* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days

235,060 Views | 2806 Replies | Last: 28 min ago by boognish_bear
BearFan33
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:56a, 2/19/26
Epstein's tentacles were everywhere. I'm glad it sounds like some people are being brought to justice, even if in a round about way. It's a huge can a worms.

In a way, I'm surprised Epstein stayed alive as long as he did.
Reply Quote
1
Robert Wilson
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:17a, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
1
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 8:51a, 2/19/26
Realitybites said:
boognish_bear said:


Do we have primary source verification of this?

Pompeo is one of the swampiest swamp creatures that ever swamped.

If that's the case, this will destroy Bannon's career.

Direct Link to the DOJ library of Epstein Files

Ya, but so was Pence. He was put there as a rino to keep Trump from actually doing anything.
Reply Quote
2
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:48a, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
3
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:47p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
5
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:58p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:15p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
3
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:18p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
2
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:36p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:41p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
4
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:05p, 2/19/26
Reply Quote
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 7:22p, 2/19/26
boognish_bear said:

another example of how foolish the Israel nonsense is.

On one hand, Epstein is an Israeli asset compromising all of our political leadership to coerce them to support Israel.
On the other hand, Epstein is a foreign policy advisor suggesting Israel to lobby US leaders to for help on Iran.

In reality, it's a wealthy American Jew have a conversation with a Jewish PM about what they'd like to see happen on Iranian policy (which ended up being nothing.)

Reply Quote
2
Robert Wilson
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 8:10p, 2/19/26
boognish_bear said:


Nancy should ask reality and cowboy.

Who should be arrested for what? They probably know even though they won't say. They're cagey like that.

Come on, ladies! Arrest somebody for something for the love of God! You bunch of pedos!
Reply Quote
1
cowboycwr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Robert Wilson • 8:42p, 2/19/26
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:

True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


Lol. Keep deflecting and protecting pedos.


What pedos have I protected, half wit?


For being "out" you sure do keep coming back here.

I see all you have is name calling still. Are you in middle school? Can't discuss a subject or provide facts so act like a bully and name call hoping to run everyone off.

As for who you are protecting….. all the people in this thread that you are defending and saying there is nothing to see here.


So you're not willing to name one?

That's interesting. Neither was the inaptly named reality bear.

And I really should've left, and I probably will, but watching you nitwits spin is kind of fascinating. It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Or a really bad sitcom.


They have been name all throughout this thread.

Hence the numerous ones stepping down or resigning from their jobs. Innocent people don't do that.
Reply Quote
2
Robert Wilson
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 12:08a, 2/20/26
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:

True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


Lol. Keep deflecting and protecting pedos.


What pedos have I protected, half wit?


For being "out" you sure do keep coming back here.

I see all you have is name calling still. Are you in middle school? Can't discuss a subject or provide facts so act like a bully and name call hoping to run everyone off.

As for who you are protecting….. all the people in this thread that you are defending and saying there is nothing to see here.


So you're not willing to name one?

That's interesting. Neither was the inaptly named reality bear.

And I really should've left, and I probably will, but watching you nitwits spin is kind of fascinating. It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Or a really bad sitcom.


They have been name all throughout this thread.

Hence the numerous ones stepping down or resigning from their jobs. Innocent people don't do that.


Ok halfwit

Then it should be easy for you

Name one
Reply Quote
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Robert Wilson • 12:25a, 2/20/26
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:
Robert Wilson said:
cowboycwr said:

True that people and corporations run from lynch mobs all the time.

But usually there has to be a mob forming first.


So with Epstein, in particular, there is no mob forming? Is that a joke?


There is one calling for people to be arrested.

But again look up any of the people who have quit trying to hide from this….. there have been no calls to arrest them, no one calling for them to come before Congress, etc.

Most of them were not in the news at all until they resigned.


You're just bizarrely incorrect. Not sure what else to say.

Wesserman had to sell his talent agency because people were refusing to work with him.

Goldman Sachs fired that lady GC because they were tired of the bad publicity.

And on and on.


No I am correct. Your proof has nothing to do with what I talked about. I was talking about people resigning. You bring up someone fired and someone whose company failed.


You're a halfwit. And that's being generous.


When someone has nothing left but name calling (in defense of pedos) I know I have won the argument.

If you had anything else you would provide proof.

You can't so you resort to name calling.

Besides I thought you were "out". That is what you said a few days ago and yet you keep trying to defend all the people showing up in these files and brush the whole thing off as nothing.


Yes, you're very bright. Good work.


Lol. Keep deflecting and protecting pedos.


What pedos have I protected, half wit?


For being "out" you sure do keep coming back here.

I see all you have is name calling still. Are you in middle school? Can't discuss a subject or provide facts so act like a bully and name call hoping to run everyone off.

As for who you are protecting….. all the people in this thread that you are defending and saying there is nothing to see here.


So you're not willing to name one?

That's interesting. Neither was the inaptly named reality bear.

And I really should've left, and I probably will, but watching you nitwits spin is kind of fascinating. It's like watching a train wreck in slow motion. Or a really bad sitcom.


They have been name all throughout this thread.

Hence the numerous ones stepping down or resigning from their jobs. Innocent people don't do that.


Ok halfwit

Then it should be easy for you

Name one


1 Les Wexner
2 Alan Dershowitz
3 Leon Black
4 Steve Tisch
5 Itzhak Perlman
6 Larry Summers
7 Ehud Barack
8 Casey Wasserman
9 Noam Chomsky
10 Glen Dubin
11 Tom Pritzker
12 Mark Epstein
13 Ronald Lauder
14 Ariana Rothschild
15 Reid Hoffman
16 Howard Lutnik
17 Micheal Levy
18 Peggy Siegal
Reply Quote
4
1 edit
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:32p, 2/20/26
Can we bring back stoning?

