Will they completely pull out of DC to go to the next stop...or leave some support in DC?

🚨 JUST IN: HUNDREDS UPON HUNDREDS of military vehicles have been spotted on a train in the middle of Washington, DC

This is the same track used when Trump brought tanks in for the military parade

Which city are these headed to? Chicago? 👀 pic.twitter.com/g50oaATGpv

— Nick Sortor (@nicksortor) September 3, 2025

FLBear5630 said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

.@POTUS: "We're making a determination now — do we go to Chicago or do we go to a place like New Orleans, where we have a great Governor, @LAGovJeffLandry, who wants us to come in and straighten [it] out." pic.twitter.com/TpQo9uU4B5

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 3, 2025

---

If he is smart, go to NO where he is invited. Going to Chicago is going to cause a **** storm, Constitutionally, politically and physically. Courts said no, go to SCOTUS and get a ruling.

---

Agreed

Besides overall New Orleans might even be a bigger **** hole than Chicago .

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

.@POTUS: "We're making a determination now — do we go to Chicago or do we go to a place like New Orleans, where we have a great Governor, @LAGovJeffLandry, who wants us to come in and straighten [it] out." pic.twitter.com/TpQo9uU4B5

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 3, 2025

---

If he is smart, go to NO where he is invited. Going to Chicago is going to cause a **** storm, Constitutionally, politically and physically. Courts said no, go to SCOTUS and get a ruling.

---

Agreed

Besides overall New Orleans might even be a bigger **** hole than Chicago .

---

And better tourist destination.

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

.@POTUS: "We're making a determination now — do we go to Chicago or do we go to a place like New Orleans, where we have a great Governor, @LAGovJeffLandry, who wants us to come in and straighten [it] out." pic.twitter.com/TpQo9uU4B5

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) September 3, 2025

---

If he is smart, go to NO where he is invited. Going to Chicago is going to cause a **** storm, Constitutionally, politically and physically. Courts said no, go to SCOTUS and get a ruling.

---

Agreed

Besides overall New Orleans might even be a bigger **** hole than Chicago .

---

And better tourist destination.

---

Certainly would consider Chicago the better tourist destination.

But you can get robbed, knifed or shot either place.

boognish_bear said:

---

“Why do we need firefighters? Nothing is on fire.” https://t.co/ZYcfYU3JQ3

— Homeland Security (@DHSgov) September 2, 2025

---

You might need them ready and waiting at the fire station. If they're parked on your lawn and sitting around your kitchen table, it's a fair question.

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

Trump is a do-er. He's not the snot ragged career politicians that have strangled this country. He acts decisively and efficiently rather than just contemplating or discussing things that never appear to happen. In this case he actualy making a War on Drugs, not making TV commercials about it.

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

Trump is a do-er. He's not the snot ragged career politicians that have strangled this country. He acts decisively and efficiently rather than just contemplating or discussing things that never appear to happen. In this case he actualy making a War on Drugs, not making TV commercials about it.

---

Funny, how this "do-er" decided to blow this boat up the day after the Epstein women testified to Congress.

I don't disagree he is a do-er. But it usually comes to benefit him or save his ass.

That's true of every large city. Especially blue cities and especially those with Soros backed DA's.

ScottS said:

---

historian said:

---

Maybe it's easier to have success one city at a time. The more cities they clean up this way, the more pressure there will be for other cities to follow suit. The blue mayors and governors who oppose these efforts will more obviously be seen as supporters of more crime. More importantly, it's clear that they don't really care about the people who are victims of these crimes.

---

Maybe those blue mayors and governors are profiting from the crime.

---

I guess under Trump the Feds taking over more is now a good thing? What happened to Government overreach. The Government can't do anything right. We have to cut spending, now 1M a day to occupy DC with National Guard is a good thing, a "do-er" thing.

You guys are as bad as the Dems.

FLBear5630 said:

---

ScottS said:

---

historian said:

---

Maybe it's easier to have success one city at a time. The more cities they clean up this way, the more pressure there will be for other cities to follow suit. The blue mayors and governors who oppose these efforts will more obviously be seen as supporters of more crime. More importantly, it's clear that they don't really care about the people who are victims of these crimes.

---

Maybe those blue mayors and governors are profiting from the crime.

