Neither of those charges are going to hold up. Clean? No. Rape coverup? Definitely not. And this was all about sexual assault.Bear8084 said:BarleyMcDougal said:I don't remember all the articles about Briles and how he hid the drinking and smoking dope and grade changes. I seem to recall the articles about...what was it...oh yeah...RAPE.Bear8084 said:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.rockmnation.com/platform/amp/2019/1/31/18205444/missouri-athletics-ncaa-infractions-postseason-ban-football-baseball-softball
So for just a tutor completing course work...Mizzou was hammered with postseason bans, recruiting restrictions, vacation of records, and a show cause slapped on the tutor.
And that's with no Lack of Institutional Control and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance labels that our program and Briles have been handed. So some of y'all can keep whistling past the graveyard about Briles and keep pretending he will be exonerated, those labels are not a good thing for a program or a former HC to have. I am hoping the NCAA sees the changes we have made and takes that into consideration.
Lack of Institutional Control. Failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance. That's already been decided. On Baylor and on Briles. Mizzou had none of those and still got blasted. What they found I am sure we will find out soon, but those are not good labels to be handed by the NCAA. I am not worried because I am hoping the NCAA will see the changes Baylor has done, but I am not believing one bit Briles is going to come out of this looking clean. Nothing points to that other than message board wishes from some diehards on here.
Baylor's going to wipe the floor with the NCAA if they really push this. What's the NCAA going to do about a retired college police chief who was the most culpable?