HuMcK said:
Doc Holliday said:
HuMcK said:
4th and Inches said:
HuMcK said:
Kind of like how Trump spun up this investigation of Hunter to use as a campaign issue against his dad. Y'all weren't ever curious how this investigation just happened to generate itself in Trump's DOJ right when Joe was putting together his campaign?
Campaign related or not, that doesn't make an allegation true or false. So I'm not really sure what you think you're trying to prove. Fact is, members of the Trump campaign did "collude" with Russia, Hillary didn't make anything up, she just noticed what the rest of us with eyes could also see.
Y'all should really nominate someone other than Trump if you want any of this to land at all, otherwise it just rings incredibly hollow.
(ignore the emoji)
i get one vote and it wont be for Trump of Biden as of today. Stand with me and vote for a young mind that has Americas best interest at heart instead of a washed up retread. Vote the incumbent out at every federal position in every state if they have had more than 8-10 years in washington. These were never supposed to be life long positions.
Donald Trump represents the most serious threat to this country's way of government in the last 100yrs, easily.
Because of how incompetent and untrustworthy our government has been for the last 100 years...tens of millions of people view that as a good thing.
US bureaucracy has done a piss poor job since it's inception. Spending trillions and delivering dog sh it results.
You don't have it in you to fight against getting ripped off. Its just not in your nature to question or criticize authority, instead you embrace it and hope that authority punishes those you hate.
If you think Donald Trump of all people is looking to prevent you from getting ripped off...then I'm sorry but that belief is just not based in any sort of reality. You can say you would prefer someone different, but again that's just not the reality of the choice we have right now (in part because people like you voted for him when there was still a chance to stop him).
Your whole animating theory for supporting DeSantis is because he "fights back" against some vague "woke agenda" with the power of the state. You expressed full throated support for the book bans, and the laws limiting what topics educators can even mention, and the laws designed to limit minority voter turnout. Maybe take that "you [...] hope that authority punishes those you hate" line and analyze how it applies to yourself and your beliefs.
Of all the candidates right now I like Ramaswamy best. Not a DeSantis fan and his campaign sucks. I think the guy is a RINO masquerading as a populist.
You're jumping to conclusions that you have no proof for. That's your problem. There aren't laws designed to limit minority voter turnout. You've been told that but there's absolutely ZERO proof of such laws.
You're a victim of idpol.
The books I support banning are pornographic or those that insinuate that white people are uniquely racist: laws should apply differently to minors. What's wrong with that? There are many topics educators shouldn't be discussing with children.
I think you've drank the kool aid on democrat talking points.
The difference between me and you is I think both parties are a joke and disastrous for our county while you're loyal to one party and a fierce defender of the establishment. I've never seen you criticize the left, not once, meanwhile I think the vast majority of republicans are war hawks and grifters.