Football
Sponsored by

Southern Miss football set to interview former Baylor head coach Art Briles

47,648 Views | 316 Replies | Last: 5 yr ago by boognish_bear
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

applemacg4 said:

So it's February 2019.

How many Baylor football players have been prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned for these allegations against them?

Just the facts.


Lack of Institutional Control and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance.


May be - but our administration is helping to promote a narrative that he looked the other way on sexual assaults, and that is why no one is hiring him.
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chuckroast said:

Bear8084 said:

applemacg4 said:

So it's February 2019.

How many Baylor football players have been prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned for these allegations against them?

Just the facts.


Lack of Institutional Control and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance.


May be - but our administration is helping to promote a narrative that he looked the other way on sexual assaults, and that is why no one is hiring him.


Maybe so, but even the USM coach admitted Briles didn't follow proper procedures. The NCAA finds that it was egregious enough to put that label on him, whatever they found.
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'd like to see the NCAA rule that says, "The member institution is required to promote an atmosphere of compliance." Talk about your made-up load of horse #$&@. Oh, they complied with the rules, but the atmosphere of compliance was lacking. Holy sump pump Batman!
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

Chuckroast said:

Bear8084 said:

applemacg4 said:

So it's February 2019.

How many Baylor football players have been prosecuted, convicted, and imprisoned for these allegations against them?

Just the facts.


Lack of Institutional Control and failure to promote an atmosphere of compliance.


May be - but our administration is helping to promote a narrative that he looked the other way on sexual assaults, and that is why no one is hiring him.


Maybe so, but even the USM coach admitted Briles didn't follow proper procedures. The NCAA finds that it was egregious enough to put that label on him, whatever they found.


My whole beef with our administration is that they are complicit in promoting the sexual assault narrative and therefore dishonest in my opinion. The sexual assault issue is what has destroyed Briles, and our administration seems fine with that. They seem OK with destroying him as long as it serves their own self interest. I don't want an administration like that or regents that have that mindset. I don't want Baylor to get through this because of those kinds of tactics. I would rather that we move on honorably.
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

I'd like to see the NCAA rule that says, "The member institution is required to promote an atmosphere of compliance." Talk about your made-up load of horse #$&@. Oh, they complied with the rules, but the atmosphere of compliance was lacking. Holy sump pump Batman!





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/2018DIEnf_HeadCoachResponsibilites_20180411.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8jJbUmrLgAhVMQq0KHQPuCasQFjABegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw1cX3R8YWwiUEjvmKtJAa6r


https://www.collegeandprosportslaw.com/collegiate-sports/ncaa-head-coaches-beware-you-are-presumptively-responsible-for-acts-of-assistant-coaches-administrators/

Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

Malbec said:

I'd like to see the NCAA rule that says, "The member institution is required to promote an atmosphere of compliance." Talk about your made-up load of horse #$&@. Oh, they complied with the rules, but the atmosphere of compliance was lacking. Holy sump pump Batman!





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/2018DIEnf_HeadCoachResponsibilites_20180411.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8jJbUmrLgAhVMQq0KHQPuCasQFjABegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw1cX3R8YWwiUEjvmKtJAa6r
Disingenuous. An atmosphere of compliance is a rebuttal to a responsible finding, not a rule unto itself. It's a theory the NCAA has created to shield responsible parties from personal sanction. If a coach or administrator is in charge of a program that is presumed to have violated the rules, that person can use the "atmosphere of compliance" as a tool to show a good-faith effort to follow the rules. If you haven't broken the rules of the NCAA, "atmosphere of compliance" is nothing but bull%$#@. And BTW, Title IX compliance is not an NCAA purview.
Bear8084
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

Bear8084 said:

Malbec said:

I'd like to see the NCAA rule that says, "The member institution is required to promote an atmosphere of compliance." Talk about your made-up load of horse #$&@. Oh, they complied with the rules, but the atmosphere of compliance was lacking. Holy sump pump Batman!





