2024

435,336 Views | 8378 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by FLBear5630
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting comments by head pollster at Rasmussen. Most of the polls showing Harris surging or ahead are from datasets that are several days old. Rasmussen polls daily, ergo shows clear trend lines. The last two nights, Trump was up 5 & 7 pts respectively, I.e. the race is right back where it was before Kamalamania.



And the Waltz pick is not going to jolt anything. It's a base pick. Hard left vs Trump 1.0 and Trump 2.0.

It's worth dusting off this older but still relevant article - populism if the left (collectivism) vs populism of the right (liberty). Looks like that's where we are.
https://www.hoover.org/research/dueling-populisms


drahthaar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.
been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.
The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union


When the Dems adhere to the Constitution you can legitimately make this claim. Without that, there is no hope for liberty.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Whiskey Pete said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.
If Trump wins, cities will burn and the democrats will encourage it.
hahahahaa
Yes, it does seem to be in character for you to laugh at the idea of innocent people suffering from a 'progressive' mob destroying buildings and hurting good people.

All the while ABC News and MSNBC will assure us they are 'mostly peaceful'.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Whiskey Pete said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.
If Trump wins, cities will burn and the democrats will encourage it.

If Trump wins and cities burn it will because Dems are behind it. They might use their front groups like BLM or antifa but it's still the same Leftists. Modern day brown shirts or black shirts for modern day fascists.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The president don't control the market but they certainly influence it. The same is true for any powerful entity in the economy.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

In a world that's objectively corrupt and wicked, we're more aligned with reality and they have a propensity to be disjointed


No, you are aligned with the trumped up fear reality of Trump. His is a dystopian vision for America.
Your amygdala is a small part of your brain, but it has a big job. It's a major processing center for emotions - emotions that DT trades. Leftist or liberals no more aligned with reality than a normal person but we offer a vision of hope and equal opportunity.
been offering that same hope and change for a while now.. when does it kick in? When their is justice for all.
The founding fathers put the word of hope and equal opportunities in the Preamble to the Constitution
" We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice,"
In order to form a more perfect means it is always an on going project of our Union
done deal.. next!

Everybody has been equal in the eyes of the law for years

Under socialists (commies, fascists, etc), some are more equal than others.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Equal opportunity" is an empty phrase with our fascist leaders perverting justice at every turn:

-open borders allowing millions of illegal aliens to break laws while violating our borders
-fascist prosecutors refusing to prosecute criminals even when their is plenty of evidence
-fascist prosecutors & judges letting violent criminals go free so they can terrorize more people
-"defund the police" to help the criminals
-illegal alien crime wave with too many victims to count: rapes, burglaries, assaults, murders, etc
-judicial double standard with certain groups based upon identity politics and politics in general
-failure to prosecute rioters in 2020 or 2024 (most recently in Washington because the Leftists like the Islamofascists & are antisemites)
-the gross injustices perpetrated on J6 protestors when rioters go free
-the sham trials against Trump based upon fake charges & ignoring his constitutional rights

The list goes on & on.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somehow I knew it was going to be VDH! He is brilliant and one of the best voices of reason out there.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ATL Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I guess it's too late to replace Trump on the ticket.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


Wolz was about as big a mistake as Vance for Trump.

Trump has an opportunity to take back the momentum. He needs a visit to the Border, a visit to Wall St, something that REALLY sets the difference in the voters heads.

Harris's handlers had been knocking it out of the park until this pick. He is worse than Tim Kane was. Kane was just boring and had no personality. This guy is a tied in the wool Communist with literal ties to China.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.


I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?
Do you defend this?

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Who is Ryan Chew?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I don't really know what the Council of Governors does....

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
That is the same as Trump saying "Find me the Votes". It is a term of speech, not literal. Trump should not be tried for it, neither should Chew. People are getting ridiuclous.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the first time Harris has crossed into negative betting odds

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
That is the same as Trump saying "Find me the Votes". It is a term of speech, not literal. Trump should not be tried for it, neither should Chew. People are getting ridiuclous.
It's more of the case of what did he mean by that?

There's red flags and no answers. That's a common theme in today's politics. Same situation with the Trump assassination where nobody is being held accountable, nobody can provide adequate answers and the can just gets kicked until people stop caring.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump tells the story of when Walz called him for help from angry protesters...

Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
Trump saying "Find me the Votes". It is a term of speech, not literal.

But that is not what the Media and the DC political class have been saying for 4 years....they have been endlessly telling us that this was de-facto evidence that Trump as trying to steal the election.

[Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.]

Is this statement by Chew not de-facto evidence as well?

Or is the Media just lying and uses words to spin reality?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.


I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?
Do you defend this?




If true (???), Is that the reason Trump lost to Biden? Trump told us not to vote early. We didn't.

Sounds to me like you won't recognize as legitimate any election your guy loses

Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.


I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?
Do you defend this?


If true (???), Is that the reason Trump lost to Biden? Trump told us not to vote early. We didn't.

