a 5th grader can see he pushed her arm down. I don't care if it was sped up 1.5 times, it is what it is.

riflebear said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

The White House doctored the video. That's pretty damning. And the doctors video was first shared by an Infowars nut.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/11/08/white-house-shares-doctored-video-support-punishment-journalist-jim-acosta/?utm_term=.3abec50686ec

The edited video looks authentic: Acosta appeared to swiftly chop down on the arm of an aide as he held onto a microphone while questioning President Trump. But in the original video, Acosta's arm appears to move only as a response to a tussle for the microphone. His statement, "Pardon me, ma'am," is not included in the video Sanders shared.

Critics said that video which sped up the movement of Acosta's arms in a way that dramatically changed the journalist's response was deceptively edited to score political points. That edited video was first shared by Paul Joseph Watson, known for his conspiracy-theory videos on the far-right website Infowars.

Watson said he did not change the speed of the video and that claims he had altered it were a "brazen lie." Watson, who did not immediately respond to requests for comment, told BuzzFeed he created the video by downloading an animated image from conservative news site Daily Wire, zooming in and saving it as a video a conversion he says could have made it "look a tiny bit different."

Side-by-side comparisons support claims from fact-checkers and experts such as Jonathan Albright, research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, who argued that crucial parts of the video appear to have been altered so as to distort the action.

The video has quickly become a flashpoint in the battle over viral misinformation, turning a live interaction watched by thousands in real time into just another ideological tug-of-war. But it has also highlighted how video content long seen as an unassailable verification tool for truth and confirmation has become as vulnerable to political distortion as anything else.

---

Did you not see his post a few above yours? He literally zoomed in, exactly how is that 'doctored'?

Amazing what you believe and are brainwashed from MSNBC & CNN.

---

So "zooming in" is now a doctored video according to Jinx. The dude chopped down on the young ladies arm, realizing what he was doing he quickly stopped. But Acosta is not an innocent party here. Such a jackass shouldn't be allowed in the Press Corps.

Ask a question and shut up, don't try to create the story. Guy should have been booted long ago.

riflebear said:

---

a 5th grader can see he pushed her arm down. I don't care if it was sped up 1.5 times, it is what it is.

---

She reached for the microphone to take it away from him. His arm touched hers. But the contact was clearly her fault--Acosta didn't even realize she was there. he also spoke respectfully to her. HE showed her more respect that she or Trump showed him.

I'm not going to change your mind; you are going to believe whatever Sanders and the Trump propaganda machine pump out. But that's what happened.

Forest Bueller said:

---

riflebear said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

The White House doctored the video. That's pretty damning. And the doctors video was first shared by an Infowars nut.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/11/08/white-house-shares-doctored-video-support-punishment-journalist-jim-acosta/?utm_term=.3abec50686ec

The edited video looks authentic: Acosta appeared to swiftly chop down on the arm of an aide as he held onto a microphone while questioning President Trump. But in the original video, Acosta's arm appears to move only as a response to a tussle for the microphone. His statement, "Pardon me, ma'am," is not included in the video Sanders shared.

Critics said that video which sped up the movement of Acosta's arms in a way that dramatically changed the journalist's response was deceptively edited to score political points. That edited video was first shared by Paul Joseph Watson, known for his conspiracy-theory videos on the far-right website Infowars.

Watson said he did not change the speed of the video and that claims he had altered it were a "brazen lie." Watson, who did not immediately respond to requests for comment, told BuzzFeed he created the video by downloading an animated image from conservative news site Daily Wire, zooming in and saving it as a video a conversion he says could have made it "look a tiny bit different."

Side-by-side comparisons support claims from fact-checkers and experts such as Jonathan Albright, research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, who argued that crucial parts of the video appear to have been altered so as to distort the action.

The video has quickly become a flashpoint in the battle over viral misinformation, turning a live interaction watched by thousands in real time into just another ideological tug-of-war. But it has also highlighted how video content long seen as an unassailable verification tool for truth and confirmation has become as vulnerable to political distortion as anything else.

---

Did you not see his post a few above yours? He literally zoomed in, exactly how is that 'doctored'?

Amazing what you believe and are brainwashed from MSNBC & CNN.

