Republicans Must Soften Their Position On Abortion.........

21,374 Views | 230 Replies | Last: 1 mo ago by historian
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
LIB,MR BEARS said:

Coke Bear said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

We do agree that abortion is a horrible thing. Rape and incest are worse, in my opinion.
I would disagree. While rape and incest are horrible acts, murdering an innocent is much worse.

A rape or incest victim can heal (with extensive therapy, counseling, and time.) There is no healing from being murdered.
following rd2's logic, if I witness a rape, stopping the crime by shooting both the attacker and the victim stops an evil and prevents an even worse evil.
Ummmm.........that makes no sense.

Where have I ever said the victim (mother) should die?

The reality is that I am almost 60 years old and my wife is 8 years behind me. Our child bearing years are behind us. Abortion is no longer an issue that directly affects us. It should probably be decided by those it directly affects.
I must admit, I am truly shocked at how many here seem to believe that rape victims should be forced to give birth to their rapist's baby.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pro life? Does the priest acting for God, ask the innocent baby if its ok?

Numbers 5:11-16

Hosea 13:16


The people of Samaria must bear their guilt,
because they have rebelled against their God.
They will fall by the sword;
their little ones will be dashed to the ground,
their pregnant women ripped open.


Making laws based on a few select verses seems wrong to me. There are over 300 Mosiac laws. Guess how many of them are about abortion?

Genesis says Adam became a living soul when he took his first breath, not when God started creating him.

Ancient law says life begins with breath.

Exodus 21 :21-23 The penalty for causing miscarriage is not the same as thr penalty for causing death. I wonder why?

I am not pro abortion. I did not choose it in my personal life. I do not want to live in a theocracy.. The one time the Bible mentions abortion is when a priest carries it out to punish a woman.

Live your life. Pray for others. Stop trying to pass laws based on you religious convictions.

If you are going to punish women, punush men too. If a man throws a baby on a women he should be forced to provide. The laws on paternital responsabilty are pitiful and largly unenforced.




KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fadskier said:

KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

If you believe an acorn is a tree then you cant justify killing the product of a rape or incest etc. Its not the acorns fault.

If you believe an unborn baby is a baby, you can't justify an abortion.


Disagree

There are situations were the mothers life is at risk .

Have known 2 women who were told they would die giving birth .

They both chose to give birth anyway and survived . But it was their option .

Rape …..the mother should have the option as well .

Not one state bans abortion if the mother's life is a stake
Thank you for this information .

Not sure many people realise this.

Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

fadskier said:

KaiBear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

If you believe an acorn is a tree then you cant justify killing the product of a rape or incest etc. Its not the acorns fault.

If you believe an unborn baby is a baby, you can't justify an abortion.


Disagree

There are situations were the mothers life is at risk .

Have known 2 women who were told they would die giving birth .

They both chose to give birth anyway and survived . But it was their option .

Rape …..the mother should have the option as well .

Not one state bans abortion if the mother's life is a stake
Thank you for this information .

Not sure many people realise this.




Kinda how ending Roe v Wade didn't end abortion

But they hey hey ho hos easily whipped into a frenzy in their sweatpants
fadskier
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
That kind of thinking got alot of Jews killed...and homosexuals, and handicapped people...
Salute the Marines - Joe Biden
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.


Nonsense. The only idiotic position is your own. The idea that abortion is a mere medical procedure is intellectually dishonest, and asinine.

You know better.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
I agree.


You would. Fools of a feather…
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Pro life? Does the priest acting for God, ask the innocent baby if its ok?

Numbers 5:11-16

Hosea 13:16


The people of Samaria must bear their guilt,
because they have rebelled against their God.
They will fall by the sword;
their little ones will be dashed to the ground,
their pregnant women ripped open.


Making laws based on a few select verses seems wrong to me. There are over 300 Mosiac laws. Guess how many of them are about abortion?

Genesis says Adam became a living soul when he took his first breath, not when God started creating him.

Ancient law says life begins with breath.

Exodus 21 :21-23 The penalty for causing miscarriage is not the same as thr penalty for causing death. I wonder why?

