AG Ken Paxton on glide path to impeachment

101,686 Views | 971 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by boognish_bear
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.



So much ignorance, so little time

Regarding the Squad, I have been critical. Check the threads I've started.
Regarding "fellow Republicans ", I'm a "10 R" Independent. You guys don't want trash like me in your party. I'm outside the tent pissing in.
Phelan did the right thing. Paxton is a crook
Dan Patrick condemns Fuentes, but you can't. Interesting

I won't vote for Trump for a lot of reasons beyond intemperate speech. Trump struggles to stay ahead of the worst president in my lifetime.

If Trump is convicted, will you lead the impeachment effort as you promised regarding Paxton?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
So, so much ignorance
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
So, so much ignorance
Well, that's a charitable explanation of your posts, Oso. Can't say I buy it by this point.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.



So much ignorance, so little time

Regarding the Squad, I have been critical. Check the threads I've started.
Regarding "fellow Republicans ", I'm a "10 R" Independent. You guys don't want trash like me in your party. I'm outside the tent pissing in.
Phelan did the right thing. Paxton is a crook
Dan Patrick condemns Fuentes, but you can't. Interesting

I won't vote for Trump for a lot of reasons beyond intemperate speech. Trump struggles to stay ahead of the worst president in my lifetime.

If Trump is convicted, will you lead the impeachment effort as you promised regarding Paxton?
Well, we know you THINK Paxton is a crook. I will allow that he does invite a lot of allegations, and that is not irrelevant. But if he really is a crook, why can't SOMEBODY nail him on something? How many years has that Rockwall Co. nonsense been going on? Is that normal? Or a sign there is no there there? And, again, if Paxton really is guilty guilty guilty with all kinds of dispositive evidence lying about....why the hell couldn't Phelan have nailed him on it? Why did Phelan only manage to put up "witnesses" who testified that they actually had no evidence, just "concerns?".....and make allegations which were provably untrue, like the granite countertops....which didn't exist.

Res Ipsa Loquitur: Phelan screwed the pooch. He has a judgment problem - He should have waited until he had actual evidence, a confession or a conviction. And/or he has an execution problem - He should have conducted hearings in the House. He should have put witnesses under oath. He should have invested considerable more effort to undermine Paxton's political support rather than his hasty "SURPRISE" impeachment vote. But he didn't = lazy, arrogant, shallow. Thought he could make a morality play out of it but got pieces of his anatomy handed to him. And rather than take his ass-kicking like a man, he's running around whining trying to turn his pain into a full-blown insurgency. Either he botched an impeachment that he should have won, or he launched an impeachment he shouldn't have done. Dude is a goofy SOB who's not ready for prime time. Maybe that's why you like him so much.

Worst of all, he's actually distracting from reality, trying to convince people the GOP has a nazi problem at a time when Democrats are actually organizing mobs to chant "gas the Jews." You should call him on that, if only to protect the Jews. But oh, no, you'll sacrifice everything to achieve your moral imperative of defeating conservatives....the people trying to get to regular budget order. How outrageously radical is that!

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility



OsoCoreyell
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
So Ken's guilt or innocence or the propriety of whether he should serve in office comes down to everyone trying to hold him to account simultaneously holding the people you don't like to account? What you're proving is that you no one you disagree with should be allowed to hold anyone to account. Does that sound like justice or fairness?
Aliceinbubbleland
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
The only people you go after are Democrats with the possible exception of what you call RINO's. We, OTOH do criticize any Republican right of Bush or Democrats left of Manchin.
Astros in Home Stretch Geaux Texans
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
So Ken's guilt or innocence or the propriety of whether he should serve in office comes down to everyone trying to hold him to account simultaneously holding the people you don't like to account? What you're proving is that you no one you disagree with should be allowed to hold anyone to account. Does that sound like justice or fairness?
I just observed who you go after, While you keep trying to change the topic.

You're a damned hypocrite or a Democrat in conservative clothing.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Aliceinbubbleland said:

Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
The only people you go after are Democrats with the possible exception of what you call RINO's. We, OTOH do criticize any Republican right of Bush or Democrats left of Manchin.
Bull


I just respond to your lynch-mob behavior. I have gone after Christie, lost a blog job for criticising President Bush, and called Trump out on his bombast more than a couple times.

You are either very ignorant or just dishonest.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility






Geez you are obtuse.

