Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

I suppose that is why they invented bitcoin!

jumpinjoe said:

---

Have you ever been raped? I guess you need to be raped to know why.

---

Nope but I've see innocent men get their names tarnished by false accusations.

jumpinjoe said:

---

Have you ever been raped? I guess you need to be raped to know why.

---

I'd i was raped and my story was true and the perpetrator had sex with me while I was clearly telling him no and the school did nothing I would sue them immediately I would not wait 10 years or even after the school released a report to make my claim, because the facts and the truth would be in my side

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

Sam U was railroaded by the extremely corrupt McLennan County District Attorney Abel Reyna. He directed his ADA co-conspirators Hilary Laborde and Robbie Moody to intentionally mislead the jury as to the content of cell phone evidence that was excluded from the trial. These three people should be considered persona non grata in the city of Waco.

This is not a one-off incident of corruption by Abel Reyna, but one of many, many examples that have surfaced in the Waco media in recent years. And this is an election year, with the primary in March and the general election in November. So it you folks that live in Waco / McLennan County don't take matters into your own hands and support a credible challenger through your actions and campaign donations, then you can expect more of the same in the future, and you'll have no one to blame but yourselves.

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

---

I don't believe they overturned his conviction. The case would be sitting back in Waco District Court most likely with the DA making his next move on the case.
Once they didn't object, it makes it really difficult on appeal.
Is the criminal court of appeals made up of former DAs? I cannot see it being made up of fair minded defense attorneys.

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

---

I don't believe they overturned his conviction. The case would be sitting back in Waco District Court most likely with the DA making his next move on the case.
Once they didn't object, it makes it really difficult on appeal.
Is the criminal court of appeals made up of former DAs? I cannot see it being made up of fair minded defense attorneys.

---

(See Gunny's post below)

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

---

I don't believe they overturned his conviction. The case would be sitting back in Waco District Court most likely with the DA making his next move on the case.
Once they didn't object, it makes it really difficult on appeal.
Is the criminal court of appeals made up of former DAs? I cannot see it being made up of fair minded defense attorneys.

---

Does "we reverse the Judgment of conviction" sound like an overturned conviction to you? From the court of appeals:

El Mariachi said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

---

I don't believe they overturned his conviction. The case would be sitting back in Waco District Court most likely with the DA making his next move on the case.
Once they didn't object, it makes it really difficult on appeal.
Is the criminal court of appeals made up of former DAs? I cannot see it being made up of fair minded defense attorneys.

---

nm

---

They sure are taking their time ratifying their decision. That would be considered a gift in some states. Sam U's lawyer get sanctioned?
Scratch out Oakman on memo line and put Sam U.

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/twin-peaks-biker-s-attorney-says-email-proves-da-reyna/article_8caeb7cf-0d04-517a-8986-cf4334e7197e.html

The defense table is pretty talented on the Twin Peaks case. They seem to be the ones doing the dirty work on DA.

xiledinok said:

---

The defense table is pretty talented on the Twin Peaks case. They seem to be the ones doing the dirty work on DA.

---

The DA is the one doing the dirty work, for years now. The biker's defense team is just making sure it gets exposed.

Of course, it's been getting exposed in the Waco media for a few years now so I don't know why it's taken so long for people to notice. Here's some more of Reyna's shenanigans:

http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/judge-denies-request-to-disqualify-special-prosecutor/article_cb7a717f-83fe-5475-a4ca-4d7f2f148a8d.html

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...


You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

You actually read Milli - worse yet, you quote what it says.

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

57Bear said:

---

Maybe Sam should raise $$$ to make a campaign "donation".

Affidavit alleges Reyna dismissed cases for friends, campaign donations
http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/affidavit-alleges-reyna-dismissed-cases-for-friends-campaign-donations/article_fa48b615-2bd1-5b42-87b4-f8bea7301e43.html

---

I heard the same thing. Lace Dunn had friends. Where do we write the checks? Friends of Abel, then put in the memo line: Oakman?

There was no objection to the evidence? Hard to claim railroaded if that's the case.

---

There wasn't an objection, but there should have been, but at present that's neither here nor there, because the Court of Appeals agreed and overturned the conviction, and I believe the CCA will soon be ratifying their decision.

