Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Give me an example of how I am doing this.

I know my place in Baylor history. Still in the record books after 39 years!

---

Wow. You just typed those two sentences back to back and don't even see the irony.

Keep looking in the mirror. Keep repeating. "I'm special...I'm relevant". Sad life when you peaked in your late teens and have to live on a football forum to remind everyone

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Give me an example of how I am doing this.

I know my place in Baylor history. Still in the record books after 39 years!

It hurts your little feelings doesn't it?

---

Worst bowl game ever record book?

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, according to your logic. They paid Briles huge..yet had "many valid reasons" to terminate "with cause"..so they could have paid him nothing. Briles would have lost any law suit with all those "many valid reasons". Again, don't get mad at me. I'm using your BoRs own words...WITHOUT CAUSE

This is who you want in charge and defend every time you cash one of their checks? Hope it's been worth it. By now, the way the BORs been handing out cash...you may have made More than Briles.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.


Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

---

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

---

It's been 1020 days! Who cares?

He had the world by the tail and screwed it all up. Almost impossible to do but he sure figured out a way to blow it all up.

It was without cause because he fired himself!

boognish_bear said:

---

---

I would think this all might turn into a racial issue really quickly if that racial slur evidence about Richard Willis comes out.

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

---

Do you really read that poorly?

Reread

I do mind the constant propaganda that he did nothing coming from the people that love him. There were many valid reasons to let him go. Some of these false narratives really hurt Baylor and their alumni - they should be challenged. Worst of all has been some of the not so subtle **** shaming of women making allegations.


His contract was terminated based on a mutually agreed upon number.

Stan Mikita said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

---

I would think this all might turn into a racial issue really quickly if that racial slur evidence about Richard Willis comes out.

---

And once the world knew about Mark Furman we all just knew OJ was set up.

Stan Mikita said:

---

boognish_bear said:

---

---

I would think this all might turn into a racial issue really quickly if that racial slur evidence about Richard Willis comes out.

---

Ya think?? The Baylor BOR did not tolerate black athletes dating white girls in 1968. Unfortunately, not much has changed at Baylor in the year of our Lord 2019.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Why are you quoting the Our Daily Bears take on the Carlton report instead of the report itself; a report that used speculation based on a BU 990 filing? The lump sum value of Briles' contract at the time of dissolution was +- $16.3mm. We're all not as stupid as you continue to assume.

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Why are you quoting the Our Daily Bears take on the Carlton report instead of the report itself; a report that used speculation based on a BU 990 filing? The lump sum value of Briles' contract at the time of dissolution was +- $16.3mm. We're all not as stupid as you continue to assume.

---

And we should also not forget that Baylor paid Briles' attorneys $2 million+ in attorneys' fees.

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Why are you quoting the Our Daily Bears take on the Carlton report instead of the report itself; a report that used speculation based on a BU 990 filing? The lump sum value of Briles' contract at the time of dissolution was +- $16.3mm. We're all not as stupid as you continue to assume.

---

You have to use a 1920's Germany interest rate to get to that number.

There was 39 Mill and 8 years left on his contract. At 6% interest PV would near 30.2 Mill - he was paid 15.1

Prime was 3.5% in May of 2016

PV annuity of equal payments

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

---

Do you really read that poorly?

Reread

I do mind the constant propaganda that he did nothing coming from the people that love him. There were many valid reasons to let him go. Some of these false narratives really hurt Baylor and their alumni - they should be challenged. Worst of all has been some of the not so subtle **** shaming of women making allegations.


His contract was terminated based on a mutually agreed upon number.

---

Again. Don't hate me. I'm using your words and the BoRs words. You said there were "many valid reasons". Yet the BoR didnt use a single one of these "many" they had available. They said "without cause"....and paid him big.

I know you hate the jam you're in. I know you try to spin and twist everything in favor of the BoR. I understand that's your job....but you're "propaganda" is "many valid reasons". Your own BOR didn't see it that way. Or they did, still paid him off big, and are idiots.

Your words. "Many valid reasons". Their words. "Without fault".

