanic culture is family oriented, have kids, religious, hard-working, pro-2nd Amendment and pro-life.
What they need is GOP support on education, immigration and integration. Republicans are missing a huge opportunity, like last night. More people listen to that guy than any other Artist in the world, so let's disrespect him and his show. That will win over the Hispanic vote...
New: Ghislaine Maxwell attorney said in closed door deposition with House Oversight that Maxwell would not answer questions unless she was granted clemency by President Donald Trump. Maxwell plead the 5th and deposition is over
— Annie Grayer (@AnnieGrayerCNN) February 9, 2026
This is what I've been saying for years. I used to think Trump got it, but obviously he doesn't. His strategy is divide, divide, divide.FLBear5630 said:Sam Lowry said:Mitch Blood Green said:
Pedophilia is horrible. Being rapped as a minor by Steve Bannon? Id set myself on fire.
Be glad you didn't see the rapping on that All-Anglo-Saxon Halftime Show last night.
Tell you what, the GOP should embrace the Hispanic culture. That is the future of the GOP, if there is one after Trump's ICE policy.
Why? Look at the population growth. Where is the growth coming from? And of those populations, which has the attributes the GOP says it values? Hispanic culture is family oriented, have kids, religious, hard-working, pro-2nd Amendment and pro-life.
What they need is GOP support on education, immigration and integration. Republicans are missing a huge opportunity, like last night. More people listen to that guy than any other Artist in the world, so let's disrespect him and his show. That will win over the Hispanic vote...
Howard Lutnick faces bipartisan calls to resign over latest Epstein revelations https://t.co/OWUiRP5f5p
— POLITICO (@politico) February 9, 2026
Q: Does the committee have any plans to subpoena Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, given the revelations about his relationship with Epstein?
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) February 9, 2026
Rep. Comer: “We've got a lot of very important people we’re trying to bring in…So we’ll see what happens”
pic.twitter.com/nMYddj9ozl
🚨🇺🇸🇮🇱 BREAKING: Kash Patel's staff threatened Thomas Massie’s staff with criminal investigations if they continued speaking up about Israel and the Epstein files. pic.twitter.com/9gr0WmRfbt
— Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸 (@jacksonhinklle) February 8, 2026
I didn’t believe it happened until I saw this video, Epstein’s lawyer said the Victim is antisemitic for exposing that he trafficked her and r@ped her cause he’s Jewish. pic.twitter.com/skHVwARMup https://t.co/sYUtu9z3AH
— Aysha (@AyshaSusmaz) February 8, 2026
This guy's take strikes me as quite reasonable and probably largely correct.
Anyone hoping the Epstein files will implicate people not already implicated is going to be very disappointed. Boies Schiller represented a bunch of putative victims and left no stone unturned, suing everyone remotely involved with Epstein, including JP Morgan Chase, who was…
— tedfrank (@tedfrank) January 28, 2025
This will not be about who is not there, rather who is there. There appears to be enough to shake up the swamp, which Donald a top level member.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
FLBear5630 said:
This will not be about who is not there, rather who is there. There appears to be enough to shake up the swamp, which Donald a top level member.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
I suspect there will be no evidence linking any of those people to Epstein's underage girl fetish.
There will be a lot of schadenfreude and manufactured moral panic over a wide variety of folks who mostly either got taken advantage of by Epstein or just knew him and liked him (appears he was a charming fellow) but had absolutely no clue about his personal fetish for underage girls.
Work through that guy's entire thread on it. Pretty darn reasonable on its face.
Robert Wilson said:
This guy's take strikes me as quite reasonable and probably largely correct.Anyone hoping the Epstein files will implicate people not already implicated is going to be very disappointed. Boies Schiller represented a bunch of putative victims and left no stone unturned, suing everyone remotely involved with Epstein, including JP Morgan Chase, who was…
— tedfrank (@tedfrank) January 28, 2025
I think its important to remember that one's name in the files is not a crime by itself. With that said there is supposed to be video evidence which was swallowed up by the fbi when they raided the island. Where did that go?
