Mitch Blood Green said:
90sBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
90sBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
Redbrickbear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
90sBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
90sBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
Jack Bauer said:
I think womens tennis and golf have ruled out biological men from playing in their leagues but the wnba just cant do it...
I don't know why she can't just say he's not eligible to play. I'd add, not committed to the bit.
When Trump tried to force the NFL to accept his team as an expansion team at the expense of the other owners, disgusted Pete Rozelle told him he'd never own an NFL franchise. For some reason she can't shut this down.
I'm calling for her removal.
Based on league rules and the WNBA CBA, why isn't Enes Kanter eligible to play?
League rules say no blokes. He's not even faking being a Sheila.
The league CBA states, "only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA."
There is no definition of "women" provided.
So again, without a definition of what "women" is, why isn't Enes Kanter or the others who have declared eligible?
They don't need to define it. He's not one. He's ineligible.
How is he not a woman then?
If you will not define it...and they will not define it....then how do we know he is not a woman?
If dylan mulvaney is a woman...and hunter schafer is a woman....then why is Kanter not a woman?
Because this is an attention ruse that's using these women to make a political point political points.
I'll just call myself a woman and go to women's spaces. This board would scream as my man body ain't as big as Kantors.
I believe the right answer is "we chose not to play" his game. If I were commissioner, my statement would be "we're not interested in their bull****"
To which Enes Kanter or Royce White or Julie Tetart or anyone else who is formally denied eligibility without a clear reason as to why can respond that they will sue for discrimination or collusion if there is evidence for that. Who knows if any of them would be successful if they chose to attempt.
There is a clear reason. We said no. Political posturing isn't a protected class. That French man? Unimpressed with his game.
Fine, if sued they can use that as their primary argument. Not sure how well "We said no" has worked in employment discrimination lawsuits, but that's for them to decide how best to argue their case should this go to court.
Julie Tetart averaged 21 ppg and 20 rpg.
I notice the WTA doesn't have any of these messy public issues on this topic.
WTA doesn't have these problems, yet. Partly because stupid men are not trying to pile on them (yet). Why wouldn't a man ranked 225 not sue the WTA or declare himself to be a woman based on these tactics yall are cheering for? Why wouldn't nonsense not jump that fence? Their "definition" has only been in place since July. It hasn't had time to be challenged. White and them might f around and set a precedent.
Julie is playing French basketball players. SHe's 6'3" and built like a dude. I believe the WNBA centers are far more skilled. (That's my eye test).
For Julie to play, she'd have to be drafted and make the team. To my basketball eye, she looks like the difference between the player who plays in the church league vs the person who plays D1 college.
The WTA doesn't have this exact problem because they have eligibility requirements on being a woman and have specifically stated:
"In this policy, 'biological male' means an individual who, regardless of their legal sex or gender identity, has an SRY gene and therefore has or previously had testes or streak testes; and 'biological female' means an individual who, regardless of their legal sex or gender identity, has no SRY gene and therefore has or previously had ovaries or streak ovaries,"
There has already been a transgender tennis player, Renee Richards, who interestingly is now opposed to it. However the rules as specified now were not in place back then.
The French league has many former WNBA and D1 players, but I'm sure current WNBA players would be better competition. Either way, the question in this conversation isn't "How good is Julie Tetart?" The question is, "Is Julie Tetart eligible to play in the WNBA?"