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

He's been quoted for having personal relationships with those on the BoR. Whether or not he's actually getting paid...who cares. I hope so, he's on the clock. He's still a shill.

For years he's quoted articles from the press, BoR members, the FoF written by the BoR for the BoR and treated them as fact and gospel when it fit his narrative about football. But when the same press, witness testimony under oath, former employees who were in positions to know, discovery by subpoena, the same FoF, or even former BoR members themselves faulted the BoR and their incompetence, personal conflict of interest, personal meddling, .., fiduciary and lack of institional oversite...Keyser would pop up and was "on the clock". Conveniently trying to discredit any and all of the information. Every time. Look at the threads he participates in. The VAST majority are the non-football...purely BoR defense.

Too bad Starr was asleep at the wheel and not following the law. He is known for carrying a blue dress with cum on it. Figures the odd ball would get hyped on something sexual.

DMan, you'll be known as Derp-Man from this point forward. Oakman managed to have the biggest black sports racist on the internet yapping about him. Good Fellas made me chuckle with his take on Russell Westbrook and the Utah Jazz fans.
GF also was complaining how he had just moved and was tired. My guess would be his former apartment complex hired Spanish speaking security, put up all Spanish signs, raised the rent $50 a month and moved in two groups of McDonald's workers from Guatemala and Honduras. You know LA real estate people hate people who tear up sxit

Art Briles was terminated and paid to go away after he threatened to cause more liability to an NCAA school. He had no problem humping on top of that money. Now, the American public thinks he is unremorseful and the face of rape.

xiledinok said:

---

Too bad Starr was not asleep at the wheel and follow the law. He is known for carrying a blue dress with cum on it. Figures the odd ball would get hyped on something sexual.

DMan, you'll be known as Derp-Man from this point forward. Oakman managed to have the biggest black sports racist on the internet yapping about him. Good Fellas made me chuckle with his take on Russell Westbrook and the Utah Jazz fans.
GF also was complaining how he had just moved and was tired. My guess would be his former apartment complex hired Spanish speaking security, put up all Spanish signs, raised the rent $50 a month and moved in two groups of McDonald's workers from Guatemala and Honduras. You know LA real estate people hate people who tear up sxit

Art Briles was terminated and paid to go away after he threatened to cause more liability to an NCAA school. He had no problem humping on top of that money. Now, the American public thinks he is unremorseful and the face of rape.

---

OWNED,

What did I just read? Someone translate. It's not even 1:00 and you're in drunk rant mode? Do your thing. Pour another glass. Look like an idiot. I'm not wasting my time on you today.

Dman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Too bad Starr was not asleep at the wheel and follow the law. He is known for carrying a blue dress with cum on it. Figures the odd ball would get hyped on something sexual.

DMan, you'll be known as Derp-Man from this point forward. Oakman managed to have the biggest black sports racist on the internet yapping about him. Good Fellas made me chuckle with his take on Russell Westbrook and the Utah Jazz fans.
GF also was complaining how he had just moved and was tired. My guess would be his former apartment complex hired Spanish speaking security, put up all Spanish signs, raised the rent $50 a month and moved in two groups of McDonald's workers from Guatemala and Honduras. You know LA real estate people hate people who tear up sxit

Art Briles was terminated and paid to go away after he threatened to cause more liability to an NCAA school. He had no problem humping on top of that money. Now, the American public thinks he is unremorseful and the face of rape.

---

OWNED,

What did I just read? Someone translate. It's not even 1:00 and you're in drunk rant mode? Do your thing. Pour another glass. Look like an idiot. I'm not wasting my time on you today.

---

I'll translate: Oakman ain't going to the NFL and you guys cannot handle the fact the verdict moved no one.

Let me know if your tribe needs references to dance naked at a gentlemen's club.

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Why are you quoting the Our Daily Bears take on the Carlton report instead of the report itself; a report that used speculation based on a BU 990 filing? The lump sum value of Briles' contract at the time of dissolution was +- $16.3mm. We're all not as stupid as you continue to assume.

