Imagine the real courage it would take to now hire a white, straight male to replace her.
Elite university presidents refuse to condemn calls for genocide!
12,772 Views |
150 Replies |
Last: 1 mo ago by Redbrickbear
Does anyone in Harvard administration have that much courage? Doubtful.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
maybe they could just hire a new president who has previous experience at another institution of higher education where they had success with the initiatives that they created and lead the school with, you know, maybe hiring somebody based on merits..historian said:
Does anyone in Harvard administration have that much courage? Doubtful.
Its a crazy idea but why not?
She's staying on with faculty, so she can continue poisoning minds.
You & I think alike but we aren't woke enough. I get the feeling Harvard does not think that way, even in the wake of woke failures.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
BUGWBBear said:
She's staying on with faculty, so she can continue poisoning minds.
Harvard's recent disgrace, the forced resignation of President Claudine Gay, is not just a story of academic misconduct but a stark revelation of the decay of intellectual integrity under the guise of progressive elitism... Read More:
— Walter Curt (@WCdispatch_) January 3, 2024
Amazing how the media frames these kinds of stories…"conservatives attack"
Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism https://t.co/GiVkT3LgUo
— The Associated Press (@AP) January 3, 2024
Associated Progressives (AP) is trying to run the false narrative that "white colonists" invented scalping "to eradicate Native Americans," without noting that, in fact, the Indians originated the practice in North America and, in modern times, it is a common journalistic phrase. pic.twitter.com/LmiippwIu0
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) January 3, 2024
Not sure how is this is a conservative attack.Redbrickbear said:
Amazing how the media frames these kinds of stories…"conservatives attack"Harvard president's resignation highlights new conservative weapon against colleges: plagiarism https://t.co/GiVkT3LgUo
— The Associated Press (@AP) January 3, 2024Associated Progressives (AP) is trying to run the false narrative that "white colonists" invented scalping "to eradicate Native Americans," without noting that, in fact, the Indians originated the practice in North America and, in modern times, it is a common journalistic phrase. pic.twitter.com/LmiippwIu0
— Christopher F. Rufo ⚔️ (@realchrisrufo) January 3, 2024
The reality is at any institute of higher learning if you plagiarize your papers,
and it is known you get kicked out of the institution.
If you do it many times over, it is clear your are not qualified for graduation, much less a
Doctorate.
This should be a "value" period, not conservative or liberal, not black, white, brown or asian.
If you have to cheat repeatedly to complete your course work, you should be disqualified from the course work and encouraged to find something else to do with your life.
She was guilty of stealing of someone else's work and somehow she's the victim! Typical woke nonsense.
Plagiarism is one of the worst things one can do in academia. Naturally, Leftists do it too often. Joe Biden did it multiple times. NY Times reporters have been caught.
It's natural for Leftists because they are mostly socialists (or Bolshevik's, communists, fascists, etc. All are variations on the same thing) and in the final analysis socialism is all about stealing.
Plagiarism is one of the worst things one can do in academia. Naturally, Leftists do it too often. Joe Biden did it multiple times. NY Times reporters have been caught.
It's natural for Leftists because they are mostly socialists (or Bolshevik's, communists, fascists, etc. All are variations on the same thing) and in the final analysis socialism is all about stealing.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
The reaction of the radical left-wing media to this story is Clown World even for that Idiocracy. This is actually serious:
Former U.S. Rep. Mayra Flores accused of passing off others’ pictures of Mexican food as her own cooking https://t.co/QcejRRLcfG
— Texas Tribune (@TexasTribune) January 3, 2024
oh no she didnt?!!Harrison Bergeron said:
The reaction of the radical left-wing media to this story is Clown World even for that Idiocracy. This is actually serious:Former U.S. Rep. Mayra Flores accused of passing off others’ pictures of Mexican food as her own cooking https://t.co/QcejRRLcfG
— Texas Tribune (@TexasTribune) January 3, 2024
Major lesson of the half victory on Gay (still makes 900k a year not to do very much - she doesn’t publish even when not plagiarizing) is that open social media platforms make RW cancel culture possible. What really freaks left out is seeing their own tactics take down their own.
— FischerKing (@FischerKing64) January 4, 2024
Apparently, Gay's resignation letter also plagiarized!
ROFL! Claudine Gay's Resignation Letter Hilariously FAILS Plagiarism Checker and NO, We're Not Joking https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/01/02/claudine-gays-resignation-letter-n2391325
ROFL! Claudine Gay's Resignation Letter Hilariously FAILS Plagiarism Checker and NO, We're Not Joking https://twitchy.com/samj/2024/01/02/claudine-gays-resignation-letter-n2391325
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
caught by the media as she entered her brownstone, gay remarked: 'I regret that I have just one life to give
for my country'.
- KKM
{ sipping java }
for my country'.
