Trump really is full of ****, isn't he?

39,851 Views | 371 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by TexasScientist
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
calling someone "Son" is just demeaning, i dont think anyone here is using it as a racist term (bit hard to do that when we dont know the race of most people we are talking to), but theres no need to refer to someone like that anyway
I'm the English Guy
Bearitto
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

calling someone "Son" is just demeaning, i dont think anyone here is using it as a racist term (bit hard to do that when we dont know the race of most people we are talking to), but theres no need to refer to someone like that anyway
Ats rowyt, Bruv.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:

bear2be2 said:

Flaming Moderate said:

D. C. Bear said:

riflebear said:




And we have a whole lot of people more pissed off at Trump's news conference/Twitter persona than the unfortunate fact that the Chinese government sought to hide the epidemic when it may have been contained and lied to the world about it when it could not.
In fairness, we have a lot more people more pissed off at people calling it "Wuhan Virus" than stopping its spread.

I would bet good money that those who call it the Wuhan Virus, Kung Flu or some other variation of the same theme are statistically more likely to spread the virus given that the partisan leanings of the former match those of the group that was telling us for weeks that COVID-19 wasn't a big deal and that everyone was just overreacting.
Many in the media and govt were telling us those things. Vox, motherjones, daily beast, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer all told us we were being xenophobic and the virus was not much worse that the flu. This virus is a bioweapon that China accidentally or purposely unleashed.
Where are those Schumer and Pelosi quotes? Your source, please?
Waco1947 ,la
Kyle
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

muddybrazos said:

bear2be2 said:

Flaming Moderate said:

D. C. Bear said:

riflebear said:




And we have a whole lot of people more pissed off at Trump's news conference/Twitter persona than the unfortunate fact that the Chinese government sought to hide the epidemic when it may have been contained and lied to the world about it when it could not.
In fairness, we have a lot more people more pissed off at people calling it "Wuhan Virus" than stopping its spread.

I would bet good money that those who call it the Wuhan Virus, Kung Flu or some other variation of the same theme are statistically more likely to spread the virus given that the partisan leanings of the former match those of the group that was telling us for weeks that COVID-19 wasn't a big deal and that everyone was just overreacting.
Many in the media and govt were telling us those things. Vox, motherjones, daily beast, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer all told us we were being xenophobic and the virus was not much worse that the flu. This virus is a bioweapon that China accidentally or purposely unleashed.
Where are those Schumer and Pelosi quotes? Your source, please?
They don't have search engine's in Russia? For someone who posts other people's thoughts as her own, I figured you would have mastered how to find stuff online.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kyle said:

Waco1947 said:

muddybrazos said:

bear2be2 said:

Flaming Moderate said:

D. C. Bear said:

riflebear said:




And we have a whole lot of people more pissed off at Trump's news conference/Twitter persona than the unfortunate fact that the Chinese government sought to hide the epidemic when it may have been contained and lied to the world about it when it could not.
In fairness, we have a lot more people more pissed off at people calling it "Wuhan Virus" than stopping its spread.

I would bet good money that those who call it the Wuhan Virus, Kung Flu or some other variation of the same theme are statistically more likely to spread the virus given that the partisan leanings of the former match those of the group that was telling us for weeks that COVID-19 wasn't a big deal and that everyone was just overreacting.
Many in the media and govt were telling us those things. Vox, motherjones, daily beast, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer all told us we were being xenophobic and the virus was not much worse that the flu. This virus is a bioweapon that China accidentally or purposely unleashed.
Where are those Schumer and Pelosi quotes? Your source, please?
They don't have search engine's in Russia? For someone who posts other people's thoughts as her own, I figured you would have mastered how to find stuff online.
You're dodging. You have nothing. And I did google it. No results. So show me the quotes
Waco1947 ,la
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Kyle said:

Waco1947 said:

muddybrazos said:

bear2be2 said:

Flaming Moderate said:

D. C. Bear said:

riflebear said:




And we have a whole lot of people more pissed off at Trump's news conference/Twitter persona than the unfortunate fact that the Chinese government sought to hide the epidemic when it may have been contained and lied to the world about it when it could not.
In fairness, we have a lot more people more pissed off at people calling it "Wuhan Virus" than stopping its spread.