---

Timbear said:

---

I don't hear ANYBODY saying Briles did nothing wrong. But, for him to be the one blamed for everything, including lack of proper University governance, and for him to be the only one paying the price, is wrong.

---

That's the weak sauce caber narrative alone.

He was blamed for his players that he refused to discipline, some of which shouldn't have ever been permitted to stay on campus, or employed fixers to cover up their unlawful transgressions.

He was not blamed for anything else, that's your narrative.

Just so happens because he was the football coach and that made media fodder, that got media attention, because the media didn't care about any other Title 9 issues outside of the juicy narrative of his scandalous handling of his program.

And if it wasn't deflection away from him you wouldn't care either.

TCU and UT had more sexual assaults on campus than Baylor in the same time period, but their football coach wasn't implicated in any of them.

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

---

Do you really read that poorly?

Reread

I do mind the constant propaganda that he did nothing coming from the people that love him. There were many valid reasons to let him go. Some of these false narratives really hurt Baylor and their alumni - they should be challenged. Worst of all has been some of the not so subtle **** shaming of women making allegations.


His contract was terminated based on a mutually agreed upon number.

---

Again. Don't hate me. I'm using your words and the BoRs words. You said there were "many valid reasons". Yet the BoR didnt use a single one of these "many" they had available. They said "without cause"....and paid him big.

I know you hate the jam you're in. I know you try to spin and twist everything in favor of the BoR. I understand that's your job....but you're "propaganda" is "many valid reasons". Your own BOR didn't see it that way. Or they did, still paid him off big, and are idiots.

Your words. "Many valid reasons". Their words. "Without fault".

---

Only problem is that is not their words. You just made that up like you make up many things.


Here is the leadership change announcement May 26 2016

• Effective immediately, Head Football Coach Art Briles has been suspended indefinitely with intent to terminate according to contractual procedures.

https://www.baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=170207




and the announcement of the settlement of the contract:

A statement released by the university Friday night said Baylor and Briles "agreed to terminate their employment relationship." The move was effective immediately.

"Both parties acknowledge that there were serious shortcomings in the response to reports of sexual violence by some student-athletes, including deficiencies in University processes and the delegation of disciplinary responsibilities with the football program," said part of what was called a joint statement from Baylor and Briles.

"Baylor wishes Coach Briles well in his future endeavors," the statement Friday read. "Coach Briles expresses his thanks to the city of Waco and wishes the Baylor Bears success in the future."


https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/06/24/briles-officially-out-at-baylor-after-sexual-assault-scandal/

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Malbec said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Thee University said:

---

Dman said:

---

Sorry. I just can't let this statement go. Yet Your own BoR, that you shill for year after year, couldn't find one reason to terminate "for cause". They had to let him go "without cause", pay him.a WHOLE LOT OF MONEY, and put him under an NDA so he wouldn't talk.

Wouldn't a competent BOR who had "many valid reasons" save all that money, fire him for just one of those "many reasons" and openly conduct a campus wide investigation into a problem that existed before Briles. Versus hide behind a wall of secrecy the whole time. Run that up your chain of command and come back with their best answer.

---

I love it! This idiotic post is why I remain.

Thank you ******man. You made my day. Again!

Thank you for posting. Please keep it up.

1020 days and still counting grown men bent over a log and the rest on their knees!

---

Hey old man. Don't get mad at me For reminding Keyser and using the BoRs own words. They fired him "without cause". And paid him huge. Not "for many valid reasons". That would be terminated "for cause". I'm sorry if you don't know the difference.

And nah, you hang around to relive your glory years and try to remind everyone your relevant.

---

Yet Briles left 24 million of his remaining 39 million contract on the table. No cause sure makes you do some strange things.

---

So, are you incompetent or just fond of disingenuous spin? What a load of raw sewage.

---

Per that same report by Chuck Carlton, Briles had a buyout of $39 million. Briles and the university came to a $15.1 million settlement, instead of the university attempting to fire him for cause, or Briles attempting to recoup the entire buyout.

---

Was he fired for "many valid reasons"..your words...