---

So "zooming in" is now a doctored video according to Jinx. The dude chopped down on the young ladies arm, realizing what he was doing he quickly stopped. But Acosta is not an innocent party here. Such a jackass shouldn't be allowed in the Press Corps.

Ask a question and shut up, don't try to create the story. Guy should have been booted long ago.

---

it's a doctored video.

The press is supposed to push the president to answer hard questions. Presidents are supposed to be presidential. Trump is never presidential.

Jinx 2 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

a 5th grader can see he pushed her arm down. I don't care if it was sped up 1.5 times, it is what it is.

---

She reached for the microphone to take it away from him. His arm touched hers. But the contact was clearly her fault--Acosta didn't even realize she was there. he also spoke respectfully to her. HE showed her more respect that she or Trump showed him.

I'm not going to change your mind; you are going to believe whatever Sanders and the Trump propaganda machine pump out. But that's what happened.

---

I saw this before any reporting happened online, I was watching it live.

That is her job to reach for the microphone and move it to the next journalist. Trump had already moved on, he yanked it back. Nice try.


Acosta didn't realize she was there? That is your argument now?
He literally turns away from her as she walks up because he knows she's there to take the microphone

Jinx 2 said:

---

Forest Bueller said:

---

riflebear said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

The White House doctored the video. That's pretty damning. And the doctors video was first shared by an Infowars nut.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/11/08/white-house-shares-doctored-video-support-punishment-journalist-jim-acosta/?utm_term=.3abec50686ec

The edited video looks authentic: Acosta appeared to swiftly chop down on the arm of an aide as he held onto a microphone while questioning President Trump. But in the original video, Acosta's arm appears to move only as a response to a tussle for the microphone. His statement, "Pardon me, ma'am," is not included in the video Sanders shared.

Critics said that video which sped up the movement of Acosta's arms in a way that dramatically changed the journalist's response was deceptively edited to score political points. That edited video was first shared by Paul Joseph Watson, known for his conspiracy-theory videos on the far-right website Infowars.

Watson said he did not change the speed of the video and that claims he had altered it were a "brazen lie." Watson, who did not immediately respond to requests for comment, told BuzzFeed he created the video by downloading an animated image from conservative news site Daily Wire, zooming in and saving it as a video a conversion he says could have made it "look a tiny bit different."

Side-by-side comparisons support claims from fact-checkers and experts such as Jonathan Albright, research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, who argued that crucial parts of the video appear to have been altered so as to distort the action.

The video has quickly become a flashpoint in the battle over viral misinformation, turning a live interaction watched by thousands in real time into just another ideological tug-of-war. But it has also highlighted how video content long seen as an unassailable verification tool for truth and confirmation has become as vulnerable to political distortion as anything else.

---

Did you not see his post a few above yours? He literally zoomed in, exactly how is that 'doctored'?

Amazing what you believe and are brainwashed from MSNBC & CNN.

---

So "zooming in" is now a doctored video according to Jinx. The dude chopped down on the young ladies arm, realizing what he was doing he quickly stopped. But Acosta is not an innocent party here. Such a jackass shouldn't be allowed in the Press Corps.

Ask a question and shut up, don't try to create the story. Guy should have been booted long ago.

---

it's a doctored video.

The press is supposed to push the president to answer hard questions. Presidents are supposed to be presidential. Trump is never presidential.

---

How is it doctored, you can see the exact same thing on the CNN video, the dude chops her arm and soon realizes what he is doing and backs off. The other guy simply does a close up of it.

Ask a tough question and shut up, he doesn't do that. No business in the press corps, at least Trump hasn't jailed him.

Quote:

---

Obamas practice.....

---

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

"My background is in the Navy, and it is good to hang an admiral once in a while as an example to the others," Dennis Blair told The New York Times in July 2013. "We were hoping to get somebody and make people realize that there are consequences to this and it needed to stop."

Blair, who served as Director of National Intelligence for the Obama administration in 2009 and 2010, was defending the Obama administration's strategy of aggressively prosecuting journalists' sources under the Espionage Act of 1917.

---

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

a 5th grader can see he pushed her arm down. I don't care if it was sped up 1.5 times, it is what it is.

---

She reached for the microphone to take it away from him. His arm touched hers. But the contact was clearly her fault--Acosta didn't even realize she was there. he also spoke respectfully to her. HE showed her more respect that she or Trump showed him.

