Baylor v Auburn game thread (for the poors)

70,774 Views | 1006 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by boognish_bear
Big12Fan2024
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OL surprised me. Exceeded my expectations because I thought they would get dominated and they didn't. Receiving corp is gonna be good, particularly Freeman. Not sure how to assess Lagway because he looked really good to start and then the ankle injury happened. Even then he had some good zip throws, which had to be tough pushing off that ankle. Gotta improve greatly on his soft touch passes but maybe that was ankle related? Main thing that worries me with him is the same thing since I saw him in high school -- turnover prone and not the greatest field vision. We have a really good power runner with great field vision and the ability to make tacklers miss (Pendergrass). What I don't see is any back with an explosively quick first step that could break one.

Defense? I give you a standing ovation. For the first time since Rhule's guys departed I saw players in position for almost the entire game to make plays and good coaching usually does that. Thank you, Klanderman and staff.

No moral victories, but we did look like the better team for most of that game, which I hope bodes well for Big 12 play.
JudgeBear1845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The good news is that this defense will keep us in games this season. As long as Dave's decisions, Spav's play calling, or offense's execution doesn't **** it up
Baylorbears111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso said:

davesburgerbarn said:

I don't think that Auburn is any good. It's going to be a long season. Ready for the next coach.
I disagree. Auburn is a legit NC threat this season.


And their QB last year was on the Heisman shortlist after an all timer against Baylor before people realized Baylor sucked.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

El Oso said:

Go for 2 if we score a td? I say yes. Defense is done. And that's not their fault.

Even after seeing the result, going for 2 was the right call.

D was gassed.

More importantly, Lagway's foot limited what he could do.
AC/DC
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Tenacious D said:

I was impressed with the defense overall, the OL actually handled themselves well or at least exceeded my expectations, some fun pieces to the offense (hello Freeman) that make some game exciting to watch this season.

Run Pendergrass as your RB1 and bring in the others to spell at times on a drive but he needs to the primary all the way.




Freeman… Baylor's Julian Edelman.
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DJ should not play next weekend. Period.
TechDawgMc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso said:

Karab said:

canoso said:

davesburgerbarn said:

I don't think that Auburn is any good. It's going to be a long season. Ready for the next coach.

I disagree. Auburn is a legit NC threat this season.

Lol, you can't be serious. They won't even make the CFP

Went right over your head, didn't it?

Sometimes it's not obvious what is sarcasm here. Glad to know that one was.
El Oso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We lose ot. Going for two was the right call. Decent play call. They stopped it.
Danielsjackson114
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You should see the dumb shyt FLunaticbear posts on the political
Board

He loves baylors DEI and Wokeness
oldbear69
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

oldbear69 said:

sOS,,, look for ways to lose …. Snatch defeat out of jaws of victory,,, will be lucky to win 3/4 games , better find qb this guy is done as in well done ….


Do you ever get sick of being wrong?


never wrong when it comes to aranda looking for ways to
lose … where have u been , newbie??

Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

El Oso said:

Go for 2 if we score a td? I say yes. Defense is done. And that's not their fault.

Even after seeing the result, going for 2 was the right call.

D was gassed.

And their D wasn't?
Youre a clown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dave is not a winner. In the most literal sense, he's just not somebody that wins close games. I know Auburn gets the benefit of the doubt for being in the SEC, but they are not a good team. Positive takeaway is that we look improved from last year, but our schedule is also tougher. Methinks we can probably pull out six wins with a bit of injury luck. That of course will be enough to bring David back….
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DJ's stat line:

27 for 54 for 50%, 333 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

It was kind of a Jeckyl/Hyde performance. Having a bum ankle didn't help.
Youre a clown
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And a bad fumble to boot
GoldenBear007
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aranda's analytics decision making throughout, cost us this game.
TechDawgMc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A few thoughts

First -- those announcers were just not good. They got so many things wrong you'd think we were listening to John Morris.

Positives:
* Defensive play was much better
* One thing that got almost no mention -- we clearly were getting great results from the defensive backs. Several of those sacks/scrambles were clearly coverage sacks. The QB had a lot of time before the pocket collapsed. Plus, they got three INTs
* Lagway shows quality leadership and can make some good throws.
* We do have at least one stud receiver.

Negatives:
* not sure we can trust the FG kicker
* I don't hate all of Dave's gambling, but when you're down 10-7 late in the 3rd, you kick the dang FG. I'm surprised we came back from that.
* Lagway continues to seem injury prone. And needs to develop better touch on short throws
* Ultimately, I just don't trust Dave's coaching

While I don't think Auburn is all that good, they are better than a lot of the teams we play this year. I just don't want to have a mediocre season and keep the dude.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A positive...team discipline was good...especially being first game of the year.

Only 5 penalties for 40 yards.
Big12Fan2024
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

A positive...team discipline was good...especially being first game of the year.

Only 5 penalties for 40 yards.

Yes, I'm exaggerating, but it seems like we used to get that many defensive PI's in one drive.
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I must say I like winning by 1 much more than losing by 1.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Big12Fan2024 said:

No issue with going for 2. Still have a huge issue with not trying the FG earlier at 10-7.

Did you see the first FG attempt? It's hard to have any confidence in a kicker booting the greatest screwballs you've ever seen.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Oso said:

No excuses. No moral victories. We aren't good, but we're better than last year.

