Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
Mothra said:
Osodecentx said:
Mothra said:
Sam Lowry said:
ATL Bear said:
What an idiot, and who are these idiots cheering that?
The same idiots he encouraged to precipitate a coup on 1/6. Are you starting to see now?
That there is a minority of fringe nuts in the Republican Party? Is that some sort of newsflash? Each side has their crazies.
Still doesn't justify a vote that supported Biden.
!. Flynn is a Republican
2. He served as NS advisor to a Republican president
3. He advocated the violent overthrow of the US government
I'm looking for stories about Republicans denouncing Flynn's recommendation
I'm sure there are some stories out there
Actually he is a lifelong Dem, and when asked, doesn't claim to belong to a party. Look up some of his quotes on the subject.
As for no. 2, he was fired after 3 weeks on the job.
As for no. 3, that is what has been reported, but he said he never advocated for that position. Let me ask you a question: Do you think it's possible that the media might have twisted Flynn's words to mean something he did not?
As for your last point, tell me, what good does it serve to denounce the painfully obvious? Should Republicans give credence to a fringe, discredited figure based on comments at a tiny rally in Dallas? Flynn has never been elected to any position. He has no power.
It serves no good purpose whatsoever to denounce Flynn other than to give the Dems another talking point.
Oh no, not another Dem talking point! Never mind a little sedition then...sorry for interrupting.
You still haven't answered my question, chicken little. Do the vast majority of Repubs agree with sedition or not?
I don't know. Why does it matter? I doubt the vast majority of Dems agree with burning down cities, but that doesn't mean they won't turn a blind eye. Don't want to give the GOP a talking point, after all.
Playing dumb again? When you proffer that Republicans must "own" statements of the crazy fringe elements of the party, it suggests that you believe a good percentage of them hold those positions. Otherwise, why suggest that a party "own" the views of its fringe elements?
Thus, I was curious if that's what you truly believed. Apparently, you are afraid to give an honest answer or simply or can't answer the question. Thus, your position that Republicans must "own" Flynn's views remains absurd.
As for your comparison to Dems and the BLM riots, when a large number of Republicans come out in support of Flynn's comments and even fund sedition efforts, then your comparison might be an apt one. Until then, it likewise is absurd.