I'm not going to change your mind; you are going to believe whatever Sanders and the Trump propaganda machine pump out. But that's what happened.

---

Wow.

Forest Bueller said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

a 5th grader can see he pushed her arm down. I don't care if it was sped up 1.5 times, it is what it is.

---

She reached for the microphone to take it away from him. His arm touched hers. But the contact was clearly her fault--Acosta didn't even realize she was there. he also spoke respectfully to her. HE showed her more respect that she or Trump showed him.

I'm not going to change your mind; you are going to believe whatever Sanders and the Trump propaganda machine pump out. But that's what happened.

---

Wow.

---

I swear the mind of a liberal is a mystery.

Last month: We believe Ford's account from 30+ years ago, with no evidence and all her witnesses denying it happened.

Today: With proof & video evidence against Acosta, we believe Acosta and condemn this female White House staffer for an attack on Acosta.

Jinx 2 said:

---

Forest Bueller said:

---

riflebear said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

The White House doctored the video. That's pretty damning. And the doctors video was first shared by an Infowars nut.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2018/11/08/white-house-shares-doctored-video-support-punishment-journalist-jim-acosta/?utm_term=.3abec50686ec

The edited video looks authentic: Acosta appeared to swiftly chop down on the arm of an aide as he held onto a microphone while questioning President Trump. But in the original video, Acosta's arm appears to move only as a response to a tussle for the microphone. His statement, "Pardon me, ma'am," is not included in the video Sanders shared.

Critics said that video which sped up the movement of Acosta's arms in a way that dramatically changed the journalist's response was deceptively edited to score political points. That edited video was first shared by Paul Joseph Watson, known for his conspiracy-theory videos on the far-right website Infowars.

Watson said he did not change the speed of the video and that claims he had altered it were a "brazen lie." Watson, who did not immediately respond to requests for comment, told BuzzFeed he created the video by downloading an animated image from conservative news site Daily Wire, zooming in and saving it as a video a conversion he says could have made it "look a tiny bit different."

Side-by-side comparisons support claims from fact-checkers and experts such as Jonathan Albright, research director of the Tow Center for Digital Journalism at Columbia University, who argued that crucial parts of the video appear to have been altered so as to distort the action.

The video has quickly become a flashpoint in the battle over viral misinformation, turning a live interaction watched by thousands in real time into just another ideological tug-of-war. But it has also highlighted how video content long seen as an unassailable verification tool for truth and confirmation has become as vulnerable to political distortion as anything else.

---

Did you not see his post a few above yours? He literally zoomed in, exactly how is that 'doctored'?

Amazing what you believe and are brainwashed from MSNBC & CNN.

---

So "zooming in" is now a doctored video according to Jinx. The dude chopped down on the young ladies arm, realizing what he was doing he quickly stopped. But Acosta is not an innocent party here. Such a jackass shouldn't be allowed in the Press Corps.

Ask a question and shut up, don't try to create the story. Guy should have been booted long ago.

---

it's a doctored video.

The press is supposed to push the president to answer hard questions. Presidents are supposed to be presidential. Trump is never presidential.

---

Maybe you need to come to terms that we don't want him to be presidential and we don't care if it hurts your feelings.

We're sick and tired of playing by YOUR rules. These are OUR rules.

You reap what you sow Jinx. You did it to us when we were concerned about Obama money laundering cold hard cash and shipping it on pallets in the middle of the night to the number one state sponsor of terrorism.

You shot our concerns down and we're shooting yours down. You just have a hard time realizing when your team is losing.

cinque said:

---

I watched that Presser in astonishment. I know you true believers don't question anything Fat Nixon does, but was his behavior in that press conference something you support? Do you think being that unhinged was necessary?

---

Not a big fan of Acosta or CNN. I think any decent poli sci student could have typed up a better question for him.
That being said, Trump and Trumpians have no idea of what the WH Press used to be like. If he went off on Acosta, he would have ordered Secret Service to Fire on Sam Donaldson.

Jinx now has the pre-defense response

"Here's my opinion. If you disagree, you are obviously brainwashed by Trump and Faux News and are a terrible person."

And looks like her compassion for other women ends with the "R" by their name.

Jack Bauer said:

---

And looks like her compassion for other women ends with the "R" by their name.


