You literally just made that up...!?HuMcK said:
Why do you always take these Russians at face value, are you really that naive? There are legit rumors that she is why Flynn was fired by Obama, not anything having to do with Iran policy differences. I don't know if those rumors are true (he was def banging that Russian tho, and he did end up eating dinner next to Putin and Jill Stein a short time later...) but I damn sure wouldn't take her word for it.
Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
Bring the receipts.HuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
This account is hilariouscinque said:
Flynn and Trump are going to learn the same lesson at about the same time. You may get by but you won't get away.
Flynn is likely to be charged with felonies he copped to that Mueller forgave. He's nowhere close to being off the hook. And Trump...it will probably be easier deciding what not to charge him with once he is driven from office.Doc Holliday said:This account is hilariouscinque said:
Flynn and Trump are going to learn the same lesson at about the same time. You may get by but you won't get away.
Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
Good question. Maybe some polls don't say what we read from, say, ABC or CNN?cinque said:Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
Of course they do. Even Fox can't hide the truth.Oldbear83 said:Good question. Maybe some polls don't say what we read from, say, ABC or CNN?cinque said:Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
You Liberals gave a strong effort to do that in 2016, no surprise you are trying hard again.cinque said:Of course they do. Even Fox can't hide the truth.Oldbear83 said:Good question. Maybe some polls don't say what we read from, say, ABC or CNN?cinque said:Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
The polls reflect what we all know. America has had enough.Oldbear83 said:You Liberals gave a strong effort to do that in 2016, no surprise you are trying hard again.cinque said:Of course they do. Even Fox can't hide the truth.Oldbear83 said:Good question. Maybe some polls don't say what we read from, say, ABC or CNN?cinque said:Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
Keep telling yourself that. You might convince yourself.cinque said:The polls reflect what we all know. America has had enough.Oldbear83 said:You Liberals gave a strong effort to do that in 2016, no surprise you are trying hard again.cinque said:Of course they do. Even Fox can't hide the truth.Oldbear83 said:Good question. Maybe some polls don't say what we read from, say, ABC or CNN?cinque said:Why would any poll anywhere make Democrats squirm?Oldbear83 said:Nope.cinque said:Trump would trade his internal polls with the Dems in a heartbeat.Oldbear83 said:
The Left is more delusional than usual today.
Maybe their "internal polls" say a few things that worry them.
But thanks for continuing the story, it's fun to watch you guys squirm in denial.
Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
No, I got a link to a paper known to be hostile to Trump, which provided nothing in the way of proof.quash said:You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
At least you are consistent.
No, that's not how it works. You have to read the article and then point out the flaws.Oldbear83 said:No, I got a link to a paper known to be hostile to Trump, which provided nothing in the way of proof.quash said:You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
At least you are consistent.
But to speak of 'consistent', you continue to play your hypocrisy and imagine anyone buys it. Guess that's some kind of hobby for you,
No, your side made the contention, it remains your job to prove it.quash said:No, that's not how it works. You have to read the article and then point out the flaws.Oldbear83 said:No, I got a link to a paper known to be hostile to Trump, which provided nothing in the way of proof.quash said:You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
At least you are consistent.
But to speak of 'consistent', you continue to play your hypocrisy and imagine anyone buys it. Guess that's some kind of hobby for you,
Calm down. Read the article. If you see flaws point them out.Oldbear83 said:No, your side made the contention, it remains your job to prove it.quash said:No, that's not how it works. You have to read the article and then point out the flaws.Oldbear83 said:No, I got a link to a paper known to be hostile to Trump, which provided nothing in the way of proof.quash said:You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
At least you are consistent.
But to speak of 'consistent', you continue to play your hypocrisy and imagine anyone buys it. Guess that's some kind of hobby for you,
Just posting a link to someone who tells the same story is not worth the spit you spray on your screen when you post against the President.
I'm fine, boyo. Still up to you to support your claim.quash said:Calm down. Read the article. If you see flaws point them out.Oldbear83 said:No, your side made the contention, it remains your job to prove it.quash said:No, that's not how it works. You have to read the article and then point out the flaws.Oldbear83 said:No, I got a link to a paper known to be hostile to Trump, which provided nothing in the way of proof.quash said:You got what you asked for. You ignored it. And now you claim that because I called you on your hypocrisy that makes me a Progressive.Oldbear83 said:That was hardly "proof".quash said:Oldbear83 said:Translation: You don't have any proof to back up your storyHuMcK said:
All based on open source reporting and admissions by the parties...
We already knew that.
In a shocking turn of events, HuMcK posted his proof and Oldbear ignored it to banter with Cinque.
But please, continue to pretend you are not a Progressive as you side with them in all threads.
At least you are consistent.
But to speak of 'consistent', you continue to play your hypocrisy and imagine anyone buys it. Guess that's some kind of hobby for you,
Just posting a link to someone who tells the same story is not worth the spit you spray on your screen when you post against the President.
This.ScruffyD said:
Was George W Bush part of the cabal? He was president for most of the last decade.
Honestly get some help.
That's what they always do. Blame the other wide for what they did to cover it up. It's Dem politics 101.Doc Holliday said:
What they accused President Trump of is actually what they themselves did. Paying foreign countries to interfere.