I am not pro abortion. I did not choose it in my personal life. I do not want to live in a theocracy.. The one time the Bible mentions abortion is when a priest carries it out to punish a woman.

Live your life. Pray for others. Stop trying to pass laws based on you religious convictions.

If you are going to punish women, punush men too. If a man throws a baby on a women he should be forced to provide. The laws on paternital responsabilty are pitiful and largly unenforced.







One doesn't need to go back to Mosaic law to know that killing another human life is wrong. It's just basic human decency and common sense.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The question is when life begins. Many people think life begins at birth with the first breath. You calling people names because they dont belief exatly like you is the reason most people dont want a theocracy.

The Bible can be used to argue it either way. My Bible says that God formed Adam out of dust of the ground. So Adam was formed. Then God blew the breath of life and Adam became a living being.

God told a priest to give a woman a test to she if she was unfaithful. If she were guilty it would cause a miscarriage. Nobody asked the innocent unborn.

Most people do not want America turned into a theocracy.

I dont like abortion. Its not my role to condemn those that dont believe like me.



BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

fadskier said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

if they expect to win in 2024. I abhor abortion. But I still think a woman should be allowed to have one before 15 weeks. And later if rape, incest, or danger to the mother is a factor.

My stance has changed on abortion. Based on what I have seen these last 2 1/2 years, any registered Democrat voter or anyone that claims they voted for Joe Biden should be given an exemption, regardless of their state law. They should be granted an abortion, no questions asked up to full gestation. It is in the best interest of our country to limit the number of Liberal Democrats in the future. We are talking about the long-term survival of our country. This is a win/ win except for the unborn that will give their lives for a better future for all of us.

What say you Liberal Democrats? Isn't this what you want? Let's light this candle. Common ground.
Here's my feeling on that. I am unapologetically prolife. The problem is that many prolifers are open to compromise but many, if not most, prochoicers are not. They will not agree to outlawing abortion except for the situations you mention SO...if they are not willing to compromise, why should I?
Actually I agree with Aliceinbubbleland. Abortion (at 15 weeks or sooner) should be a decision between the mother and father and ultimately the mother. It is not our place to speak for every woman in the world and her individual circumstances. It is a decision between her and God.

My daughter recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. We cannot imagine life without him.
Your thoughts on this matter seem a bit incongruous. You are delighted with your beautiful baby grandson and can't imagine life without him......yet you would have supported your daughter's decision to tear him limb by limb as he is ripped away from the safe environment of the womb he was healthily developing in, even if it was for mere convenience?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

fadskier said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

if they expect to win in 2024. I abhor abortion. But I still think a woman should be allowed to have one before 15 weeks. And later if rape, incest, or danger to the mother is a factor.

My stance has changed on abortion. Based on what I have seen these last 2 1/2 years, any registered Democrat voter or anyone that claims they voted for Joe Biden should be given an exemption, regardless of their state law. They should be granted an abortion, no questions asked up to full gestation. It is in the best interest of our country to limit the number of Liberal Democrats in the future. We are talking about the long-term survival of our country. This is a win/ win except for the unborn that will give their lives for a better future for all of us.

What say you Liberal Democrats? Isn't this what you want? Let's light this candle. Common ground.
Here's my feeling on that. I am unapologetically prolife. The problem is that many prolifers are open to compromise but many, if not most, prochoicers are not. They will not agree to outlawing abortion except for the situations you mention SO...if they are not willing to compromise, why should I?
Actually I agree with Aliceinbubbleland. Abortion (at 15 weeks or sooner) should be a decision between the mother and father and ultimately the mother. It is not our place to speak for every woman in the world and her individual circumstances. It is a decision between her and God.

My daughter recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. We cannot imagine life without him.
Your thoughts on this matter seem a bit incongruous. You are delighted with your beautiful baby grandson and can't imagine life without him......yet you would have supported your daughter's decision to tear him limb by limb as he is ripped away from the safe environment of the womb he was healthily developing in, even if it was for mere convenience?
When our daughter came to us in tears after learning she was pregnant, she was unsure if her and her fianc were ready to be parents. My daughter had advanced endometriosis, so her even getting pregnant was a longshot. She knew my stance on abortion. I hugged and held her and told no matter what her decision, I would still love her. I am her father and will always love her no matter what.

