80sBEAR said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

It was a BlackBerry phone

---

I know - just trying to do it quickly - the last sentence is the real point

---

I owned one of the first iPhones in Dallas

---

Don't tell us. Mark Cuban, Jerry Jones, and Dirk Nowitzki got theirs before you?

---

Aren't you cute. I paid an employee 100 bucks to go to the Apple Store early morning the day of the release.

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

That's simply not true. Jasmin testified that the second SA occurred in the pool area. :





Plus, in the video clip immediately after the missing clip, you can see them leave the pool area (separately and walking calmly.).

Trial counsel was not for elliott
Not even close
Ineffective counsel was one of the basis for appeal
All hands had to be on deck to convict a guy with zero evidence he was guilty and a ton of evidence he wasn't .

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

Not to mention the eyewitnesses (Goodley) who testified that she went willingly only to be threatened with perjury .

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

Robemcdo said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

Not to mention the eyewitnesses (Goodley) who testified that she went willingly only to be threatened with perjury .

---

You really need to learn to word your arguments better. Are they challenging witnesses or intimidating them? At this point, I believe zero of what you say. What do the crown prosecutors in Canada say, "Awe shucks. If you don't think your friend did it, then that's enough for us."

I think that's reasonable to say especially with the Federal investigation being rumored within the DA's office.

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

---

Hell I've been beating the drums on this Elliott story for a year and a half . Must have been the language barrier .

Hutch said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

---

Isn't the file data based upon the hardware and the software of the phone? That is the trace information in the file? So you could do a lot of the same phone on airplane mode saving a file? I am asking. How the file is saved on the phone seems to me would make the file ironclad as happening in a certain timeframe between other file saves.

Gunny Hartman said:

---

80sBEAR said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

It was a BlackBerry phone

---

I know - just trying to do it quickly - the last sentence is the real point

---

I owned one of the first iPhones in Dallas

---

Don't tell us. Mark Cuban, Jerry Jones, and Dirk Nowitzki got theirs before you?

---

Aren't you cute. I paid an employee 100 bucks to go to the Apple Store early morning the day of the release.

---

Where do I sign up?

Robemcdo said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

---

Hell I've been beating the drums on this Elliott story for a year and a half . Must have been the language barrier .

---

Oh I know you have dude. It's just hard to know what's real and what's not when you keep saying 0/0/0 because statistically, that number is highly highly unlikely.

TheAgentGrant said:

---

I think that's reasonable to say especially with the Federal investigation being rumored within the DA's office.

---

And the Rangers investigation.

ColomboLQ said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

---

Hell I've been beating the drums on this Elliott story for a year and a half . Must have been the language barrier .

---

Oh I know you have dude. It's just hard to know what's real and what's not when you keep saying 0/0/0 because statistically, that number is highly highly unlikely.

---

Yep.

ColomboLQ said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

---

Hell I've been beating the drums on this Elliott story for a year and a half . Must have been the language barrier .

---

Oh I know you have dude. It's just hard to know what's real and what's not when you keep saying 0/0/0 because statistically, that number is highly highly unlikely.

---

I Don't dispute the probability of my claim being mathematically improbable on it's own but I don't really think it's a stretch considering that every accusation after the initial payout produced a 7 figure payout . We will find out soon enough that the accusations before the payout (SU and TE) were bogus. Then it will become a little easier to consider all of them are. Don't be influenced by a lineup . Especially when there is a pot of gold at the end .
Plus I have a real hard time believing these athletes would have to resort to a life altering (for them ) method to achieve female 'companionship' in these Tinder driven campuses .

Robemcdo said:

---

Plus I have a real hard time believing these athletes would have to resort to a life altering (for them ) method to achieve female 'companionship' in these Tinder driven campuses .

---

This has no bearing on the rest of your post.....but this is terrible, terrible logic. Else how else do you explain what's happening in Hollywood. Why would famous celebrities with tons of money have to resort to sexual assault/harassment and/or rape for companionship? Why would Bill Cosby need to resort to drugging women for sex? But it clearly happens. Not saying these players are innocent or guilty, but let's not use the fact they're college athletes as evidence supporting their innocence. That's a dangerous false myth.

snarebear55 said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Plus I have a real hard time believing these athletes would have to resort to a life altering (for them ) method to achieve female 'companionship' in these Tinder driven campuses .

---

This has no bearing on the rest of your post.....but this is terrible, terrible logic. Else how else do you explain what's happening in Hollywood. Why would famous celebrities with tons of money have to resort to sexual assault/harassment and/or rape for companionship? Why would Bill Cosby need to resort to drugging women for sex? But it clearly happens. Not saying these players are innocent or guilty, but let's not use the fact they're college athletes as evidence supporting their innocence. That's a dangerous false myth.

