2024

639,309 Views | 10579 Replies | Last: 3 hrs ago by The_barBEARian
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

boognish_bear said:


Good news
lol, you do realize national polls dont mean squat right?


Funny how any poll showing that Trump may be losing support is meaningless.
I certainly haven't said that. i note the full range.

There are general factors: variance between polling firms is largely a function of different assumptions about "who is going to vote." Polling firms have to FIRST make assumptions about who is going to vote, then poll that cohort. That's why "all adults" polls tend to be less accurate than "registered voters" polls, which tend to be less accurate than "likely voters." The "all adult" polls are not irrelevant, but they are also full of people who are not likely to vote.

Then there are factors unique to the cycle. This one (and the last few & next few) will be even harder to poll than normal, give the political realignments going on - the leftward move of the educated & higher income parts of the electorate (particularly whites) and related rightward move of the working classes of all races. The most obvious manifestation of this can be seen with low-propensity voters. My entire adult life, Republicans were a smaller cohort of higher-propensity voters, and Democrats were the low-propensity voters......Dems tended to win elections with ginormous turnout, while Republicans tended to win the lower turnout cycles. That is the genesis of moderate Republican aversion to "setting our hair on fire." Don't do anything to fire up the Dems, lest they come boiling out of the woodworks. The 2012 Romney campaign was the apogee of such thinking - they literally hired several key Tea Party leaders of the massive 2010 wave that spawned a 70+ seat swing to GOP control.....and sent them around the country to tell all the TP groups to stay quiet. They did not want to do anything to anger Democrats. Flash forward a decade to the Trump era, and the evolution in turnout is nearly complete. It is Republicans who depend on the low-propensity voter (and need a Trump-type populist candidate to turn them out.) Bot old-school GOP-ers (and your thinking leans this way) see the Trump-schtick as exactly the kind of stuff that brings about the old concerns about firing up Dem turnout of lower-propensity voters. One problem - now it is the GOP which needs the theatrics to fire up its base of lower-propensity voters....

Most polls show Trump winning the independent vote comfortably. The problem is....the independent vote IS predominantly lower-propensity voters. Trump has to turn them out to win. And, at least when HE is on the ballot, he typically does. On election day, he typically does out-perform his polling.

Within that context, Dems are using mail-in voting to to offset their turnout disadvantage. Some of this is real - single professional women are lower-propensity votes unless an issue important to them (like abortion) is on the ballot, in which case the come boiling out of the woodwork. And, of course, some of Dem turnout is pure shenanigan - ballot harvesting and outright fraud.




Whiterock, just want to say. I enjoy your posts and conversations. I appreciate you don't go personal and the times we have it has been in a heated discussion not ongoing. Keep it up. Too much attention goes to the idiots, I need to give props to those that do good.


As for Trump, I personally believe he is great to move the needle. Still think his best role would be as the new Rush and do what he likes - talk from the pulpit and do rallies.

But as we get closer to actually electing a President will the middle of the Nation actually go through with it? His base, will. Were the Primaries his floor or ceiling when it is for real?


Very good questions. It's all about "who will vote." He will need a big turnout of new voters, if this is any indicator….



boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,


Both are very unliked..

This will be a turn out battle

Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Vote for the candidate without Dementia. If you don't know which one that is, you probably also have Dementia or are probably not the brightest bulb on the tree.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
What is going to be interesting is what the numbers do the closer to November we get. There was a time Trump was trouncing Biden, now we are getting closer and the polls are hedging their bets more.

Firebrands like Trump are attractive 12 to 18 months outside of an election, actually voting for them to let them do what they preach is another thing all together.

Will the Independents actually be able to put everything aside about Trump the man and vote for Trump the Candidate? I am saying No. That when push comes to shove and they start seeing more of Trump on TV and in debates, they run back to Biden.

GOP should have run Haley or DeSantis.
Realitybites
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,

RFK appeals quite a bit to the people who refused the Covid-19 vaccine and were persecuted because of it. In general, these were republicans or libertarians not Biden voters.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
What is going to be interesting is what the numbers do the closer to November we get. There was a time Trump was trouncing Biden, now we are getting closer and the polls are hedging their bets more.

Firebrands like Trump are attractive 12 to 18 months outside of an election, actually voting for them to let them do what they preach is another thing all together.

Will the Independents actually be able to put everything aside about Trump the man and vote for Trump the Candidate? I am saying No. That when push comes to shove and they start seeing more of Trump on TV and in debates, they run back to Biden.

GOP should have run Haley or DeSantis.

Well, they didn't run Haley or DeSantis. Why are you still on here trying to compare Trump to a candidate that you like, that didn't the enough votes in the primaries?

You say you want to talk politics, so let's talk politics. The GOP and the DNC has their nominee for the election. Maybe it's a good time to start talking about Trump vs. Biden? Or would you rather just spend your time dumping on Trump, no matter what?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
The takeaway? If only we had picked a candidate who would have fared better against one of the worst incumbents in modern history than one with Trump's incredible baggage. I suspect the polls wouldn't even be close right now, had we done so. But we just can't quit Trump.