---

I guess under Trump the Feds taking over more is now a good thing? What happened to Government overreach. The Government can't do anything right. We have to cut spending, now 1M a day to occupy DC with National Guard is a good thing, a "do-er" thing.

You guys are as bad as the Dems.

---

Oh so now you are worried about overspending. Where were you when USAID $ was flushed down the toilet?

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

Which he did without Congressional approval. In 2014, Obama initiated airstrikes against ISIS in Iraq and Syria without seeking new congressional approval, instead relying on the 2001 Authorization for the Use of Military Force (AUMF) passed after 9/11.

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

What is it with you guys and the "well they did it"????? He was wrong too. Biden was wrong for his f-ed up Afghanistan. That doesn't give Trump a pass to do anything he wants. You seem to think because Biden was an idiot Trump has to up the ante and its perfectly fine.

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

What is it with you guys and the "well they did it"????? He was wrong too. Biden was wrong for his f-ed up Afghanistan. That doesn't give Trump a pass to do anything he wants. You seem to think because Biden was an idiot Trump has to up the ante and its perfectly fine.

---

Policy has been long established by various presidents that terrorists can be killed.

Sorry you don't approve.

boognish_bear said:

---

Don't know if his facts check out or not

Pritzker: So, in case there was any doubt as to the motivation behind Trump's military occupations, take note. 13 of the top 20 cities in homicide rates have Republican governors. None of these cities is Chicago. Eight of the top ten states with the highest homicide rates are led… pic.twitter.com/QlB792g3xo

— Acyn (@Acyn) August 25, 2025

---

No one believes that for a second

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

What is it with you guys and the "well they did it"????? He was wrong too. Biden was wrong for his f-ed up Afghanistan. That doesn't give Trump a pass to do anything he wants. You seem to think because Biden was an idiot Trump has to up the ante and its perfectly fine.

---

Policy has been long established by various presidents that terrorists can be killed.

Sorry you don't approve.

---

He is pushing the limits of Presidential authority. There has to be more than him saying they are terrorists. There has to be done proof they are terrorists and the FTO has declared them. This isn't about killing scumbags, it is about checks and balances and Executive authority.

Did they report to the Congressional oversight before? Is there Intel to say who they were. We are pushing some bad precedents if we just say ok President can do what he wants because we don't like drug runners or another group. You guys really don't get that

DAC said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Don't know if his facts check out or not

Pritzker: So, in case there was any doubt as to the motivation behind Trump's military occupations, take note. 13 of the top 20 cities in homicide rates have Republican governors. None of these cities is Chicago. Eight of the top ten states with the highest homicide rates are led… pic.twitter.com/QlB792g3xo

— Acyn (@Acyn) August 25, 2025

---

No one believes that for a second

---

Its not about the red states as much as the problems come from the blue cities.

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

What is it with you guys and the "well they did it"????? He was wrong too. Biden was wrong for his f-ed up Afghanistan. That doesn't give Trump a pass to do anything he wants. You seem to think because Biden was an idiot Trump has to up the ante and its perfectly fine.

---

Policy has been long established by various presidents that terrorists can be killed.

Sorry you don't approve.

---

He is pushing the limits of Presidential authority. There has to be more than him saying they are terrorists. There has to be done proof they are terrorists and the FTO has declared them. This isn't about killing scumbags, it is about checks and balances and Executive authority.

Did they report to the Congressional oversight before? Is there Intel to say who they were. We are pushing some bad precedents if we just say ok President can do what he wants because we don't like drug runners or another group. You guys really don't get that

---

You are being ridiculous.

These narcos are killing Americans by the thousands every single month. What in the world is this trend lately throughout the Trump haters that all of a sudden we are supposed to shed tears for criminals ?

And other presidents have done far worse internationally on behalf of Israel and other countries.

At least this time we are defending ourselves.

When Obama killed terrorists in the Middle East …..I applauded.

When Trump destroyed ISIS …..I applauded.

Same goes with this latest deal.

ScottS said:

---

historian said:

---

Maybe it's easier to have success one city at a time. The more cities they clean up this way, the more pressure there will be for other cities to follow suit. The blue mayors and governors who oppose these efforts will more obviously be seen as supporters of more crime. More importantly, it's clear that they don't really care about the people who are victims of these crimes.

