Politico writer says people are sharing baseless claims...from Politico. https://t.co/5FYYe2exJo pic.twitter.com/QEzwkUclFA
— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) October 31, 2022
Paul Pelosi Attacked
32,602 Views |
357 Replies |
Last: 3 yr ago by whiterock
The only thing clear about this is you wanting to use it as an attempt to smear the right as dangerous.HuMcK said:
And yet police statements have made clear that they didn't know each other...almost as if he was referring to "his friend" in an attempt to keep the lunatic intruder in his house calm while he was on the phone with police and before he fully understood what the guy was there for (apprently to ziptie and/or kill Nancy if reports are accurate). Police have also made clear nobody was wearing just underwear when they got there either, btw.
Are you just going to straight up pretend like the guy's social media presence is fake, or what? You went out of your way to insinuate he was some crazy hippy based on vague stuff, but at the same time you flat out disregard the guy's own recent and explicit posts...
By the way y'all, smobserver is a right wing propaganda rag deliberately disguised as a local news outlet even though it is not, a favorite tactic of the right wing to employ in recent years. So of course y'all (and Elon) fell for it hook line and sinker.
There's a reason you don't post about why you think democrat policies are good.
No worries. Since this was an attack on Our Democracy, the Republicans will investigate this once they take control of the House in January. Subpoenas will go out to Grindr just in case.Doc Holliday said:The only thing clear about this is you wanting to use it as an attempt to smear the right as dangerous.HuMcK said:
And yet police statements have made clear that they didn't know each other...almost as if he was referring to "his friend" in an attempt to keep the lunatic intruder in his house calm while he was on the phone with police and before he fully understood what the guy was there for (apprently to ziptie and/or kill Nancy if reports are accurate). Police have also made clear nobody was wearing just underwear when they got there either, btw.
Are you just going to straight up pretend like the guy's social media presence is fake, or what? You went out of your way to insinuate he was some crazy hippy based on vague stuff, but at the same time you flat out disregard the guy's own recent and explicit posts...
By the way y'all, smobserver is a right wing propaganda rag deliberately disguised as a local news outlet even though it is not, a favorite tactic of the right wing to employ in recent years. So of course y'all (and Elon) fell for it hook line and sinker.
There's a reason you don't post about why you think democrat policies are good.
https://townhall.com/columnists/kurtschlichter/2022/10/31/everyone-is-laughing-at-the-ridiculous-pelosi-big-lie-n2615222
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
Gunter gleiben glauchen globen
Mostly the Democrats ...fubar said:
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Would that include the woman who is attempting to fundraise off her husband's misfortune?fubar said:
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
Especially our president.fubar said:
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
BIDEN ON ATTACK ON PAUL PELOSI: "You can't condemn the violence unless you condemn those people who continue to argue the election was not real, that it’s being stolen [...] All the malarkey that's being put out there to undermine democracy. You can't just apologize..." pic.twitter.com/uy3pYmJkrr
— Breaking911 (@Breaking911) October 31, 2022
There's a lot of unknowns right now, but there are questions which demand answers:
1. The glass is visibly broken outwards on the door. Why is that?
2. Wide-angle shots of the house show multiple security cameras. What do those cameras show?
3. Police in San Francisco wear body-cams as a matter of policy, especially when entering a home. What do those cameras, and microphones reveal?
4. Someone opened the door. Initial reports said a third person opened from inside. If so, who was that and if not, how did the door get opened, since police reported their first observance was to see Pelosi and the intruder in a struggle?
5. The idea of a MAGA supporter who is also a resident of San Francisco, with multiple contacts who called him a 'hippie who lived in a commune' and a former girlfriend who said he was 'very Progressive', is frankly absurd to the point that anyone claiming so may be fairly accused of gaslighting.
Again, there's a lot of confusion, but this is not at all related to January 6, no matter how hard some try to paint it in those colors.
,
1. The glass is visibly broken outwards on the door. Why is that?
2. Wide-angle shots of the house show multiple security cameras. What do those cameras show?
3. Police in San Francisco wear body-cams as a matter of policy, especially when entering a home. What do those cameras, and microphones reveal?