Reply Quote
1
J.R.
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:48p, 2/20/26
I don't know the end game here, but I think it is a cluster beyond belief. Why is Trump fighting so hard with his stripper AG to no let it all out unreacted. Trump has to be in there and is implicated one would think. Trump ain't doing this to save his friends skin. Trump doesn't operate that way. No way he takes this grief if he is clean.
Reply Quote
5
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:17p, 2/20/26
boognish_bear said:
Can we bring back stoning?


Maybe we can bring back the inquisition instead.

Stretch these scum on a medieval rack.

But knowing this, how far a stretch is it to consider that they were killing kids, eating them, and dissolving the remains in acid?
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:02a, 2/21/26
Is It Time To Reopen The Franklin Child Prostitution Case After Epstein Revelations?

The seriousness of a conspiracy can often be quantified by the amount of energy the establishment expends trying to bury it. Consider for a moment the fact that Jeffery Epstein's monstrous club of elites faced near zero mainstream exposure for over 20 years, despite his arrest for human trafficking in 2006.
Think about the level of political and media interference, the highly organized propaganda, the targeted attacks against conspiracy researchers Think about the amount of money and time that was expended just to shut us up and convince the public the Epstein situation was "overblown".

The revelations of the "Lolita Express" and the flights to Little Saint James Island are nothing compared to what we now find in the millions of documents released in the past month. Hints of rape, torture, possible murder, and even cannibalism are present in the coded (and not so coded) language of Epstein's emails. And, if the revelations of "Pizzagate" and the John Podesta emails are correct, then many of the horrors committed on Epstein's Island involved young children.

As I noted in my last article, Epstein's private emails contain coded references to "pizza" (an FBI confirmed code used by pedophiles to describe young boys) over 900 times. They mention "jerky" over 380 times, including mentions of "freezing jerky", "walking" jerky from one location to another, and getting jerky tested in a lab for "safety".

The establishment machine is going into panic mode, once again trying to obcure the darker aspects of the Epstein files as "conspiracy theory" and "moral panic". There is a clear attempt being made to mitigate and run damage control.

In other words, the elites are willing to give up the fight on the issue of underage sex trafficking. They know that the abuse of teens will not trigger enough outrage to get them killed by mobs of angry citizens. However, they are DESPERATE to silence any discussion on the abuse of very young children including babies. They will do anything to prevent the investigation from escalating to issues of cannibalism and occultism.

As long as the public thinks it was all about rich and powerful perverts getting their jollies with 16 and 17-year-old girls, the elites think they can weather the storm. After all, in most states the age of consent is 16. They might even be able to convince a large percentage of the populace that those girls did those things "of their own free will."

I can already see them generating the spin in the event that any of the perpetrators actually go to trial. By the time it's over, people will be questioning if anything criminal happened at all? That's how the system works. It demands that the public ignore the obvious and wait for official confirmation of guilt, which rarely ever comes when oligarchs are involved.

I would continue to warn people NOT to put too much hope in the notion that any of the Epstein suspects will face legitimate legal consequences. Just look at how many corrupt judges we have encountered in the US when it comes to the immigration issue. Now imagine the army of left wing judges that will slither out of the woodwork to protect Epstein's clients.

The Epstein case does not represent a silver bullet for eliminating the elites and their cabal, but it does represent a moment of mass awakening that cannot be stopped. Never before have conspiracy analysts been so close to exposing the reality of the "New World Order" to the normies. It creates a pathway to other opportunities, including reopening conspiracy events that were buried by the establishment a long time ago.
Reply Quote
3
1 edit
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:27p, 2/21/26
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:38p, 2/21/26
Reply Quote
2
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:57p, 2/21/26


Lutnick made a lot of money off 911 and of course that was the one day in his whole life that he ever took his kid to school.
Reply Quote
2
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 4:20p, 2/21/26
boognish_bear said:


Oy vey!!!
Reply Quote
1 edit
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
4:22p, 2/21/26
Reply Quote
2
The_barBEARian
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to muddybrazos • 4:23p, 2/21/26
muddybrazos said:


Lutnick made a lot of money off 911 and of course that was the one day in his whole life that he ever took his kid to school.


I've come to the conclusion that either the CIA/Mossad facilitated the 9/11 attack or they knew if was coming and stood down because they wanted it to happen...
Reply Quote
muddybrazos
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to The_barBEARian • 4:26p, 2/21/26
The_barBEARian said:
muddybrazos said:


Lutnick made a lot of money off 911 and of course that was the one day in his whole life that he ever took his kid to school.


I've come to the conclusion that either the CIA/Mossad facilitated the 9/11 attack or they knew if was coming and stood down because they wanted it to happen...

I dont know how much you know but go look up urban moving systems and the dancing Israelis. then when you look into tower 7 you understand the whole thing was a setup.
Reply Quote
1
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:16p, 2/21/26
boognish_bear said:

Lots of crap out there about Epstein files right not. If the above was true, then the Dems would have been all over it when Biden had 100% control of the Files
"The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why." — Mark Twain
Reply Quote
1
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 2/21/26
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:38p, 2/21/26
I can't understand why Trump has not already cut ties with Lutnick

Reply Quote
1
2 edits
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:41p, 2/21/26
Reply Quote
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:32a
boognish_bear said:

Mostly true.
Reply Quote
1
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:37a
boognish_bear said:
I can't understand why Trump has not already cut ties with Lutnick


so all we have to do is call the FBI and make patently wild-assed allegations and we can get the entire cabinet tossed out?

A Jewish businessman is "deeply rooted to the royal family?" Which royal family?

A who's who list of American investment firms are all in on it? (whatever "it" means.)
Reply Quote
1
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.