While you are making up stuff about Patrick, a conservative PAC manager, and an internet troll, this is actually happening in Dallas. And you are helping that SFB Phelan' desperately try to distract from it.

Exactly what are you up to?


whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OsoCoreyell said:

Oldbear83 said:

You keep proving Whiterock's point, you know. The only people you go after are Republicans, Oso.
So Ken's guilt or innocence or the propriety of whether he should serve in office comes down to everyone trying to hold him to account simultaneously holding the people you don't like to account? What you're proving is that you no one you disagree with should be allowed to hold anyone to account. Does that sound like justice or fairness?

Arguing that the legal actions against Paxton are suitable for accountability AT THIS TIME is not excusing anything. It just means that the cake is not done yet so put away the fecking matches and work more urgent problems, like Democrats having card carrying fascist anti-Semites in their Congressional caucus and bona fife fifth columns of people publicly demonstrating for the eradication rig Israel. .
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility







Exactly what are you up to?
Just posting facts and watching you tie yourself into knots trying to reconcile all of your contradictory statements.

BTW, I don't blame your for trying to change the subject. Defending the crooks you're working for must be really difficult
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is from Dallas. I wonder if there is a group taking pictures of the people demonstrating in favor of killing all Israelis. If I had names of these people, I would not hire them. Your employees reflect your values & the values of your company. These people have disqualified themselves from working for me


Wrecks Quan Dough
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility






Geez you are obtuse.

While you are making up stuff about Patrick, a conservative PAC manager, and an internet troll, this is actually happening in Dallas. And you are helping that SFB Phelan' desperately try to distract from it.

Exactly what are you up to?



Any other Democrats want to join Mayor Johnson in the GOP?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I doubt your company really needs more baristas, anyway ...
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility





While you are making up stuff about Patrick, a conservative PAC manager, and an internet troll, this is actually happening in Dallas. And you are helping that SFB Phelan' desperately try to distract from it.

Exactly what are you up to?
See? It isn't the hard. You can quit defending the indefensible

October 17, 2023 7:21 PM
State Republican Executive Committee is informed that former Rep. Stickland has been removed as President of Defend Texas Liberty PAC
Jill Glover, the party's point person on legislative priorities, emailed the SREC that Luke Macias is the new President of DTL
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility





While you are making up stuff about Patrick, a conservative PAC manager, and an internet troll, this is actually happening in Dallas. And you are helping that SFB Phelan' desperately try to distract from it.

Exactly what are you up to?
See? It isn't the hard. You can quit defending the indefensible

October 17, 2023 7:21 PM
State Republican Executive Committee is informed that former Rep. Stickland has been removed as President of Defend Texas Liberty PAC
Jill Glover, the party's point person on legislative priorities, emailed the SREC that Luke Macias is the new President of DTL
I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!

T
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodece said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:


You have in common with the left that you are driven by hatred, and worse by hatred of the wrong people. Seek help.
Is Strickland the internet troll? If Fuentes is the internet troll, why would Strickland meet with him? Why is Strickland running a multimillion dollar Republican PAC?

Who do I hate?
You don't even know who these people are. Yet you hate them anyway.
Not true. I don't like what they are trying to do to my state.


Do you love/like Fuentes?
apparently you are obsessed with him.

you remind me of the one of those legislators/preachers who rails against immorality at every opportunity, then one day gets caught up in a very embarrassing situation. Down deep, I think you have a hankering for this Fuentes fellow. Seek help.
If I'm obsessed, you continue to ignore the relationship between Defend Texas Liberty and Fuentes. Why? Dan Patrick and Wilks had no problem condemning the Hitler admirer.

You won't condemn what Fuentes advocates? That says it all.
I've condemned intolerance, racism, anti-Semitism, etc... roundly, often, forever. I do not need to dance to your tune to prove any more.

I have not, however, heard you doing so. For that matter, I cannot remember you criticizing the Squad, or progressives, or islamists (worst of them all). They only thing you ever get excited about is criticizing conservatives, for one made up excuse after another. So I'm going to let you make an ass of yourself harping about problems you've created just to make yourself feel good. (or in the case of this thread, lashing out in anger over a failed impeachment.)

If you really cared about good governance, you'd go after the guy who just wasted millions on a failed impeachment. Instead, you are literally calling fellow Republicans Nazis (while refusing to vote for Trump due to his intemperant speech). Trump criticizes an Israeli deputy minister for a bone-headed comment (that actually was a bone-headed comment)? You express outrage. Then spin on a dime and hold up a tiny little straw man for every conservative to denounce at risk of being outage as a witch.