4. Someone opened the door. Initial reports said a third person opened from inside. If so, who was that and if not, how did the door get opened, since police reported their first observance was to see Pelosi and the intruder in a struggle?
5. The idea of a MAGA supporter who is also a resident of San Francisco, with multiple contacts who called him a 'hippie who lived in a commune' and a former girlfriend who said he was 'very Progressive', is frankly absurd to the point that anyone claiming so may be fairly accused of gaslighting.
Again, there's a lot of confusion, but this is not at all related to January 6, no matter how hard some try to paint it in those colors.
,
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
modern journalism is just so, so wild. pic.twitter.com/HGEAhPcasj
— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) October 31, 2022
Politico: "WHERE DID YOU HEAR THIS BASELESS CLAIM?"
— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) October 31, 2022
the Internet: pic.twitter.com/oGCNsYz7tQ
"Republicans seize on baseless claims *WE PUBLISHED*"
— T. Becket Adams (@BecketAdams) October 31, 2022
Do we agree that the Dems who celebrated Rand's assault were wrong?4th and Inches said:look at all those GOP who egg on violence!Doc Holliday said:
Scope on a pistol? Does that really take down a hog?J.R. said:I have a Glock 9MM with a scope for pigs that I try to exterminate at my ranch in W. Texas. Great gun.ShooterTX said:This needs it's own thread... pretty sure there are a few thousand online in various gun forums.Golem said:trey3216 said:.40 is the correct answer. Every timeHuMcK said:
Tbh I know it's sacrilege, but I'm on team 9mm. More bullets=more better for self defense.
2 x 9mm > 1 x .40
I'll just say that I was a big .40S&W fan for a number of years... but no longer. I got rid of most of them and replaced with either 9mm or 45ACP. The pressures involved in .40S&W are a bit ridiculous. 9mm is very accurate and modern bullets are very effective. If that isn't enough for your needs (really large hogs in South Texas) then skip the .40 and go straight to the .45 or a nice wheelgun in .357mag. I've shot plenty of hogs in every caliber from .32ACP to 50AE... 9mm is just fine up to about 160lb piggies. A trusty ole 1911 is great for everything up to about 330 pounders. Above that you are going to need multiple hits with something that ends in "magnum". Most impressive one was a big Russian boar that took 7 well placed hits of 44 mag coming out of an 18 inch barrel carbine. It finally fell over after the 8th round hit it. Not a single bullet went through the animal. Took 4 of us to drag the beast out of the brush.
All this to say, unless you are attacked by a 400lb+ "Russian hog" type person... modern 9mm is more than enough for the job.
The worst things Republicans do to Democrats is return the hate.
More from the criminal complaint, “DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress there were consequences to actions.”
— Tom Winter (@Tom_Winter) October 31, 2022
MSNBC is reporting that someone opened the door for David DePape...and WAPO is calling him a home invader.HuMcK said:More from the criminal complaint, “DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress there were consequences to actions.”
— Tom Winter (@Tom_Winter) October 31, 2022
No one will explain how David DePape got in the mansion because it discredits the official narrative.
Who the hell would welcome in a complete stranger clad only in his underwear ?Doc Holliday said:MSNBC is reporting that someone opened the door for David DePape...and WAPO is calling him a home invader.HuMcK said:More from the criminal complaint, “DEPAPE also later explained that by breaking Nancy’s kneecaps, she would then have to be wheeled into Congress, which would show other Members of Congress there were consequences to actions.”
— Tom Winter (@Tom_Winter) October 31, 2022
No one will explain how David DePape got in the mansion because it discredits the official narrative.
Wangchung said:
A simple solution to these gaping holes in the "crazy Jesus man circumvented top notch security systems in his undies and had a conversation with Paul until police arrived and then decided to attack" story is to remember one word; coincidence. All your concerns can be answered with that magic word.
Surely they have body cams
NEW: Per ICE source, David DePape, the suspect accused of beating Paul Pelosi in his home with a hammer after breaking in, is currently in the U.S. illegally as a “longtime” visa overstay. @FoxNews
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) October 31, 2022
A couple of good pieces. The regime media's coverage of this is at best embarrassment at at worst criminal.