What would you say are the percentages of a Trump win at this time, in your mind?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
The takeaway? If only we had picked a candidate who would have fared better against one of the worst incumbents in modern history than one with Trump's incredible baggage. I suspect the polls wouldn't even be close right now, had we done so. But we just can't quit Trump.

What would you say are the percentages of a Trump win at this time, in your mind?
Hard to handicap a race before the conventions, but I do keep in mind the following points of reference:

In 2020, Biden's final RCP poll average was 51.2% and he officially won 51.4% of the PV, so the polls were under the number by 0.2 points

In 2016, Trump's final RCP poll average was 43.6% and he won 46.1% of the PV, so the polls undervalued Trump in 2016 by 2.5 points. In 2020 Trump's final RCP average was 44.0% and he won 46.9% of the PV, so the polls undervalued Trump by 2.9 points.

This means that since polls have not changed their methodology after the 2016 or 2020 it would be reasonable to say that the polls are likely undervaluing Trump by 2.7 points or so. Also, Trump only led Clinton in 2016 for a week in July in the polls, and from October 2019 to the election in 2020 Trump always trailed Biden, it is statistically significant that Trump has led this election cycle in most polls.

The hitch of course is that Trump's polling average is in the mid 40s, indicating he is unlikely to enjoy a Reaganesque PV majority come November. The race will come down to key states, where the numbers are also in Trump's favorite but could be more volatile.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
What is going to be interesting is what the numbers do the closer to November we get. There was a time Trump was trouncing Biden, now we are getting closer and the polls are hedging their bets more.

Firebrands like Trump are attractive 12 to 18 months outside of an election, actually voting for them to let them do what they preach is another thing all together.

Will the Independents actually be able to put everything aside about Trump the man and vote for Trump the Candidate? I am saying No. That when push comes to shove and they start seeing more of Trump on TV and in debates, they run back to Biden.

GOP should have run Haley or DeSantis.

Well, they didn't run Haley or DeSantis. Why are you still on here trying to compare Trump to a candidate that you like, that didn't the enough votes in the primaries?

You say you want to talk politics, so let's talk politics. The GOP and the DNC has their nominee for the election. Maybe it's a good time to start talking about Trump vs. Biden? Or would you rather just spend your time dumping on Trump, no matter what?
Why? Human nature... You are right, should focus on the two candidates.

There is really nothing to discuss. In this election, as things stand I am voting Trump. Will he win? He should stand a good shot if he behaves and stresses a comparison of 2019 to today. He should be better than Biden, if he has some bumpers in place. Boring race with fascinating Candidates.

The more curious thing is what is happening in the House. Trump with a Dem House and Senate is going to be ugly. I am hoping that the Right can come in line behind Johnson and start using the Majority, even if it is small.

Senate I am seeing GOP stands a good chance of winning, if things hold. Sort of boring there too.




boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?






GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Let's Go Brandon!
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

That strategy worked well for Romney.
Romney would have made a far better president than Obama , Trump or Biden .
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

historian said:

That strategy worked well for Romney.
Romney would have made a far better president than Obama , Trump or Biden .


Obama and Biden? Yes

Trump? No

Romney would have caved on Covid just like Trump, would have given us more David Souter like Supreme Court justices, pushed for amnesty, and probably pushed for a war with Iran or Syria

Plus he would have been lame
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Almost anyone not on the Left would be better than Obama or Biden since they have a record mostly of disaster, and always blaming their mistakes on someone out of power. For Biden the record is 100% disaster: Bidenflation, border invasion, Afghanistan, his war on women and children, endless corruption, lies, & incompetence, etc.

At least Trump had some actual accomplishments: tax cuts, growing economy (despite covid), no new wars, relative international stability, forcing NATO countries to pay for their own defense, relative peace in the Middle East, Abraham Accords, progress on controlling the border, etc.

It's a very sharp contrast. Obama & Biden each had numerous scandals (remember Fast & Furious?) while all Trump has are idiotic fake scandals since disproven. For example, the Russian collusion hoax was an obvious lie from the beginning. The only people who collided were all the Leftists with their fraud, lies, & cover ups. Many of them belong in jail including Barack, Hillary, & Bill. The "fake" impeachment was over a diplomatic phone call! Presidents have been doing that kind of thing almost since it was invented.

And I don't even like Trump!!
β€œIncline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.


Not sure if true - friend shared a meme that if only men voted the GOP would have won every presidential election since Eisenhower.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.
Some very intelligent folks believe every bad rumor about Trump and that every extra ' legal ' process inflicted on him is justified because Trump is a ' threat '.

Amazing how effective repetitive propaganda can be if given enough time.

Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.
Holy cow! You're married to Humck?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

whiterock said:

boognish_bear said:

https://nypost.com/2024/04/21/us-news/rfk-jrs-candidacy-may-hurt-trump-more-than-biden-in-2024-a-surprising-new-poll-says/

Trump ekes out a win against Biden one-on-one 46% to 44%, but when Kennedy is added to the mix, Biden tops Trump at 39% to 37%, followed by Kennedy at 13%,
a very high percentage of the two-man race polling being done at this time look like the one you cited - 46-44, one way or the other (Trump winning more than not). But less discussed is...."what about those TEN points of undecideds?

