Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
GrowlTowel said:quash said:BearFan33 said:Sam Lowry said:Trump is obviously still an influence, both from his words while in office and from his hints about the future.BearFan33 said:There is no trump propaganda. He has been deplatformed. There are only media outlets reporting all sorts of versions of what happened and who was responsible. I have shared links on this board which provides evidence of the fbi's involvement in the "insurrection." It mirrors their involvement in Whitmer "kidnap" plot where the majority of the participants were on the fbi payroll in a classic entrapment scheme. If this was the greatest threat to our democracy why didn't they stop it? Isn't that what they are supposed to do? Why did they participate?Sam Lowry said:What I feel is not hate but deep disappointment. Every time Democrats further debase themselves, Republicans say "hold my beer." I voted with MAGA before realizing there was no line some of you wouldn't cross (I don't necessarily mean you; in general I think you're one of the saner ones here, but you're too invested in Trump's propaganda).Doc Holliday said:Then you agree with our President that it's the worst attack since the civil war?Sam Lowry said:I'm not minimizing the race riots. They were atrocious, and I've said so many times. But that's $2 billion over the better part of a year. MAGA cost the government $30 million-plus in just a few hours.Doc Holliday said:2020 BLM / Racial based rioting: $2 Billion in damage. 34 dead, some of those children. Not the first year this happened.Sam Lowry said:Sure it is. This board completely lost it every time someone called the BLM protests peaceful, even though they mostly were. Now you're doing the same thing. I point out MAGA misbehavior, you distract with "but but look at all those other people who weren't violent."GrowlTowel said:Sam Lowry said:That's the exact same spin the media put on the "fiery but mostly peaceful" protests.Doc Holliday said:99% of what transpired on J6 looks like that video.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove. No one should expect to get the whole truth of the event from 1-2 minutes of video.
It isn't and you know it.
J6: MAGA team member killed. Minimal damage. Mostly peaceful.
It's not the same. The treatment isn't the same either. Our VP helped nonprofits get millions to post bail for BLM rioters who were jailed. She wants J6 trespassers jailed for life.
If so, why not have these people jailed for life?
You have a deep hatred for MAGA and growing love for neoliberal narratives. I hope I never wake up to find myself repeating the talking points of the DC establishment.
It's sad, but once you accept that our DOJ and FBI have become partisan agents who are not trustworthy, things become easier to understand. Even more concerning, it appears our military leadership is on the same path.
It's become routine for right-wingers to cry "false flag." I haven't seen evidence that 1/6 was such an operation.
Sit in a dark closet, put fingers in ears, close eyes and continue to repeat "There is no evidence". I have posted some several times on this site. You can choose to ignore it at your own peril. The threat to our republic is not from the "insurrection," it's from corrupt law enforcement agencies and media. Both of which have cast their lot with the Democratic Party.
Gee, if only that evidence had been presented in one of the dozens and dozens of court challenges...
How many actually held evidentiary hearings?
BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Dallas man who threatened 'traitors' after Capitol riot is set to be first North Texan sentencedquash said:ATL Bear said:I'm asking you to explain your fantastical projections on what never happened.quash said:ATL Bear said:Yeah, I guess if they stuck to the court system to do the same thing we'd call it a legal insurrection.quash said:ATL Bear said:How were they going to overturn it? Disrupt it? Sure. How would any one of them overturn it?quash said:fadskier said:
Words vs. actions...alot of people spout stuff but very few act on it. These people ended up breaking in and taking pictures.
I cannot get over the way so many of you completely disregard the reason for the breaking in: to overturn the results of a valid presidential election. I guess if you take selfies then the intent just disappears...
Beats me, I wasn't part of group that wanted to stop the steal and arrest the VP. I just know that was their expressed intent.
Whether the "how" was substantive or just flat goofy really doesn't matter: they broke in to stop the working of the valid electoral process in a presidential election so that their guy would be kept in office.
And how would someone with no legal authority to arrest, arrest the VP? C'mon, we've projected way too much on this. They interrupted a procedural ceremony because yes, they wanted their guy to stay in the position. Guess what, there are hundreds of thousands who still want that.
Are you asking me to make sense of what nutjobs think?
I am still gobsmacked by the way you guys break your backs to bend over the obvious. This wasn't an attempt to interrupt a ceremony.
Troy Smocks sez Hi.
Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
The "evidence" from Revolver is literally nothing but speculation. It doesn't resemble investigative journalism in any way.BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
Most of the time I roll my eyes at these types of things, but the fed's involvement in catalyzing the fake Gretchen Whitmer conspiracy makes this seem not completely crazy.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
Separating evidence from conjecture is no more an ideological exercise than tossing bad apples from a bushel basket.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
Sam Lowry said:Separating evidence from conjecture is no more an ideological exercise than tossing bad apples from a bushel basket.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
Here's a hypothetical statement from your link, as it would have appeared in an investigative article: "Ray Epps was thus among the very first people to instigate the January 6 riot. In the video above, he is working with a man identified by multiple sources as John Doe, an FBI agent."