Once she heard the baby's heartbeat after the sonogram, she said there was no way she was giving up that baby.
My liberal, indoctrinated daughter gave birth to an angel from Heaven. My daughter did not tear him limb from limb. She did the right thing.

Yes, abortion is a HORRIBLE thing!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

The question is when life begins. Many people think life begins at birth with the first breath. You calling people names because they dont belief exatly like you is the reason most people dont want a theocracy.

The Bible can be used to argue it either way. My Bible says that God formed Adam out of dust of the ground. So Adam was formed. Then God blew the breath of life and Adam became a living being.

God told a priest to give a woman a test to she if she was unfaithful. If she were guilty it would cause a miscarriage. Nobody asked the innocent unborn.

Most people do not want America turned into a theocracy.

I dont like abortion. Its not my role to condemn those that dont believe like me.
1. Since the bible does not say that Adam was conceived in a womb from a sperm and egg, you can't conclude that all human life thenceforth from Adam and Eve does NOT start with conception. Neither can you conclude that God "breathing" into Adam's nostrils is the equivalent of a newborn baby taking it's first breath of air. After all, fetuses have nostrils too. So how do you know when God "breathed" life into it?

2. The bible supports the idea of personhood in the womb (and even BEFORE the womb!): Psalm 139:13-18 and Jeremiah 1:5.

3. Your citation in Numbers and Hosea, if they refer to the death of the unborn, only refer to them as by authority of God, and judgement from God. By what authority, then, do you bring judgement upon the unborn aborted today?

4. It does not take theocratic beliefs to make an argument that human life begins at conception. There is no need for America to turn theocratic to defend life for the unborn.

5. If it is "not your role to condemn those that don't believe like you", then how in the world are you to condemn murder, rape, etc? As I said before, it is troubling how you view this as a virtue, instead of it as the anti-civilizational nonsense that it really is.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

fadskier said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

if they expect to win in 2024. I abhor abortion. But I still think a woman should be allowed to have one before 15 weeks. And later if rape, incest, or danger to the mother is a factor.

My stance has changed on abortion. Based on what I have seen these last 2 1/2 years, any registered Democrat voter or anyone that claims they voted for Joe Biden should be given an exemption, regardless of their state law. They should be granted an abortion, no questions asked up to full gestation. It is in the best interest of our country to limit the number of Liberal Democrats in the future. We are talking about the long-term survival of our country. This is a win/ win except for the unborn that will give their lives for a better future for all of us.

What say you Liberal Democrats? Isn't this what you want? Let's light this candle. Common ground.
Here's my feeling on that. I am unapologetically prolife. The problem is that many prolifers are open to compromise but many, if not most, prochoicers are not. They will not agree to outlawing abortion except for the situations you mention SO...if they are not willing to compromise, why should I?
Actually I agree with Aliceinbubbleland. Abortion (at 15 weeks or sooner) should be a decision between the mother and father and ultimately the mother. It is not our place to speak for every woman in the world and her individual circumstances. It is a decision between her and God.

My daughter recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. We cannot imagine life without him.
Your thoughts on this matter seem a bit incongruous. You are delighted with your beautiful baby grandson and can't imagine life without him......yet you would have supported your daughter's decision to tear him limb by limb as he is ripped away from the safe environment of the womb he was healthily developing in, even if it was for mere convenience?
When our daughter came to us in tears after learning she was pregnant, she was unsure if her and her fianc were ready to be parents. My daughter had advanced endometriosis, so her even getting pregnant was a longshot. She knew my stance on abortion. I hugged and held her and told no matter what her decision, I would still love her. I am her father and will always love her no matter what.

Once she heard the baby's heartbeat after the sonogram, she said there was no way she was giving up that baby.
My liberal, indoctrinated daughter gave birth to an angel from Heaven. My daughter did not tear him limb from limb. She did the right thing.

