AG Ken Paxton on glide path to impeachment

101,675 Views | 971 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by boognish_bear
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

After listening all day today I think this is the best defense that can be offered at this time in hearings. Something about these 8 and Sutton doesn't set well. Also the bank President got to the top because of 44 years, not qualifications. He is either stupid or wanted to appear that way as something stinks about the foreclosure sale.

I don't know where Hardin was going today but it was boring. The young attorney, Cammack, was hung out to dry by Paul and Paxton. That was the only thing I could see today that meant Paxton was the creep I suspected him to be.

I had no clue until I got Buzbee's campaign flyer today that he is a MAGA. I never would have suspected him to be associated with them.
The question is, where are the swing Senators on the question of Sutton & the Gang of 8? Not sure about that, but know for sure that no sane elected official would want to reward someone else's palace coup with victory, when they are so dependent on their own staff.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

After listening all day today I think this is the best defense that can be offered at this time in hearings. Something about these 8 and Sutton doesn't set well. Also the bank President got to the top because of 44 years, not qualifications. He is either stupid or wanted to appear that way as something stinks about the foreclosure sale.

I don't know where Hardin was going today but it was boring. The young attorney, Cammack, was hung out to dry by Paul and Paxton. That was the only thing I could see today that meant Paxton was the creep I suspected him to be.

I had no clue until I got Buzbee's campaign flyer today that he is a MAGA. I never would have suspected him to be associated with them.
The question is, where are the swing Senators on the question of Sutton & the Gang of 8? Not sure about that, but know for sure that no sane elected official would want to reward someone else's palace coup with victory, when they are so dependent on their own staff.
LOL. You're just gobbling up what MQS is dishing out aren't you?

High level staff, all movement conservatives, suspect illegal activity. They report it to FBI. That isn't a palace coup, that is being honest . I guess dishonest state senators might see it as "rewarding the palace coup".

Convicting Paxton and removing him from office isn't rewarding the whistle blowers. It's thinning the herd of a dishonest AG; it would be rewarding the taxpayers of Texas. Republicans would also be the winners.
Frank Galvin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

After listening all day today I think this is the best defense that can be offered at this time in hearings. Something about these 8 and Sutton doesn't set well. Also the bank President got to the top because of 44 years, not qualifications. He is either stupid or wanted to appear that way as something stinks about the foreclosure sale.

I don't know where Hardin was going today but it was boring. The young attorney, Cammack, was hung out to dry by Paul and Paxton. That was the only thing I could see today that meant Paxton was the creep I suspected him to be.

I had no clue until I got Buzbee's campaign flyer today that he is a MAGA. I never would have suspected him to be associated with them.
The question is, where are the swing Senators on the question of Sutton & the Gang of 8? Not sure about that, but know for sure that no sane elected official would want to reward someone else's palace coup with victory, when they are so dependent on their own staff.


How is it a palace coup? In a coup the actors take over for the king. None of this group were going to be named AG, they faced the real chance they would not even be retained in their positions by whoever succeeded Paxton.
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hopefully they will finish the trial this week.
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I wished they had gone ahead with Buzbee's threat to vote. Enough of this circus. Hardin was incompetent today. He looked like a Biden press conference. I was hoping the whire would testify so the stupids that voted for Paxton could see the hypocrisy.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She was going to plead the 5th so a waste of time having her. Pretty sure Angela Paxton knew this was the strategy all along so save the sympathy.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Sure, sure, Jeb Bush and Mitt Romney were going to create jobs, defend Freedom and appoint originalist judges,, but they just never got the chance?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?

No one person could ever balance the budget themselves obviously, but the first step is to at least reduce the annual deficit. If you truly want that to happen, the last few decades have made it very clear that you should vote for a Democratic President.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?

No one person could ever balance the budget themselves obviously, but the first step is to at least reduce the annual deficit. If you truly want that to happen, the last few decades have made it very clear that you should vote for a Democratic President.
That last statement could only be made by a very dishonest, or very mentally ill person.

That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA



< chuckle>


Nice try, but my concentration is in Accounting. Clinton's math was a fairy tale.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


That, or the guy deciding the Defense would rest is the same guy who got the Prosecution to rest before they were really done.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Probably. Rusty Hardin handed the victory to defense. Erin Ephley should have been the lead and she should do the closing but the old fart will probably hand it to Buzbee on a platter.

One can only hope the RINO (Religious In Name Only) vote him out or he is convicted here in Harris County.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

After listening all day today I think this is the best defense that can be offered at this time in hearings. Something about these 8 and Sutton doesn't set well. Also the bank President got to the top because of 44 years, not qualifications. He is either stupid or wanted to appear that way as something stinks about the foreclosure sale.

I don't know where Hardin was going today but it was boring. The young attorney, Cammack, was hung out to dry by Paul and Paxton. That was the only thing I could see today that meant Paxton was the creep I suspected him to be.

