Trade war leading to recession?

22,370 Views | 253 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by Whiskey Pete
riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Along those lines:

"Wake up, Republicans. Your party stands for all the wrong things now.

By Stuart Stevens
Jan. 1, 2020 at 9:00 a.m. CST
Stuart Stevens is a writer and GOP political consultant who is working with a political action committee that backs Bill Weld for president.
Here's a question: Does anybody have any idea what the Republican Party stands for in 2020?
One way to find out: As you are out and about marking the new year, it is likely you will come across a Republican to whom you can pose the question, preferably after a drink or two, as that tends to work as truth serum: "Look, I was just wondering: What's the Republican Party all about these days? What does it, well, stand for?"

I'm betting the answer is going to involve a noun, a verb and either "socialism" or "Democrats." Republicans now partly define their party simply as an alternative to that other party, as in, "I'm a Republican because I'm not a Democrat."

In a long-forgotten era say, four years ago such a question would have elicited a very different answer. Though there was disagreement over specific issues, most Republicans would have said the party stood for some basic principles: fiscal sanity, free trade, strong on Russia, and that character and personal responsibility count. Today it's not that the Republican Party has forgotten these issues and values; instead, it actively opposes all of them.
Republicans are now officially the character doesn't count party, the personal responsibility just proves you have failed to blame the other guy party, the deficit doesn't matter party, the Russia is our ally party, and the I'm-right-and-you-are-human-scum party. Yes, it's President Trump's party now, but it stands only for what he has just tweeted.
A party without a governing theory, a higher purpose or a clear moral direction is nothing more than a cartel, a syndicate that exists only to advance itself. There is no organized, coherent purpose other than the acquisition and maintenance of power.

This is a sad fall. In Ronald Reagan's America, being born an American was to win's life lottery; in Donald Trump's America, it makes you a victim, a patsy, a chump.
Trump didn't hijack the GOP and bend it to his will. He did something far easier: He looked at the party, saw its fault lines and then offered himself as a pure distillation of accumulated white grievance and anger. He bet that Republican voters didn't really care about free trade or mutual security, or about the environment or Europe, much less deficits. He rebranded kindness and compassion as "PC" and elevated division and bigotry as the admirable goals of just being politically incorrect. Trump didn't make Americans more racist; he just normalized the resentments that were simmering in many households. In short, he let a lot of long-suppressed demons out of the box.
This paranoid element in the party has existed for decades, since the Joe McCarthy era, when some Republicans who saw dark forces threatening the country argued that only radical action by "true" Americans white, Christian, conservative could safeguard the nation. Barry Goldwater revived the theme in 1964, and George Wallace won five states with it as a third-party candidate in 1968. I worked in every Republican presidential campaign from 1996 through 2012 and assumed that those guys had long been vanquished and that optimism and inclusion had prevailed. I was wrong.

This impeachment moment and all that has led to it should signal a day of reckoning. A party that has as its sole purpose the protection and promotion of its leader, whatever he thinks, is not on a sustainable path. Can anyone force a change? I'm not optimistic. Trump won with 46.1 percent of the vote in 2016, while Mitt Romney lost with 47.2 percent in 2012; no wonder Republicans have convinced themselves that the path to victory and power lies with angry division. Having ignored the warning signs for years myself, I know the seductive lure of believing what you prefer while ignoring the obvious truth.
Which is this: We are a long way more than a half-century from 1968, much less 1952. The United States is now a diverse, chaotic collection of 330 million people, a country of immigrants and multiculturalism that is growing less white every day. It is not some gauzy Shangri-La of suburban bliss that never existed.
I'd like to say that I believe the party I spent so many years fighting for could rise to the challenge of this moment. But there have been too many lies for too long."










riflebear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
riflebear said:

Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
That article nails it.

Ask a Democrat.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
For quash to still be here posting nothingness, he has to be another getting $0.08 per post

Ole paid to post Quash!!!
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

riflebear said:

Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
That article nails it.

Ask a Democrat.
That article is pure leftist trash full of falsehoods and narratives.
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

riflebear said:

Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
That article nails it.

Ask a Democrat.
That article is pure leftist trash full of falsehoods and narratives.
Instead of a meltdown try to be specific.
Florda_mike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

riflebear said:

Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
That article nails it.

Ask a Democrat.
That article is pure leftist trash full of falsehoods and narratives.
Instead of a meltdown try to be specific.


Here's "SPECIFIC!"

YOU'RE LIBERAL TRASH MASQUERADING AS A LIBERTARIAN
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Membership in the TPP sure would be a pretty useful tool to use as leverage against China right now...

Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It violates Trumps isolationist ideology. The other North American countries are members.
I have found theres only two ways to go:
Living fast or dying slow.
I dont want to live forever.
But I will live while I'm here.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Florda_mike said:

quash said:

Doc Holliday said:

quash said:

riflebear said:

Quash. Most of that article is completely wrong about what we would say.

I'm curious though - What does the Democrat party stand for?
That article nails it.

Ask a Democrat.
That article is pure leftist trash full of falsehoods and narratives.
Instead of a meltdown try to be specific.


Here's "SPECIFIC!"

YOU'RE LIBERAL TRASH MASQUERADING AS A LIBERTARIAN
Hey, don't forget our resident liberal lifelong Republicans!
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.