The irony is rich.

I guess you missed this?

Quote:

whiterock said:
If (Paxton is) convicted of something, I will be at the forefront of the impeachment crowd.
Just curious. If Trump is convicted of something will you be in the forefront of the impeachment crowd?

Trump's prosecutions are, each of them, outrageous political intimidation tactics, of which you are so enamored that you irrationally propose impeaching a private citizen.

Calm down, Citizen Beria. You are making a fool of yourself.
Enjoying watching you tie yourself in knots defending your felons.

You tell us if Paxton is convicted you'll "be in the forefront" of the impeachment movement.
But if Trump is convicted it's "outrageous political intimidation tactics". All Trump, all the time. LOL

Biden has committed crimes and he is bad. Trumps has committed crimes and he is good. LOL

If 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats, that's good.
If 75% of Texas Republicans side with Democrats to impeach a crook, that's bad.

The Republican caucus passes a rule that all Republicans would support the majority candidate. Scalise wins the majority, some Republicans refuse to support Scalise and you think that is good.
Jordan wins the majority and some Republicans refuse to support him and you think that is bad.

What is the name of your yoga class? I need your remarkable flexibility





While you are making up stuff about Patrick, a conservative PAC manager, and an internet troll, this is actually happening in Dallas. And you are helping that SFB Phelan' desperately try to distract from it.

Exactly what are you up to?
See? It isn't the hard. You can quit defending the indefensible

October 17, 2023 7:21 PM
State Republican Executive Committee is informed that former Rep. Stickland has been removed as President of Defend Texas Liberty PAC
Jill Glover, the party's point person on legislative priorities, emailed the SREC that Luke Macias is the new President of DTL
I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party. What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism.

What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display.


Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
"Moderate" Republican -

A Democrat wannabe who has to appease a conservative voter base.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.



Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it.
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same.
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it. No, I didn't defend McCarthy, but ole ugly is sure better than ole nothing
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same. The 4% laid out the game plan, the 10% just ran the play designed by the 4%
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote What Senate vote?
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter. No I didn't. I observe that your caucus agreed to unite behind the winner of the cucus vote. Scalise won and you changed the rules.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
LOL. Typical. You start the fire and demand that others extinguish it. You're the Republican, not I. You broke it, you fix it.
Do I detect a criticism of Gaetz? This is new. Good for you! Gaetz doesn't represent the base
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it. No, I didn't defend McCarthy, but ole ugly is sure better than ole nothing
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same. The 4% laid out the game plan, the 10% just ran the play designed by the 4%
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote What Senate vote?
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter. No I didn't. I observe that your caucus agreed to unite behind the winner of the cucus vote. Scalise won and you changed the rules.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
LOL. Typical. You start the fire and demand that others extinguish it. You're the Republican, not I. You broke it, you fix it.
Do I detect a criticism of Gaetz? This is new. Good for you! Gaetz doesn't represent the base
I didn't start anything. You did, picking up Phelan's red-herring nonsense to distract from his shoddily done impeachment process. Dude is politically incompetent and very divisive. He's done nothing to help himself. He's just made himself and his supporters even bigger targets. Texas is a conservative state, you know. (see above about political incompetence).

Gaetz doesn't bother me at all. He speaks for at least as large a part of the electorate as you do, and a larger part of the Republican Party than McCarthy. So only a damned fool would write him off as a damned fool. Accommodating his concerns are as important as accommodating yours. And in this particular circumstance, he had good reason to withdraw his support from a Speaker who had violated most of the agreements he made to secure his office.

Yes, I'd prefer to have the caucus unite and start working on the Republican platform. As soon as your moderate knuckleheads get tired of being spiteful, it will happen.

Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it. No, I didn't defend McCarthy, but ole ugly is sure better than ole nothing
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same. The 4% laid out the game plan, the 10% just ran the play designed by the 4%
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote What Senate vote?
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter. No I didn't. I observe that your caucus agreed to unite behind the winner of the cucus vote. Scalise won and you changed the rules.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
LOL. Typical. You start the fire and demand that others extinguish it. You're the Republican, not I. You broke it, you fix it.
Do I detect a criticism of Gaetz? This is new. Good for you! Gaetz doesn't represent the base
I didn't start anything. You did, picking up Phelan's red-herring nonsense to distract from his shoddily done impeachment process. Dude is politically incompetent and very divisive. He's done nothing to help himself. He's just made himself and his supporters even bigger targets. Texas is a conservative state, you know. (see above about political incompetence).