Or was he fired "without cause"...and paid a lot of money? BORs own words and actions. If so, and they had "many valid reasons" (again..your words), what an incompetent cluster of leaders.

See, this is the problem with hypocrisy and shilling. You're own spin highlights the absurdity.

---

Do you really read that poorly?

Reread

I do mind the constant propaganda that he did nothing coming from the people that love him. There were many valid reasons to let him go. Some of these false narratives really hurt Baylor and their alumni - they should be challenged. Worst of all has been some of the not so subtle **** shaming of women making allegations.


His contract was terminated based on a mutually agreed upon number.

---

Again. Don't hate me. I'm using your words and the BoRs words. You said there were "many valid reasons". Yet the BoR didnt use a single one of these "many" they had available. They said "without cause"....and paid him big.

I know you hate the jam you're in. I know you try to spin and twist everything in favor of the BoR. I understand that's your job....but you're "propaganda" is "many valid reasons". Your own BOR didn't see it that way. Or they did, still paid him off big, and are idiots.

Your words. "Many valid reasons". Their words. "Without fault".

---

Only problem is that is not their words. You just made that up like you make up many things.


Here is the leadership change announcement May 26 2016

• Effective immediately, Head Football Coach Art Briles has been suspended indefinitely with intent to terminate according to contractual procedures.

https://www.baylor.edu/mediacommunications/news.php?action=story&story=170207




and the announcement of the settlement of the contract:

A statement released by the university Friday night said Baylor and Briles "agreed to terminate their employment relationship." The move was effective immediately.

"Both parties acknowledge that there were serious shortcomings in the response to reports of sexual violence by some student-athletes, including deficiencies in University processes and the delegation of disciplinary responsibilities with the football program," said part of what was called a joint statement from Baylor and Briles.

"Baylor wishes Coach Briles well in his future endeavors," the statement Friday read. "Coach Briles expresses his thanks to the city of Waco and wishes the Baylor Bears success in the future."


https://dfw.cbslocal.com/2016/06/24/briles-officially-out-at-baylor-after-sexual-assault-scandal/

---

Was he formally and officially fired "for cause" or "without cause"? It's not a trick question.

BTW. As
For your quotes above...Your BoR is a walking contradiction. Remind me why you think Baylor can't do better?

Written by Baylor to a Briles:

"As you speak with others regarding these issues, you can be assured you may make certain statements without fear of contradiction from Baylor based on the information currently known to us. In particular, at this time we are unaware of any situation where you personally had contact with anyone who directly reported to you being the victim of sexual assault or that you directly discouraged the victim of an alleged sexual assault from reporting to law enforcement or University officials. Nor are we aware of any situation where you played a student athlete who had been found responsible for sexual assault. We wish you the very best in your future endeavors.

"Very truly yours,

"Christopher W. Holmes

"General Counsel."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/ncaaf/big12/2017/09/01/baylor-art-briles-letter/627224001/

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

Have you or have you not acknowledged having personal relationships on the BoR?

And Why don't You address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR? It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. They were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all. You immediately question or try to discredit. It's a one way street. It's why you have NO CREDIBILITY on this topic.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. But Ive also held the BoR accountable for a double standard. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

You still don't address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR. It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. Yhey were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

---

Fired employees ..... more credible ..... what a joke

And do you really read so poorly you are not aware of how limited that letter is? No one claims Briles turned away a rape victim that showed up on his doorstep. He will never be a major college HC again for the many things not addressed in that letter.

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

You still don't address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR. It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. Yhey were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

---

Fired employees ..... more credible ..... what a joke

And do you really read so poorly you are not aware of how limited that letter is? No one claims Briles turned away a rape victim that showed up on his doorstep. He will never be a major college HC again for the many things not addressed in that letter.

---

Thank you for proving my point. I used Baylor's own leadership words on purpose. The quotes you used from them were were just as limiting.....yet their words were credible and meaningful when it fits your narrative. But this letter, again their words, is meaningless when it doesn't? You're a joke.