Sounds to me like you won't recognize as legitimate any election your guy loses
Sounds to me like you think elections can't be fraudulent.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Osodecentx said:

Doc Holliday said:

Even if Trump wins it sounds like democrats have a plan to keep him from being POTUS.




Not what he said.
If Trump loses election, he thinks there will be civil war type conditions because Trump supporters won't accept results
He said if Congress decides to disqualify him on J6 2025 then it will lead to civil war.

Only democrats would disqualify him.




Wouldn't Trump be disqualified if he has less than 270 EV? Trump supporters claim Jan was "only" a riot, a riot of MAGA supporters
The topic is that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him and it's up to Congress, that democrats would decide to disqualify him in the event he has enough electoral votes.


I didn't hear it that way. If S Ct disqualifies the winner of the EV I'll meet you at the Capitol and lead the charge. If you don't accept the results of an election, I'll meet you at the Capitol to defend the results.

I'll defend the results which ever way it goes. I wonder if you will accept a result you don't like (e.g. if Trump loses it was stolen)?
Watch the video. He's saying that because the Supreme Court refuses to disqualify him that democrats may have to resort to disqualifying him, even if he wins.

I think Trump will be assassinated if he's polling high or wins.


I watched the video. I'll defend election results whichever way it goes. Will you?
Do you defend this?


If true (???), Is that the reason Trump lost to Biden? Trump told us not to vote early. We didn't.

Sounds to me like you won't recognize as legitimate any election your guy loses
Sounds to me like you think elections can't be fraudulent.


Sure they can. Did Trump lose Wisconsin because of this? Is it possible your guy can lose an election? He's trying awfully hard
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
Trump saying "Find me the Votes". It is a term of speech, not literal.

But that is not what the Media and the DC political class have been saying for 4 years....they have been endlessly telling us that this was de-facto evidence that Trump as trying to steal the election.

[Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.]

Is this statement by Chew not de-facto evidence as well?

Or is the Media just lying and uses words to spin reality?
We agree here. I don't agree with them. I am my own Nation on this...
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
Thanks, for all I knew he was a TikTok influencer. Maybe he still is ,,,
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like we've been seeing more Vance than Trump lately for some reason.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

FLBear5630 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
Trump saying "Find me the Votes". It is a term of speech, not literal.

But that is not what the Media and the DC political class have been saying for 4 years....they have been endlessly telling us that this was de-facto evidence that Trump as trying to steal the election.

[Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.]

Is this statement by Chew not de-facto evidence as well?

Or is the Media just lying and uses words to spin reality?

Whenever the fascists accuse of Trump of something it's almost a given that they are guilty of that very thing. They stole the 2020 election in several states (probably tried in all 50) and will try again this year, at least in the swing states.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:

Seems like we've been seeing more Vance than Trump lately for some reason.
Makes sense, actually.

1. Walz was the new shiny object for Democrats, but he was so poorly-vetted that next to him, Vance looks immensely capable and a much better choice;

2. Walz knew he never served in combat, yet he played the 'combat veteran' card thinking he could attack Vance that way ... and hoo boy did Vance destroy Walz's cred in quick fashion

3. Vance also got a two-for-one shot in on Harris, by walking over to her plane and speaking to the press, all the while reminding them how Harris dodged answering questions

4. Trump's recent stupids fade from the chatter while Vance reminds voters he earned his way up and actually served in combat as a Marine


That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
AP Fact check False
CLAIM: Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall was fired in recent days for her role in rigging the 2020 presidential election.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. A spokesperson for Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson said Woodall's removal had nothing to do with how she ran elections, adding there "was no indication of election impropriety" in Milwaukee's 2020 vote. He pointed to internal issues "that raised" concerns as the reason for the dismissal.
THE FACTS: With the 2024 election just six months away, social media users continue to promote erroneous claims of election-related fraud in 2020, most recently with a spotlight on Wisconsin.
"Claire Woodall, the Milwaukee elections director was replaced just 6 months before the presidential election," reads one X post. "The reason? Mainstream media says it's nothing to see here but some reports say otherwise. Claire printed 64,000 ballots in a back room at City Hall in Milwaukee and had random employees fill them out for the 2020 presidential election. Biden won Wisconsin over Trump by a margin of 20,649 votes."



The post had received approximately 26,000 likes and more than 12,700 shares as of Monday.

Johnson replaced Woodall in a surprise move on May 6, announcing that her deputy, Paulina Gutierrez, would be in charge of the election commission. But the change has nothing to do with how Woodall ran elections, including in 2020.


