drahthaar said:
FLBear5630 said:
Golden Helmet said:
Ridiculous
Being paid $18M to go away says it all.
A regent who voted not to terminate told me "that man did nothing wrong, but those in positions of power would sell their own mothers down the river to protect the image and reputation of that college"
That's exactly what they did and they ruined a man's life in the process.
He did nothing wrong? No counter suit? Did he sue for defamation or slander? As you said, he can't get a job. Pretty much destroyed his career worth more than 18M. What was the outcome of Briles rebuttal and countersuits? I live in FL, so it was not really covered here like in Texas.
Lawyers made it go away.
Press and PR made Briles radioactive…not employable.
So he was innocent, wronged, it was provable and couldn't get a day in court?
Did he win? Did he lose? Accept a payoff? What does "Lawyers made it go away" mean?
You guys are making it sound like he, the BOR (willing to tell people on this site he did nothing wrong) and the Alumni all knew he did nothing wrong but there was no recourse?
Or, was it yours and those that know's opinion he did nothing wrong? I have seen a lot of lawyers, they can' just "make things go away without both side agreeing. You guys keep bring this up? How did Briles push back when he was wronged? Like I said, we didn't get much coverage. Just know what was reported and there were prosecutions.