Yes, abortion is a HORRIBLE thing!
....but you would have supported her "right" to tear him limb from limb, correct? That's the incongruous part.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Pro life? Does the priest acting for God, ask the innocent baby if its ok?

Numbers 5:11-16

Hosea 13:16


The people of Samaria must bear their guilt,
because they have rebelled against their God.
They will fall by the sword;
their little ones will be dashed to the ground,
their pregnant women ripped open.


Making laws based on a few select verses seems wrong to me. There are over 300 Mosiac laws. Guess how many of them are about abortion?

Genesis says Adam became a living soul when he took his first breath, not when God started creating him.

Ancient law says life begins with breath.

Exodus 21 :21-23 The penalty for causing miscarriage is not the same as thr penalty for causing death. I wonder why?

I am not pro abortion. I did not choose it in my personal life. I do not want to live in a theocracy.. The one time the Bible mentions abortion is when a priest carries it out to punish a woman.

Live your life. Pray for others. Stop trying to pass laws based on you religious convictions.

If you are going to punish women, punush men too. If a man throws a baby on a women he should be forced to provide. The laws on paternital responsabilty are pitiful and largly unenforced.





Well hell, let's get rid of all laws that prohibit murder of anyone. I don't want to live in a theocracy.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

fadskier said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

if they expect to win in 2024. I abhor abortion. But I still think a woman should be allowed to have one before 15 weeks. And later if rape, incest, or danger to the mother is a factor.

My stance has changed on abortion. Based on what I have seen these last 2 1/2 years, any registered Democrat voter or anyone that claims they voted for Joe Biden should be given an exemption, regardless of their state law. They should be granted an abortion, no questions asked up to full gestation. It is in the best interest of our country to limit the number of Liberal Democrats in the future. We are talking about the long-term survival of our country. This is a win/ win except for the unborn that will give their lives for a better future for all of us.

What say you Liberal Democrats? Isn't this what you want? Let's light this candle. Common ground.
Here's my feeling on that. I am unapologetically prolife. The problem is that many prolifers are open to compromise but many, if not most, prochoicers are not. They will not agree to outlawing abortion except for the situations you mention SO...if they are not willing to compromise, why should I?
Actually I agree with Aliceinbubbleland. Abortion (at 15 weeks or sooner) should be a decision between the mother and father and ultimately the mother. It is not our place to speak for every woman in the world and her individual circumstances. It is a decision between her and God.

My daughter recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. We cannot imagine life without him.
Your thoughts on this matter seem a bit incongruous. You are delighted with your beautiful baby grandson and can't imagine life without him......yet you would have supported your daughter's decision to tear him limb by limb as he is ripped away from the safe environment of the womb he was healthily developing in, even if it was for mere convenience?
When our daughter came to us in tears after learning she was pregnant, she was unsure if her and her fianc were ready to be parents. My daughter had advanced endometriosis, so her even getting pregnant was a longshot. She knew my stance on abortion. I hugged and held her and told no matter what her decision, I would still love her. I am her father and will always love her no matter what.

Once she heard the baby's heartbeat after the sonogram, she said there was no way she was giving up that baby.
My liberal, indoctrinated daughter gave birth to an angel from Heaven. My daughter did not tear him limb from limb. She did the right thing.

Yes, abortion is a HORRIBLE thing!
....but you would have supported her "right" to tear him limb from limb, correct? That's the incongruous part.
So how many unwanted children have you adopted, fed, housed, and clothed through the age of eighteen? Yeah, that's what I thought. You remind me of a blue state sanctuary city.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

fadskier said:

RD2WINAGNBEAR86 said:

if they expect to win in 2024. I abhor abortion. But I still think a woman should be allowed to have one before 15 weeks. And later if rape, incest, or danger to the mother is a factor.

My stance has changed on abortion. Based on what I have seen these last 2 1/2 years, any registered Democrat voter or anyone that claims they voted for Joe Biden should be given an exemption, regardless of their state law. They should be granted an abortion, no questions asked up to full gestation. It is in the best interest of our country to limit the number of Liberal Democrats in the future. We are talking about the long-term survival of our country. This is a win/ win except for the unborn that will give their lives for a better future for all of us.