The reason for the dismissal was related to "other issues internal to the election commission office and to city government that raised concern," said Jeff Fleming, Johnson's spokesperson. He declined to say what those issues were.
"People see one side on this side of the camera, but there are other things on the other side of the camera that I also have to deal with and that's exactly what I did with my decision," Johnson told WISN-TV. He declined to
Waco1947 ,la
4th and Inches
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Waco1947 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
AP Fact check False
CLAIM: Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall was fired in recent days for her role in rigging the 2020 presidential election.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. A spokesperson for Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson said Woodall's removal had nothing to do with how she ran elections, adding there "was no indication of election impropriety" in Milwaukee's 2020 vote. He pointed to internal issues "that raised" concerns as the reason for the dismissal.
THE FACTS: With the 2024 election just six months away, social media users continue to promote erroneous claims of election-related fraud in 2020, most recently with a spotlight on Wisconsin.
"Claire Woodall, the Milwaukee elections director was replaced just 6 months before the presidential election," reads one X post. "The reason? Mainstream media says it's nothing to see here but some reports say otherwise. Claire printed 64,000 ballots in a back room at City Hall in Milwaukee and had random employees fill them out for the 2020 presidential election. Biden won Wisconsin over Trump by a margin of 20,649 votes."



The post had received approximately 26,000 likes and more than 12,700 shares as of Monday.

Johnson replaced Woodall in a surprise move on May 6, announcing that her deputy, Paulina Gutierrez, would be in charge of the election commission. But the change has nothing to do with how Woodall ran elections, including in 2020.


The reason for the dismissal was related to "other issues internal to the election commission office and to city government that raised concern," said Jeff Fleming, Johnson's spokesperson. He declined to say what those issues were.
"People see one side on this side of the camera, but there are other things on the other side of the camera that I also have to deal with and that's exactly what I did with my decision," Johnson told WISN-TV. He declined to
lol, using the MSM to fact check anything comedy gold
Adopt-a-Bear 2024

#90 COOPER LANZ ( DL )
CLASS Junior
HT/WT 6' 3", 288 lbs


#50 KAIAN ROBERTS-DAY ( DL )
CLASS Sophomore
HT/WT 6' 3", 273 lbs
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
4th and Inches said:

Waco1947 said:

Doc Holliday said:

Oldbear83 said:

Who is Ryan Chew?
Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall is thanked by Ryan Chew of The Elections Group for "delivering just the margin needed at 3:00 am" to give Biden a 2020 victory.

Woodall was fired from her job in May for "internal" issues.

Chew is the president of the The Elections Group which is connected to and funded by George Soros and Jennifer Morrell.
AP Fact check False
CLAIM: Milwaukee Election Commission Executive Director Claire Woodall was fired in recent days for her role in rigging the 2020 presidential election.
AP'S ASSESSMENT: False. A spokesperson for Milwaukee Mayor Cavalier Johnson said Woodall's removal had nothing to do with how she ran elections, adding there "was no indication of election impropriety" in Milwaukee's 2020 vote. He pointed to internal issues "that raised" concerns as the reason for the dismissal.
THE FACTS: With the 2024 election just six months away, social media users continue to promote erroneous claims of election-related fraud in 2020, most recently with a spotlight on Wisconsin.
"Claire Woodall, the Milwaukee elections director was replaced just 6 months before the presidential election," reads one X post. "The reason? Mainstream media says it's nothing to see here but some reports say otherwise. Claire printed 64,000 ballots in a back room at City Hall in Milwaukee and had random employees fill them out for the 2020 presidential election. Biden won Wisconsin over Trump by a margin of 20,649 votes."



The post had received approximately 26,000 likes and more than 12,700 shares as of Monday.

Johnson replaced Woodall in a surprise move on May 6, announcing that her deputy, Paulina Gutierrez, would be in charge of the election commission. But the change has nothing to do with how Woodall ran elections, including in 2020.


The reason for the dismissal was related to "other issues internal to the election commission office and to city government that raised concern," said Jeff Fleming, Johnson's spokesperson. He declined to say what those issues were.
"People see one side on this side of the camera, but there are other things on the other side of the camera that I also have to deal with and that's exactly what I did with my decision," Johnson told WISN-TV. He declined to
lol, using the MSM to fact check anything comedy gold
It's not as if Waco will ever admit the Democrats did anything bad ...
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Waco1947
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

boognish_bear said:

Seems like we've been seeing more Vance than Trump lately for some reason.
Makes sense, actually.

1. Walz was the new shiny object for Democrats, but he was so poorly-vetted that next to him, Vance looks immensely capable and a much better choice; He's got the woman locked up. (sarcasm)

2. Walz knew he never served in combat, yet he played the 'combat veteran' card thinking he could attack Vance that way ... and hoo boy did Vance destroy Walz's cred in quick fashion Walz never said he was a combat veteran. This is straight up a lie.

3. Vance also got a two-for-one shot in on Harris, by walking over to her plane and speaking to the press, all the while reminding them how Harris dodged answering questions I saw his interview on the tarmac. He simply said lies and went unchallenged by the press.

4. Trump's recent stupids fade from the chatter while Vance reminds voters he earned his way up and actually served in combat as a Marine This fact is right.



Waco1947 ,la
First Page Last Page
Page 187 of 240
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.