Here's the statement as it actually appears in the link: "Ray Epps was thus among the very first people to instigate the January 6 riot. In the video above, he is working with a clean-cut, athletic young man who also fits the profile of a federal agent."
The first statement is evidence. The second is speculation. Everything in your link, the Carlson video, and what I've seen from Revolver falls in the second category. Even Tucker admits several times that he has no idea what the truth is.
You are nitpicking at reasons to ignore this information. I suppose that might be because you dont like the conclusions or the implications of their work make you uncomfortable. Maybe its something else. The implications of their work sure as hell make me feel uncomfortable.
All I ask is you look at all the work they put in and tell me how it doesn't fit the category of investigative journalism. They included their methods and findings. They also backed it up with Wray's squirmy testimony among other things. After you have done this and still feel its shoddy work with wild speculations than so be it.
BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
It would strengthen you position if you could point out 'conspiracies" that have been proven true.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
What you have there isn't investigative work. It's a list of suspicions that someone put together while surfing the internet. It's like what an actual reporter would pitch in hopes of beginning an actual investigation, not what they would publish as the result.BearFan33 said:Sam Lowry said:Separating evidence from conjecture is no more an ideological exercise than tossing bad apples from a bushel basket.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
Here's a hypothetical statement from your link, as it would have appeared in an investigative article: "Ray Epps was thus among the very first people to instigate the January 6 riot. In the video above, he is working with a man identified by multiple sources as John Doe, an FBI agent."
Here's the statement as it actually appears in the link: "Ray Epps was thus among the very first people to instigate the January 6 riot. In the video above, he is working with a clean-cut, athletic young man who also fits the profile of a federal agent."
The first statement is evidence. The second is speculation. Everything in your link, the Carlson video, and what I've seen from Revolver falls in the second category. Even Tucker admits several times that he has no idea what the truth is.
You are nitpicking at reasons to ignore this information. I suppose that might be because you dont like the conclusions or the implications of their work make you uncomfortable. Maybe its something else. The implications of their work sure as hell make me feel uncomfortable.
All I ask is you look at all the work they put in and tell me how it doesn't fit the category of investigative journalism. They included their methods and findings. They also backed it up with Wray's squirmy testimony among other things. After you have done this and still feel its shoddy work with wild speculations than so be it.
Sam Lowry said:The "evidence" from Revolver is literally nothing but speculation. It doesn't resemble investigative journalism in any way.BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
spoken like an abulance chaserquash said:GrowlTowel said:quash said:BearFan33 said:Sam Lowry said:Trump is obviously still an influence, both from his words while in office and from his hints about the future.BearFan33 said:There is no trump propaganda. He has been deplatformed. There are only media outlets reporting all sorts of versions of what happened and who was responsible. I have shared links on this board which provides evidence of the fbi's involvement in the "insurrection." It mirrors their involvement in Whitmer "kidnap" plot where the majority of the participants were on the fbi payroll in a classic entrapment scheme. If this was the greatest threat to our democracy why didn't they stop it? Isn't that what they are supposed to do? Why did they participate?Sam Lowry said:What I feel is not hate but deep disappointment. Every time Democrats further debase themselves, Republicans say "hold my beer." I voted with MAGA before realizing there was no line some of you wouldn't cross (I don't necessarily mean you; in general I think you're one of the saner ones here, but you're too invested in Trump's propaganda).Doc Holliday said:Then you agree with our President that it's the worst attack since the civil war?Sam Lowry said:I'm not minimizing the race riots. They were atrocious, and I've said so many times. But that's $2 billion over the better part of a year. MAGA cost the government $30 million-plus in just a few hours.Doc Holliday said:2020 BLM / Racial based rioting: $2 Billion in damage. 34 dead, some of those children. Not the first year this happened.Sam Lowry said:Sure it is. This board completely lost it every time someone called the BLM protests peaceful, even though they mostly were. Now you're doing the same thing. I point out MAGA misbehavior, you distract with "but but look at all those other people who weren't violent."GrowlTowel said:Sam Lowry said:That's the exact same spin the media put on the "fiery but mostly peaceful" protests.Doc Holliday said:99% of what transpired on J6 looks like that video.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove. No one should expect to get the whole truth of the event from 1-2 minutes of video.
It isn't and you know it.
J6: MAGA team member killed. Minimal damage. Mostly peaceful.
It's not the same. The treatment isn't the same either. Our VP helped nonprofits get millions to post bail for BLM rioters who were jailed. She wants J6 trespassers jailed for life.