Gaetz doesn't bother me at all. He speaks for at least as large a part of the electorate as you do, and a larger part of the Republican Party than McCarthy. So only a damned fool would write him off as a damned fool. Accommodating his concerns are as important as accommodating yours. And in this particular circumstance, he had good reason to withdraw his support from a Speaker who had violated most of the agreements he made to secure his office.

Yes, I'd prefer to have the caucus unite and start working on the Republican platform. As soon as your moderate knuckleheads get tired of being spiteful, it will happen.

Gaetz started it and you support Gaetz's motion to vacate. That "broke it" and neither Gaetz not you can fix it, apparently.

Are you advising your Congressman to vote for Emmer? I'm reading that some Jordan dead-enders are "being spiteful"
quash
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

And on this topic you have been truthful and honest?

Please.


I guess we haven't done the Futility Games in a bit.

Ok, oldbear, quote me and prove what I said was untrue.

There's always a first time...
“Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place.” (The Law, p.6) Frederic Bastiat
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Go back to laughing at the idea of protecting our border in the other thread, Quash.

Even that is more credible than your bilge in this one.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it. No, I didn't defend McCarthy, but ole ugly is sure better than ole nothing
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same. The 4% laid out the game plan, the 10% just ran the play designed by the 4%
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote What Senate vote?
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter. No I didn't. I observe that your caucus agreed to unite behind the winner of the cucus vote. Scalise won and you changed the rules.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
LOL. Typical. You start the fire and demand that others extinguish it. You're the Republican, not I. You broke it, you fix it.
Do I detect a criticism of Gaetz? This is new. Good for you! Gaetz doesn't represent the base
Dude is politically incompetent and very divisive. Texas is a conservative state, you know. (see above about political incompetence).
Speaking of incompetence. Your guys in DC are putting on a clinic. Why don't y'all get your **** together?

Total politically incompetent and dangerous to the country
whiterock
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

whiterock said:

Osodecentx said:

Quote:

I didn't defend Stickland. I attacked Phelan for wasting his time attacking a very disagreeable lieutenant of one of the largest conservative donors in the country, in order to distract from his own abysmal failures of leadership.

Now that this noble work (sic) is done, let's see if Phelan has the courage to lash out at the real beating hart of anti-semitism in this country - Democrats - or if he continues gnawing on the bones of his (ostensibly) own coalition. Will he attack Democrats for border policy which is inflicting enormous damage on millions of Texans? Or will he keep up the petty intra-party squabbling with Republicans who disagree with him? My money will be on the latter. That's two big fights he's picked within his own party in the span of a few months. Apparently, that's all he knows how to do. Wolf in sheep's clothing, your buddy Phelan is....saving Texas from Republicans, By God!
Phelan has shown courage and has lashed out at the beating "hart" (sic) of anti-semitism - Your think Fuentes isn't an anti-semite? Dan Patrick and Wilks do.

75% 0f Texas House members agreed with Phelan. 96% of Congressional Republicans supported McCarthy. Yet you support the arsonists who are burning down the Republican majority.

If you want to see a Republican civil war, look no further than DC. The Gaetz 8, 4% of the Republican conference, combined with 100% of Congressional Democrats, to let slip the dogs of war.

Oh quit whacking off to Phelan's red-herring. Fuentes is not a Republican. One Republican consultant making an inexplicably bad decision to meet with him (assuming such was the context) is not evidence of a "beating heart of anti-semitism" within a political party.

What IS evidence of a beating heart of anti-Semitism within a political party is a member of Congress spouting Hamas-propaganda at a demonstration at our Capitol, leading to a sit-in (near riot) INSIDE the US capitol in support of a terrorist group which currently holds American citizen hostages. True

And progressive activists all across the country rallying in support of Hamas, chanting the genocidal "...from the river to the sea...." chant about the destruction of the Jewish state and peoples. True

Yet, here you are, again, posting Phelan's skim coat bull**** to distract from the real problems, apparently to help Democrats, in so doing covering up for blatant, rampant, and most importantly institutional anti-semitism. Nonsense. Are you really trying to link Phelan to Democrat antisemitism? Fail.
.
What I see in Washington is 20 moderate Republicans refusing to even negotiate with a conservative Speaker designate. Very obvious that moderates would rather burn down the house rather than let a conservative lead it. The arrogance and entitlement of the moderates is raging on display. This is fiction
"whacking off"? Classy. At least you've given up defending Stickland's meeting with Fuentes. It took a while, but you're finally in the right place.