In a normal two man race, a very big percentage end up not voting at all. And two guys with unpopularity numbers as high as Biden & Trump would normally expect to see the "meh, I can't pull the lever for either of these two...." be higher than average. That's where the significance of the third party candidates comes in. Normally, there's only a Libertarian (who pulls a 2-4 points, almost all of it from Republicans). Occasionally, there will be a Green (who pulls a point or two, almost all of it from Democrats). This cycle, though, we have both, and a stronger Green candidate than normal (Cornel West). Most significantly, there is a true independent with some talent and name ID - RFK Jr. He's LIKELY to pull 6-10 points. What all these 3rd party candidates are going to do is suck off a significant percentage of that "undecided vote," make it harder and harder for the major candidates to find an issue to swing a big percentage of undecideds their way.

Normally, given the polling we see (lean Trump) and the number & quality of 3rd party candidates on the ticket, we should expect to see a race structured thusly break late and closely for the challenger (Trump).

All that's to say, the post immediately above penned by 4th & Inches is correct - it will be a turnout election.

Dems have demonstrated a significant advantaged in the last two cycles with mail-in voting operations. GOP must match that effort or Dems will eke out another win. GOP is putting in the effort to do so. But will it be good enough? To early to tell.
What is going to be interesting is what the numbers do the closer to November we get. There was a time Trump was trouncing Biden, now we are getting closer and the polls are hedging their bets more.

Firebrands like Trump are attractive 12 to 18 months outside of an election, actually voting for them to let them do what they preach is another thing all together.

Will the Independents actually be able to put everything aside about Trump the man and vote for Trump the Candidate? I am saying No. That when push comes to shove and they start seeing more of Trump on TV and in debates, they run back to Biden.

GOP should have run Haley or DeSantis.

yeah, and I was once convinced Obama would be easier to beat than Hillary.

The process usually does offer up the strongest candidate.....
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

GrowlTowel said:

My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.
Holy cow! You're married to Humck?
Good bull is good bull. Well played.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Whiskey Pete said:

GrowlTowel said:

My wife still believes the Russian collusion. So it worked for some portion of the population.
Holy cow! You're married to Humck?
Good bull is good bull. Well played.
Sorry! Couldn't resist
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump was a good president for three years. He delivered a rona vax in record time. He did especially well given the consolidated effort among the radical left and the deep state to constantly undermine him. We cannot afford four more years of the divisive authoritarianism of the Biden Administration, and a vote for Biden effectively is a vote for Harris. I cannot imagine how unhinged this administration would be as a lame duck. I'll hold my nose and vote for Trump.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I've had to hold my nose for every presidential election but one since I started voting. Most other races too. It's almost always the lesser of evils.
β€œIncline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:


Unfrickin' believable!!! So these lonely women think that China Joe is the answer to all of their hopes and dreams???? They are obviously having great sex since they all celebrate the ability to kill their unborn children. My God! Mental illness has definitely spun out of control in this country. Perhaps a degree in Psychology is a golden ticket in 2024 and beyond.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

Jack Bauer said:


Unfrickin' believable!!! So these lonely women think that China Joe is the answer to all of their hopes and dreams???? They are obviously having great sex since they all celebrate the ability to kill their unborn children. My God! Mental illness has definitely spun out of control in this country. Perhaps a degree in Psychology is a golden ticket in 2024 and beyond.
the low fat diet, the no meat revolution, the lack of iodine as people have been told to eat less salt.. female hormones are messed up at an all time high level.

Women need more protien and animal fat in their diet plus supplemental iodine. Many of womens hormonal health issues will go away.
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:


Beat me to it.

Dems are using abortion issue to fire up single women (who area lower-turnout demographic) and then using mail-in voting operations funded by corporate donors to build 501c3 non-profits to engage in heavy voter ID and registration operations drive turnout Now that all the voter data is on-line, it's easy to find who's eligible, who's registered or not, who's requested ballots or not, and who's voted or not....if you have the money and people to do the grunt work. GOP has not in prior cycles had anything remotely approaching such a well-tuned effort.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

I've had to hold my nose for every presidential election but one since I started voting. Most other races too. It's almost always the lesser of evils.


Was enthusiastic for

Reagan
H. Ross Perot
Donald Trump ( 2016 )

The rest was picking the lessor of two evils.

But this presidential election offers the worst choices by far.


J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

historian said:

That strategy worked well for Romney.
Romney would have made a far better president than Obama , Trump or Biden .


Obama and Biden? Yes

Trump? No

Romney would have caved on Covid just like Trump, would have given us more David Souter like Supreme Court justices, pushed for amnesty, and probably pushed for a war with Iran or Syria

Plus he would have been lame
you are nothing but a whack job. Trump >Romney? You funny.
First Page Last Page
Page 128 of 303
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.