What say you Liberal Democrats? Isn't this what you want? Let's light this candle. Common ground.
Here's my feeling on that. I am unapologetically prolife. The problem is that many prolifers are open to compromise but many, if not most, prochoicers are not. They will not agree to outlawing abortion except for the situations you mention SO...if they are not willing to compromise, why should I?
Actually I agree with Aliceinbubbleland. Abortion (at 15 weeks or sooner) should be a decision between the mother and father and ultimately the mother. It is not our place to speak for every woman in the world and her individual circumstances. It is a decision between her and God.

My daughter recently gave birth to a beautiful baby boy. We cannot imagine life without him.
Your thoughts on this matter seem a bit incongruous. You are delighted with your beautiful baby grandson and can't imagine life without him......yet you would have supported your daughter's decision to tear him limb by limb as he is ripped away from the safe environment of the womb he was healthily developing in, even if it was for mere convenience?
When our daughter came to us in tears after learning she was pregnant, she was unsure if her and her fianc were ready to be parents. My daughter had advanced endometriosis, so her even getting pregnant was a longshot. She knew my stance on abortion. I hugged and held her and told no matter what her decision, I would still love her. I am her father and will always love her no matter what.

Once she heard the baby's heartbeat after the sonogram, she said there was no way she was giving up that baby.
My liberal, indoctrinated daughter gave birth to an angel from Heaven. My daughter did not tear him limb from limb. She did the right thing.

Yes, abortion is a HORRIBLE thing!
....but you would have supported her "right" to tear him limb from limb, correct? That's the incongruous part.
So how many unwanted children have you adopted, fed, housed, and clothed through the age of eighteen? Yeah, that's what I thought. You remind me of a blue state sanctuary city.
Unborn humans are not illegal aliens who chose to break the law. Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
" Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex."

Really?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

The question is when life begins. Many people think life begins at birth with the first breath. You calling people names because they dont belief exatly like you is the reason most people dont want a theocracy.

The Bible can be used to argue it either way. My Bible says that God formed Adam out of dust of the ground. So Adam was formed. Then God blew the breath of life and Adam became a living being.

God told a priest to give a woman a test to she if she was unfaithful. If she were guilty it would cause a miscarriage. Nobody asked the innocent unborn.

Most people do not want America turned into a theocracy.

I dont like abortion. Its not my role to condemn those that dont believe like me.
If it is "not your role to condemn those that don't believe like you", then how in the world are you to condemn murder, rape, etc? As I said before, it is troubling how you view this as a virtue, instead of it as the anti-civilizational nonsense that it really is.
Very good question. God forbid with "force our beliefs" on others by saying things like murder, rape, theft and drunk driving should be outlawed.

Guess than means we live in a theocracy, using LIQR's logic (or lack thereof).
cowboycwr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Mothra said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

At 14 and 15 B and I found out she was pregnant. We looked at options, I told her I would work my ass off and take care of her and our baby. She considered abortion but we got married, Daughter is now 47. Abortion was legal in 1976 so she had options. We made the right decision for us. It was her (and to a certain extent my) decision. There was no need to the state of Texas or the governor or the feds to get involved. Isnt that the way its supposed to be?




So because you chose not to murder your baby, we should give women the option of murdering their baby. There's that LIQR logic we all know and love.



Who gives you the right to give any options? Why do you have the power to force your believes on others?
Two years of Covid beliefs being forced on everyone proves this line of argument false.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

The question is when life begins. Many people think life begins at birth with the first breath. You calling people names because they dont belief exatly like you is the reason most people dont want a theocracy.

The Bible can be used to argue it either way. My Bible says that God formed Adam out of dust of the ground. So Adam was formed. Then God blew the breath of life and Adam became a living being.

God told a priest to give a woman a test to she if she was unfaithful. If she were guilty it would cause a miscarriage. Nobody asked the innocent unborn.

Most people do not want America turned into a theocracy.

