BREAKING: Speaker McCarthy said the House impeachment committees plan to bring in 9 Biden family members to answer staff questions about bank records showing they got money from China through Hunter Biden

— Paul Sperry (@paulsperry_) September 17, 2023

Waco1947 said:

---

President Biden is worth an estimated $10 million, up from $8 million when he took office. The increase has nothing to do with family business dealings in far-flung countries. Instead, he is getting richer by doing what a lot of 80-year-old Americans are doing: sitting on real estate. The president owns two homes in Delaware that are worth an estimated $7 million combined, $1.8 million more than they were when he took office. Forbes

---

Nah how does he have millions in liquid cash that he got through a couple dozen shell companies?

Rawhide said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Much ado about nothing. Trump could not find anything nor can Comer, Jordan et al.

---

So exactly how did Biden acquire a net worth of tens of millions of dollars working 30 plus years on a federal government salary ?

Magic ?

---

Easy. He either

1) Won the lottery
2) Won the slot machine jackpot
3) Just followed Nancy Pelosi and copied her husband's trades in the stock market

---

Amazing how semi literate Dem partisans don't care if Biden acquires tens of millions of dollars illegally; as long as they get an extra 150 bucks a month in their 'disability' check.

I mean I'm not breaking new ground acknowledging how Democrats deploy completely different standards depending on the T-shirt. But it is amazing the the narrative from the LWNJ media is "no direct evidence" against Biden (even though actually there is) and "circumstantial evidence" is bad (although 99% of evidence is circumstantial) yet when it is Trump the narrative does a 180.

To say there’s no cause for an impeachment investigation is to deny the reality of all we’ve learned about the Biden family business.https://t.co/9sKfd7Xqys

— Wall Street Journal Opinion (@WSJopinion) September 18, 2023

Still evidence free since J6

Months ago, I wrote about the move of the Biden legal team to adopt a scorched earth strategy attacking witnesses and critics. https://t.co/YRoRUQ3ZlF This has included suing the computer shop owner who gave the FBI the laptop and now includes a lawsuit against the IRS itself...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 18, 2023

...He also includes public statements: “This assault on Mr. Biden’s rights involved the public disclosure of his confidential tax information during more than 20 nationally televised and non-congressionally sanctioned interviews and numerous public statements."...

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 18, 2023

...Under Section 6103(f), the House Committee had authority to release this information. Indeed, the Senate report stated “Although the principal purpose of section 6103 is to protect taxpayer-specific information, section 6103 also clearly contemplates the need for the public…

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 18, 2023

There is one striking pattern among the alleged crimes facing Hunter Biden: they all served to conceal the underlying corruption. The investigation and charging of Hunter has, thus far, been strikingly surgical in avoiding this pattern of concealment. https://t.co/J5BL7bDM9h

— Jonathan Turley (@JonathanTurley) September 18, 2023

@Empowr has released its timeline of the Hunter Biden investigation. TONS of information here, and it's based on public sources and info released by Congress--which any of us can speak about as public citizens. Find it here ⬇️ https://t.co/UhfR01j0vf

— Tristan Leavitt (@tristanleavitt) September 18, 2023

Statement on Hunter Biden lawsuit from Gary Shapley legal team: “This suit against the IRS is just another frivolous smear by Biden family attorneys trying to turn people’s attention away from Hunter Biden’s own legal problems and intimidate any current and future whistleblowers.… pic.twitter.com/PUif2Dw1uR

— Catherine Herridge (@CBS_Herridge) September 18, 2023

Democrats forget there are consequences in politics https://t.co/KxFCrA0Wfs

— Washington Examiner (@dcexaminer) September 17, 2023

Waco1947 said:

---

Still evidence free since J6

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Still evidence free since J6

---

Not that you really care, but it is pretty obvious now that you're just trolling. I mean you could say "the evidence does not convince me" or more honestly "don't care, he's a Klanocrat," but to say there is no evidence is just mentally dishonest to making you pointless to any conversation.

Once again, fact free

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

Guy Noir said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

---

He was commenting on 98.96% of his own posts.

Suppose the Fire Department shows up to a building on fire. Joe Biden is stopped speeding out of the parking lot in his Corvette with a property insurance policy for the building in his glove box, an empty gas can in the trunk and Hunter Biden with a crack pipe and a BIC lighter in the passenger seat.

Waco1947: There is ZERO evidence that Joe Biden was involved in the fire.

Hunter Biden tries to avoid in-person arraignment in federal gun charges case https://t.co/lxLAWv415G

— Fox News (@FoxNews) September 19, 2023

Incredible

We've gone from

1). Hunters laptop is Russian disinformation
2). Hunter did nothing wrong
3). Hunter did drugs, but not corruption

And finally

4). Actually, corruption is good. https://t.co/FyT9bRBiXW

— Comfortably Smug (@ComfortablySmug) September 19, 2023

Malbec said:

---

Suppose the Fire Department shows up to a building on fire. Joe Biden is stopped speeding out of the parking lot in his Corvette with a property insurance policy for the building in his glove box, an empty gas can in the trunk and Hunter Biden with a crack pipe and a BIC lighter in the passenger seat.

Waco1947: There is ZERO evidence that Joe Biden was involved in the fire.