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/pelosi-attack-suspect-was-a-psychotic?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/pelosi-and-kavanaugh-murder-plots?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/pelosi-attack-suspect-was-a-psychotic?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
https://michaelshellenberger.substack.com/p/pelosi-and-kavanaugh-murder-plots?utm_source=profile&utm_medium=reader2
It is astonishing how gullible a good lot of you are.
Oldbear83 said:
There's a lot of unknowns right now, but there are questions which demand answers:
1. The glass is visibly broken outwards on the door. Why is that?
2. Wide-angle shots of the house show multiple security cameras. What do those cameras show?
3. Police in San Francisco wear body-cams as a matter of policy, especially when entering a home. What do those cameras, and microphones reveal?
4. Someone opened the door. Initial reports said a third person opened from inside. If so, who was that and if not, how did the door get opened, since police reported their first observance was to see Pelosi and the intruder in a struggle?
5. The idea of a MAGA supporter who is also a resident of San Francisco, with multiple contacts who called him a 'hippie who lived in a commune' and a former girlfriend who said he was 'very Progressive', is frankly absurd to the point that anyone claiming so may be fairly accused of gaslighting.
Again, there's a lot of confusion, but this is not at all related to January 6, no matter how hard some try to paint it in those colors.
,
Quote:
And now the mother of DePape's two children, Gypsy Taub, has publicly confirmed that DePape has experienced psychotic episodes. "He is mentally ill," she told ABC7, "He has been mentally ill for a long time." Taub said DePape disappeared for almost a year and "came back in very bad shape. He thought he was Jesus. He was constantly paranoid, thinking people were after him. And it took a good year or two to get back to, you know, being halfway normal." However, it is not clear whether DePape's psychosis is a result of an underlying mental illness, like schizophrenia or bipolar disorder, or from the long-term use of drugs, particularly meth, which can result in psychosis and permanent changes to brain functioning. Taub's neighbors, as I reported yesterday, said Taub herself suffered frequent bouts of paranoid psychosis and had repeatedly lied about them to the police.
1) Mentally ill.
2) Homeless for long periods.
3) Delusional
4) Mentally ill, plus meth.
5) Psychosis or schizophrenia.
But Jan. 6th.
Yes, a lot of people should be ashamed of themselves. It starts with Biden and works it's way down.
Yes, it is incredible how many people thought that someone on the political right wing lived in Berkeley.ScruffyD said:
It is astonishing how gullible a good lot of you are.
And the truth is always the first casualty. Nothing matters but propaganda for power.He Hate Me said:Yes, it is incredible how many people thought that someone on the political right wing lived in Berkeley.ScruffyD said:
It is astonishing how gullible a good lot of you are.
I'm sure there is all kinds of video. I'm also sure the most likely scenario is this is merely a random nutcase doing random nutcase things. But since we don't know for sure yet, why not have some tongue-in-cheek fun at the emotionally fragile democrats' expense with some democrat-like conjecture?nein51 said:Wangchung said:
A simple solution to these gaping holes in the "crazy Jesus man circumvented top notch security systems in his undies and had a conversation with Paul until police arrived and then decided to attack" story is to remember one word; coincidence. All your concerns can be answered with that magic word.
Surely they have body cams
Cobretti said:NEW: Per ICE source, David DePape, the suspect accused of beating Paul Pelosi in his home with a hammer after breaking in, is currently in the U.S. illegally as a “longtime” visa overstay. @FoxNews
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) October 31, 2022
Build the wall.
please, for the sake of democracy, give it to us as it really happened!ScruffyD said:
It is astonishing how gullible a good lot of you are.
Wangchung said:I'm sure there is all kinds of video. I'm also sure the most likely scenario is this is merely a random nutcase doing random nutcase things. But since we don't know for sure yet, why not have some tongue-in-cheek fun at the emotionally fragile democrats' expense with some democrat-like conjecture?nein51 said:Wangchung said:
A simple solution to these gaping holes in the "crazy Jesus man circumvented top notch security systems in his undies and had a conversation with Paul until police arrived and then decided to attack" story is to remember one word; coincidence. All your concerns can be answered with that magic word.