---

I don't believe they overturned his conviction. The case would be sitting back in Waco District Court most likely with the DA making his next move on the case.
Once they didn't object, it makes it really difficult on appeal.
Is the criminal court of appeals made up of former DAs? I cannot see it being made up of fair minded defense attorneys.

---

Does "we reverse the Judgment of conviction" sound like an overturned conviction to you? From the court of appeals:

---

It sounds like the criminal court of appeals hasn't sent it back and there is an appeal still pending. It hasn't been sent back. The appeal of the appeal is happening.
Some states wouldn't be as generous with no objections.

He told me the same last week. He liking what he's hearing from his attorney.

He would have been tossed out at old Baylor and Baylor's ass would have been covered in the old wrong but effective way.
Raw end of the stick. Fire and brimstone.
Agent, Sam might have had a 1 billion to 1 odds life disaster where all screwed up but him. I d lower it with certain things to about 1 million to 1. Ouch!
Ask Sam if he ever saw the cellphone evidence and report back. Thanks.

What do you want to know?

Gunny Hartman said:

---

What do you want to know?

---

Okay, I remember how the cellphone evidence worked against him and hurt him. Remember, only getting online reports and I wasn't present.
When was the evidence turned over?
How long from turnover until testimony?
Did Sam see the evidence to read and look over?

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

What do you want to know?

---

Okay, I remember how the cellphone evidence worked against him and hurt him. Remember, only getting online reports and I wasn't present.
When was the evidence turned over?
How long from turnover until testimony?
Did Sam see the evidence to read and look over?

---

Love to help, but no way I have time to expound on it all once again. This link should answer all your questions:

https://sicem365.com/forums/1/topics/8113

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

jumpinjoe said:

---

Have you ever been raped? I guess you need to be raped to know why.

---

I'd i was raped and my story was true and the perpetrator had sex with me while I was clearly telling him no and the school did nothing I would sue them immediately I would not wait 10 years or even after the school released a report to make my claim, because the facts and the truth would be in my side

---

That's real easy to say now that everybody and their mother understands Title IX. If litigation is the first thing you think of after being raped you were probably a ***** already.

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

marco said:

---

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

jumpinjoe said:

---

Have you ever been raped? I guess you need to be raped to know why.

---

I'd i was raped and my story was true and the perpetrator had sex with me while I was clearly telling him no and the school did nothing I would sue them immediately I would not wait 10 years or even after the school released a report to make my claim, because the facts and the truth would be in my side

---

That's real easy to say now that everybody and their mother understands Title IX. If litigation is the first thing you think of after being raped you were probably a ***** already.

---

Yea you tell the police and they litigate for you. Then you turn the evidence over to the da so they can withhold it from the defense and cheat and lie to win

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

---

Are you really that clueless?

You're hedging your hopes of vindicating Briles, McCaw, Starr, and Shillinglaw on Sam U.?

You really must not understand much of anything that has happened.

xiledinok said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

What do you want to know?

---

Okay, I remember how the cellphone evidence worked against him and hurt him. Remember, only getting online reports and I wasn't present.
When was the evidence turned over?
How long from turnover until testimony?
Did Sam see the evidence to read and look over?

---

The evidence was turned over to the defense during trial when I should have been turned over before trial like the law states that it should so the defendant can get a fair chance to prove he's innocent. The prosecutors withheld this evidence, lied to the judge and claimed that they just got the evidence that day when they had it way before trial. They threatened his roommate with perjury and prison time with the evidence while knowing it proved he was telling the truth. When that failed they cross examined him anyways. Ukwuachu didn't know what was on the phone records until a year after his trial. Because he didn't have a phone records expert to go over the locations of his roommates phone calls. The prosecutors also withheld Morgan reeds phone records. The girl that claimed she dropped off his roommate that night and cross examined her with a misrepresentation of the phone records. All for the sake of Robbing that young man of justice.
Ukwuachu not only has proof that they did this he has proof that they knowingly wrote an article after they won the conviction and they are lying about the phone records in there too.

He will sue the county for everything they got when it's all said and done and I don't blame him. How would you feel if you knew you were innocent but you got railroaded and lied on by scumbag corrupt prosecutors?? Is that what you call justice?? Do victims ever lie?? No victims don't lie, LIARS lie. Doesn't surprise me that liars helped a liar lie to ruin not just Ukwuachu's life but hundreds of good men's lives and careers. If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been Art Briles would have still been the coach, and Baylor's good name would still be intact. Instead they chose to fire an innocent man, pay him millions and refuse to release the pepper Hamilton report because the lawyers for pepper Hamilton said Ukwuachu should have been cleared.