I would bet good money that those who call it the Wuhan Virus, Kung Flu or some other variation of the same theme are statistically more likely to spread the virus given that the partisan leanings of the former match those of the group that was telling us for weeks that COVID-19 wasn't a big deal and that everyone was just overreacting.
Many in the media and govt were telling us those things. Vox, motherjones, daily beast, Nancy Pelosi, Chuck Schumer all told us we were being xenophobic and the virus was not much worse that the flu. This virus is a bioweapon that China accidentally or purposely unleashed.
Where are those Schumer and Pelosi quotes? Your source, please?
They don't have search engine's in Russia? For someone who posts other people's thoughts as her own, I figured you would have mastered how to find stuff online.
You're dodging. You have nothing. And I did google it. No results. So show me the quotes


Did you not hit "enter" or "return?"
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm the English Guy
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

cms186 said:



how does he keep getting away with lying so blatantly? why do so many of you just keep accepting his dishonesty? it baffles me

(this is in response to the second of the two tweets)
I always think he is and then I see posts like yours and CNN and MSNBC and I could almost, not quite, bring myself to vote for the ******* who is the only President in the last 100 years that is taking on the BS in DC.

I like him one day and hate him the next but if you think the poison spewed by our 24/7 is fair and balanced you need to return to kindergarten and start over with education.
How do you defend the President's lies?
Waco1947 ,la
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
cms186
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
and the right continues to flail about blindly, refusing to see the incompetence of those in charge
I'm the English Guy
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
and the right continues to flail about blindly, refusing to see the incompetence of those in charge
You parrot the DNC as if it was second nature to you.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
Waco1947 ,la
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?


How do you defend the slaughter of the unborn?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

That is not an answer.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

That is not an answer.
It certainly is, and better than anything I have ever seen from you, J.R.

Go back to "Dallas".
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?


How do you defend the slaughter of the unborn?
Pro choice is not the issue here. The issue is the President's lies.
Waco1947 ,la
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Waco1947 ,la
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
D. C. Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

D. C. Bear said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?


How do you defend the slaughter of the unborn?
Pro choice is not the issue here. The issue is the President's lies.



He's exercising his choice to support the president. What is the problem?
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Waco1947 ,la
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
cms186 said:



how does he keep getting away with lying so blatantly? why do so many of you just keep accepting his dishonesty? it baffles me

(this is in response to the second of the two tweets)
I believe W came up with the strategic stockpile and stocked it with supplies.

Obama used most of the strategic stockpile and did not restock it.

With that said, Trump is trying to blame anyone else for this.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
You hate the President, and cannot support that hate except by blurting absurd posts like that one.

That's not my problem, and it's not 'attacking you' to say so.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.


President Obama lied but I don't seem to remember your hatred of him.

Comes down to abortion and butt humpers does it not?
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...


waco47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
No, Fouci did not lie to the American people as The President has done. He regularly misled us; lied to us, and deflect blame. Maybe, Fouci made a misstep early on but he is a source of science and truth; the President is not.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco has nothing but hate and speaks only from that hate and of that hate.
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podium - and that is more than well documented.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podeum - and that is more than well documented.
Hey Wac47, how's it going?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podeum - and that is more than well documented.
So when the President quotes Dr. Fauci ... ?
TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podeum - and that is more than well documented.
So when the President quotes Dr. Fauci ... ?
You give him too much credit. I don't believe Trump has the mental faculty to quote someone, much less Fouci.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

That is not an answer.
It certainly is, and better than anything I have ever seen from you, J.R.

Go back to "Dallas".
Well, I kinda live here, so no need to go back.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podeum - and that is more than well documented.
So when the President quotes Dr. Fauci ... ?
You give him too much credit. I don't believe Trump has the mental faculty to quote someone, much less Fouci.
Biden doesn't have the mental acuity to even quote what's written down on paper for him
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

That is not an answer.
It certainly is, and better than anything I have ever seen from you, J.R.

Go back to "Dallas".
Well, I kinda live here, so no need to go back.

Well, that explains a lot

TexasScientist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HashTag said:

TexasScientist said:

Oldbear83 said:

TexasScientist said:

HashTag said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

Waco1947 said:

Oldbear83 said:

The OP continues to prove the malice and delusion of the Left, nothing more.
How do you defend the President's lies?
The same as you do, actually.


I am honest enough to admit the President's flaws, but you are not honest enough to credit the President's good works.

A flaw is "The President calls people names."
A lie is a moral issue -- "Anybody can get a test if they want a test." That lie is destructive. That lie raises false hope.
Your malice blinds you, Waco.


It's all you can see. All you love is hate.
The President lied. You have no defense except to attack me.
Well, if the President lied then so did Dr. Fauci and others when they said, at the beginning, that it was no big deal, including those on the democrat side like pelosi, biden, schumer, etc.... Don't forget the newspapers too...

wac47, you have a problem with only seeing what you believe.
I'm not sure about Fouci. I don't recall him being caught in a lie. Trump lies about something just about every time he steps up to a podeum - and that is more than well documented.
So when the President quotes Dr. Fauci ... ?
You give him too much credit. I don't believe Trump has the mental faculty to quote someone, much less Fouci.
Biden doesn't have the mental acuity to even quote what's written down on paper for him
Maybe. But have you watched Trump struggle to read and deliver every scripted speach he is given?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.