Your 4% burn down the house and you blame McCarthy.
Republicans agree that they would unite around the majority's choice for a new Speaker. Scalise gets the majority and a handful of your arsonists renege. You blame moderates.
Jordan's backers threaten and bully their colleagues who refuse to be bullied. You blame moderates.
Jordan can't get to 217 and you blame moderates. Thankfully, this is true.
If Democrats were really smart, a few would cross over and vote for Jordan. That would be a rolling disaster guaranteeing a Jeffires Speakership.


Thanks for confirming my statement by launching an unprincipled attack - that I have defended the meeting or its participants - purely for your own gratification (i.e. onanism) rather than attacking the real anti-semites on the left.

And we see that same pathology in the "4%" attack. McCarthy is completely responsible for his ouster. He made agreement with a group of conservatives to get their votes for speaker. He broke it. Numerous times. When it became clear, after repeated violations, that McCarthy had abandoned the agreement entirely (which were officially enshrined in party rules), they withdrew their support. They played by the rules; he didn't. You defend him. Typical.

The situation at this moment is: moderates are engaging in payback for a fight they caused, then you blame conservatives for being unreasonable. Typical.

We have an equal number of conservatives and moderates poking one another in the eye......and you blame conservatives. Typical.

We have most of the Democrat Party and many societal institutions engaging in shocking displays of anti-semitism....and you are attacking Republicans. Typical.

Forgive us for believing you are willing to burn it all down to stop conservatives (even to the point of giving cover to others engaging in antisemitic rioting and violence.

Speaking of unprincipled

Fact - 4% of Republicans side with 100% of Democrats and you side with Democrats. Then you criticize the 96%.. Well, we're 20 days into it. Congratulations to Gaetz. Hakeem Jeffries supports this message.

Fact - 75% of Texas Republicans vote to impeach a crook and you side with the 25%.

Fact - Patrick and Wilks condemned a meeting with Fuentes, the Hitler admirer. You defended it until the guy was finally fired.

Fact - Republican conference votes to unite behind the Speaker candidate who gets the most votes on a secret ballot. Scalise wins the majority and arsonists refuse to vote for Scalise. You support the bomb throwers, but when others do the same thing you call them obstructionists.

How about a little consistency
Speaking of unprincipled:
--you defend McCarthy making an agreement, then repeatedly violating it. No, I didn't defend McCarthy, but ole ugly is sure better than ole nothing
--you cite 4% as a moral yardstick, then ignore 10% doing the same. The 4% laid out the game plan, the 10% just ran the play designed by the 4%
--you hold the House vote as a yardstick, then ignore the Senate vote What Senate vote?
--you state I defended something I a) never defended, and b) criticized.
--Scalise and Jordan had almost identical vote totals, an you ignore the latter. No I didn't. I observe that your caucus agreed to unite behind the winner of the cucus vote. Scalise won and you changed the rules.

I could do the same to you over the doxxing of the AG. A few house members broke the law doing that. Am I trying to tie you to that? Nope. Condemnation culture is soviet = small people running around with boogeymen demanding outrage, or else.

Grow a spine. Tell us who you support, rather than who you don't. Build something rather than throwing bombs all the time. Otherwise, some people might start to say you are acting like Gaetz
LOL. Typical. You start the fire and demand that others extinguish it. You're the Republican, not I. You broke it, you fix it.
Do I detect a criticism of Gaetz? This is new. Good for you! Gaetz doesn't represent the base
Dude is politically incompetent and very divisive. Texas is a conservative state, you know. (see above about political incompetence).
Speaking of incompetence. Your guys in DC are putting on a clinic. Why don't y'all get your **** together?

Total politically incompetent and dangerous to the country
I agree. Moderates are totally politically incompetent and dangerous to the country. They refuse to work with the majority of the people in their own caucus. I mean, they pushed Tom Emmer for speaker, fer crissakes...the architect of the 2022 NRCC fiasco. No wonder it fell flat before the floor vote. Talk about divisive.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.