Dementia Joe's Gestapo is at it again

9,337 Views | 203 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Waco1947
Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Canada2017 said:

whiterock said:

Canada2017 said:

Strongly doubt you will see either a Republican president in 2024 or 60 Republican senators .

For if one believes the Dems stole the 2020 election 'generating' 81 million votes for old man Biden …..why wouldn't they merely repeat the process with the coming mid terms and 2024 ?
You can only steal close elections.

2024 will not be close.


Agreed

Dems will 'win' by at least 6 million votes .
why do you keep bringing up popular vote numbers? We are still a constitutional republic with an electroral college.

Have gou joined the cry babies who dont understand how our govt works?

The politicians and media know the truth but use it to work up the sheeple
Can't have it both ways.

Either Trump got his fat ass stomped in 2020 in a fair election .

Or Dems are going to use similar techniques to 'steal ' again .

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Canada2017 said:

4th and Inches said:

Canada2017 said:

whiterock said:

Canada2017 said:

Strongly doubt you will see either a Republican president in 2024 or 60 Republican senators .

For if one believes the Dems stole the 2020 election 'generating' 81 million votes for old man Biden …..why wouldn't they merely repeat the process with the coming mid terms and 2024 ?
You can only steal close elections.

2024 will not be close.


Agreed

Dems will 'win' by at least 6 million votes .
why do you keep bringing up popular vote numbers? We are still a constitutional republic with an electroral college.

Have gou joined the cry babies who dont understand how our govt works?

The politicians and media know the truth but use it to work up the sheeple
Can't have it both ways.

Either Trump got his fat ass stomped in 2020 in a fair election .

Or Dems are going to use similar techniques to 'steal ' again .


trump lost by less than 200k after they "cheated like crazy"

Winning by 5 mil votes in california is the same as winning by 12.5 k like Biden did in GA. There are no bonus electoral votes for winning by large margins.

Trump got his fat ass stomped in an election that the total votes dont mean sh.. in.

muddybrazos
How long do you want to ignore this user?




The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.

4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess the January 6 TV Show isn't really concerned with the truth or fact finding.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Out of control.

Canada2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Out of control.




Incredible

There are no limits anymore .

Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/18/fact-check-pelosis-office-ray-epps-did-not-have-calls-before-jan-6/10167077002/
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Apparently laws were broken.
Waco1947
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Apparently laws were broken.
happens every day..

Some are dealt with harshly, some are given grace.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/18/fact-check-pelosis-office-ray-epps-did-not-have-calls-before-jan-6/10167077002/



Is this the USA Today that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession?

The only thing you've debunked is that you can logically process information.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/18/fact-check-pelosis-office-ray-epps-did-not-have-calls-before-jan-6/10167077002/



Is this the USA Today that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession?

The only thing you've debunked is that you can logically process information.
Is there a reason you fall for this kind of stuff every time without even googling it? It takes ten seconds. Incredible.
WacoKelly83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/18/fact-check-pelosis-office-ray-epps-did-not-have-calls-before-jan-6/10167077002/



Is this the USA Today that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession?

The only thing you've debunked is that you can logically process information.
Is there a reason you fall for this kind of stuff every time without even googling it? It takes ten seconds. Incredible.


Is this the Google that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession? Incredible.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WacoKelly83 said:




The FBI has become the Democrat SS.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

Sam Lowry said:

4th and Inches said:

muddybrazos said:





The Ray Epps stuff isnt going away.


not sure about the last thing but phone records show contact with pelosi
Debunked.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2022/08/18/fact-check-pelosis-office-ray-epps-did-not-have-calls-before-jan-6/10167077002/



Is this the USA Today that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession?

The only thing you've debunked is that you can logically process information.
Is there a reason you fall for this kind of stuff every time without even googling it? It takes ten seconds. Incredible.


Is this the Google that told us the 2016 election was stolen and sexy mama wal-mart masks will stop a disease and the border is secure and inflation is transitory and we're not in a recession? Incredible.

My sister-in-law immigration judge told me last night that she finally no longer has to wear a mask during court proceedings, which she holds via Zoom in a special room they added to their house for the purpose.

Think about that. You're at home. Alone, In a room. By yourself. But because there is a pandemic on, you have to wear a mask. Just so everyone else in your meeting (hearing) can see you wearing a mask. Just so we can all remind one another there is a pandemic on and we should all wear masks.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

WacoKelly83 said:




The FBI has become the Democrat SS.

Good Lord what nonsense.
Waco1947
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

WacoKelly83 said:




The FBI has become the Democrat SS.

Good Lord what nonsense.
very true! It is utter nonsense to raid that guys house. Targeting political opponents is bad.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?
Golem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?


Read the article. This is why revolutions happen. The DOJ is the SS.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

WacoKelly83 said:




The FBI has become the Democrat SS.

Good Lord what nonsense.
very true! It is utter nonsense to raid that guys house. Targeting political opponents is bad.
Maybe he broke the law. - does that matter to you?
Waco1947
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

Harrison Bergeron said:

WacoKelly83 said:




The FBI has become the Democrat SS.