---

I had no idea that the Baylor Interdisciplinary Core had an official line of crack paraphernalia.

whitetrash said:

---

Guy Noir said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

---

He was commenting on 98.96% of his own posts.

---

He's Myers is his own person and there is no evidence that Joe pocketed any of of evidence.

Waco1947 said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Guy Noir said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

---

He was commenting on 98.96% of his own posts.

---

He's Myers is his own person and there is no evidence that Joe pocketed any of of evidence.

---

So I will posit to you another question that you will refuse to answer. But heck, I am a glutton for punishment.

If you will, lay out your personal evidentiary standard for when you will believe something. What is your minimum threshold of evidence you require.

For example, in order to believe a person committed a crime, do you need to see a video tape said person committing the crime? Would you believe eye witness testimony? What would it require for you to believe a person committed a crime?

I am honestly curious, what specific evidence would it take to convince you a person committed a crime? What is the bar that evidence must pass in order for you to consider it reliable and trustworthy?

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Guy Noir said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

---

He was commenting on 98.96% of his own posts.

---

He's Myers is his own person and there is no evidence that Joe pocketed any of of evidence.

---

So I will posit to you another question that you will refuse to answer. But heck, I am a glutton for punishment.

If you will, lay out your personal evidentiary standard for when you will believe something. What is your minimum threshold of evidence you require.

For example, in order to believe a person committed a crime, do you need to see a video tape said person committing the crime? Would you believe eye witness testimony? What would it require for you to believe a person committed a crime?

I am honestly curious, what specific evidence would it take to convince you a person committed a crime? What is the bar that evidence must pass in order for you to consider it reliable and trustworthy?

---

I would just love to hear what constitutes his definition of evidence. I am sure the standard is fluid depending upon the team affiliation of the perpetrator.

Malbec said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

whitetrash said:

---

Guy Noir said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Once again, fact free

---

Are you denying that foreign entities paid obscene amounts of money to Hunter Biden where the only logical conclusion is that he was the son of the Vice President?

---

He was commenting on 98.96% of his own posts.

---

He's Myers is his own person and there is no evidence that Joe pocketed any of of evidence.

---

So I will posit to you another question that you will refuse to answer. But heck, I am a glutton for punishment.

If you will, lay out your personal evidentiary standard for when you will believe something. What is your minimum threshold of evidence you require.

For example, in order to believe a person committed a crime, do you need to see a video tape said person committing the crime? Would you believe eye witness testimony? What would it require for you to believe a person committed a crime?

I am honestly curious, what specific evidence would it take to convince you a person committed a crime? What is the bar that evidence must pass in order for you to consider it reliable and trustworthy?

---

I would just love to hear what constitutes his definition of evidence. I am sure the standard is fluid depending upon the team affiliation of the perpetrator.

---

Agreed. Which is why he will not answer. Like most Orwellian National Socialists, he creates an entire worldview based on T-shirt. The most obvious example is there is literally 100 times more evidence against The Biden Crime Family than the four Trump banana republic indictments, but he changes his standard based on T-shirt. What do you expect from a child groomer.

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Unfortunately, there are a number of these.

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Unfortunately, there are a number of these.

---

He's a denier of facts and truth

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Unfortunately, there are a number of these.

---

Unfortunately, you have shown none of these.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Unfortunately, there are a number of these.

---

Unfortunately, you have shown none of these.

---

Unfortunately, I have limited interest in laying them all out, I have just seen enough of them to know they are there and the odds a quite high that the president of my country is a crook.

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Then you're not paying attention. It is all there - you're head is just in the sand.

Waco1947 said:

---

D. C. Bear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Evidence emails, paper trails, bank accounts,recordings.
Stuff like that

---

Unfortunately, there are a number of these.

---

Unfortunately, you have shown none of these.

---

I have pointed it out to you multiple times, you you pretend it does not exist.

1. Hunter's emails to his daughter saying he pays dad's bills
2. "10% for the Big Guy"
3. What's App messages Hunter threatening Chinese businessman that his dad will retailiate
4. DIRECT EVIDENCE - Joe on video bragging he got the prosecutor investigation Burisma fired
5. DIRECT EVIDENCE - Testimony of Hunter's business partner 1
6. DIRECT EVIDENCE - Testimony of Hunter's business partner 2
7. Joe's millions on a not-millionaire salary
8. Russian oligarch who gave Hunter millions did not get sanctioned

What else?

New: A fourth IRS official has confirmed that the Biden-appointed U.S. attorneys in D.C. and California refused to partner with Weiss on Hunter Biden charges.https://t.co/ymCywDr485

— Sarah Bedford (@sarahcbedford) September 22, 2023

https://t.co/DbTe6tXIW2 pic.twitter.com/pq7yE5cT0R

— Stephen L. Miller (@redsteeze) September 22, 2023

Merrick Garland’s Hunter lies blown up YET AGAIN by IRS whistleblowers https://t.co/Ou1xrgznAh pic.twitter.com/hW9qKgn1MF

— NY Post Opinion (@NYPostOpinion) September 22, 2023

This issue isn't unique only to the Bidens, it likely permeates through the entire Democrat Party and the RINOS in the Republican Party. It needs to be weeded out. We need Donald Trump to help us!