This is really the issue. We're well past the point of moral victories being acceptable.

I saw lots of things from this team that encouraged me, but at the end of the day an L is an L. And now we've got to win basically every toss-up in Big 12 play.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
greggor25 said:

Aranda experiment if we take the 3 points in first half we win the game.

"Taking the three points" requires your kicker to make those with enough regularity to inspire confidence.

Apparently, he was a disaster in camp, and his first attempt today certainly bolstered that perception.
Delmar 2.0
How long do you want to ignore this user?
El Oso said:

Delmar 2.0 said:

Baylor def doesn't look like a 2 or 3 win team like the consensus on this board thinks


Im sorry. How many games are we going to win scoring zero points?


They didn't score 0 points. Offense moved the ball easily most of the game, defense looked tremendously improved over last year, and they showed much better than all the haters told us all summer they would. I stand by my assessment, the BU team I watched today looked much better than a 2or 3 win team.
I ain't quite as dumb as I seem
-- (P.C. 1974)
Karab
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

DJ's stat line:

27 for 54 for 50%, 333 yards, 2 TDs, 1 INT

It was kind of a Jeckyl/Hyde performance. Having a bum ankle didn't help.

Don't forget injuring himself and fumbling.

This is exactly what UF warned us about:
1) Injury Prone
2) Shows flashes of greatness
3) Makes horrible decisions that negate the greatness

The Lagway experience.

Hope he gets better throughout the year.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I know the throw did not help...but that was a great tackle

Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?

A lot of stuff looked better. Some of it looked similar to what we've become used to.

But it's the first game against an opponent that we don't even know whether they are actually good or not. I think they had the same record as Baylor last season, starting over with a new head coach and a lot of turnover.

We still don't know that much, other than the defense looked far more competent, and elements of the offense were encouraging.

Too many questions still left to be answered.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
Big12Fan2024
How long do you want to ignore this user?
bear2be2 said:

Big12Fan2024 said:

No issue with going for 2. Still have a huge issue with not trying the FG earlier at 10-7.

Did you see the first FG attempt? It's hard to have any confidence in a kicker booting the greatest screwballs you've ever seen.

No doubt that was dog ugly but if you're ready to give up on your FG kicker as a coach in the 1st game of the year because he missed his first attempt then you should fire whoever is responsible for the kicking game and consider firing yourself as head coach because it implies the position was completely misassessed and the talent level misevaluated at that position in both Spring practice and a month of pre-season practices. It's difficult for me to believe the kid shanked every FG in practice and yet we put him in the game as our FG kicker. Surely if he was that undependable in practice and we had no confidence in him, we would have gone with someone else.

EDITED TO ADD: Just saw your other post that said he was a disaster in camp. Didn't know that. That explains a lot more, but although I know we lost Hawkins to Ohio St unexpectedly surely there was someone who could have competed with him in preseason practices? I guess not if that's who we rolled out. Yikes.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
canoso said:

davesburgerbarn said:

I don't think that Auburn is any good. It's going to be a long season. Ready for the next coach.

I disagree. Auburn is a legit NC threat this season.

I think Auburn is a pretty mediocre SEC team. But mediocre SEC teams recruit at a much higher level than we do. So I do find it encouraging that we didn't lose the physical battle to the same degree today that we did last year.

Today's game was a matchup of equals. They just made one more play than we did.
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TechDawgMc said:

JudgeBear1845 said:

That would have been a TD 9 out of 10 times...it was the right call to go for it. Not the highest level of execution. Klopf would have walked in if that ball was out in front of him.

Ironic how DJ will laser some really tough, NFL level throws but seems to struggle with short throws.

That's what I noticed a lot. Tough throws he made a lot of good throws. Short tosses were often terrible. Maybe that's partly about his foot, but his easy touch passes were just not good.

His touch throws leave much to be desired. But he's got a lot of tools, and he showed a lot of grit today. Hopefully he'll stay healthy and continue to improve the more experience he gains in this offense.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really expected today to be an embarrassing loss. At least we delivered a solid game in a game with a national audience... instead of a big face plant.

Baylorbears111
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Dia del DougO said:


A lot of stuff looked better. Some of it looked similar to what we've become used to.

But it's the first game against an opponent that we don't even know whether they are actually good or not. I think they had the same record as Baylor last season, starting over with a new head coach and a lot of turnover.

We still don't know that much, other than the defense looked far more competent, and elements of the offense were encouraging.

Too many questions still left to be answered.


Why do we have questions in Year 8?
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BUwolverine2012 said:

Aranda loses games by not taking the easy points.

Easy points aren't easy points when you don't have a kicker. If Hawkins was still on our roster, we would have taken more field goals today.
Dia del DougO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Baylorbears111 said:

Dia del DougO said:


A lot of stuff looked better. Some of it looked similar to what we've become used to.

But it's the first game against an opponent that we don't even know whether they are actually good or not. I think they had the same record as Baylor last season, starting over with a new head coach and a lot of turnover.

We still don't know that much, other than the defense looked far more competent, and elements of the offense were encouraging.

Too many questions still left to be answered.


Why do we have questions in Year 8?

That's a good question.
"The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else when you're uncool."
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.