2023 Transfer Portal & Recruiting

16,073 Views | 113 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Crawfoso1973
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I thought this was strange too, but the beat writer for K State says it basically boiled down to 2 things: 1) he wanted to get closer to home - New York; 2) he was likely going to continue being a role player because Tang and staff just didn't trust his defensive skills.
BearlyBeloved
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I want a transfer who is 7-foot-2 with good hands and doesn't miss the close-in shots.

And free throws at least as good as Thamba's.

TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Interesting, thought he was a solid piece for them. With Johnson and Nowell out of eligibility I assumed he was in line for a much bigger role
It might actually be a blessing for Tang. He caught lightning in the bottle getting to the elite 8 in his first year, with a big home win vs. archrival as well. Pressure should be off to allow him to take a couple of years to build the program up. I don't know what kind of NIL$ they have up there, but I figure there are players who watched what KSU did this year and want in on that.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?


No surprise on this.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Timbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Does the culture of JOY require keeping players who are not productive so you don't hurt their feelings?
vanillabryce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Timbear said:

Does the culture of JOY require keeping players who are not productive so you don't hurt their feelings?


Not sure. Maybe ask Deuce Bello, Givon Crump, Nolan Dennis, Stargell Love, Tyson Jolly, and all the others who've transferred out because they weren't good enough.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
vanillabryce said:

Timbear said:

Does the culture of JOY require keeping players who are not productive so you don't hurt their feelings?


Not sure. Maybe ask Deuce Bello, Givon Crump, Nolan Dennis, Stargell Love, Tyson Jolly, and all the others who've transferred out because they weren't good enough.
I think those mentioned above came expecting regular minutes per game. For the most part they went elsewhere to get that playing time. Every program has guys on the bench who only get playing time in blowouts, and stay around because they are good teammates, contribute well in practice, etc. Some folks on this site are way too concerned about the 12th and 13th. guys on the roster.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No team will legitimately play 11-12 players regularly. You're 100% right about the unnecessary obsession with those spots on our bench.
Team America
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TXBEAR_bf said:

Talked to a buddy of mine that is tied in to UNC, he said that there is something going on that is not right…some rumors of possible improprieties. They obviously have had 5-6 guys jump in the portal. Will be interesting to see what their incoming class looks like. Hubert will get one more year, but if he has another seasons with zero quad one wins he will be gone.


You mean like players not going to class or getting grades for bogus classes?? Seems like I remember hearing something about that.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Timbear said:

Does the culture of JOY require keeping players who are not productive so you don't hurt their feelings?
Good God, you're an *******.
EvilTroyAndAbed
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Team America said:

TXBEAR_bf said:

Talked to a buddy of mine that is tied in to UNC, he said that there is something going on that is not right…some rumors of possible improprieties. They obviously have had 5-6 guys jump in the portal. Will be interesting to see what their incoming class looks like. Hubert will get one more year, but if he has another seasons with zero quad one wins he will be gone.


You mean like players not going to class or getting grades for bogus classes?? Seems like I remember hearing something about that.
Dude, that happened under Grant Teaff.
Stefano DiMera
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Umm .Hunter Dickinson.. center at Michigan..I'd take him in a New York minute!
TXBEAR_bf
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, more of a cultural thing. As in the culture became toxic, and there are already boosters that want him gone.
Bear living in the woods of Bend Oregon
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

No team will legitimately play 11-12 players regularly. You're 100% right about the unnecessary obsession with those spots on our bench.
The best teams [legitimate annual championship contenders] routinely rely on players 9-12 for injury/illness replacement, load management, and blowout win/loss minute absorption.

If recognizing championship formula recognition is "unnecessary obsession", count most experts into that group.
Mitch Henessey
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Adriacus Peratuun said:

Mitch Henessey said:

No team will legitimately play 11-12 players regularly. You're 100% right about the unnecessary obsession with those spots on our bench.
The best teams [legitimate annual championship contenders] routinely rely on players 9-12 for injury/illness replacement, load management, and blowout win/loss minute absorption.

If recognizing championship formula recognition is "unnecessary obsession", count most experts into that group.
Oh yeah? Name the last national championship squad that routinely played their 11-12th men off the bench in anything more than garbage time. I'll wait.
Adriacus Peratuun
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mitch Henessey said:

Adriacus Peratuun said:

Mitch Henessey said:

No team will legitimately play 11-12 players regularly. You're 100% right about the unnecessary obsession with those spots on our bench.
The best teams [legitimate annual championship contenders] routinely rely on players 9-12 for injury/illness replacement, load management, and blowout win/loss minute absorption.

If recognizing championship formula recognition is "unnecessary obsession", count most experts into that group.
Oh yeah? Name the last national championship squad that routinely played their 11-12th men off the bench in anything more than garbage time. I'll wait.
Easy: Kansas last year.



