LOLJusHappy2BeHere said:
Mueller/Barr Letter and Riff
18,150 Views |
181 Replies |
Last: 6 yr ago by Florda_mike
Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
https://news.yahoo.com/laura-ingraham-chris-wallace-fox-news-mueller-barr-020755922.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca&fbclid=IwAR3665IAzE12TpGqHaMy0_8dKX9m0_i0o1rPjaQtyj_Nc2wHBItvTQqdy9A
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
"When I despair, I remember that all through history the ways of truth and love have always won. There have been tyrants, and murderers, and for a time they can seem invincible, but in the end they always fall. Think of it--always."
Mahatma Gandhi
Mahatma Gandhi
Already debunked.JusHappy2BeHere said:DOJ policyDoc Holliday said:The legalese behind these claims are garbage.JusHappy2BeHere said:Doc Holliday said:Show me where he has broken the law.Jinx 2 said:Trump is your political pope. As long as he advances an agenda you approve of, he can do no wrong. If he flouts, skirts, obstructs or outright violates the law, you'll excuse that because you support him.Doc Holliday said:You're pushing fake news and you don't even realize it.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:"When Barr pressed Mueller on whether he thought Barr's memo to Congress was inaccurate, Mueller said he did not but felt that the media coverage of it was misinterpreting the investigation, officials said."HuMcK said:
Mueller sent two letters to Barr, and Barr intentionally sat on Mueller's executive summaries, while testifying to Congress that he did not know if Mueller approved of his 4pg "summary". These letters sure make Barr's testimony sound an awful lot like a deliberate lie to Congress.
At first the line was "if Mueller disagrees let him say so", as if Barr citing 1/3 of a single sentence written by Mueller wasn't shady enough, and now we find out that Mueller did speak up to Barr the next day after the Barr letter. When it was originally reported that Mueller's investigators took issue with the Barr letter, y'all whined about anonymous sources. Now, when Mueller actually puts his name to a letter calling Barr out, it's time to trust anonymous sources engaging in CYA maneuvers again. Funny how that works.
How many times are you going to fall for Democrat created narratives?
Mueller wanted the report to be released piecemeal to inflict the most political damage possible, since it contained no actual wrongdoing on the part of the president. This letter is pure politics.
The report was released almost two weeks ago. Very few redactions. Minimal. Only those required by law. Apparently you haven't looked at it.
If Democrats controlled the media, Hillary would be president right now. The truth is nonpartisan.
YOU CANT.
Why didn't Mueller charge?
But, but, but....I thought everything on Fox News was supposed to be immediately dismissed out of hand because that Network solely carries the water for conservatives and the GOP(?). Are you telling me Fox News is actually what they say they are ("fair and balanced")?? Stop the presses!!!!JusHappy2BeHere said:
https://news.yahoo.com/laura-ingraham-chris-wallace-fox-news-mueller-barr-020755922.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca&fbclid=IwAR3665IAzE12TpGqHaMy0_8dKX9m0_i0o1rPjaQtyj_Nc2wHBItvTQqdy9A
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
Barr (and other GOP operatives) are like the White Walkers.JusHappy2BeHere said:
https://news.yahoo.com/laura-ingraham-chris-wallace-fox-news-mueller-barr-020755922.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca&fbclid=IwAR3665IAzE12TpGqHaMy0_8dKX9m0_i0o1rPjaQtyj_Nc2wHBItvTQqdy9A
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
He may look dead, but any minute Trump will re-animate him and he'll start lurching onward, continuing the zombie apocalypse against the rule of law and congressional oversight.
No that's just your imagination.Jinx 2 said:Barr (and other GOP operatives) are like the White Walkers.JusHappy2BeHere said:
https://news.yahoo.com/laura-ingraham-chris-wallace-fox-news-mueller-barr-020755922.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca&fbclid=IwAR3665IAzE12TpGqHaMy0_8dKX9m0_i0o1rPjaQtyj_Nc2wHBItvTQqdy9A
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
He may look dead, but any minute Trump will re-animate him and he'll start lurching onward, continuing the zombie apocalypse against the rule of law and congressional oversight.
Barr is taking down Obama's criminals and there's nothing anyone can do about it.
riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
You know damn well congress is powerless here lolHuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Our version of reality is DJT is POTUS and will continue to be POTUS until 2024. He did nothing wrong after the most broad investigation into a President in HISTORY.HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Your reality CANNOT accept that.