Fired employees? That's your line in the sand? The irony, if your BoR reported to anyone but themselves, they'd off ALL been fired for being in charge and mishandling the biggest most expensive scandal that encompassed the ENTIRE university..before Briles was ever on campus. Would their quotes matter to you then? They would never have survived a vote of confidence. They are in place for one reason. They answer to no one. If you have the balls to argue otherwise..well, you prove my point even more.

What about former BoR members and BoR members who were there at the time? Jokes? Testimony under oath and depositions where lies are crimes..jokes? Yet media quotes from your BOR members not under oath were gospel. Even your own interim president chosen by the BoR exposed the degree of the campus problems and the BORs failures while under oath in front of the state panels. Was he a joke as well?

You're exposing your own double standards and hypocrisy. That's the only JOKE.

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

You still don't address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR. It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. Yhey were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

---

Fired employees ..... more credible ..... what a joke

And do you really read so poorly you are not aware of how limited that letter is? No one claims Briles turned away a rape victim that showed up on his doorstep. He will never be a major college HC again for the many things not addressed in that letter.

---

Thank you for proving my point. I used Baylor's own leadership words on purpose. The quotes you used from them were were just as limiting.....yet their words were credible and meaningful when it fits your narrative. But this letter, again their words, is meaningless when it doesn't? You're a joke.

Fired employees? That's your line in the sand? The irony, if your BoR reported to anyone but themselves, they'd off ALL been fired for being in charge and mishandling the biggest most expensive scandal that encompassed the ENTIRE university..before Briles was ever on campus. Would their quotes matter to you then? They would never have survived a vote of confidence. They are in place for one reason. They answer to no one. If you have the balls to argue otherwise..well, you prove my point even more.

What about former BoR members and BoR members who were there at the time? Jokes? Testimony under oath and depositions where lies are crimes..jokes? Yet media quotes from your BOR members not under oath were gospel. Even your own interim president chosen by the BoR exposed the degree of the campus problems and the BORs failures while under oath in front of the state panels. Was he a joke as well?

You're exposing your own double standards and hypocrisy. That's the only JOKE.

---

Derp Man, Briles cannot be trusted and is the main failure after Ian. The guy lied to his bosses after creating millions of dollars in liability. Briles is burnt toast. Do you expect to keep your job after lying to the board (boss)?

Briles cannot shoot straight but he can sue, look terrible in the Defendant's response and then dismiss after making a fool out of himself. His lack of candor is legendary. You cannot lie to your boss and expect a job (even if you are the rootin tootin small town Texas ball coach). Even a Derp like Rex should know it.

Sorry, this ain't TAPPS or a blighted one or two water tower ****hole town. You get fired for lying.

xiledinok said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

You still don't address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR. It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. Yhey were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

---

Fired employees ..... more credible ..... what a joke

And do you really read so poorly you are not aware of how limited that letter is? No one claims Briles turned away a rape victim that showed up on his doorstep. He will never be a major college HC again for the many things not addressed in that letter.

---

Thank you for proving my point. I used Baylor's own leadership words on purpose. The quotes you used from them were were just as limiting.....yet their words were credible and meaningful when it fits your narrative. But this letter, again their words, is meaningless when it doesn't? You're a joke.

Fired employees? That's your line in the sand? The irony, if your BoR reported to anyone but themselves, they'd off ALL been fired for being in charge and mishandling the biggest most expensive scandal that encompassed the ENTIRE university..before Briles was ever on campus. Would their quotes matter to you then? They would never have survived a vote of confidence. They are in place for one reason. They answer to no one. If you have the balls to argue otherwise..well, you prove my point even more.

What about former BoR members and BoR members who were there at the time? Jokes? Testimony under oath and depositions where lies are crimes..jokes? Yet media quotes from your BOR members not under oath were gospel. Even your own interim president chosen by the BoR exposed the degree of the campus problems and the BORs failures while under oath in front of the state panels. Was he a joke as well?

You're exposing your own double standards and hypocrisy. That's the only JOKE.

---

Derp Man, Briles cannot be trusted and is the main failure after Ian. The guy lied to his bosses after creating millions of dollars in liability. Briles is burnt toast. Do you expect to keep your job after lying to the board (boss)?