I dont like abortion. Its not my role to condemn those that dont believe like me.






Many people are wrong. Mocking them is fun and right.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

" Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex."

Really?
Yep. That's how babies are made. It's no hidden secret.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Coke Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

The question is when life begins. Many people think life begins at birth with the first breath. You calling people names because they dont belief exatly like you is the reason most people dont want a theocracy.

The Bible can be used to argue it either way. My Bible says that God formed Adam out of dust of the ground. So Adam was formed. Then God blew the breath of life and Adam became a living being.
Nearly 98% of Embryologists state that life begins at conception. Almost 100% of medical school text books state the same. When sperm and egg unite, a completely new organism is created. It begins to replicate. It is alive.

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

God told a priest to give a woman a test to she if she was unfaithful. If she were guilty it would cause a miscarriage. Nobody asked the innocent unborn.
Actually when one studies the text here, it states that if she's guilty, that her thigh will waste away and her abdomen swell. This does not equate to a miscarriage (which is not an abortion at any rate.)

Most OT scholars believe that this means that if she is guilty, she may become infertile due to the effects that have been described.

I do find it interesting that many Pro-choice individuals will try to use the Bible as justification for abortion. I enjoy discussing it's merits using science, logic, and reason.

PS. (I'm not calling you a Pro-choice person.)
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks for the informative and thoughtful reply Coke .

https://magazine.jhsph.edu/2022/brief-history-abortion-us

This is not meant as a rebuttal of your post. Just a history of how things changed.
Limited IQ Redneck in PU
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

" Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex."

Really?
Yep. That's how babies are made. It's no hidden secret.
So every time you and your wife have sex you are choosing to have a baby? How many children do you have?
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

" Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex."

Really?
Yep. That's how babies are made. It's no hidden secret.


Lawyers are made from a special type of sex

Jk. Kinda
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
And if a man doesn't want to pay child support, then that is between himself and the mother. And if he has abandoned the mother and child, then it is up to him only.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He Hate Me said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
And if a man doesn't want to pay child support, then that is between himself and the mother. And if he has abandoned the mother and child, then it is up to him only.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
I am actually more offended in situations where the father wants the baby and the mother wants to terminate the pregnancy. It takes two to make a baby. In the end, the father really has no rights or say in the matter. That sucks!
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
LIB,MR BEARS
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

Wangchung said:

Limited IQ Redneck in PU said:

" Their parents chose to make them in 99.999% of all cases, when they chose to have sex."

Really?
Yep. That's how babies are made. It's no hidden secret.
So every time you and your wife have sex you are choosing to have a baby? How many children do you have?
Everytime a person gets behind the wheel drunk they do not kill someone but, they do run that risk. This is hard, I know.
Porteroso
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:


Are you not aware of common pregnancy complications?
What specific complications?

Porteroso said:

For the victim of a rape to be forced to carry a fetus to term is just evil. Women should be able to avoid pregnancy by choosing who to have sex with and when. If I thought the survival of humanity could he dependent upon these rape babies that might change my mind, but while the fetus is certainly innocent in the case of rape, so is the mother. Being forced to live with a constant reminder of that trauma is just horrible.
If our country does does execute the rape victim and we don't execute the rapist, why should we execute the innocent baby?

Aborting the baby does not get rid of the pain of rape. It only adds to it. Many women feel the shame of the rape and now have to live with the regret of an abortion. It compounds that wound.

Women should simply be able to choose for themselves. Whether a woman gives birth and mothers a child or not should not depend upon whether or not a man decides to rape her.

The government forcing women to bear the children of rapists is not appropriate.
Does the fetus get a choice?

Of course not. You can't get a straight answer from a fetus on anything, can you? Sometimes there are vast consequences to evil, and a woman being forced to choose between having control over motherhood, and the life of an unborn baby, is truly an evil consequence of rape. I am not claiming it is right to abort the baby. But it is very right for the woman to have the choice. Whatever the woman chooses, the blame for any imaginable fallout can easily be assigned to the rapist.