BearFan33 said:Robert Wilson said:
This guy's take strikes me as quite reasonable and probably largely correct.Anyone hoping the Epstein files will implicate people not already implicated is going to be very disappointed. Boies Schiller represented a bunch of putative victims and left no stone unturned, suing everyone remotely involved with Epstein, including JP Morgan Chase, who was…
— tedfrank (@tedfrank) January 28, 2025
I think its important to remember that one's name in the files is not a crime by itself. With that said there is supposed to be video evidence which was swallowed up by the fbi when they raided the island. Where did that go?
He talks about the alleged video evidence a bit in that thread, and there is an internal FBI/DOJ email about it. Apparently, there was homemade porn Epstein enjoyed himself and pictures of Epstein with underage girls lured by him/Maxwell/other girls, but no third-party males pictured in any of it.
We probably won't ever see an Epstein client list ... because there probably was no client list ... because there probably were no clients...
Robert Wilson said:FLBear5630 said:
This will not be about who is not there, rather who is there. There appears to be enough to shake up the swamp, which Donald a top level member.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
I suspect there will be no evidence linking any of those people to Epstein's underage girl fetish.
There will be a lot of schadenfreude and manufactured moral panic over a wide variety of folks who mostly either got taken advantage of by Epstein or just knew him and liked him (appears he was a charming fellow) but had absolutely no clue about his personal fetish for underage girls.
Work through that guy's entire thread on it. Pretty darn reasonable on its face.
Yeah, I agree what he says makes sense.
I think the fallout will be more perception related. People losing positions over being in it, like in Great Britain more than legally. I think it will influence elections; GOP is not looking good. Massie only one of consequence that is coming out as caring. Women demographic will not like the GOPs position.
FLBear5630 said:Robert Wilson said:FLBear5630 said:
This will not be about who is not there, rather who is there. There appears to be enough to shake up the swamp, which Donald a top level member.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
I suspect there will be no evidence linking any of those people to Epstein's underage girl fetish.
There will be a lot of schadenfreude and manufactured moral panic over a wide variety of folks who mostly either got taken advantage of by Epstein or just knew him and liked him (appears he was a charming fellow) but had absolutely no clue about his personal fetish for underage girls.
Work through that guy's entire thread on it. Pretty darn reasonable on its face.
Yeah, I agree what he says makes sense.
I think the fallout will be more perception related. People losing positions over being in it, like in Great Britain more than legally. I think it will influence elections; GOP is not looking good. Massie only one of consequence that is coming out as caring. Women demographic will not like the GOPs position.
Oh, yeah, the moral panic aspect of it will screw over a lot of people.
But it's basically bread and circuses.
I now think I understand why the Democrats never touched it and neither did Trump. It's not because rich and powerful people are all pedophiles (which never made much sense to me anyway). Rather, we are all on an emotionally charged snipe hunt.
Robert Wilson said:FLBear5630 said:Robert Wilson said:FLBear5630 said:
This will not be about who is not there, rather who is there. There appears to be enough to shake up the swamp, which Donald a top level member.
The curious one is Bannon, that is the guy needing to be investigated.
I suspect there will be no evidence linking any of those people to Epstein's underage girl fetish.
There will be a lot of schadenfreude and manufactured moral panic over a wide variety of folks who mostly either got taken advantage of by Epstein or just knew him and liked him (appears he was a charming fellow) but had absolutely no clue about his personal fetish for underage girls.
Work through that guy's entire thread on it. Pretty darn reasonable on its face.
Yeah, I agree what he says makes sense.
I think the fallout will be more perception related. People losing positions over being in it, like in Great Britain more than legally. I think it will influence elections; GOP is not looking good. Massie only one of consequence that is coming out as caring. Women demographic will not like the GOPs position.
Oh, yeah, the moral panic aspect of it will screw over a lot of people.
But it's basically bread and circuses.
