PartyBear said:
I realize USC thinks they can get whomever they want, or that whomever they get will bring back the glory similar to all blue bloods see Texas post DKR and post Brown. BTW I am not saying that Trojanmoondoggie is this way. I do not see who U.S.C. would turn to actually if they fired Riley today that would not be underwhelming to their partisans. Maybe they think they could get Lashlee from SMU? I wouldn't be so sure of that though.
But I had heard as well that the sanctions give at least the fan base the view that they have an opening to make a change. As is the case everywhere though the fan base's thinking doesnt mean making a change has even seriously crossed the mind of the USC administration.
No, I wouldn't say I am one who believes we can get anyone we want.
We already went through this in the early 2000s when Hackett had to go, and we didn't exactly have coaches living up for the job.
We struck gold with CPC, but I remember a lot of fans who weren't totally enamored by the choice.
Then came Kiffin and Sark. And there were fans who weren't overly enamored by these two either.
It think when Sark came down from Washington they were calling him 7 win Sark. And USC wanted more.
So, I don't believe that SC could just drop CLR and get whoever we want.
USC is not an easy place to coach, and a lot of coaches don't want any part of it.
I think we're stuck with him for a while. I just hope he can turn things around.
Just like BU, SC had some close losses. If things swing just a bit the other way, or if CLR makes calls to close out the game that solidify and hold the lead, our record might look a lot better. We only lost to #3 PSU by 3 points. And we were holding with ND for quite a long time. And there was no reason for losing to Maryland or Minnesota. And we even kept it close with Michigan.
Coach took a lot of grief though for his play calling in games that could have been won.
The concern is the lack of improvement in much of that play calling as the season progressed.