https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/2018DIEnf_HeadCoachResponsibilites_20180411.pdf&ved=2ahUKEwi8jJbUmrLgAhVMQq0KHQPuCasQFjABegQIBRAB&usg=AOvVaw1cX3R8YWwiUEjvmKtJAa6r
Disingenuous. An atmosphere of compliance is a rebuttal to a responsible finding, not a rule unto itself. It's a theory the NCAA has created to shield responsible parties from personal sanction. If a coach or administrator is in charge of a program that is presumed to have violated the rules, that person can use the "atmosphere of compliance" as a tool to show a good-faith effort to follow the rules. If you haven't broken the rules of the NCAA, "atmosphere of compliance" is nothing but bull%$#@. And BTW, Title IX compliance is not an NCAA purview.


https://www.collegeandprosportslaw.com/collegiate-sports/ncaa-head-coaches-beware-you-are-presumptively-responsible-for-acts-of-assistant-coaches-administrators/

Sure sounds like a rule to me. And who said anything about Title IX?
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bear8084 said:

https://www.collegeandprosportslaw.com/collegiate-sports/ncaa-head-coaches-beware-you-are-presumptively-responsible-for-acts-of-assistant-coaches-administrators/

Sure sounds like a rule to me. And who said anything about Title IX?
Thanks for the clarity on that one. Given that a HC is presumptively responsible for the actions of coaches under him, it's starting to make more sense why the NCAA indicated in its notice to Briles that he is going to get hit (unless his response during the extension made a difference).


Banned BarleyMcDougal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aberzombie1892 said:

Bear8084 said:

https://www.collegeandprosportslaw.com/collegiate-sports/ncaa-head-coaches-beware-you-are-presumptively-responsible-for-acts-of-assistant-coaches-administrators/

Sure sounds like a rule to me. And who said anything about Title IX?
Thanks for the clarity on that one. Given that a HC is presumptively responsible for the actions of coaches under him, it's starting to make more sense why the NCAA indicated in its notice to Briles that he is going to get hit (unless his response during the extension made a difference).
Baylor and Briles will likely be the recipients of minor penalties, despite how the NCAA's grandstanding makes the situation seem so dire for both parties.

Again, they aren't dipping their feet into the waters of sexual assault. Baylor already provided the information once Briles was canned and they don't foresee major sanctions.
Banned BarleyMcDougal
How long do you want to ignore this user?
As an aside, it looks like Hopson DID alert the president of USM. They could be saving face, but according to this article he knew of Briles' visit to the campus.

https://collegefootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2019/02/11/southern-miss-president-issues-statement-on-jay-hopson-after-art-briles-interview-debacle/
BoonDockSaint
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I think the NCAA has had more than enough time to investigate Art Briles and whether he should be allowed to coach in the NCAA again or not...
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
PartyBear said:

If Briles is exhonerated by the NCAA then it is clear he wasn't one who had to go.


Which means we can rehire him.
Eball
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ScottS said:

PartyBear said:

If Briles is exhonerated by the NCAA then it is clear he wasn't one who had to go.


Which means we can rehire him.
I asked this somewhere else but never got an answer...do we actually know for sure what the notice letters said in regards to violations as to BU and CAB? Some sports person said they were level one violations and I just don't know if they were guessing or if it was confirmed? Also anyone else get a notice letter or just CAB and BU?

I get the whole argument that CAB can be held responsible for the actions of his coaches and staff but that also means that the individuals can get sanctioned as well...if only CAB got a letter and it is partly becasue he is responsible for coaches and staff then obviously not too serious as none of them got notice letters individually.

Wichitabear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
But, we will not be rehiring him
ScottS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wichitabear said:

But, we will not be rehiring him


Our mistake
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired by USM. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?


Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?


Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.
University of Southern Mississippi
Football Records

2009: 7-6
2010: 8-5
2011: 11-2
2012: 0-12
2013: 1-11
2014: 3-9
2015: 9-5
2016: 7-6
2017: 8-5
2018: 6-5

USM has appeared in a bowl game in 18 of the last 22 years. They have had a winning record in 22 of the last 25 seasons.

At least get your facts straight. G5 bottom indeed.

xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

xiledinok said:

Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?


Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.
University of Southern Mississippi
Football Records

2009: 7-6
2010: 8-5
2011: 11-2
2012: 0-12
2013: 1-11
2014: 3-9
2015: 9-5
2016: 7-6
2017: 8-5
2018: 6-5

USM has appeared in a bowl game in 18 of the last 22 years. They have had a winning record in 22 of the last 25 seasons.

At least get your facts straight. G5 bottom indeed.




Those lot lizards haven't been good lately. How did they play 14 games? 9-5?
Coach Hops' program is on life support financially. No one wants to bail them out and UAB already passed them.