I now think I understand why the Democrats never touched it and neither did Trump. It's not because rich and powerful people are all pedophiles (which never made much sense to me anyway). Rather, we are all on an emotionally charged snipe hunt.
I agree with you. There is no surviving this. There is no rationalizing it. If you are there, you are done.
Well...guess he's not going to distance himself from Bannon
JUST IN: Trump’s DOJ asked the Supreme Court to dismiss Steve Bannon’s criminal contempt indictment and conviction for refusing to testify in the Jan. 6 congressional investigation, saying it’s in the “interests of justice.” pic.twitter.com/6nB7HkykQK
— Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) February 9, 2026
NEW: Newly released Epstein documents reveal FBI agent purposely removed hard drive from jail video recording system, intentionally erasing all prison footage during the time of Epstein’s death.
— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) February 9, 2026
🔗: https://t.co/0emUkTti9T pic.twitter.com/KcTt954vsy
— Dominic Michael Tripi (@DMichaelTripi) February 9, 2026
Someone should start keeping track of the conservatives willing to go on Steve Bannon's program and then ask those conservatives about Bannon and Epstein.
— Erick Erickson (@EWErickson) February 9, 2026
Laura Ingraham asked the Turning Point crowd how many were satisfied with the Epstein investigation and invited applause—she was met with boos.
— Ounka (@OunkaOnX) February 9, 2026
When she asked who was not satisfied, the room erupted in loud applause. pic.twitter.com/a9o7zeTOpR
BREAKING: Buckingham Palace confirms King Charles will fully support a police investigation into his brother, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor. An extraordinary royal moment.
— @theroyaleditor (@RobertDJobson) February 9, 2026
🚨 BREAKING: U.S. CONGRESSMAN WARNS EPSTEIN FALLOUT COULD TOPPLE THE BRITISH MONARCHY
— Jim Ferguson (@JimFergusonUK) February 9, 2026
Rep. Ro Khanna says the Epstein scandal is no longer just about disgraced individuals — it threatens the entire British establishment.
“This is the most vulnerable the British monarchy has… pic.twitter.com/7cpaUdpt8k
Breaking MS NOW:
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) February 9, 2026
Some of the Epstein documents the DOJ invited members of Congress to view are STILL redacted, despite promises otherwise.
Rep. Jamie Raskin says DOJ's reading room has just four computers.
He said that, according to calculations by his staffers, it would take…
boognish_bear said:Breaking MS NOW:
— Kyle Griffin (@kylegriffin1) February 9, 2026
Some of the Epstein documents the DOJ invited members of Congress to view are STILL redacted, despite promises otherwise.
Rep. Jamie Raskin says DOJ's reading room has just four computers.
He said that, according to calculations by his staffers, it would take…
Would like corroboration from multiple other unaffiliated sources. Not that I don't think this could be the case, but I doubt much from MSNow would be admissible in court.
Trump most mentioned in Epstein files 38,000 times.
Winning...
Winning...
.@RepThomasMassie on viewing the unredacted Epstein files: "What I saw that bothered me were the names of at least six men that had been redacted that are likely incriminated by their inclusion in these files." pic.twitter.com/q5Tx1a6Dkc
— CSPAN (@cspan) February 9, 2026
This is well known retired CEO.
— Thomas Massie (@RepThomasMassie) February 9, 2026
DOJ should unredact this.
Why did they redact it?https://t.co/F6hhKELDm0 pic.twitter.com/Dh2v88961p
🚨🚨 BREAKING: At least 6 names were redacted in the Epstein files; according to Representatives Thomas Massie and Ro Khanna,
— Globe Observer (@_GlobeObserver) February 9, 2026
Massie claims one is “pretty high up” in a foreign government. pic.twitter.com/5MTeyV398Y
FLBear5630 said:
Trump most mentioned in Epstein files 38,000 times.
Winning...
And in those 38,000 "mentions", how many lead to Trump's wrong doings?
Pretty sure IT"S STILL ZERO
"The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why." — Mark Twain