---

Maybe those blue mayors and governors are profiting from the crime.

---

A very real possibility. For reason most of us cannot comprehend, they prefer their cities have high crime.

Less crime is definitely a good thing. Obviously. The greet expense is not, also obviously. I would expect what is happening in DC is temporary and soon it will be turned over to a reformed local police dept that will be given the tools & support to go their jobs. It will also destroy the local politicians who want more crime or don't care. Spending a little now is a wise investment if it brings positive results long term.

You are correct, though, ideally this would be a local issue only. That would presume local leaders would do their jobs and put the people first. The corruption still needs to be rooted out at all levels of govt.

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Assassin said:

---

FLBear5630 said:

---

Sam Lowry said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

Is there a reason they are going one city at a time rather than several at once?

---

Because it's plainly illegal and Trump is testing the waters, obviously.

---

So we'll blow up a boat off Venezuela

---

"War on Drugs"... literally

---

We usually apprehend and confiscate. Using a hellfire missile, is an escalation.

It is the old joke, Bad guy wakes up and see a US President in scandal and says "Oh, ****" something is getting blown up today...

---

Read the responses

"The US Navy is now blowing up cartel ships in the Caribbean. Who voted for this?!?!" pic.twitter.com/4p8CRJl72z

— End Wokeness (@EndWokeness) September 2, 2025

---

It is not about the responses, it is about what is the law. Public opinion polls do not run how things operate. It is a representative Democracy not a direct Democracy. Whether or not people on here think it is cool, does not mean he can do or should do it. Not to mention timing is a bit suspicious.

---

So when Obama killed terrorists throughout the Middle East ....was it also opposed as a matter of 'law' ?

---

What is it with you guys and the "well they did it"????? He was wrong too. Biden was wrong for his f-ed up Afghanistan. That doesn't give Trump a pass to do anything he wants. You seem to think because Biden was an idiot Trump has to up the ante and its perfectly fine.

---

Policy has been long established by various presidents that terrorists can be killed.

Sorry you don't approve.

---

He is pushing the limits of Presidential authority. There has to be more than him saying they are terrorists. There has to be done proof they are terrorists and the FTO has declared them. This isn't about killing scumbags, it is about checks and balances and Executive authority.

Did they report to the Congressional oversight before? Is there Intel to say who they were. We are pushing some bad precedents if we just say ok President can do what he wants because we don't like drug runners or another group. You guys really don't get that

---

You are being ridiculous.

These narcos are killing Americans by the thousands every single month. What in the world is this trend lately throughout the Trump haters that all of a sudden we are supposed to shed tears for criminals ?

And other presidents have done far worse internationally on behalf of Israel and other countries.

At least this time we are defending ourselves.

When Obama killed terrorists in the Middle East …..I applauded.

When Trump destroyed ISIS …..I applauded.

Same goes with this latest deal.

---

You see no difference between ISIS and using military to destroy boats in the Gulf with no due process or self defense need? If so, why has it nor been done before by Trump, either Bush's or Reagan? Forget Obama or Biden. Think about it, Rumsfeld, Cheney and Mattis all did not do this. Why?

You are going to ends justifies the means right into having no checks or balances. Well, let's see when they turn in the direction of you cheerleaders to see your reaction. Maybe it will natural resources, development rights, or any host of development tariffs or restrictions. Maybe just someone using your property or financial vehicles for investment. Everyone thinks they are immune until they turn the light on you.

It's silly to suggest that enemy combatants are entitled to due process. In a wartime situation, and for all practical purposes the US has been at war with the drug cartel's & terrorists for decades, you destroy the enemy. You don't arrest them, bring them to trial, and allow a bunch of America-hating Leftist lawyers and judges legitimize them and pretend their causes are just. The cartel's are greedy criminals of the worst kind and the terrorists are barbaric murderers of the worst kind. They must be destroyed without remorse.

This is not complicated. The Marxists try to complicate everything with doublespeak and pathetic, dishonest arguments.

Great article on the rogue judges:

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2025/09/a_dozen_federal_judges_walk_into_a_bar.html

VZ has declared war* on us....... 'bout time we fought back.

Along w/ China.

- el KKM

D!

Torpedo the Dams!!

Suelten los perros, amigos!!!