I wish you lived in the same universe as us, Huck, where the law drives what authorities may or may not do, and the media can say what it likes but their spin does not change the reality of the matter.HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
The plain facts are that nowhere in the report does Mueller ask for charges against Trump, in fact he goes out of his way to say there is no evidence of any conspiracy or cooperation between anyone in the White House and Russia, which is the entire basis of his investigation. Mueller cites some incidents regarding behavior and statements, but again in none of them states that an indictment is recommended, appropriate, or desired. Further, Mueller's letter simply states that he wants additional information released, which is what happened when Barr released the full report, excepting redactions required by law. What's more, Mueller cooperated actively with Barr in redaction of the report, and notably, Trump at no time exercised Executive Privilege, even though he could have done so and avoided a lot of media nonsense (compare that, for example, to Obama citing Executive Privilege to prevent Congress from reviewing documents which appeared to tie Eric Holder to the criminal decisions in the Fast and Furious Scandal).
The plain fact is that there is no legal basis on which to pursue a valid indictment against either Trump or any of his appointees, and Barr's testimony is accurate and therefore legal.
Democrats may pursue Trump, Barr, or the Easter Bunny if they wish, but they will look foolish more and more for doing so.
riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
Right, and that's why I stated it cuts both ways and is ridiculous.JusHappy2BeHere said:and the GOP has gotten away with being partisan *******s for years and counted on the Democrats always being the better people and not paying it back.... At least this investigation paid for itself and put people in prison....redfish961 said:I'm not talking about Benghazi and I think that's part of the problem.JusHappy2BeHere said:But 4 years on Benghazi was money well spent and totally worthwhile?redfish961 said:To me, who cares?Osodecentx said:0.1 of 1% was redactedJinx 2 said:
That's a question for Congress. Which should have access to the full report, with no redactions.
Redacted/Unredacted, still the same conclusion.
I watched the hearing and while some asked meaningful questions aimed at gaining information, others went on a tirade ending in requests for recusals and resignation without asking any meaningful question. Instead, they chose to attack and ask the Attorney General about his thoughts and feelings.
He's the Attorney General, he's not supposed to act on thoughts or feelings.
I'm not partisan by any stretch, but geez, some of these clowns are making me turn that way.
I voted for Obama first term, and Trump for this term because of one main reason...I am part of the ABC club...Anyone but Clinton.
That being said, speaking for myself, I wish we would slow these silly hearings that go nowhere down, quit inventing costly investigations, and start putting our Government attention on real problems.
After a couple of years of this crap to get a big nothing burger pretty much pisses me off. If you can't make a determination after that period of time with all of the support one could be given, then I would have to believe, there's not enough there.
btw, the Mueller Investigation at least broke even thanks to Manafort
We always want to revert to some event in the past in order to attempt to justify the present actions. All in an effort to support ones "party", no matter what and no matter right or wrong.
That sword cuts both ways and is done by both party's supporters. It seriously impedes progress.
All one has to do is watch the hearing and it's pretty obvious who is there to get information and who is there to spend their entire allotted time to berate and insult while gaining zero information or even attempting to gain information.
A couple of Senators really stood out and it's the usual ones who are just there to bicker. Blumenthal and Hinoso (sp?) were way over the top and a disgrace.
Others like Kamala Harris and Booker actually did what they were supposed to be doing and did gain some input.
I can understand being aggressive and sometimes that is necessary, but those 2 clowns and their tactics were useless and a waste of time.
and I'm not saying this is you, but it does ring hollow when years of investigations that turned up nothing are just fine, but this one that ends in 200 indictments and or guilty pleas is a waste of time....
If Blumenthal and Hinoso were out of bounds then they may pay a price for that in the long run.... or not.... I'm guessing they did it because it plays well with their base back home and helps them get re-elected.... see GOP examples like Jordan, Olson, Ghomert, King, Grassley, Cruz, Johnson, and the Spineless Lindsey Graham....
I'm not allegiant to any party...My allegiance is to America.
Despite what has happened over the past, all I'm saying is it's a waste of time because some are more concerned with getting reelected than doing their job.
Personally, I think the 2 party system needs to go away. It is unproductive and basically a circus that leaves you right where you started in these hearings.
It irritates me that my tax dollars goes to pay someone to sit and berate and insult for their entire allotted time instead of trying to gain information and doing their job.
To me, that is a genuine waste of time and money.
That's for this Congress now or any in the future.
Doc Holliday said:Our version of reality is DJT is POTUS and will continue to be POTUS until 2024. He did nothing wrong after the most broad investigation into a President in HISTORY.HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Your reality CANNOT accept that.
Why do you constantly say such obviously stupid things? Mueller's investigation was no where near as wide ranging in scope or duration as Starr's was. The Clintons were investigated, in the 90s, for a land deal that happenned in the 70s, and eventually he was impeached for lying about an affair (Brett Kavanaugh's idea to pursue that line of inquiry, btw). Hell, neither Trump or his son (or Kushner) were even questioned in person, and Mueller never even looked into his finances despite that being the most obvious area of alleged Russian entanglement. Mueller was tough on Manafort and Stone, but he handled Trump himself with kid gloves compared to Starr.