Malbec, you guys still running up a bill on old Art?
Can I post more to get it up?
Malbec
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

How did they play 14 games? 9-5? ....
4 non-conference games (including @Mississippi State and @Nebraska), 8 conference games (7-1), the conference championship game, and the bowl game at the Cotton Bowl in Dallas against Washington = 14. Keep going Elmer.
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

xiledinok said:

How did they play 14 games? 9-5? ....
4 non-conference games (including @Mississippi State and @Nebraska), 8 conference games (7-1), the conference championship game, and the bowl game at the Cotton Bowl in Dallas against Washington = 14. Keep going Elmer.


Wow, when did you put your mouth on Southern Mississippi? How much do you all charge Art an hour?
Southern Mississippi won all those games and ended up in the C-USA. Their program is a financial blight on their school. The hope was to backdoor Art then put a few butts in the seats.
The stadium is used for a practice bombing site for our military I would guess (they don't hook up the bombs though it would pretty cool to see a stadium go).
ColomboLQ
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

xiledinok said:

Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?


Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.
University of Southern Mississippi
Football Records

2009: 7-6
2010: 8-5
2011: 11-2
2012: 0-12
2013: 1-11
2014: 3-9
2015: 9-5
2016: 7-6
2017: 8-5
2018: 6-5

USM has appeared in a bowl game in 18 of the last 22 years. They have had a winning record in 22 of the last 25 seasons.

At least get your facts straight. G5 bottom indeed.


That has never been his strong suit.
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Look, the other one takes over to run a bill.

Southern Mississippi is bottom five. Their financial situation is a bad one. Maybe they can buy some RPO t shirts.

It's shameful that I have you two pumping up Southern Mississippi. When is Brett Farve getting brought up?
Chuckroast
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired by USM. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?
If the report does not slam him, I think he will get hired somewhere . . . I hope as a HC
oldbear69
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Malbec said:

xiledinok said:

Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?


Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.
University of Southern Mississippi
Football Records

2009: 7-6
2010: 8-5
2011: 11-2
2012: 0-12
2013: 1-11
2014: 3-9
2015: 9-5
2016: 7-6
2017: 8-5
2018: 6-5

USM has appeared in a bowl game in 18 of the last 22 years. They have had a winning record in 22 of the last 25 seasons.

At least get your facts straight. G5 bottom indeed.


X never lets facts get in the way..when it comes to hating on cab....
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:

Look, the other one takes over to run a bill.

Southern Mississippi is bottom five. Their financial situation is a bad one. Maybe they can buy some RPO t shirts.

It's shameful that I have you two pumping up Southern Mississippi. When is Brett Farve getting brought up?
There may be some truth to that since USM does pay the lowest HC salary in the CUSA conference, and given that USM pays roughly 1/3 of what the highest paying CUSA program pays, that is certainly saying something. However, given Jay Hopson's okay-by-mid-tier-G5-standards record, USM may be getting a pretty good deal return on investment, and, further, that kind of return may be what is keeping Jay employed after the events over the last couple of weeks.

https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2018/10/4/17937554/breaking-down-coaches-salaries-in-conference-usa-football-salary-head-coach-cusa
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aberzombie1892 said:

xiledinok said:

Look, the other one takes over to run a bill.

Southern Mississippi is bottom five. Their financial situation is a bad one. Maybe they can buy some RPO t shirts.

It's shameful that I have you two pumping up Southern Mississippi. When is Brett Farve getting brought up?
There may be some truth to that since USM does pay the lowest HC salary in the CUSA conference, and given that USM pays roughly 1/3 of what the highest paying CUSA program pays, that is certainly saying something. However, given Jay Hopson's okay-by-mid-tier-G5-standards record, USM may be getting a pretty good deal return on investment, and, further, that kind of return may be what is keeping Jay employed after the events over the last couple of weeks.

https://www.underdogdynasty.com/2018/10/4/17937554/breaking-down-coaches-salaries-in-conference-usa-football-salary-head-coach-cusa
It's a poor situation for a football coach.
UAB already passed them on the football food chain after bringing their program back to life.


The goofballs above look like idiots promoting Southern Miss but that's what they get paid to do - protect Art Briles' soiled legacy and make it appear he is relevant. They win at the expense of their overall school and students. Football drains the school of money, much like Art Briles when he hires assistant coaches (little return).
applemacg4
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired by USM. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?
Because he's a mouthpiece for the administration that

Quote:

seems fine with...destroying him as long as it serves their own self interest.

