* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days

230,006 Views | 2752 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:


True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:


True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:



Most important, probably an accurate number.

Important? Top 10? Not so much.



Here's RPD's take on it, the source you chose to cite.

In my opinion, Lutnick, Patel, and Bondi all have to go.

Oh, and in case you haven't been paying attention, Pizzagate is back including an email from Epstein and his urologist talking about going to get Pizza and Grape Soda after he takes his ED meds.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Has anyone else noticed a common thread running through the overwhelming majority of perps identified to this point?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

whiterock said:



Most important, probably an accurate number.

Important? Top 10? Not so much.



Here's RPD's take on it, the source you chose to cite.

In my opinion, Lutnick, Patel, and Bondi all have to go.

Oh, and in case you haven't been paying attention, Pizzagate is back including an email from Epstein and his urologist talking about going to get Pizza and Grape Soda after he takes his ED meds.

Understand the argument and it has merit, particularly with respect to cohesion of a few pieces of Trump's base.

the question, as a politician, is do you simply respond to the narratives of the day? or do you create your own? Trump is trying to do the latter. He wants the upcoming election to be decided on the economy, which will be accelerating into overdrive growth mode when the election occurs. And he's right. The economy will be the big issue. Epstein, not so much. It's all out now. It'll be very old news by this fall.

Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Has anyone else noticed a common thread running through the overwhelming majority of perps identified to this point?


Who perpetrated what?
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


After reading your responses to this thread, I've come to the conclusion that you're


A pedophile

A gay pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile who is affiliated with the Mossad

Or maybe just a Christian Zionist

But one of those rocks is going to find its mark.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Looks like it was a Jewish private school

Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Robert Wilson said:


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


After reading your responses to this thread, I've come to the conclusion that you're


A pedophile

A gay pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile who is affiliated with the Mossad

Or maybe just a Christian Zionist

But one of those rocks is going to find its mark.


Uh huh

Or I think it's funny to watch you nutless brainless choads get monetized by the grifters
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:


True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


Lol. Keep deflecting and protecting pedos.
Robert Wilson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:

Robert Wilson said:

cowboycwr said:


True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


Lol. Keep deflecting and protecting pedos.


What pedos have I protected, half wit?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:

Robert Wilson said:


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


After reading your responses to this thread, I've come to the conclusion that you're


A pedophile

A gay pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile

A gay Jewish pedophile who is affiliated with the Mossad

Or maybe just a Christian Zionist

But one of those rocks is going to find its mark.


Robert is a card carrying member of NAMBLA
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.