Flynn plead guilty to trap the SPYGATE plotters. Guaranteed.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
Huck to Doc: "Why do you constantly say such obviously stupid things?"
He's just trying to communicate to you on your level, Huck.
He's just trying to communicate to you on your level, Huck.
Doc Holliday said:Flynn plead guilty to trap the SPYGATE plotters. Guaranteed.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
I'm constantly amazed at all the arm chair lawyers thinking they know more than the real thing about how the law works.
A great example of the difference between CNN and Fox.JusHappy2BeHere said:
https://news.yahoo.com/laura-ingraham-chris-wallace-fox-news-mueller-barr-020755922.html?ncid=facebook_yahoonewsf_akfmevaatca&fbclid=IwAR3665IAzE12TpGqHaMy0_8dKX9m0_i0o1rPjaQtyj_Nc2wHBItvTQqdy9A
Fox News' Chris Wallace Calls Out His Own Network's Opinion Hosts Over Barr Coverage
Fox News' Chris Wallace called out opinion hosts employed by his own network on Wednesday for "pushing a political agenda" when covering communications between special counsel Robert Mueller and Attorney General William Barr.
Correspondence between the special counsel and attorney general came into sharp focus Tuesday night after The Washington Post reported on a letter Mueller sent to Barr in March. Following Barr's release of a four-page summary to Congress about the conclusions of the special counsel's investigation, Mueller wrote that Barr's summary "did not fully capture the context, nature, and the substance" of the investigation.
"There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results" of the probe, Mueller's letter read.
Fox News opinion host Laura Ingraham downplayed the letter's significance during an appearance on the network Wednesday, focusing instead on comments Barr made about a subsequent phone call he said he had with Mueller.
The attorney general said during his opening testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Wednesday that Mueller had complained in that call about media coverage of Barr's letter, not the letter's inaccuracy.
"That's not what [Mueller] says in the letter," Wallace pointed out. "What he says in the letter is, 'You didn't reflect what we found in the report.' And there are a lot of people who having read the full report, or as much as has been not redacted agree that [Barr] didn't reveal what was fully in the report."
Wallace seemingly referenced Ingraham when he pointed to Fox News' opinion hosts for failing to acknowledge the significance of Mueller's letter to Barr.
"I know there's some people who don't think this March 27th letter is a big deal ... and some opinion people who appear on this network, who may be pushing a political agenda, but we have to deal in facts," Wallace said on Shep Smith's Fox News program Wednesday.
Wallace said the "facts" show that Mueller's letter was "a clear indication" that the special counsel was "very upset the letter that had been sent out by the attorney general and wanted it changed or at least added to."
"Those aren't opinions. That's not a political agenda. Those are the facts," he added.
Watch Wallace's comments in the video above.
Wallace was allowed to say what he wanted, without interruption, and without attack.
This would never happen on CNN.
Huck: "I'm constantly amazed at all the arm chair lawyers thinking they know more than the real thing about how the law works."
How ironic, that coming from Huck.
How ironic, that coming from Huck.
Go away troll, adults are talking. Why don't you and Florda go jerk each other off or something? That would be more productive than your last few posts here.
"Go away troll, adults are talking"
What Huck heard from his parents, teachers, peer group, colleagues, and spouse on a daily basis.
So, naturally it's his go-to line when he gets schooled.
What Huck heard from his parents, teachers, peer group, colleagues, and spouse on a daily basis.
So, naturally it's his go-to line when he gets schooled.
Here's another example of the pettiness displayed at the circus.
I watched the brief "hearing" this morning and obviously Barr no-showed.
After the hearing, one of the senators thought it would be a great idea to place a chicken figure at Barr's nameplate.
This is a grown man, not young, and a Senator. This is how he chooses to engage? What benefit is supposed to come out of that?
Some of these folks act like they are 12.
I watched the brief "hearing" this morning and obviously Barr no-showed.
After the hearing, one of the senators thought it would be a great idea to place a chicken figure at Barr's nameplate.
This is a grown man, not young, and a Senator. This is how he chooses to engage? What benefit is supposed to come out of that?
Some of these folks act like they are 12.
So bottom line. Whats the score on dem/rep arrests ?
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
When you've got nothing (which is exactly what you've got), then resort to that good ole' fall back of personal attacks - right HuMck?? Your Alinsky-ite leftist masters have indoctrinated you well.HuMcK said:
Go away troll, adults are talking. Why don't you and Florda go jerk each other off or something? That would be more productive than your last few posts here.
Someone should investigate! Oh, wait...they just did.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:
So bottom line. Whats the score on dem/rep arrests ?