- KKM
{ sipping java }
Are you a man or a mouse!? - F. D.
The AP has been getting more biased for the past 20 years but thats it for me. Conservatives have a new weapon and it is plagiarism? So write your own dissertation and strip the conservatives of their big guns! So stupid I can hardly believe it.
Irony.. honesty is a weapon now
A large mass of people voted against a big orange liar in 2020 by voting for a canidate who literally dropped out of presidential race twice prior for.. checks notes.. lying!
Honesty isnt a new tool of the GOP, your post is a far bigger symptom of how far off track we are..
A large mass of people voted against a big orange liar in 2020 by voting for a canidate who literally dropped out of presidential race twice prior for.. checks notes.. lying!
Honesty isnt a new tool of the GOP, your post is a far bigger symptom of how far off track we are..
The truly scary part about all of this idiocy is how many "useful idiots" will follow like brainless lemmings.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Most of the elite, left-wing news sources don't even pretend anymore. I think it really started during Obama but got really bad during 2012 during the first burn, loot, murder episodes.Porteroso said:
The AP has been getting more biased for the past 20 years but thats it for me. Conservatives have a new weapon and it is plagiarism? So write your own dissertation and strip the conservatives of their big guns! So stupid I can hardly believe it.
I mean this is right up there with "mostly peaceful."
The bias used to be around what was covered and not covered. And then it became willingly parroting disinformation. Now it is actually creating disinformation.
They aren't journalists. They are propagandists who act like their degrees are from the Joseph Goebbels School of "Journalism".
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Most of the AP is still filled with quality journalism. It is the fact that a slight bias has become acceptable that allows for more extreme alternative fact reporting like this. But no need to go overboard, in most articles a clear attempt is made to be factual.
AP is now walking back the conservative weapon comments..
all narrative, all the time....historian said:
They aren't journalists. They are propagandists who act like their degrees are from the Joseph Goebbels School of "Journalism".
Mostly false narrative
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
4th and Inches said:
AP is now walking back the conservative weapon comments..
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/05/us/plagiarism-bill-ackman-neri-oxman-claudine-gay-harvard.html
Yeah otherwise the libs are now weaponizing.... plagiarism? Stealing?
The fascists weaponize everything. The truly frustrating part is that they usually get away with it because the media & Big Tech covers for them.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
This is a great example of how stupid the authoritarian media is ...Porteroso said:4th and Inches said:
AP is now walking back the conservative weapon comments..
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/05/us/plagiarism-bill-ackman-neri-oxman-claudine-gay-harvard.html
Yeah otherwise the libs are now weaponizing.... plagiarism? Stealing?
And how stupid they think we are
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
Ackman plans to use AI in a massive plagiarism review for all of the MIT faculty. Next up Harvard's entire faculty and suggests donors will want this for every other school from an independent 3rd party review company. He suggests that large corporations need independent auditors, schools need independent reviews also.
Ackman writing novels to bury the lead. This is all that matters and all that needs to be addressed. 🔥 It all down. pic.twitter.com/wHwdqZL7Cb
— Amanda Jean (@AJAmmirabilis) January 7, 2024
He's correct. But will it happen?
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
She said the quiet part out loud.Jacques Strap said:
Ackman plans to use AI in a massive plagiarism review for all of the MIT faculty. Next up Harvard's entire faculty and suggests donors will want this for every other school from an independent 3rd party review company. He suggests that large corporations need independent auditors, schools need independent reviews also.Ackman writing novels to bury the lead. This is all that matters and all that needs to be addressed. 🔥 It all down. pic.twitter.com/wHwdqZL7Cb
— Amanda Jean (@AJAmmirabilis) January 7, 2024
Jacques Strap said:
Ackman plans to use AI in a massive plagiarism review for all of the MIT faculty. Next up Harvard's entire faculty and suggests donors will want this for every other school from an independent 3rd party review company. He suggests that large corporations need independent auditors, schools need independent reviews also.Ackman writing novels to bury the lead. This is all that matters and all that needs to be addressed. 🔥 It all down. pic.twitter.com/wHwdqZL7Cb
— Amanda Jean (@AJAmmirabilis) January 7, 2024
Go for it. I'm curious
When i wrote my dissertation (1M years ago), I not only had to go through my review panel, but MONTHS before I defended before the panel, I had MULTIPLE meetings with my source checkers - a group of fellow grad students who served to cite check other candidate's dissertations for just these kinds of errors. There was also a similar arrangement at the school where I taught. The idea was to catch any inadvertent failures to cite or appropriately quote. The system is not foolproof, and it isn't nearly as robust as search engine's make it now, but it wasn't exactly easy to screw up.
I also had many meetings with doctoral candidates to discuss the exacting standards of plagiarism rules. Unless the humanities faculty at her degree granting institution were just lazy as heck, it is impossible for her not to have been aware of exactly what constituted plagiarism, and the consequences (i.e. career death in academia).
