It's not. Elon Musk is running a shadow operation financed by George Soros and Klaus Shwab that looks for fake MS13 trans members to help them stay in the country at homes of liberal judges.ScottS said:
Assassin, the OP says this is all hilarious. Like its not really happening.
What are you gonna do when they cut off your government check?Assassin said:It's not. Elon Musk is running a shadow operation financed by George Soros and Klaus Shwab that looks for fake MS13 trans members to help them stay in the country at homes of liberal judges.ScottS said:
Assassin, the OP says this is all hilarious. Like its not really happening.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:What are you gonna do when they cut off your government check?Assassin said:It's not. Elon Musk is running a shadow operation financed by George Soros and Klaus Shwab that looks for fake MS13 trans members to help them stay in the country at homes of liberal judges.ScottS said:
Assassin, the OP says this is all hilarious. Like its not really happening.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:What are you gonna do when they cut off your government check?Assassin said:It's not. Elon Musk is running a shadow operation financed by George Soros and Klaus Shwab that looks for fake MS13 trans members to help them stay in the country at homes of liberal judges.ScottS said:
Assassin, the OP says this is all hilarious. Like its not really happening.
Government spending drops 5.1% in first quarter.
— Richard Grenell (@RichardGrenell) May 3, 2025
Amazing.
Every American should celebrate the shrinking of Washington, DC spending.
Working with @SecDuffy, the @DOGE is glad to stop funding studies to determine if roads are racist.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 2, 2025
This was an actual thing that was happening! 🤦♂️ https://t.co/H5pWcmG9jT
Contract update!
— Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE) May 6, 2025
In the last two days, agencies terminated 148 wasteful contracts with a ceiling value of $420M and savings of $198M, including a $143K HHS contract for the “potency monitoring of confiscated marijuana samples.” pic.twitter.com/MnYPvN6jpl
It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Great work today by @USDOL, canceling $13.6M in wasteful DEI grants totaling $8.4M in savings, including:
— Department of Government Efficiency (@DOGE) May 6, 2025
- $716k for “DEIA materials, training modules, and support networks”
- $398k for “gender equity awareness training”
- $350k to “migrant sending or receiving communities”
Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Will it?Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Rubio?KaiBear said:After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Republicans have far better options.
One of several.Assassin said:Rubio?KaiBear said:After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Republicans have far better options.
The head of a US agency shuttered by @DOGE repeatedly said not to hire any whites, according to a sworn affidavit by his assistant, who is black
— Luke Rosiak (@lukerosiak) May 9, 2025
When its general counsel discovered rampant misconduct by its officials, they framed him for death threats to stop his probe, he said pic.twitter.com/1mjfNu99YB
This is BIG 🚨 Documents reveal Democrats in Maine have been using USAID money to pay for their campaigns
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 9, 2025
The Maine Wire “Governor Janet Mills administration has been using taxpayer dollars like the USAID Fund”
“Were about 10-15% of the way through reviewing all 4,500 of these… pic.twitter.com/MYGeiOiGOL
so, when will they press charges? A lot of press releases, not much prosecution. If this stuff is as bad and illegal as they keep saying where are the charges? How many people have been charged?Assassin said:This is BIG 🚨 Documents reveal Democrats in Maine have been using USAID money to pay for their campaigns
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 9, 2025
The Maine Wire “Governor Janet Mills administration has been using taxpayer dollars like the USAID Fund”
“Were about 10-15% of the way through reviewing all 4,500 of these… pic.twitter.com/MYGeiOiGOL
I'm with you on pressing charges, but who in Maine would be charged? Better be a rock solid case, or the paper trail will dead end in some deep hole.FLBear5630 said:so, when will they press charges? A lot of press releases, not much prosecution. If this stuff is as bad and illegal as they keep saying where are the charges? How many people have been charged?Assassin said:This is BIG 🚨 Documents reveal Democrats in Maine have been using USAID money to pay for their campaigns
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 9, 2025
The Maine Wire “Governor Janet Mills administration has been using taxpayer dollars like the USAID Fund”
“Were about 10-15% of the way through reviewing all 4,500 of these… pic.twitter.com/MYGeiOiGOL
KaiBear said:After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Republicans have far better options.