Yea, like she said, it was the young womans fault here. I suppose she believes women should not be allowed by men to do their job. That's all she was doing.

---

Jack Bauer said:

---

Jinx now has the pre-defense response

"Here's my opinion. If you disagree, you are obviously brainwashed by Trump and Faux News and are a terrible person."

And looks like her compassion for other women ends with the "R" by their name.

---

thats amusing, because the response from the your side is usually the exact same thing, but substitute in "Mainstream Media" for "Trump"

I never heard about this. Doesn't look like it was actually from air force one, but outside of it. They even told her she couldn't 'yell' at the President.

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

Yes, not just scary, but "scary on many levels." The "many levels" adds emphasis and emphasis makes a statement more believable.

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

Well our country doesn't limit freedom of speech like yours. So you're just going to have to deal with it or be a pro government fascist and use the power of the government to censor sources...like your country already does lol.

riflebear said:

---

I never heard about this.

---

thats pretty sad, though after a quick google (which reveals plenty of News articles about the incident from the time it happened), she wasnt removed FROM Air Force 1, but an area near it and was trying to give Obama a letter, the security staff suggested she give it to a staffer, she refused, saying she wanted to give it to him personally, they told her to leave, changed their minds, then changed them again, asked her to leave, she refused and she was removed from the area.

She wasnt "removed for being Pro-Life"

Also, although she probably is Pro-Life, she was there to give him a letter to take a stand for Traditional Marriage (presumably as opposed to Gay Marriages), she claimed to have WH press credentials, but this wasnt confirmed by anyone and she offered no evidence to support that claim.

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

Well our country doesn't limit freedom of speech like yours. So you're just going to have to deal with it or be a pro government fascist and use the power of the government to censor sources...like your country already does lol.

---

Really? because Trump and his cronies sure seem to be limiting Jim Acosta's freedom of speech, lol.

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

Well our country doesn't limit freedom of speech like yours. So you're just going to have to deal with it or be a pro government fascist and use the power of the government to censor sources...like your country already does lol.

---

Really? because Trump and his cronies sure seem to be limiting Jim Acosta's freedom of speech, lol.

---

How so? Last time I checked he had every right to speak freely as much as he wants. Was he jailed for expressing an opinion? Did they remove his tongue last night? Did they cut off his hands so he couldn't type his thoughts? How exactly was his freedom of speech taken away?

This should be good...

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

---

Wait, you are trying to claim Info Wars is a credible news source?

I mean, just here is a lie he posted TODAY about the shooting in California



which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

cms186 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

---

Wait, you are trying to claim Info Wars is a credible news source?

I mean, just here is a lie he posted TODAY about the shooting in California



which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

---

Cleary he isn't middle-Eastern, but that's a dated photo of him. I'm not defending infowars, I've actually never even been to their site (do they have a site?), but the early reports on the shooting were wrong by other news sources as well. I happened to be up late last night working and had the tv tuned to CNN. The initial reports of the shooter was that he was in his 20s and had a lot of tattoos. I don't know if he has tattoos now, but none of the photos I've seen of him show any visible tattoos. Infowars is a clearly biased site and they will run with anything, confirmed or not, that fits their agenda, but sadly, that's how a lot of the media sources are these days.

Jinx 2 said:

---

curtpenn said:

---

Jinx 2 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

This video is great because they zoom in and play the incident on repeat. Close up it sure does look like a bully physically imposing his will and trying to prevent a young lady from doing her job. I'm sure Leftists will applaud this though. They'll probably try to destroy that poor white White House aide next as punishment for daring attempt to take the mic from their leftist reporter god.

---

It looks like the aide is reaching in to snatch the Mic away, all Acosta does is hold on to it, the only bully in the room is Trump and when he doesnt get his way, throws his toys out of the pram like the giant baby that he is.

---

Trump is the kind of bully who tries to head off a perceived threat by making sure the bearers realize he's going to erupt at them like a supervolcano. Acosta didn't cave to that (and he certainly didn't push the officious little intern).

He was asking a legitimate question about Trump's rhetoric inciting violence. Trump didn't want to hear or answer the question. So Trump went on the offensive, trashing Acosta and 2 other reporters.

He's using the same tactic to try to ward off the investigation. Which makes it clear what he really fears. Wonder if he fired Sessions to make that the headline yesterday rather than the GOP's retaking of the House. That's his M.O.

