robby44 said:
Oldbear83 said:
robby44 said:
Oldbear83 said:
robby44 said:
Oldbear83 said:
robby44 said:
Florda_mike said:
Canada2017 said:
tommie said:
Canada2017 said:
tommie said:
Canada2017 said:
tommie said:
Canada2017 said:
So either Trump is crazy to risk his biggest re election asset ( the economy ) in a showdown with China.
or
Trump is patriotic enough to put his country's long term trade interests ahead of his personal political interests .
Starting to understand why so many past presidents ( of both political parties ) chose to do nothing about China's continuing trade abuses.
Or maybe he's the guy that has bankrupted multiple businesses.
If you have cash, there's about to be lots of midwestern land for sake for cheap.
Yeah that's a 3rd option.
A 70+ year old billionaire willingly accepts daily national abuse and the ever growing chance of assassination in order to make a few extra bucks .
I don't believe he's a billionaire.
Well there it is......your in-depth assessment of Trumps wealth confirms his motives are nothing but a Midwest land grab .
Actually not. My assessment is his judgement (and temperament) gets on the way of him being aWarren Buffet or a Bill Gates.
A few things stand out. He doesn't seem to have any long term relationships (partnerships). None of us can go it alone. Gates has(d) Allen. Buffet has Munger.
Trump has Trump. He's boastful. He's a superb marketer. He doesn't water other peoples lawn. He instead takes their water and feels slighted when they want compensation for it.
He churns through people and distrusts. It's impossible to build a successful enterprise that way.
It's just my sniff of the situation.
Shortcomings not withstanding......I am amazed Trump functions as well as he does with all of the abuse he takes .
If I had 1/10 of his mere millions I would be in bed with my gorgeous wife on some massive yacht off the southern coast of France and let this incredibly ignorant US electorate rot in their own juices .
^^^ Canada I would too
Trump's sacrifice isn't missed by me either
He's a decade older than me and there's no way I'd be doing what he's doing if I were him
Sacrifice?
You mean like dodging the draft
Show me where you said that about Bill Clinton, or held Obama's lack of military service against him.
I'm not knocking lack of military service I'm referring to avoiding the draft.
There was no draft for Obama's age range. Clinton got 1 college deferment not 4 plus a medical
Not what I asked.
Military service either is, or is not an essential requirement.
Which is it?
It's not a requirement to become president but it would be nice for someone who talks constantly about love of the flag and patriotism to have not been a draft dodger.
But if that is what turns you on fine
Passive-aggressive much?
If you want to play games with things which happened damn near a half-century ago, suppose Trump felt bad about his choice as a young man, and that's why he has worked so hard to avoid committing troops to senseless conflicts? Maybe that's why Trump has worked harder than either Obama or Bush or Clinton to avoid new wars and avoid expanding troop commitments.
No games sir
My uncle made the ultimate sacrifice and died defending his country. My granddad and dad put their lives on the line as well in WWII and Korea
Real patriots. Not sure what games you are referring to
I have great respect for our veterans. I simply don't forget that military service is not the only mark of a man.
You have cherry-picked an excuse to hate Trump. Fine. Right up there with hating him for his weight, his hair, or the way he talks, for reasons not to like him.
Me, I see if he does what he promised. Originalist judges, check. Strong economy, check. Wants a secure border, check.
It would be nice to be able to say Trump served in the military, but like I said, maybe that prompted Donald Trump to do some introspection as he got older, and make command decisions which don't lead to useless casualties. I am glad Obama never had to go to war, and I respect both Bushes for their service, but I like someone who thinks about the cost of a military response, and who pays that cost.