If so, why not have these people jailed for life?
You have a deep hatred for MAGA and growing love for neoliberal narratives. I hope I never wake up to find myself repeating the talking points of the DC establishment.
It's sad, but once you accept that our DOJ and FBI have become partisan agents who are not trustworthy, things become easier to understand. Even more concerning, it appears our military leadership is on the same path.
It's become routine for right-wingers to cry "false flag." I haven't seen evidence that 1/6 was such an operation.
Sit in a dark closet, put fingers in ears, close eyes and continue to repeat "There is no evidence". I have posted some several times on this site. You can choose to ignore it at your own peril. The threat to our republic is not from the "insurrection," it's from corrupt law enforcement agencies and media. Both of which have cast their lot with the Democratic Party.
Gee, if only that evidence had been presented in one of the dozens and dozens of court challenges...
How many actually held evidentiary hearings?
All of them that had standing.
And when you watch all the footage of Ray Epps trying to incite the crowd on the 5th and directing people to break through the barricades on the 6th it's obvious this was a coordinated planned thing. If he wasn't controlled by the feds he would be locked up in solitary with the rest of the selfie boomers.Harrison Bergeron said:Most of the time I roll my eyes at these types of things, but the fed's involvement in catalyzing the fake Gretchen Whitmer conspiracy makes this seem not completely crazy.BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
4th and Inches said:spoken like an abulance chaserquash said:GrowlTowel said:quash said:BearFan33 said:Sam Lowry said:Trump is obviously still an influence, both from his words while in office and from his hints about the future.BearFan33 said:There is no trump propaganda. He has been deplatformed. There are only media outlets reporting all sorts of versions of what happened and who was responsible. I have shared links on this board which provides evidence of the fbi's involvement in the "insurrection." It mirrors their involvement in Whitmer "kidnap" plot where the majority of the participants were on the fbi payroll in a classic entrapment scheme. If this was the greatest threat to our democracy why didn't they stop it? Isn't that what they are supposed to do? Why did they participate?Sam Lowry said:What I feel is not hate but deep disappointment. Every time Democrats further debase themselves, Republicans say "hold my beer." I voted with MAGA before realizing there was no line some of you wouldn't cross (I don't necessarily mean you; in general I think you're one of the saner ones here, but you're too invested in Trump's propaganda).Doc Holliday said:Then you agree with our President that it's the worst attack since the civil war?Sam Lowry said:I'm not minimizing the race riots. They were atrocious, and I've said so many times. But that's $2 billion over the better part of a year. MAGA cost the government $30 million-plus in just a few hours.Doc Holliday said:2020 BLM / Racial based rioting: $2 Billion in damage. 34 dead, some of those children. Not the first year this happened.Sam Lowry said:Sure it is. This board completely lost it every time someone called the BLM protests peaceful, even though they mostly were. Now you're doing the same thing. I point out MAGA misbehavior, you distract with "but but look at all those other people who weren't violent."GrowlTowel said:Sam Lowry said:That's the exact same spin the media put on the "fiery but mostly peaceful" protests.Doc Holliday said:99% of what transpired on J6 looks like that video.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove. No one should expect to get the whole truth of the event from 1-2 minutes of video.
It isn't and you know it.
J6: MAGA team member killed. Minimal damage. Mostly peaceful.
It's not the same. The treatment isn't the same either. Our VP helped nonprofits get millions to post bail for BLM rioters who were jailed. She wants J6 trespassers jailed for life.
If so, why not have these people jailed for life?
You have a deep hatred for MAGA and growing love for neoliberal narratives. I hope I never wake up to find myself repeating the talking points of the DC establishment.
It's sad, but once you accept that our DOJ and FBI have become partisan agents who are not trustworthy, things become easier to understand. Even more concerning, it appears our military leadership is on the same path.
It's become routine for right-wingers to cry "false flag." I haven't seen evidence that 1/6 was such an operation.
Sit in a dark closet, put fingers in ears, close eyes and continue to repeat "There is no evidence". I have posted some several times on this site. You can choose to ignore it at your own peril. The threat to our republic is not from the "insurrection," it's from corrupt law enforcement agencies and media. Both of which have cast their lot with the Democratic Party.
Gee, if only that evidence had been presented in one of the dozens and dozens of court challenges...
How many actually held evidentiary hearings?
