Spencer Pratt Surges to Second in LA Mayoral Primary
Last updated 5 minutes ago
In Los Angeles' nonpartisan mayoral primary, incumbent Karen Bass leads with 36.5% of votes tallied so far, while Pratt holds a strong second at 30.1%, ahead of Councilmember Nithya Raman's 20.2%. No one reached the 50% needed to win outright, setting up a November runoff between the top two amid the city's battles with homelessness, crime, and urban decline. Pratt's social media campaign, fueled by before-and-after images of areas like Skid Row and his personal fire story, tapped into voter frustration despite his reality TV past.

TrojanMoondoggie said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

redfish961 said:

---

It seems as if Pratt is getting some pretty good traction.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

---

He will end up losing because the regime-party in California is just too good at ballot harvesting and buying votes

But it will be closer than usual.

Unfortunately real democracy does not exist on the ground in California anymore

---

True.
There has definitely been a surge out here, and we're seeing a conservative push we haven't seen in a long time.
But at the end of the day, with voting indiscretions along with voter ignorance, it will be more of the same.
I saw a you tuber who was interviewing people at The Grove seeing who they were voting for.
The first three were women who said Bass. Of course.
The first was a black woman whose reasoning was "black pride." Of course. Nothing else she could say to justify a vote for the failure.
The second was another black woman who said she's voting Bass because she liked how she threw a party for Ramadan. Another educated winner.
The third looked like a retread from the movie Sid and Nancy who said she felt that other woman would do great in handling the homeless crisis. lol
That tells you all you need to know.
At least the other seven included six men and one woman. They all said they were voting Pratt. And interestingly they all had CONCRETE reasons for voting for Pratt, and not the other candidates. Go and figure.
We're talking educated voters vs. dimwits. And sadly the dimwits will once again overpower those who are educated. And with the voting issues out here, they'll see to it that the fraudulent slack is picked up where it needs to be.

---

https://t.co/PGQLy7ue8u pic.twitter.com/Bew14rZlrE

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) June 2, 2026

Redbrickbear said:

---

TrojanMoondoggie said:

---

Redbrickbear said:

---

redfish961 said:

---

It seems as if Pratt is getting some pretty good traction.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.

---

He will end up losing because the regime-party in California is just too good at ballot harvesting and buying votes

But it will be closer than usual.

Unfortunately real democracy does not exist on the ground in California anymore

---

True.
There has definitely been a surge out here, and we're seeing a conservative push we haven't seen in a long time.
But at the end of the day, with voting indiscretions along with voter ignorance, it will be more of the same.
I saw a you tuber who was interviewing people at The Grove seeing who they were voting for.
The first three were women who said Bass. Of course.
The first was a black woman whose reasoning was "black pride." Of course. Nothing else she could say to justify a vote for the failure.
The second was another black woman who said she's voting Bass because she liked how she threw a party for Ramadan. Another educated winner.
The third looked like a retread from the movie Sid and Nancy who said she felt that other woman would do great in handling the homeless crisis. lol
That tells you all you need to know.
At least the other seven included six men and one woman. They all said they were voting Pratt. And interestingly they all had CONCRETE reasons for voting for Pratt, and not the other candidates. Go and figure.
We're talking educated voters vs. dimwits. And sadly the dimwits will once again overpower those who are educated. And with the voting issues out here, they'll see to it that the fraudulent slack is picked up where it needs to be.

---

https://t.co/PGQLy7ue8u pic.twitter.com/Bew14rZlrE

— Geiger Capital (@Geiger_Capital) June 2, 2026

---

There is a reason ... it is not a coincidence that it only happens in certain areas.

I remember in 2024, Florida counted 99% of 8m statewide ballots in one day.

It can be done.

Jack Bauer said:

---

I remember in 2024, Florida counted 99% of 8m statewide ballots in one day.

It can be done.

---

Don't forget that California needs to edit at least some of the ballots.

Jack Bauer said:

---

I remember in 2024, Florida counted 99% of 8m statewide ballots in one day.

It can be done.

---

California needs it though. Without all the extra time, a Republican might be elected

Karen Bass, the destroyer of Los Angeles, has managed to unite all off my friends regardless of politics. We are all in agreement that she is the absolute worst. Yet half the city voted for more of her “needles, crime, and human shit”policies. Evidently there’s no fixing stupid.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) June 3, 2026

Assassin said:

---

Karen Bass, the destroyer of Los Angeles, has managed to unite all off my friends regardless of politics. We are all in agreement that she is the absolute worst. Yet half the city voted for more of her “needles, crime, and human shit”policies. Evidently there’s no fixing stupid.

— James Woods (@RealJamesWoods) June 3, 2026

---

Fixing might be the right term there.

Breakdown of voting demographics in LA and Cal in general could be interesting.
Of course, anyone getting some sort of financial benefit - even if it costs them in the long run - will be inclined to vote to keep what they're getting.

Activists will vote their ideology no matter how bad it gets.

This is what progressive policies do to cities.

Danielsjackson114 said:

---

This is what progressive policies do to cities.

---

Karen "The Destroyer" Bass is apparently becoming the latest cliche in LA. Said so often, it may be losing it's hutzpah!

Spencer Pratt got ZERO out of 25k ballots?? This is mathematically impossible...

Check this out from last night and tell me they're NOT cheating! 25K ballots counted and every candidate's count changed EXCEPT Spencer Pratt.
Credit: @MJTruthUltra pic.twitter.com/EcpkhQIOoZ

— Sue Bowers (@GemCollector24) June 3, 2026

What kind of political entity can't count the votes within 3-4 days of the election?

Osodecentx said:

---

What kind of political entity can't count the votes within 3-4 days of the election?

---

Californication...

California keeps dumping votes. Odds are shifting because the vote dumps always seem to go one way.

Count until you get the result you want? https://t.co/7xa3JMQHtv

— Ron DeSantis (@RonDeSantis) June 4, 2026

Redbrickbear said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

What kind of political entity can't count the votes within 3-4 days of the election?

---

I would say it's 3rd world

But then that is being unfair to many 3rd world nations who can hold a vote and get the election results in within 24 hours…many within a few hours after the polls close.

So Democratic controlled States and cities in the USA are a special breed of dysfunctional (possibly on purpose)

---

Of course they could do it within 24 hours, but how would all the Democrats get elected then? A Republican might sneak in!

Jack Bauer said:

---

Many voters choose to return their Vote by Mail ballot on Election Day. Those ballots are valid and deserve the same level of care, security, and verification as every other ballot cast in the election.

Taking the time for work ensures every eligible vote is counted accurately. pic.twitter.com/Rj5wEItimj

— Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder/County Clerk (@LACountyRRCC) June 3, 2026

---

Crappy excuse. Those votes don't take weeks to count in normal places. Breeds a serious distrust of the voting system. Somehow they don't seem to care.

Cheaters

Jack Bauer said:

---

The latest from the L.A. County vote processing center…@nithyavraman cut into @spencerpratt’s lead by about 3,000 votes today but still trails him by about 37,000 votes for 2nd place.

It could take 3 weeks to know the outcome. pic.twitter.com/qyVwK3McIr

— Elex Michaelson (@Elex_Michaelson) June 4, 2026

---

I realize the dumocrats need extra time to determine how many additional fraudulent votes they need to manufacture to win, but seriously it takes another 3 weeks??