...meanwhile he thinks the guy who brought a Heisman trophy and state of the Art stadium to Waco is only capable of working an oil rig in West Texas.

...and for those of you looking at records, something about stones and glass houses comes to mind.

1997
Roberts
2-9
6th South


1998
Roberts
2-9
6th South

Kevin Steele (Big 12) (19992002)
1999
Steele
1-10
6th South

2000
Steele
2-9
6th South

2001
Steele
3-8
6th South

2002
Steele
3-9
6th South

Guy Morriss (Big 12) (20032007)
2003
Morriss
3-9
6th South

2004
Morriss
3-8
6th South

2005
Morriss
5-6
5th South

2006
Morriss
4-8
T-5th South

2007
Morriss
3-9
6th South
xiledinok
How long do you want to ignore this user?
applemacg4 said:

Guy Noir said:

xiledinok said:

No one will be rehiring him.
It's our mistake not getting him under control before he blew himself up.

Oh well, it would have been cotton gin employment for Art without football.
You do not know this. He was almost hired by USM. It has been 3 years of being ostracised from US College Football Coaching. Why do you feel it is your duty to keep slamming Art Briles?
Because he's a mouthpiece for the administration that

Quote:

seems fine with...destroying him as long as it serves their own self interest.

...meanwhile he thinks the guy who brought a Heisman trophy and state of the Art stadium to Waco is only capable of working an oil rig in West Texas.

...and for those of you looking at records, something about stones and glass houses comes to mind.

1997
Roberts
2-9
6th South


1998
Roberts
2-9
6th South

Kevin Steele (Big 12) (19992002)
1999
Steele
1-10
6th South

2000
Steele
2-9
6th South

2001
Steele
3-8
6th South

2002
Steele
3-9
6th South

Guy Morriss (Big 12) (20032007)
2003
Morriss
3-9
6th South

2004
Morriss
3-8
6th South

2005
Morriss
5-6
5th South

2006
Morriss
4-8
T-5th South

2007
Morriss
3-9
6th South


You guys just fail miserably still investing in dreams of Art coaching again.
The NCAA doesn't like protests and boycotts. Art managed to get a bad verdict in the court of public opinion. The public just loves to hammer crooked coaches with no discipline or values.
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rex may post here daily like a desperate train hobo, but he won't answer the question of why Briles won't step up to the media plate and defend himself.

Not saying give an apology, we're talking just defend himself and answer a few questions.

The guy can't even do that.
Aberzombie1892
How long do you want to ignore this user?
At this point, it would be in his best interest to wait until the results of the NCAA investigation are released and that is honestly something that he should have strongly considered during from the beginning. If he says things now that even remotely appear to conflict with those results when they are released, it would be held against him.
RegentCoverup
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aberzombie1892 said:

At this point, it would be in his best interest to wait until the results of the NCAA investigation are released and that is honestly something that he should have strongly considered during from the beginning. If he says things now that even remotely appear to conflict with those results when they are released, it would be held against him.
Fair enough. I want to like Briles and I think he has a lot of redeeming qualities.

But having someone like Rex hang around a website trying to trash Baylor isn't a good look.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
xiledinok said:




Because there's no excitement outside the bubble to hire him.
"Almost hired him"....Southern Mississippi has been bottom G5 for a decade.
Ostracized isn't the word. He has been avoided. He is on par as a road hazard.

I checked the dictionary and avoid is used to define Ostracize. You lexical judgement is a little off.
I suggest you avoid correcting people when you are wrong.

ostracize
Dictionary result for ostracize
/strsz/
verb
past tense: ostracized; past participle: ostracized
[ol]
  • exclude (someone) from a society or group.
    "a group of people who have been ridiculed, ostracized, and persecuted for centuries"
    synonyms:
    exclude, shun, spurn, cold-shoulder, give someone the cold shoulder, reject, repudiate, boycott, blackball, blacklist, cast off, cast out, shut out, avoid, ignore, snub, cut dead, keep at arm's length, leave out in the cold, bar, ban, debar, banish, exile, expel; More



  • [/ol]
     
    ×
    subscribe Verify your student status
    See Subscription Benefits
    Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.