The ultimate sign of cowards. These women have taken advantage of Ukwuachu's railroading for money. Sad but it's the truth. There's always two sides to every story. And the other side is about to be known. The real scandal, the McLennan county DA corruption scandal coming to a newsstand near you. REALLY SOON.

MilliVanilli said:

---

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

---

Are you really that clueless?

You're hedging your hopes of vindicating Briles, McCaw, Starr, and Shillinglaw on Sam U.?

You really must not understand much of anything that has happened.

---

I asked you a question and you failed to answer it. You dodged it which is the first sign of delusion. Pls don't waste my time

MilliVanilli said:

---

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

---

Are you really that clueless?

You're hedging your hopes of vindicating Briles, McCaw, Starr, and Shillinglaw on Sam U.?

You really must not understand much of anything that has happened.

---

I've $een exactly what$ been going on. A whole lot of accu$ation$ with no proof. But i have $een a whole lot of $$$ettlement$$

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

---

Are you really that clueless?

You're hedging your hopes of vindicating Briles, McCaw, Starr, and Shillinglaw on Sam U.?

You really must not understand much of anything that has happened.

---

I asked you a question and you failed to answer it. You dodged it which is the first sign of delusion. Pls don't waste my time

---

You asked a stupid agenda driven question that was given an appropriate response.

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Bearwitness8223 said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Eastside Bear said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

MilliVanilli said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

NoBSU said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Robert Wilson said:

---

Whatever happened to Shawn Oakman?

Is the McLennan County DA ever going to try that case? Just the arrest and indictment ruined Oakman's life, so it seems like a trial is in order to determine whether it was appropriate. Wasn't that about 2 years ago?

---

They had to delay it because Oakman had to get new lawyers.

---

Well there was that little thing. Why did he need new lawyers?

$$$$ is what these guys need for legal defense but their supporters on Baylor boards offer them only post count (especially when the post scores a valueless internet point for Ian or Art).

---

Franko started a fund to help Oakman keep his chosen lawyers. Some money was given. IMO, everyone deserves a competent defense. I imagine lots of people get nervous about the optics of giving money for someone who has been charged with rape.

---

Not everyone

---

I'm sure your Canadian dollars will vindicate him...

---

That's the spirit .
Let's mock someone who does not live in your country who is financially trying to assist someone in need who DOES live in your country .

We need more like you .

---

You're mocked because you're an agenda driven liar that pretends he's powerful instead of an irrelevant hack on an entertainment message board.

---

You have repeatedly called Robe a liar on this board. What exactly has he lied about? Details, not insults, please.

---

Almost everything. He swears Carlton Dotson, a convicted murderer, is innocent with zero proof beyond absurd ranting.

He swears all rape victims are lying.

He swears some mythical video tape vindicates Tevin Elliott, and he wants to pretend Elliott and Sam U. are the lone issues with the disgraced former regime and that if he can disqualify those that he'll vindicate his fallen hero.

He's not after justice, he's after an absurd fantasy agenda.

It's actually shameful he's pretending to give two shakes of a stick about any of these alleged mishandlings of Sam U. because he'd let him rot if he didn't think it would help him promote a fantasy about an unemployable football coach returning to the sidelines.

He's also PMed fellow lunatics on here spreading lies that posters are regents and Baylor lawyers, it's hilarious how paranoid he is.

He's also a Canadian that claims some sort of affiliation with Ian McCaw and is constantly here launching absurd apologetics about the very AD that destroyed Baylor football with his incompetence, negligence and complicit collusion with unacceptable events.

---

If Ukwuachu was cleared like he should have been do you think his "Baylor scandal" takes place?

---

Are you really that clueless?

You're hedging your hopes of vindicating Briles, McCaw, Starr, and Shillinglaw on Sam U.?

You really must not understand much of anything that has happened.

---

I've $een exactly what$ been going on. A whole lot of accu$ation$ with no proof. But i have $een a whole lot of $$$ettlement$$

---

You're the kind of nincompoop that plagues this board by showing the world your ass as much as possible.

You think the issue of Sam U's possible mistrial tangents into vindicating an unemployable football coach and perhaps if we were all as divorced from reality as you are that narrative could exist outside your own pointy head.