Like it or not, there has been a paternalistic thought that certain scholars who belong to privileged classes get by with things that others would never be allowed to get away with. I experienced this on a doctoral review panel when several of the panelists had comments about the quality of research for a candidate of color. We provided initial feedback and were then called individually by the dean, who told us that we needed to "give it another read, with some grace" and that our institution needed to be seen to grant degrees to a certain number of "the right kind" of candidates. It was galling and we categorically refused. None of the folks that refused are in academia today.
I also had many meetings with doctoral candidates to discuss the exacting standards of plagiarism rules. Unless the humanities faculty at her degree granting institution were just lazy as heck, it is impossible for her not to have been aware of exactly what constituted plagiarism, and the consequences (i.e. career death in academia).
Like it or not, there has been a paternalistic thought that certain scholars who belong to privileged classes get by with things that others would never be allowed to get away with. I experienced this on a doctoral review panel when several of the panelists had comments about the quality of research for a candidate of color. We provided initial feedback and were then called individually by the dean, who told us that we needed to "give it another read, with some grace" and that our institution needed to be seen to grant degrees to a certain number of "the right kind" of candidates. It was galling and we categorically refused. None of the folks that refused are in academia today.
Not surprising. I will sometimes listen to Victor Davis Hanson's podcast, and he will talk about his experiences over the years in a very similar way. Blacks, Hispanics, Native Americans - the "good" POCs - get admitted with exponentially lower scores and then effectively will graduate regardless of the qualify of their work.OsoCoreyell said:
When i wrote my dissertation (1M years ago), I not only had to go through my review panel, but MONTHS before I defended before the panel, I had MULTIPLE meetings with my source checkers - a group of fellow grad students who served to cite check other candidate's dissertations for just these kinds of errors. There was also a similar arrangement at the school where I taught. The idea was to catch any inadvertent failures to cite or appropriately quote. The system is not foolproof, and it isn't nearly as robust as search engine's make it now, but it wasn't exactly easy to screw up.
I also had many meetings with doctoral candidates to discuss the exacting standards of plagiarism rules. Unless the humanities faculty at her degree granting institution were just lazy as heck, it is impossible for her not to have been aware of exactly what constituted plagiarism, and the consequences (i.e. career death in academia).
Like it or not, there has been a paternalistic thought that certain scholars who belong to privileged classes get by with things that others would never be allowed to get away with. I experienced this on a doctoral review panel when several of the panelists had comments about the quality of research for a candidate of color. We provided initial feedback and were then called individually by the dean, who told us that we needed to "give it another read, with some grace" and that our institution needed to be seen to grant degrees to a certain number of "the right kind" of candidates. It was galling and we categorically refused. None of the folks that refused are in academia today.
I have no problem with economic-based affirmative action for college admission. No every applicant has access to the same resources. However, affirmative action in post-graduate work is insane. One of these things has to be true:
- Left-wing colleges are inherently racist against "good" POC
- Left-wing colleges do not believe "good" POC are as intelligent or as capable as Whites and "bad" POC
Really simple rule of thumb for racial issues: if doing something for of against one group is offensive of discriminatory then it is just as off egg nose of discriminatory if done for another group.
The Leftists seem to be basing many of their decisions on the Orwellian idea that some people "are more equal than others." That's unequal and it is unconstitutional.
The Leftists seem to be basing many of their decisions on the Orwellian idea that some people "are more equal than others." That's unequal and it is unconstitutional.
“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Psalm 119:36
I hate to read your last sentence that you and the others lost careers by not just "passing" students.OsoCoreyell said:
When i wrote my dissertation (1M years ago), I not only had to go through my review panel, but MONTHS before I defended before the panel, I had MULTIPLE meetings with my source checkers - a group of fellow grad students who served to cite check other candidate's dissertations for just these kinds of errors. There was also a similar arrangement at the school where I taught. The idea was to catch any inadvertent failures to cite or appropriately quote. The system is not foolproof, and it isn't nearly as robust as search engine's make it now, but it wasn't exactly easy to screw up.
I also had many meetings with doctoral candidates to discuss the exacting standards of plagiarism rules. Unless the humanities faculty at her degree granting institution were just lazy as heck, it is impossible for her not to have been aware of exactly what constituted plagiarism, and the consequences (i.e. career death in academia).
Like it or not, there has been a paternalistic thought that certain scholars who belong to privileged classes get by with things that others would never be allowed to get away with. I experienced this on a doctoral review panel when several of the panelists had comments about the quality of research for a candidate of color. We provided initial feedback and were then called individually by the dean, who told us that we needed to "give it another read, with some grace" and that our institution needed to be seen to grant degrees to a certain number of "the right kind" of candidates. It was galling and we categorically refused. None of the folks that refused are in academia today.