I had no clue until I got Buzbee's campaign flyer today that he is a MAGA. I never would have suspected him to be associated with them.
The question is, where are the swing Senators on the question of Sutton & the Gang of 8? Not sure about that, but know for sure that no sane elected official would want to reward someone else's palace coup with victory, when they are so dependent on their own staff.
LOL. You're just gobbling up what MQS is dishing out aren't you?

High level staff, all movement conservatives, suspect illegal activity. They report it to FBI. That isn't a palace coup, that is being honest . I guess dishonest state senators might see it as "rewarding the palace coup".

Convicting Paxton and removing him from office isn't rewarding the whistle blowers. It's thinning the herd of a dishonest AG; it would be rewarding the taxpayers of Texas. Republicans would also be the winners.

LOL. ""Suspect" is the right word. here's your case, in a nutshell

Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prosecutors stunned me this morning knocking it out of the park with powerful closing argument. Buzbee tried to make this a Bush yankees vs Texans.

Hon Jeff Leach made me proud. What a great challenge to those on the fence. And Buzbee's trampling the law enforcement (Rangers, FBI, Justic Department) was killed by Prosecutions saying We Back The Blue.

FY Paxton
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggy Buzbee just stomped on Bush's graves in College Station during his ranting closing
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA



< chuckle>


Nice try, but my concentration is in Accounting. Clinton's math was a fairy tale.
I am not a Bill Clinton fan but he did go through Business Process Engineering to try to make the government more efficient. His last month or so in office the spending was less than revenues.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA



< chuckle>


Nice try, but my concentration is in Accounting. Clinton's math was a fairy tale.
I am not a Bill Clinton fan but he did go through Business Process Engineering to try to make the government more efficient. His last month or so in office the spending was less than revenues.
Believe that if it makes you feel good.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

quash said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

House impeaches by simple majority. Senate convicts by 2/3rds. Trump's impeached, then acquitted

The standard of evidence for a senator to convict is whatever the senator thinks it is. Senator can vote to convict for any reason or no reason at all.fo
no argument from me
Impeachment is not a legal process. It's a political process. Rules of due process do not apply, although the bodies involved will establish rules that are facsimiles of due process.

Literally, the people voting to impeach and convict are looking at how their vote will affect their re-election process.
I don't disagree. I'm wondering if senators believe it is helpful politically to acquit a guy whose been indicted once and may be indicted again. Do they want their political futures tied up with this guy?


Thanks for bringing the conversation back to my initial point: they could have avoided that dilemma entirely by not impeaching him in the first place and letting the courts handle it........



If, and only if, the allegations are true then his conduct in office is despicable.

If not impeachment then what sanction would you impose? (Aside from "let the voters decide" which is fair.)

He has been under indictment (but inexplicably not prosecuted) for 7-8 years on one (specious) charge.
He is (recently) being investigated by the FBI on another.

Are you going to remove him from office just because he's accused?
(remember, he's been accused of some of the counts for a long, long time and been elected anyway.)
Or are you going to let the processes in motion play out and remove him if/when convicted?

Why the rush to impeach?
Could it be that the legal cases against him are so weak?
Would it not be more fair to him and the majority of people who voted for him to let the legal processes lay out FIRST?

"Nah, I don't like the SOB and most especially the nutjobs who support him, so I'll help the Democrats screw him over the first chance I get, voters be damned."
--Osodecentx

Nothing in the Texas construction or the rules of the legislature require that body to pause while other charges are resolved. There is no interplay

Neither is there a "rush". Resolving this between sessions is entirely appropriate.

Not sure why you asked me those questions: as I said if he is convicted he's out, if not he can stay as far as I'm concerned.

But you didn't answer the question I asked: what sanction would you impose if the evidence supports the charges?
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:


I wished I could be so confident as you in counting votes.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Guy Noir
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA



< chuckle>


Nice try, but my concentration is in Accounting. Clinton's math was a fairy tale.
I am not a Bill Clinton fan but he did go through Business Process Engineering to try to make the government more efficient. His last month or so in office the spending was less than revenues.
Believe that if it makes you feel good.
Check it out.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guy Noir said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Oldbear83 said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

Guy Noir said:

Aliceinbubbleland said:

The REAL RINO's are the MAGA's. They have destroyed GOP
Interesting point. The MAGA's haven't done anything to balance the federal budget.

Seriously, who has?
Reagan, Clinton, you know, the ones that were real Republicans and not RINO MAGA



< chuckle>


Nice try, but my concentration is in Accounting. Clinton's math was a fairy tale.
I am not a Bill Clinton fan but he did go through Business Process Engineering to try to make the government more efficient. His last month or so in office the spending was less than revenues.
Believe that if it makes you feel good.
Check it out.
Oh I did, long ago. It's not just Clinton of course, but government 'accounting' is smoke and mirrors to put David Copperfield to shame.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.