---

A$$hat Acosta isn't "asking a legitimate question"; first words out of his mouth "... wanna challenge you on one of the statements you made..." followed by a lecture/assertion, "the caravan was not an invasion". What a ******. Perhaps if he would simply ask a question? But, no...

---

Asking the president why he outright lied about a caravan of refugees who won't reach the border for weeks and mischaracterized them as an "invasion" is totally legitimate.

You want everybody to sit down, shut up and believe everything Trump and his administration say--even the things you know aren't true--because you support his agenda.

I'm glad we have a press who won't do that.

My question is why Acosta thought he might get an honest answer from Trump re: the hateful rhetoric or his miscahracterization of the Honduran refugees. Trump was obviously not going to answer either of those questions--at least not truthfully.

---

Way to completely deflect or miss the point. Acosta did not ask questions as anyone can see (who bothers to take the time). He literally begins with a challenge and follows up with an assertion. Is he looking for answers, or lecturing? Typical...

My question is why would the President even bother to acknowledge such a narcissistic dirtbag who can't even pose an honest question?

Doc Holliday said:

---

When the president tells you to sit down because others need to ask questions...you sit down.

---

Acosta slept with a bunch of female leakers in the white house. They were leaking out the mouth while he was leaking something down low.

Did Trump and his staff learn to make a fake video from Putin, the old KGB spy that has dirt on Trump.

xiledinok said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

When the president tells you to sit down because others need to ask questions...you sit down.

---

Acosta slept with a bunch of female leakers in the white house. They were leaking out the mouth while he was leaking something down low.

Did Trump and his staff learn to make a fake video from Putin, the old KGB spy that has dirt on Trump.

---

You hit the bottle early today I see! Well done sir! No ambulance chasing today?

cms186 said:

---

which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

---

I thought that guy looked familiar....

cms186 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

---

Wait, you are trying to claim Info Wars is a credible news source?

I mean, just here is a lie he posted TODAY about the shooting in California



which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

---

Many news agencies were reporting this earlier today. I saw many liberal sites describing it as a man who looked middle eastern before they even tweeted this. But feel free to pick the one you disagree w/

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

It's the kind of thing they would do in Saudi Arabia and it's not funny.

cms186 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

---

Wait, you are trying to claim Info Wars is a credible news source?

I mean, just here is a lie he posted TODAY about the shooting in California



which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

---

You were saying? This was posted about 4 hours prior to Watson's post which is why so many people spread this. This is a very credible source, don't you think?

OK, liberals. Here is the exact explanation which proves again the liberals are trying to demonize the source to distract from the actual topic. This guy is British and calls out the radical left in Europe all the time, he also goes after the liberal media a lot which is why they are called 'conspiracy' theorists.

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

riflebear said:

---

cms186 said:

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

cms186 said:

---

cms186 said:

---

---

for those that seem to be claiming the video wasnt doctored (if you read the twitter thread, which im sure most of you wont, you'll also see its likely that the White House probably just took the video straight from Info Wars, which is hilarious and scary on so many levels)

---

Scary? Really?

---

that people in the White House get their news from a right wing conspiracy nutjob? yes, its pretty scary

---

I've seen his posts multiple times online and everything I have seen has been backed up. The liberals think any 'conservative' group is a conspiracy website. Could he have reported something that turned up false in the past? Of course, but that happens almost daily on MSNBC & CNN.

Typical liberal tactics. Same thing they have been using against FoxNews for almost 20 years.

I'm still amazed that 95% of the media is proven to be liberal, yet Dems are terrified of the remaining 5%. Just shows they don't want free an open and equal press. They want to control everything you hear. It's why the Obama press conferences were essentially love fest w/ almost zero accountability.

---

Wait, you are trying to claim Info Wars is a credible news source?

I mean, just here is a lie he posted TODAY about the shooting in California



which, if you didnt know, was carried out by this guy, obviously not a "Middle Eastern Man with a Beard"

---

Many news agencies were reporting this earlier today. I saw many liberal sites describing it as a man who looked middle eastern before they even tweeted this. But feel free to pick the one you disagree w/

---

I've been following this story since early this a.m., and the only info I've seen about the shooter was that he was a former Marine and that he had pscyhological problems.

Twitter is not a reliable news source.