Good Lord what nonsense.
very true! It is utter nonsense to raid that guys house. Targeting political opponents is bad.
Maybe he broke the law. - does that matter to you?
Maybe you pulled that assumption out of your ass, Waco ... which is far more likely.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

Was there a warrant? If they were enforcing a warrant, what would you have recommended?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

Was there a warrant? If they were enforcing a warrant, what would you have recommended?
Explain why you need ten cars for a warrant for simple assault by a person with no criminal, let alone violent, history?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

The warrant charged Mark with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, due to a claimed "ATTACK OF A PATIENT ESCORT."
Ryan-Marie stated this charge comes from an incident that had already been thrown out of the District Court in Philadelphia but was somehow picked up by Merrick Garland's Department of Justice.
On several occasions when Mark went to sidewalk counsel last year, he took his eldest son, who was only 12 at the time, she explained. For "weeks and weeks," a "pro-abortion protester" would speak to the boy saying "crude … inappropriate and disgusting things," such as "you're dad's a ***," and other statements that were too vulgar for her to convey.
Repeatedly, Mark would tell this pro-abortion man that he did not have permission to speak to his son and please refrain from doing so. And "he kept doing it and kind of came into [the son's] personal space" obscenely ridiculing his father. At this point, "Mark shoved him away from his child, and the guy fell back."
"He didn't have any injuries or anything, but he tried to sue Mark," and the case was thrown out of court in the early summer.
Since the Biden administration has taken power in January 2021, Garland's Department of Justice and the FBI have committed dozens of SWAT team raids that have been characterized as a political "weaponization" of the federal agencies against pro-lifers,Trump supporters, conservative Christians, and medical freedom advocates.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fbi-raids-home-of-catholic-pro-life-speaker-author-with-guns-drawn-as-his-terrified-kids-watch/


Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So .... Hearsay
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

The warrant charged Mark with violating the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act, due to a claimed "ATTACK OF A PATIENT ESCORT."
Ryan-Marie stated this charge comes from an incident that had already been thrown out of the District Court in Philadelphia but was somehow picked up by Merrick Garland's Department of Justice.
On several occasions when Mark went to sidewalk counsel last year, he took his eldest son, who was only 12 at the time, she explained. For "weeks and weeks," a "pro-abortion protester" would speak to the boy saying "crude … inappropriate and disgusting things," such as "you're dad's a ***," and other statements that were too vulgar for her to convey.
Repeatedly, Mark would tell this pro-abortion man that he did not have permission to speak to his son and please refrain from doing so. And "he kept doing it and kind of came into [the son's] personal space" obscenely ridiculing his father. At this point, "Mark shoved him away from his child, and the guy fell back."
"He didn't have any injuries or anything, but he tried to sue Mark," and the case was thrown out of court in the early summer.
Since the Biden administration has taken power in January 2021, Garland's Department of Justice and the FBI have committed dozens of SWAT team raids that have been characterized as a political "weaponization" of the federal agencies against pro-lifers,Trump supporters, conservative Christians, and medical freedom advocates.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/fbi-raids-home-of-catholic-pro-life-speaker-author-with-guns-drawn-as-his-terrified-kids-watch/



Looks like a suspect raid from that info. If it is the man's first and only offense of any such nature, the action is totally inappropriate. The tossing of the case to sue makes it look even more inappropriate.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep, I can totally see why you would need 30 guys and dozen squad cars and swat to raid a house of the guy who said bad words to a 12 year old in front of abortion clinic.
EatMoreSalmon
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Yep, I can totally see why you would need 30 guys and dozen squad cars and swat to raid a house of the guy who said bad words to a 12 year old in front of abortion clinic.
Except they raided the home of the father of the 12 year old for pushing away the person harassing his son at close quarters.

The person harassing the 12 year old is not being sued or investigated, it appears.
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
EatMoreSalmon said:

4th and Inches said:

Yep, I can totally see why you would need 30 guys and dozen squad cars and swat to raid a house of the guy who said bad words to a 12 year old in front of abortion clinic.
Except they raided the home of the father of the 12 year old for pushing away the person harassing his son at close quarters.

The person harassing the 12 year old is not being sued or investigated, it appears.
maybe they thought this guy was hiding records for Trump

You need alot of FBI agents for that
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

Was there a warrant? If they were enforcing a warrant, what would you have recommended?
Oh, a knock on the door by a couple of agents and a pair of handcuffs would probably have sufficed. I'm sure they could have called his lawyer and arranged him to surrender at FBI offices, like they would allow a Democrat to do.

And having mentioned "a Democrat"....how many Antifa/BLM types got 10 cars and a rogering in front of their spouse and kids?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Yep, I can totally see why you would need 30 guys and dozen squad cars and swat to raid a house of the guy who said bad words to a 12 year old in front of abortion clinic.
Doing everything they can to get abortion into the news to distract voters from the issues they really care about.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

WacoKelly83 said:




Why? Was there a warrant?

The guy pushed away an opposing activist who the guy felt was threatening his kid, twice. Potentially, an assault.

Apparently, an assault at an abortion clinic is a federal offense.

For that, the guy got a SWAT raid, at home, in front of his wife and kids. One can allow that the raider might have been reasonably charged and still be outraged over the SWAT raid.

But while this wildly disproportionate law enforcement is carried out by Democrats, some will save their opprobrium for Trump as an ostensibly greater potential threat to liberty, even though during his four years his admin never remotely did the kind of Jack-booted thuggery we see from the never-Trump party.

Reality is, Trump might be the only person in view brave enough to fix the problem.

Was there a warrant? If they were enforcing a warrant, what would you have recommended?
Oh, a knock on the door by a couple of agents and a pair of handcuffs would probably have sufficed. I'm sure they could have called his lawyer and arranged him to surrender at FBI offices, like they would allow a Democrat to do.
Also looks like they could have called and asked him to come out.

However, what is this guy is like some of the posters here who call the FBI "SS" and "Nazis"? People like that aren't balanced and the FBI could have been criticized for not going in harder.

I mean, look at this:

The FBI has become the Democrat SS.

the kind of Jack-booted thuggery

(edit - 2 more gems)
You justify SS style weaponization of law enforcement because you hate the people they target.

If it goose steps like a duck….

Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like overkill at a minimum.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.