Fre3dombear said:KaiBear said:After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Republicans have far better options.
What dq's him in your opinion? I haven't read it
KaiBear said:Fre3dombear said:KaiBear said:After reading his autobiography.......am convinced Vance is not presidential material.Assassin said:Lets hope its not for the next 12 years, post 2 term VanceKaiBear said:I wish.Assassin said:I think that the fact that the public knows how much of their taxpayer funds have been siphoned off to the side, things will forever be differentFLBear5630 said:Assassin said:It’s money laundering
— Wall Street Apes (@WallStreetApes) May 5, 2025
“So it turns out 7,000 politically connected NGOs are receiving 90% of all taxpayer money going to nonprofits. Roughly $300 billion in government money flows through nonprofits every year with zero transparency with regard to where that money goes.”
“The… pic.twitter.com/TEB6SzEdJe
Problem is that it is legal. Have to change the law.
However things will return to the same old BS when the Dems regain the White House.
Republicans have far better options.
What dq's him in your opinion? I haven't read it
A. He's not an overly bright guy. Focused and hard working though.
B. Seems to look for the easy path in whatever he does. Yes, he was a Marine, but to my surprise he rarely if ever saw combat.
C. Family background is shaky ; to put it mildly. Suspect Vance's wife has better genetics than his.
D. Seems to lack real courage, more lucky than brilliant.
Faults and all would prefer Rubio or DeSantis.
Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Because, it is more of a press release campaign. Look at the budget in the big, beautiful bill, how much is being saved?Harrison Bergeron said:
If DOGE is not making significant cuts, I wonder why so many are freaking out about it.
I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Try not to be ridiculous.EatMoreSalmon said:Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Would you read an article from OAN and take it seriously?
You give a ridiculous source, and you're piqued at the response?Sam Lowry said:Try not to be ridiculous.EatMoreSalmon said:Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Would you read an article from OAN and take it seriously?
Not piqued, just a little embarrassed on your behalf.EatMoreSalmon said:You give a ridiculous source, and you're piqued at the response?Sam Lowry said:Try not to be ridiculous.EatMoreSalmon said:Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Would you read an article from OAN and take it seriously?
Your credibility is suffering if you believe The Atlantic to be a reliable source to quote. Once upon a long time ago they could have been, but alas.Sam Lowry said:Not piqued, just a little embarrassed on your behalf.EatMoreSalmon said:You give a ridiculous source, and you're piqued at the response?Sam Lowry said:Try not to be ridiculous.EatMoreSalmon said:Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Would you read an article from OAN and take it seriously?
Keep digging.EatMoreSalmon said:Your credibility is suffering if you believe The Atlantic to be a reliable source to quote. Once upon a long time ago they could have been, but alas.Sam Lowry said:Not piqued, just a little embarrassed on your behalf.EatMoreSalmon said:You give a ridiculous source, and you're piqued at the response?Sam Lowry said:Try not to be ridiculous.EatMoreSalmon said:Sam Lowry said:I have read it. Did you read the article?Assassin said:Please read more of this DOGE thread. There are more "Facts" in a single post there than 100 pages of The AtlanticSam Lowry said:
The Actual Math Behind DOGE's Cuts
If you thought Elon Musk was really trying to cut costs, you weren't in on the joke.
By Jessica Riedl
In November, when Donald Trump first announced his plan to place Elon Musk in charge of a new Department of Government Efficiency, the idea was widely written off as a joke. Then Trump took office, and DOGE began its very real stampede through the government. As an effort to meaningfully reduce federal spending, however, DOGE remains wholly unserious.
Musk initially promised that he would eliminate $2 trillion of the $7 trillion federal budget, before scaling back his ambitions to $1 trillion, and then $150 billion. Even that revised target is highly improbable.
The bad news is that the project seems quite likely to expand long-term budget deficits. Slashing IRS enforcement will embolden tax evasion and reduce revenues by hundreds of billions of dollars over the decade. Laying off Department of Education employees who ensure collection of student-loan repayments will increase the deficit. Illegally terminated federal employees are already being reinstated with full back pay, leaving the government with little to show for its trouble besides mounting legal fees.
https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2025/05/musk-doge-spending-cuts/682736/
Would you read an article from OAN and take it seriously?