Briles cannot shoot straight but he can sue, look terrible in the Defendant's response and then dismiss after making a fool out of himself. His lack of candor is legendary. You cannot lie to your boss and expect a job (even if you are the rootin tootin small town Texas ball coach). Even a Derp like Rex should know it.

Sorry, this ain't TAPPS or a blighted one or two water tower ****hole town. You get fired for lying.

---

OWNED.

Pour another glass. Leave this to the sober adults who don't need translators.

Dman said:

---

xiledinok said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

Dman said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

BarleyMcDougal said:

---

Keyser Soze said:

---

PV annuity of equal payments

---

You take a lot of shots for being a BOR shill. So let's clear that up...

Are you employed by Baylor? Are you employed by the BOR directly? A PR firm employed by the BOR/a person on the BOR? Any company contracted by Baylor/Baylor employee/BOR?

Do you have ANY employment connection to Baylor?

---

ALL Questions No & Never.


Some likes to embellish a great deal. .... often ..... I consider it a sign of a poor argument .

---

You still don't address your double standard, moving the line of accountability, and constant attempt to discredit any of those calling for accountability from the BoR. It's your well documented hypocrisy that makes you a shill. According to you, all allegations against Briles was accurate. Press/click bait articles, and the FOF written by the BoR for the BoR. Yhey were gospel. Yet much more credible sources against the BoR (witness's and depositions under oath that have come out during legal proceedings, even former and current BOR members who were there that hold the BoR accountable for a problem that existed WAY before Briles...you dismiss it all.

I've admitted Briles wasn't perfect. I've supported Rhule From day 1. You've been a one trick pony.

---

Fired employees ..... more credible ..... what a joke

And do you really read so poorly you are not aware of how limited that letter is? No one claims Briles turned away a rape victim that showed up on his doorstep. He will never be a major college HC again for the many things not addressed in that letter.

---

Thank you for proving my point. I used Baylor's own leadership words on purpose. The quotes you used from them were were just as limiting.....yet their words were credible and meaningful when it fits your narrative. But this letter, again their words, is meaningless when it doesn't? You're a joke.

Fired employees? That's your line in the sand? The irony, if your BoR reported to anyone but themselves, they'd off ALL been fired for being in charge and mishandling the biggest most expensive scandal that encompassed the ENTIRE university..before Briles was ever on campus. Would their quotes matter to you then? They would never have survived a vote of confidence. They are in place for one reason. They answer to no one. If you have the balls to argue otherwise..well, you prove my point even more.

What about former BoR members and BoR members who were there at the time? Jokes? Testimony under oath and depositions where lies are crimes..jokes? Yet media quotes from your BOR members not under oath were gospel. Even your own interim president chosen by the BoR exposed the degree of the campus problems and the BORs failures while under oath in front of the state panels. Was he a joke as well?

You're exposing your own double standards and hypocrisy. That's the only JOKE.

---

Derp Man, Briles cannot be trusted and is the main failure after Ian. The guy lied to his bosses after creating millions of dollars in liability. Briles is burnt toast. Do you expect to keep your job after lying to the board (boss)?

Briles cannot shoot straight but he can sue, look terrible in the Defendant's response and then dismiss after making a fool out of himself. His lack of candor is legendary. You cannot lie to your boss and expect a job (even if you are the rootin tootin small town Texas ball coach). Even a Derp like Rex should know it.

Sorry, this ain't TAPPS or a blighted one or two water tower ****hole town. You get fired for lying.

---

OWNED.

Pour another glass. Leave this to the sober adults who don't need translators.

---

Derp man, how much to drink did Art and company have before coming up with the idea to show up to the Rice game? Was it 'Buy a pint night' around the Rice campus? He solidified himself as an out of touch smal! town little world man. He ran away when the media cameras were too bright for him at Rice. He knew immediately he had screwed up.

Derp man, did you teach Briles how to negotiate? You shouldn't lie to your bosses after doub!ing down on negotiations.

Derp, do you lie to your bosses?