---

Black athlete in the south does not equate to powerful Hollywood executive . One walks away unscathed One gets prison
These guys are not animals

Robemcdo said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation. From what several people are posting, there looks like there actually is a good chance Elliot's conviction was not beyond reasonable doubt. Plus it's fun to see Keyser get corrected repeatedly.

---

Hell I've been beating the drums on this Elliott story for a year and a half . Must have been the language barrier .

---

Oh I know you have dude. It's just hard to know what's real and what's not when you keep saying 0/0/0 because statistically, that number is highly highly unlikely.

---

I Don't dispute the probability of my claim being mathematically improbable on it's own but I don't really think it's a stretch considering that every accusation after the initial payout produced a 7 figure payout . We will find out soon enough that the accusations before the payout (SU and TE) were bogus. Then it will become a little easier to consider all of them are. Don't be influenced by a lineup . Especially when there is a pot of gold at the end .
Plus I have a real hard time believing these athletes would have to resort to a life altering (for them ) method to achieve female 'companionship' in these Tinder driven campuses .

---

Doubtful. Remember, Title IX is a discrimination law. The only liability to the university would be in the inability of the Plaintiff to access a Baylor education. In some cases, that education was achieved by the Plaintiffs and in other cases, that limitation was temporary (meaning once the perpetrator was gone from campus, the impediment was removed). Unless the university is being sued under state laws regarding negligence (for instance, for failing to remove a perpetrator they had found responsible, who reoffended, etc.), the worth of these suits is greatly limited.

ColomboLQ said:

---

This has been a fascinating thread to read. I appreciate the civil conversation.

---

Dilly dilly...

Pleasantly shocked how civil this thread has been the last few pages even though there are differences of opinion. Where am I?

Hutch said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

---

In my own doctoring experiment, I didn't need to change meta data at all. I simply manually set the time and date on the phone and snapped a picture. Meta data would have the exact same date as the phone.

Robemcdo said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

Not to mention the eyewitnesses (Goodley) who testified that she went willingly only to be threatened with perjury .

---

The same dirtbag DA's who threatened Peni Tagive Sam Ukwuachu's roommate with perjury with evidence they KNEW was false. Rotten corrupt scumbag prosecutors and Abel reyna will be in jail when this is all said and done. It amazes me how many people on this board give the lawyers for the state so much leeway and benefit of the doubt. It blows my mind how competent people will believe anything they're told by prosecuters just because they work for the state. It's sad, but the victims never lie narrative has blinded your eyes and closed your ears so that you don't care about the truth. And the innocent men who were railroaded by a well documented corrupt DAs office.bet those headlines won't make it to sports center

Keyser Soze said:

---

Hutch said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

---

In my own doctoring experiment, I didn't need to change meta data at all. I simply manually set the time and date on the phone and snapped a picture. Meta data would have the exact same date as the phone.

---

Defintely a job for Q...

Keyser Soze said:

---

Hutch said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

---

In my own doctoring experiment, I didn't need to change meta data at all. I simply manually set the time and date on the phone and snapped a picture. Meta data would have the exact same date as the phone.

---

That's an interesting experiment. I didn't know that was possible. I will have to try it and then analyze the EXIF data.

But that is an unlikely explanation for the cell phone video we are talking about. To do that, Tevin would have to change his phone's date and time settings right before a random sexual encounter in order to create the desired time stamp. Or, it would have to be a staged encounter to allow for a planned date and time stamp. And the female accomplice would have to sound just like an inebriated Jasmin. Theoretically possible, but highly unlikely IMO.

Franko said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

That's simply not true. Jasmin testified that the second SA occurred in the pool area. :





Plus, in the video clip immediately after the missing clip, you can see them leave the pool area (separately and walking calmly.).

---

That is not necessarily a contradiction. The pool area was huge, approximately 130 by 90 - she also said she was up against the fence which would be the outside perimeter.

Do you have a link or pic of some of the pool camera footage?

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

I think the missing pool segment would be about the second time he raped her. It was the before the first he carried her.

There is nothing to prove or disprove that the DA received the missing pool footage in the first place. There is no certainty it disappeared in their hands.

Robemcdo said:

---

snarebear55 said:

---

Robemcdo said:

---

Plus I have a real hard time believing these athletes would have to resort to a life altering (for them ) method to achieve female 'companionship' in these Tinder driven campuses .

---

This has no bearing on the rest of your post.....but this is terrible, terrible logic. Else how else do you explain what's happening in Hollywood. Why would famous celebrities with tons of money have to resort to sexual assault/harassment and/or rape for companionship? Why would Bill Cosby need to resort to drugging women for sex? But it clearly happens. Not saying these players are innocent or guilty, but let's not use the fact they're college athletes as evidence supporting their innocence. That's a dangerous false myth.

