Bidens Pressured Burisma Founder into Paying $10 Million Bribe

101,520 Views | 786 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Doc Holliday
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Fani Willis must be getting ready to make a move. Every time Republicans get wind of bad legal news for Trump, they start crying about Hunter Biden, like clockwork.
Its the other way around.

Hunter gets exposed by Archer and shortly after Trump is indicted.

Your premise doesn't even make sense considering almost all of the GOP/Media is against Trump. They're not coming together to protect the guy.

You defend the establishment that gets us into forever wars, spend us into unaffordable living and brainwash us into accepting degeneracy. Why won't you address this? All you do is comment about how DC politicians do no wrong except Trump.

I don't even know what your personal politics are. Like do you support insane taxes and trans ideology being shoved down our throats?
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Makes sense since Joe "The Big Guy" Biden talked to Burisma 100x about the weather.

GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Fani Willis must be getting ready to make a move. Every time Republicans get wind of bad legal news for Trump, they start crying about Hunter Biden, like clockwork.


You got your teams wrong. It is the other way around.
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Fani Willis must be getting ready to make a move. Every time Republicans get wind of bad legal news for Trump, they start crying about Hunter Biden, like clockwork.


You got your teams wrong. It is the other way around.
Yep.

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?






Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jack Bauer said:

GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Fani Willis must be getting ready to make a move. Every time Republicans get wind of bad legal news for Trump, they start crying about Hunter Biden, like clockwork.


You got your teams wrong. It is the other way around.
Yep.


Literally the day after each time the Biden's get exposed and humck thinks its team Trump trying to downplay their issues...

Now he's ignoring the bank records which are DAMNING!
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Amazing, even with the pattern right there in front of your face, you still don't see it.

These Trump investigations are years in the making, and yet somehow the GOP manages to put on some hastily assembled distraction literally one day before each judicial actions against Trump. What do you think is easier to pull off on short notice: a congressional committee hearing, or a years long investigation culminating with indictments? And now, predictably, we have even more "revelations" timed right before Fani Willis is getting ready to swing her hammer. Frankly, the sequence is so obvious that it would get called out for lazy writing on a TV show.
HuMcK
How long do you want to ignore this user?
My personal politics is "f#ck the traitors".

Dems are far from perfect and I disagree with them on major issues, most notably weapons bans. But they aren't getting in bed with foreign governments and trying to burn down our constitutional system like the Trump GOP is.

Before Trump, I was the definition of a swing-voter. I didn't even vote for Obama in 2008, nor did I vote for Hillary. Even now I don't automatically vote blue, but with Trumpism being the currently dominant ideology on the right, I absolutely do not vote for any Trump supporting red anymore and I never will. Fundamentally, I just don't like bullies or thieves, and that's what the modern GOP mostly is these days.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Amazing, even with the pattern right there in front of your face, you still don't see it.

These Trump investigations are years in the making, and yet somehow the GOP manages to put on some hastily assembled distraction literally one day before each judicial actions against Trump. What do you think is easier to pull off on short notice: a congressional committee hearing, or a years long investigation culminating with indictments? And now, predictably, we have even more "revelations" timed right before Fani Willis is getting ready to swing her hammer. Frankly, the sequence is so obvious that it would get called out for lazy writing on a TV show.


Fantasy land material.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

Amazing, even with the pattern right there in front of your face, you still don't see it.

These Trump investigations are years in the making, and yet somehow the GOP manages to put on some hastily assembled distraction literally one day before each judicial actions against Trump. What do you think is easier to pull off on short notice: a congressional committee hearing, or a years long investigation culminating with indictments? And now, predictably, we have even more "revelations" timed right before Fani Willis is getting ready to swing her hammer. Frankly, the sequence is so obvious that it would get called out for lazy writing on a TV show.
It's illegal for anyone outside an investigation into Trump to have access on when they're going to file charges.

You think the GOP has insiders on those targeting Trump?! If so that means you have some traitorous dems on your side.
Doc Holliday
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

My personal politics is "f#ck the traitors".

Dems are far from perfect and I disagree with them on major issues, most notably weapons bans. But they aren't getting in bed with foreign governments and trying to burn down our constitutional system like the Trump GOP is.

Before Trump, I was the definition of a swing-voter. I didn't even vote for Obama in 2008, nor did I vote for Hillary. Even now I don't automatically vote blue, but with Trumpism being the currently dominant ideology on the right, I absolutely do not vote for any Trump supporting red anymore and I never will. Fundamentally, I just don't like bullies or thieves, and that's what the modern GOP mostly is these days.
I'm not a Trump fan either, of all candidates I prefer Ramaswamy.

See I'm really against the entire system that both GOP and Dems uphold. I can't tell if you actually have a problem with DC corruption or not. Or if you even recognize the actual problems such as forever wars, entitlement spending, money printing, and too much red tape designed for profit etc.

These are problems that have made the middle class financially unstable.

If you don't agree that the federal government is deeply corrupt and upholds profit for the 1% then we're not going to agree on anything.

Does the idea of paying someone to do a job and them not doing it make you mad? Really at the core of it I feel ripped off. We all collectively pay trillions yearly and its going to pork & barrel spending and filtered through a corrupt bureaucracy. At the very least they could deliver on welfare, but they don't. Why don't you have a MAJOR problem with that?

People employed by private companies do their job efficiently and frugally. Government employees can royally screw up and lose billions of dollars and nobody loses their job. This will destroy the country and is unacceptable, so why accept it?
Whiskey Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HuMcK said:

My personal politics is "f#ck the traitors".

But they aren't getting in bed with foreign governments and trying to burn down our constitutional system
Not only are they in bed with foreign governments, they're happy to sleep in the wet spot after they've screwed the USA.

With that being said, those democrats are accompanied by plenty of establishment Republicans too.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

HuMcK said:

Amazing, even with the pattern right there in front of your face, you still don't see it.

These Trump investigations are years in the making, and yet somehow the GOP manages to put on some hastily assembled distraction literally one day before each judicial actions against Trump. What do you think is easier to pull off on short notice: a congressional committee hearing, or a years long investigation culminating with indictments? And now, predictably, we have even more "revelations" timed right before Fani Willis is getting ready to swing her hammer. Frankly, the sequence is so obvious that it would get called out for lazy writing on a TV show.


Fantasy land material.


Obvious who loyally watches The View.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:



Remember when the authoritarian "media" went hysterical and full regard when Trump questioned a "journo?"
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Come on guys - the real issue here is Clarence Thomas.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jacques Strap
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti said:



Whew!

For a moment there I thought it said Amos Hochstein was "Hunter Biden's Special Prosecutor". Glad to know this dude is only a "current special presidential coordinator" and there was no funny business going on.
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cobretti
How long do you want to ignore this user?
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.