Coleman-Lands and Adams started the year as #11 and #12 in rotation. Pettiford gets injured and Coleman Lands basically gets the minutes. Clemence simply wasn't very good as the backup to Wilson and Adams replaces him as the primary F backup. Even with Self's tendency to play a short rotation, players that started the year deep down the bench played key roles [in one or more games] on the run to a National Championship. They didn't play a ton of minutes but they played some competitive game minutes [including the NC]. Even 2-3 minutes played in a three point NC game win = important.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Re: the debate on the 11th and 12 guys on the roster, I am in the middle on this. I personally feel those spots should be used for high upside / developmental players willing to redshirt, such as Bonner and Grimes. Unfortunately, we just had our 11th and 12 players materially contribute nothing after 3 and 4 years of occupying roster spots that could have been used to stash high-upside players that could be in line to contribute next year or the year after.

On the other hand, I do realize our program is guided by a "culture of JOY" wherein our staff values team culture and won't run guys off who don't pan out the way they hoped they would. As long as they are willing practice players and contribute to the program, we don't run them off. That sends a message to recruits and their families that said culture of JOY isn't just empty rhetoric, but that our staff is loyal to players and will see them through to get their Baylor degree if that is what they choose to do.
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Re: the debate on the 11th and 12 guys on the roster, I am in the middle on this. I personally feel those spots should be used for high upside / developmental players willing to redshirt, such as Bonner and Grimes. Unfortunately, we just had our 11th and 12 players materially contribute nothing after 3 and 4 years of occupying roster spots that could have been used to stash high-upside players that could be in line to contribute next year or the year after.

On the other hand, I do realize our program is guided by a "culture of JOY" wherein our staff values team culture and won't run guys off who don't pan out the way they hoped they would. As long as they are willing practice players and contribute to the program, we don't run them off. That sends a message to recruits and their families that said culture of JOY isn't just empty rhetoric, but that our staff is loyal to players and will see them through to get their Baylor degree if that is what they choose to do.
Looking at a couple of guys in the portal: Ace Baldwin, 6-0 VCU guard, good scorer, top level defender. Any chance on him?

Also, I noticed Harrison Ingram from Stamford is in the portal. Thought this was a good quality SF on a bad team. Interested where he lands.
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
gobears20
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Staff
bear2be2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
gobears20 said:


I'd bet he's Tech-bound.

He's a really good player, though.
Booboo Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of churn in Baylor's roster.

tmcats
How long do you want to ignore this user?
IowaBear said:

Interesting, thought he was a solid piece for them. With Johnson and Nowell out of eligibility I assumed he was in line for a much bigger role
TWD 1974
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seeing this heading tonight:
Creighton's Ryan Nembhard plans to transfer, sources say. Guys numbers aren't that great, but he looked like John Stockton against us. What do you bet this guy lands in the Big 12?
Task Force 2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess Gonzaga where his brother played.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I really like his game, is a very heady and high IQ player who can distribute and hit 3s. I wonder if we are looking at him.
PaperBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Crawfoso1973 said:

Re: the debate on the 11th and 12 guys on the roster, I am in the middle on this. I personally feel those spots should be used for high upside / developmental players willing to redshirt, such as Bonner and Grimes. Unfortunately, we just had our 11th and 12 players materially contribute nothing after 3 and 4 years of occupying roster spots that could have been used to stash high-upside players that could be in line to contribute next year or the year after.

On the other hand, I do realize our program is guided by a "culture of JOY" wherein our staff values team culture and won't run guys off who don't pan out the way they hoped they would. As long as they are willing practice players and contribute to the program, we don't run them off. That sends a message to recruits and their families that said culture of JOY isn't just empty rhetoric, but that our staff is loyal to players and will see them through to get their Baylor degree if that is what they choose to do.
Craw, I know you and I have disagreed in the past on 5-stars vs developing underrated/hungry players, but this post sums up BU's current state perfectly. Would rather err on the side of JOY and hit on the Bonners, Grimes and Vitals, but you're right, those types of dudes might never show up if we get a reputation for quickly cutting our losses at the end of the bench.
PaperBear89
How long do you want to ignore this user?
tmcats said:

IowaBear said:

Interesting, thought he was a solid piece for them. With Johnson and Nowell out of eligibility I assumed he was in line for a much bigger role

Last time we had an Ish on the roster, it worked out alright. Just sayin
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Nembhard will end up going to the highest paycheck. He knows he has little shot for the league given his size so he's hoping to make cash while he can. There are enough programs out there with NIL dollars that he'll end up with a sweet deal to be able to make as much bank as possible, then eventually head overseas.

That's the trend that's become apparent in the portal. Guys like Nembhard, Cryer and a host of "good" college players who are not serious contenders for a future NBA paycheck, know they need to move and get the biggest NIL dollars they can get while they still have eligibility.
Crawfoso1973
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Truth. As a college hoops fan, this is an awful trend. I don't blame the individual players and they are making the smart decision for themselves, but as a fan it sucks. I enjoy seeing guys develop over a 3 or 4 year period.
vanillabryce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kalib Boone from OK State is in the portal.

6'9 with one year left. He was up and down last season.
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DanaDane
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Married A Horn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://www.on3.com/transfer-portal/top/basketball/2023/?position=sf

Here is a good site that tracks the transfer portal. Wish we could pin it somehow.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.