---

Black athlete in the south does not equate to powerful Hollywood executive . One walks away unscathed One gets prison
These guys are not animals

---

Your point don't even address mine - you're only talking about consequences of actions. Of course the rich and powerful are more likely to get away with their actions. That has NOTHING to do with the likelihood of committing said action. The race issue is an indictment about our justice system, don't confuse the two. This is why true victims (in general, not in a specific Baylor case) of athlete sexual assault are hesitant to come forward - because some people won't believe them because of this very attitude.

Franko said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Hutch said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

airplane mode

general>date&time>set automatically (off) > manually set time and or date

take pic or video

done -

Just did it on an iphone 7 and my pic stays at the changed date when I switch back - very easy


Without the original device to dig into forensically, a texted video's date does not mean much

---

Except digital photos have metadata - that can not easily be changed.

---

In my own doctoring experiment, I didn't need to change meta data at all. I simply manually set the time and date on the phone and snapped a picture. Meta data would have the exact same date as the phone.

---

That's an interesting experiment. I didn't know that was possible. I will have to try it and then analyze the EXIF data.

But that is an unlikely explanation for the cell phone video we are talking about. To do that, Tevin would have to change his phone's date and time settings right before a random sexual encounter in order to create the desired time stamp. Or, it would have to be a staged encounter to allow for a planned date and time stamp. And the female accomplice would have to sound just like an inebriated Jasmin. Theoretically possible, but highly unlikely IMO.

---

If it was Jasmine there would be no reason to alter a time.

FWIW - I did not deconstruct the file, but it remained stamped with the altered time in my pictures. I also think older tech would be easier to compromise not harder

Keyser Soze said:

---

Franko said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

That's simply not true. Jasmin testified that the second SA occurred in the pool area. :





Plus, in the video clip immediately after the missing clip, you can see them leave the pool area (separately and walking calmly.).

---

That is not necessarily a contradiction. The pool area was huge, approximately 130 by 90 - she also said she was up against the fence which would be the outside perimeter.

Do you have a link or pic of some of the pool camera footage?

---

Read the last question and answer in the second page. She clearly says the second alleged SA occurred in the gated area which is the pool.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

I think the missing pool segment would be about the second time he raped her. It was the before the first he carried her.

There is nothing to prove or disprove that the DA received the missing pool footage in the first place. There is no certainty it disappeared in their hands.

---

These 2 rapes did not exactly happens hours apart First one was actually her performing sexual acts on him . Second was the encounter you can hear on the tape . Not certain but my guess they are minutes apart ..
The MYTH is he was convicted of raping multiple girls . It's one girl two acts

No disagreement, it is just that the gated area is huge. The pool area is around 12,000 sq ft with 440 LF of fence - one camera focused on the pool would would be hard pressed to cover everything

But weren't there other complaints against Elliot that weren't charged due to lack of evidence?

Robemcdo said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Gunny Hartman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Missing 30:

Important fact that many are missing - the pool video does not show the crime scene. Most the pool cam would catch would be nothing. It was never an issue until after TE was convicted.

This is from TE's appeal:

Although Elliott testified at the hearing that counsel never informed him of the gap, neither the State nor trial counsel thought the video was very important. The State did not notice the gap until it was pointed out in Elliott's motion for new trial. It did not think the video was very important. By affidavit, trial counsel for Elliott stated that after viewing the video for trial, he did not find anything to contradict Jasmin's testimony or that would be beneficial for the defense.

---

What the pool video would show is them traversing to the spot where the act actually happened. Hernandez claimed she was protesting while he was carrying her, and he claimed that she was of course a willing participant. So who's story would the video back up? Well that part of the video went missing while in the hands of the DA, so I think you can deduce your answer.

---

I think the missing pool segment would be about the second time he raped her. It was the before the first he carried her.

There is nothing to prove or disprove that the DA received the missing pool footage in the first place. There is no certainty it disappeared in their hands.

---

These 2 rapes did not exactly happens hours apart First one was actually her performing sexual acts on him . Second was the encounter you can hear on the tape . Not certain but my guess they are minutes apart ..
The MYTH is he was convicted of raping multiple girls . It's one girl two acts

---

I guess the uncertainty on number comes from the fact that multiple girls also testified that he assaulted them



http://www.wacotrib.com/news/courts_and_trials/three-women-testify-elliott-assaulted-them/article_8792a6d7-a9c0-5778-b8a8-4116d3b68816.html

bularry said:

---

But weren't there other complaints against Elliot that weren't charged due to lack of evidence?

---

Yes several others testified but there was not enough evidence or was too late to press charges.

My guess is that Tevin was an A-hole but probably not a rapist. At least I don't think he raped Jasmine Hernandez, which is the only one he got convicted for.