Surely they have body cams
I don't care about conspiracy. I don't even truly care what happened. Regardless of what happened no one should be beaten in their own home. But if you want to put and end to all of the conjecture it's super simple. Just release the body cam footage.
LOLCobretti said:NEW: Per ICE source, David DePape, the suspect accused of beating Paul Pelosi in his home with a hammer after breaking in, is currently in the U.S. illegally as a “longtime” visa overstay. @FoxNews
— Bill Melugin (@BillFOXLA) October 31, 2022
Well, that is just your typical MAGA guy right there... an illegal alien. LOL
They really expect us to believe this crap?
No one should be beaten in their own home... absolutely true. This is why we must protect the right to self defense, and the most effective tools for self defense.nein51 said:Wangchung said:I'm sure there is all kinds of video. I'm also sure the most likely scenario is this is merely a random nutcase doing random nutcase things. But since we don't know for sure yet, why not have some tongue-in-cheek fun at the emotionally fragile democrats' expense with some democrat-like conjecture?nein51 said:Wangchung said:
A simple solution to these gaping holes in the "crazy Jesus man circumvented top notch security systems in his undies and had a conversation with Paul until police arrived and then decided to attack" story is to remember one word; coincidence. All your concerns can be answered with that magic word.
Surely they have body cams
I don't care about conspiracy. I don't even truly care what happened. Regardless of what happened no one should be beaten in their own home. But if you want to put and end to all of the conjecture it's super simple. Just release the body cam footage.
I assume you have your NRA membership already?
and Politico for publishing false information and then admonishing others for spreading said information.Oldbear83 said:Mostly the Democrats ...fubar said:
Some of you ought to be ashamed of yourselves.
The NRA is a joke.
None of this really matters. On November 8th, ole Nancy is gonna be put in the trailer sent to the soap factory. She will no longer be Speaker. She will be Sitter.ScruffyD said:
It is astonishing how gullible a good lot of you are.
Life is good.
"Stand with anyone when he is right; Stand with him while he is right and part with him when he goes wrong." - Abraham Lincoln
nein51 said:
The NRA is a joke.
Sure it is... which is why your kind is so obsessed with them.
Much of what you all are in a frenzy over is focused on the information that first comes out, which is often wrong and illogical, but reported nonetheless and later corrected. Y'all are either too lazy or disingenuous to accept that much of what is first reported is incorrect.
He broke in. There was no third person. He wasn't wearing underwear. The victim was in underwear (it was past midnight most folks sleep in a state of undress) and on and on.
They likely won't release body cam footage as it violates all manner of privacy for the victim. Don't imagine many of you would want video of you beaten about the head with a hammer while sporting your boxers, just to satisfy the curiosity of folks who run down the same rabbit holes as the perpetrator.
He broke in. There was no third person. He wasn't wearing underwear. The victim was in underwear (it was past midnight most folks sleep in a state of undress) and on and on.
They likely won't release body cam footage as it violates all manner of privacy for the victim. Don't imagine many of you would want video of you beaten about the head with a hammer while sporting your boxers, just to satisfy the curiosity of folks who run down the same rabbit holes as the perpetrator.
ScruffyD said:
Much of what you all are in a frenzy over is focused on the information that first comes out, which is often wrong and illogical, but reported nonetheless and later corrected. Y'all are either too lazy or disingenuous to accept that much of what is first reported is incorrect.
He broke in. There was no third person. He wasn't wearing underwear. The victim was in underwear (it was past midnight most folks sleep in a state of undress) and on and on.
They likely won't release body cam footage as it violates all manner of privacy for the victim. Don't imagine many of you would want video of you beaten about the head with a hammer while sporting your boxers, just to satisfy the curiosity of folks who run down the same rabbit holes as the perpetrator.
I am glad you figured out the truth. I was waiting for someone with the definitive answer to chime in.