The evil of rape does not dissolve after the act. It forces many hard situations for life. The government has no place forcing a victim of rape to birth a permanent reminder of this evil.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:


Are you not aware of common pregnancy complications?
What specific complications?

Porteroso said:

For the victim of a rape to be forced to carry a fetus to term is just evil. Women should be able to avoid pregnancy by choosing who to have sex with and when. If I thought the survival of humanity could he dependent upon these rape babies that might change my mind, but while the fetus is certainly innocent in the case of rape, so is the mother. Being forced to live with a constant reminder of that trauma is just horrible.
If our country does does execute the rape victim and we don't execute the rapist, why should we execute the innocent baby?

Aborting the baby does not get rid of the pain of rape. It only adds to it. Many women feel the shame of the rape and now have to live with the regret of an abortion. It compounds that wound.

Women should simply be able to choose for themselves. Whether a woman gives birth and mothers a child or not should not depend upon whether or not a man decides to rape her.

The government forcing women to bear the children of rapists is not appropriate.
Does the fetus get a choice?

Of course not. You can't get a straight answer from a fetus on anything, can you? Sometimes there are vast consequences to evil, and a woman being forced to choose between having control over motherhood, and the life of an unborn baby, is truly an evil consequence of rape. I am not claiming it is right to abort the baby. But it is very right for the woman to have the choice. Whatever the woman chooses, the blame for any imaginable fallout can easily be assigned to the rapist.

The evil of rape does not dissolve after the act. It forces many hard situations for life. The government has no place forcing a victim of rape to birth a permanent reminder of this evil.
There are two kinds of society -- one where a child is a permanent reminder of evil, and one where a child is a unique human being. The government's place is to foster the latter kind.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Porteroso said:

Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:

Coke Bear said:

Porteroso said:


Are you not aware of common pregnancy complications?
What specific complications?

Porteroso said:

For the victim of a rape to be forced to carry a fetus to term is just evil. Women should be able to avoid pregnancy by choosing who to have sex with and when. If I thought the survival of humanity could he dependent upon these rape babies that might change my mind, but while the fetus is certainly innocent in the case of rape, so is the mother. Being forced to live with a constant reminder of that trauma is just horrible.
If our country does does execute the rape victim and we don't execute the rapist, why should we execute the innocent baby?

Aborting the baby does not get rid of the pain of rape. It only adds to it. Many women feel the shame of the rape and now have to live with the regret of an abortion. It compounds that wound.

Women should simply be able to choose for themselves. Whether a woman gives birth and mothers a child or not should not depend upon whether or not a man decides to rape her.

The government forcing women to bear the children of rapists is not appropriate.
Does the fetus get a choice?



The evil of rape does not dissolve after the act.
Neither does the evil of murdering an unborn child.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He Hate Me said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
And if a man doesn't want to pay child support, then that is between himself and the mother. And if he has abandoned the mother and child, then it is up to him only.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
You're correct. It's none of your ****ing business.
Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

He Hate Me said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

This is a topic that shouldn't be addressed anywhere but between the man, woman and their doctor. If there is no dad involved then between woman and her doctor.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
And if a man doesn't want to pay child support, then that is between himself and the mother. And if he has abandoned the mother and child, then it is up to him only.

Stop this idiotic discussion everywhere. It's not your business.
You're correct. It's none of your ****ing business.
Sure, it is. The destruction of innocent life is everyone's business. Protecting the innocent is a core function of government and society. Same for ensuring that those who make babies pay to raise those babies and don't pass the cost on to society and government.

If anyone has been touched or affected by abortion, then Rachel's Vineyard is an excellent resource.

https://www.rachelsvineyard.org/
RD2WINAGNBEAR86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The discussion on a tough topic has been great here. The discussion has been respectful for the most part. I respect everyone's opinion here.

No abortions after 15 weeks. The only exceptions are rape, incest, and danger to the mother. That is where I am. Not sure anyone is going to change my mind. It seems both Republicans and Democrats alike see my position as "too radical". We gotta find some middle ground.
"Never underestimate Joe's ability to **** things up!"

-- Barack Obama
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.