All of them that had standing.
quash said:BearFan33 said:I guess you and Sam get to decide what is "investigative journalism" and what is a conspiracy site.quash said:BearFan33 said:quash said:BearFan33 said:I've been posting the revolver pieces here but some people don't see it as evidence as it's not being discussed in a courtroom somewhere. There are a number of very troubling parallels to the whitmer kidnap plot (which was a classic entrapment scheme done for political purposes).Jack Bauer said:
The insurrection was instigated by Feds...??Must Watch!@DarrenJBeattie Joins Tucker Carlson To Discuss Today’s Bombshell Revolver News Investigative Piece On 1/6
— The Columbia Bugle 🇺🇸 (@ColumbiaBugle) October 26, 2021
Who Is Ray Epps? https://t.co/6bbWmMWKxX pic.twitter.com/00LO9LS2OV
Here's why courtrooms matter. Unlike chat boards, evidence in a courtroom is subject to rules of evidence. Additionally, opposing parties get a chance to rebut them in the same forum.
Here's why actual investigative journalism matters. Sometimes investigative journalists discover things that were covered up by a corrupt law enforcement agency or other governmental entity which leads to prosecutions of said criminals. You dismiss all of what has been provided because it hasn't been vetted in courtroom. Yet you seem to hold beliefs regarding the "insurrection" on media speculation and information not held to that standard.
I would distinguish between investigative journalism and conspiracy sites.
The funny thing is that just about everything the left labels as a "conspiracy" winds up being true.
Yes. Me. Sam. You. Everybody else. We all get to engage our minds to whatever degree makes us happy.
I decided Pizzagate was a conspiracy; did I miss where that ended up being true? Same for the elite pedophile cabal promulgated by Q and crumb folk on this site.
Has Covid been proven to be a hoax? Was it actually caused by 5G? Or was it that the vaccine contained a 5G chip?
Was the Uri snow really fake?
Jewish space lasers?
The election was stolen?
more like the 95% of lawyers, give the other 5% a bad name..quash said:4th and Inches said:spoken like an abulance chaserquash said:GrowlTowel said:quash said:BearFan33 said:Sam Lowry said:Trump is obviously still an influence, both from his words while in office and from his hints about the future.BearFan33 said:There is no trump propaganda. He has been deplatformed. There are only media outlets reporting all sorts of versions of what happened and who was responsible. I have shared links on this board which provides evidence of the fbi's involvement in the "insurrection." It mirrors their involvement in Whitmer "kidnap" plot where the majority of the participants were on the fbi payroll in a classic entrapment scheme. If this was the greatest threat to our democracy why didn't they stop it? Isn't that what they are supposed to do? Why did they participate?Sam Lowry said:What I feel is not hate but deep disappointment. Every time Democrats further debase themselves, Republicans say "hold my beer." I voted with MAGA before realizing there was no line some of you wouldn't cross (I don't necessarily mean you; in general I think you're one of the saner ones here, but you're too invested in Trump's propaganda).Doc Holliday said:Then you agree with our President that it's the worst attack since the civil war?Sam Lowry said:I'm not minimizing the race riots. They were atrocious, and I've said so many times. But that's $2 billion over the better part of a year. MAGA cost the government $30 million-plus in just a few hours.Doc Holliday said:2020 BLM / Racial based rioting: $2 Billion in damage. 34 dead, some of those children. Not the first year this happened.Sam Lowry said:Sure it is. This board completely lost it every time someone called the BLM protests peaceful, even though they mostly were. Now you're doing the same thing. I point out MAGA misbehavior, you distract with "but but look at all those other people who weren't violent."GrowlTowel said:Sam Lowry said:That's the exact same spin the media put on the "fiery but mostly peaceful" protests.Doc Holliday said:99% of what transpired on J6 looks like that video.Sam Lowry said:
I'm not sure what that's supposed to prove. No one should expect to get the whole truth of the event from 1-2 minutes of video.
It isn't and you know it.
J6: MAGA team member killed. Minimal damage. Mostly peaceful.
It's not the same. The treatment isn't the same either. Our VP helped nonprofits get millions to post bail for BLM rioters who were jailed. She wants J6 trespassers jailed for life.
If so, why not have these people jailed for life?
You have a deep hatred for MAGA and growing love for neoliberal narratives. I hope I never wake up to find myself repeating the talking points of the DC establishment.
It's sad, but once you accept that our DOJ and FBI have become partisan agents who are not trustworthy, things become easier to understand. Even more concerning, it appears our military leadership is on the same path.
It's become routine for right-wingers to cry "false flag." I haven't seen evidence that 1/6 was such an operation.
Sit in a dark closet, put fingers in ears, close eyes and continue to repeat "There is no evidence". I have posted some several times on this site. You can choose to ignore it at your own peril. The threat to our republic is not from the "insurrection," it's from corrupt law enforcement agencies and media. Both of which have cast their lot with the Democratic Party.
Gee, if only that evidence had been presented in one of the dozens and dozens of court challenges...
How many actually held evidentiary hearings?
All of them that had standing.
Now tell the one about sharks and professional courtesy.