There are none.midgett said:fubar said:I read/watch a variety, but NPR recently (lots of car time over the past few weeks). When at home watching, PBS and CNN mostly. In print (or online), New York Times.midgett said:fubar said:Watching Fox News equals research?Doc Holliday said:fubar said:
"
You researchers may be surprised at the report ... especially if Fox News is your primary source.
Fox News isn't my primary source but since you bring it up, who/what is your primary news source?
For the record, however, I didn't bring it up. Doc said that "millions" of people had "researched" this. When I challenged that assertion -- which is on its face preposterous -- he said that millions ... watch Fox News.
And also for the record, the report he and some others have been pimping, and waiting on with bated breath ... never mind. I don't want to spoil it for you.
Except to say that their usual backup plan is already in motion.
No doubt there are some who exaggerate on here. I missed "millions" have "researched." Ugh. We have several here on both sides that exaggerate too much.
Always love you, good brother, fubar. Just never knew you were naive to depend so much on biased sources when it comes to politics. :-)
Truth is, it's very difficult to find true political journalists without an agenda
One would think the financial press would be an island of reason, balance, if not conservative, or at least understanding and tolerant of conservative view points. But...
Arizona State and TAMU released a joint study of financial journalists last year. 4.4% self-identified as right of center. 58.5% identified as left of center.
In reality, it's worse than that. Voting patterns vary from cycle to cycle, but over time, People who describe themselves as "moderate" tend to vote left of center at about a 2 to 1 rate. So most of those self-identified "moderates" really aren't that moderate.
Progressive post-modernism owns the print media, news media, entertainment media, social media, search engines, bureaucracy, clerisy, intelligensia and (increasingly) public education. Those are the elite institutions that determine the direction and parameters of acceptable debate, and they have totally lost touch with the masses of the country, who have not only not adopted the unbearable lightness of wokeness, but are turning to reject it. Describing the "divide" in the country as a period of unusually sharp partisanship due to an unusually unpresidential POTUS doesn't just profoundly understate the magnitude of what's happening. It misses the dynamic entirely.
the political imbalance in the media wouldn't be a problem per se if they weren't working so hard to appear impartial.
https://www.dailywire.com/news/462-financial-journalists-were-asked-their-ashe-schow.