Sam Lowry said:Someone should investigate! Oh, wait...they just did.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
Maybe one day y'all will actually look at and acknowledge what he found.
I see you've moved the debate. Our back and forth was about Barr's testimony and the 'summary' and what he did or did not do wrong. Once we proved you were wrong instead of admitting it or answering the question you bring up Manafort? LOL Way to change the subject.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
FYI - Barr VOLUNTEERED to appear in front of the Senate & House yesterday & today. Nadler changed the rules last minute and it's NEVER been done in that committee since Watergate - again that's how they do impeachment hearings which this was not.
Nadler threatening subpoena of someone who volunteered? LOL Of course the liberal media forgets to mention that. This is all theater and libs are biting liberal talking points hook line & sinker. I just never thought you would do that too.
Gladly:HuMcK said:Sam Lowry said:Someone should investigate! Oh, wait...they just did.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
Maybe one day y'all will actually look at and acknowledge what he found.
"The Office did not identify evidence of a connection between Manafort's sharing polling data and Russia's interference in the election, which had already been reported by U.S. media outlets at the time of the August 2 meeting. The investigation did not establish that Manafort otherwise coordinated with the Russian government on its election-interference efforts."
Johnny Bear said:When you've got nothing (which is exactly what you've got), then resort to that good ole' fall back of personal attacks - right HuMck?? Your Alinsky-ite leftist masters have indoctrinated you well.HuMcK said:
Go away troll, adults are talking. Why don't you and Florda go jerk each other off or something? That would be more productive than your last few posts here.
Where's that criticism at for Olbear? I finally responded to him after multiple trolling attempts just in this thread alone, and I'm the one getting accused of personally insulting his dumb ass. Double standards are a *****.
HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:Flynn plead guilty to trap the SPYGATE plotters. Guaranteed.HuMcK said:riflebear said:Tell me where I'm wrong?HuMcK said:riflebear said:LOL - really?HuMcK said:riflebear said:Goodness, do you all not know what's going on? Barr agreed to testify under the House chamber rules and then Nutty Nadler tried to change them last minute. Really the only time you ever have staffers do the questioning is in some impeachment proceedings which this clearly is not - but nice try pushing a false narrative...again.HuMcK said:Doc Holliday said:He's not spooked.HuMcK said:
Told y'all he was spooked by the staff counsel questioning plan. Now let's see how far this escalates.
Democrats we're being extremely disrespectful and he isn't putting up with it.
Lol sure, that must be why he balked at targeted questioning by a staff counsel instead of the usual grandstanding questions by politicians. Remember when Hillary turned down a Congressional summons during the Benghazi hearings because Republicans were "disrespectful" towards her? Oh wait no that's not right, Hillary wasn't a cowardly little btch like this administration is, so she actually sat for 11hrs of testimony.
The funniest thing I've seen today is libs say he's scared to testify? Really? After 5 hours in front of the Senate owning all the libs, he's scared?
You all lost this round so bad and the fact that liberals on the Hill are trying to lie (AGAIN) is just sad (and funny) to watch.
Move on, lets talk about Trump being a racist again. That seems to be their fall back so lets do it...
Sounds like that's exactly what Pelosi has in mind. I'd be pretty cautious too if I were Barr, he's walked himself out onto some fairly treacherous ice now.
Funny how the real liars to Congress under Obama never seemed to get this kind of treatment from Pelosi.
Barr - DID NOT LIE
Mueller - WORKED FOR & REPORTED TO BARR - who cares if he was upset w/ his boss.
Barr - DID NOT HAVE TO RELEASE ANYTHING
Do you libs realize you are complaining about something that Barr actually did for you in releasing the report? You are upset that he didn't release it 3 weeks earlier which was impossible by the way.
Game over - next fake scandal please?
I wish I lived in your version of reality, where things can just be dismissed with a confident declaration and every scandal is "fake" except the ones that target Democrats, convictions and the actual facts be damned.
Barr even asked Mueller to come review his summary and Mueller declined. Then 3 weeks later he released the entire report. This is where the press has failed the citizens. If they had an ounce of integrity and actually asked tough questions to Dems then they could be held accountable. Instead they are off in the Wild West lying daily and spreading fake news dividing the country further because they can't stand not being in the White House.
Sure, it's all just a Democrat plot to get Trump and it's all made up. I mean, it's not like Trump's campaign manager chose to stay in Federal prison over telling Mueller the truth about his election-related dealings with a Russian spy. Even Trump's sycophants would agree that's pretty suspicious behavior...right?
I'm constantly amazed at all the arm chair lawyers thinking they know more than the real thing about how the law works.
Yeah, lmao. "Please God, don't lump the evangelicals with us."