Post here for exciting advancements in mRNA technology!
In December 2025, researchers at MIT and the Broad Institute published a landmark study showing that mRNA can rejuvenate the aging immune system.
- The Breakthrough: They used mRNA to turn the liver into a "factory" that produces signaling proteins normally made by the thymus (which shrinks as we age).
- The Result: In older subjects, this "immune reset" doubled the production of young T-cells, making their immune response to infections and vaccines as strong as that of a much younger individual. This could be a game-changer for protecting the elderly from future pandemics.
One of the biggest hurdles in mRNA therapy has been "off-target effects"mRNA going where it isn't needed. In late 2025, Mount Sinai researchers developed cSMRTS (cell-selective modRNA translation system).
- How it works: This mRNA has a built-in "on/off switch." It "senses" the environment inside a cell; if it detects it is inside a cancer cell, it turns on and produces a toxic protein to kill the cell. If it's in a healthy cell, it stays off.
+1 - The Impact: This allows for much higher doses of treatment with nearly zero side effects in healthy tissue.
The "holy grail" of oncologypersonalized vaccineshit a major milestone in 2025.
- Moderna & BioNTech: Large-scale trials for melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer have shown that these vaccines (tailored to the specific mutations of a patient's own tumor) can reduce the risk of recurrence or death by up to 75% when combined with immunotherapy.
- Pancreatic Cancer: Early 2025 data showed that these vaccines are proving effective even for "cold" tumors like pancreatic cancer, which were previously thought to be unreachable by the immune system.
Instead of just suppressing the whole immune system (which leaves patients vulnerable to infection), researchers are now using mRNA to re-train it.
- The "Inverse" Vaccine: New experimental therapies use mRNA to teach the immune system that certain "self" proteins (like those in the joints for arthritis or the brain for MS) are not enemies. This "resets" the immune system without shutting it down entirely.
A major breakthrough in Lipid Nanoparticles (LNPs) was announced in November 2025.
- New, highly efficient delivery particles can produce the same immune response as current vaccines using only 1% of the dose.
- This not only makes the shots much cheaper to produce but significantly reduces common side effects like fever or arm soreness.
Hilarious two minute skit perfectly captures the insanity of the COVID era. pic.twitter.com/g4o6yzzsI4
— redpillbot (@redpillb0t) March 11, 2026
Bill Gates wanted the Danish government to support DTP vaccination for 161 million African children, claiming it saved 30 million lives.
— Valerie Anne Smith (@ValerieAnne1970) April 8, 2026
The Danish government discovered that vaccinated girls died at 10X the rate of unvaccinated girls. pic.twitter.com/MrbI4oQ3hG
LIB,MR BEARS said:Bill Gates wanted the Danish government to support DTP vaccination for 161 million African children, claiming it saved 30 million lives.
— Valerie Anne Smith (@ValerieAnne1970) April 8, 2026
The Danish government discovered that vaccinated girls died at 10X the rate of unvaccinated girls. pic.twitter.com/MrbI4oQ3hG
It's kind of embarassing how easily duped you are.
What the research actually shows
The work comes primarily from the Bandim Health Project, a Danish/African research group led by Dr. Peter Aaby and Dr. Christine Stabell Benn. It's not a "Danish government" discovery it's independent academic research conducted mainly in Guinea-Bissau and other low-income countries, not Denmark.
Their key findings:
- In seven studies of BCG-vaccinated children, DTP vaccination was associated with a roughly 2.5-fold increase in mortality in girls, with no corresponding increase in boys.
- Being DTP vaccinated versus not vaccinated was associated with approximately a 2.07-fold higher overall mortality.
- After three doses of DTP, the female-to-male mortality rate ratio increased to about 1.66, meaning girls were dying at a higher relative rate than boys compared to unvaccinated children.
Why this is complicated, not a simple lie
- The researchers found that live attenuated vaccines (like measles, BCG, oral polio) appear to boost the immune system broadly, while non-live vaccines like DTP appear to increase overall mortality, especially among girls.
- A separate Danish register-based study actually found the opposite that children with fewer DTP vaccinations experienced increased mortality raising the concern that the Bandim findings may be affected by residual confounding.
- The WHO's SAGE review concluded there was not convincing evidence of a large sex-differential effect, though the majority of studies (7 of 10) did suggest DTP had some deleterious effect.
The "10x" claim is false and inflated. The real research is legitimate peer-reviewed science showing roughly a 2x increase in all-cause mortality associated with the whole-cell DTP vaccine in low-income country settings a genuine scientific controversy that WHO has been slow to act on according to the researchers. The effect is specific to the whole-cell DTP used in developing countries, not the acellular version used in the U.S. and Europe. There are also serious methodological debates about whether confounding explains the findings. It's a real unsettled question, but wildly different from the viral "10x" version.
The largest autopsy study reveals that the vaccine caused 74% of deaths.
— Valerie Anne Smith (@ValerieAnne1970) April 11, 2026
Dr. Peter McCullough: "In the largest autopsy series published today...in 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the mRNA vaccine was the cause of death." pic.twitter.com/0ZHGECB95i
LIB,MR BEARS said:The largest autopsy study reveals that the vaccine caused 74% of deaths.
— Valerie Anne Smith (@ValerieAnne1970) April 11, 2026
Dr. Peter McCullough: "In the largest autopsy series published today...in 73.9% of individuals, it was determined that the mRNA vaccine was the cause of death." pic.twitter.com/0ZHGECB95i
You really are ignorant.
This is a badly misleading claim, and there are multiple serious problems with it.
The study itself is deeply flawed:
The three physicians who reviewed all 325 autopsies and decided which (Science Feedback) deaths were caused by vaccination were McCullough, Hodkinson, and Makis all well-known for spreading COVID misinformation. This raises obvious objectivity concerns.
The "independence" of their review likely just meant these three biased individuals sat in separate rooms before sharing their largely pre-determined conclusions not independent in any meaningful scientific sense. (Tech ARP)
The study included no control group of unvaccinated autopsies for comparison a basic requirement for establishing causation. (Science Feedback)
They contradicted the original researchers:
105 of the 240 vaccine-attributed deaths came from a single Colombian study whose own authors found "no relation between cause of death and vaccination." The review authors also counted 24 of 28 autopsies from a Singapore study as vaccine-related, even though those original authors identified "no definite causative relationship" to mRNA vaccines. (FactCheck.org)
The sample is cherry-picked and tiny:
They selected 44 papers out of 678 studies, covering just 325 autopsies. By ignoring a representative sample, the authors manufactured a "74% death rate" that lacks scientific basis. (Tech ARP)
The mean age of death in the study was 70.4 years (ResearchGate) an age group with abundant pre-existing cardiovascular conditions that explain the very causes of death being attributed to vaccines.
Conflict of interest:
Several co-authors, including McCullough, are affiliated with The Wellness Company, which sells products claiming to "detoxify" the body from spike protein a direct financial interest in promoting vaccine fear. (Mythdetector)
The preprint was pulled:
The preprint was removed from The Lancet's preprint server because its methodology did not support its conclusions. (European Newsroom)
Bottom line: The 74% figure comes from a biased team reviewing a cherry-picked sample, overriding the conclusions of the original researchers, with no control group. It tells you how three vaccine skeptics classified a tiny selected set of autopsy reports not what actually caused those deaths. There is no evidence that COVID-19 vaccination increases overall mortality risk, and a wealth of data supports that COVID-19 vaccines protect against severe disease and death. (FactCheck.org)
Former CNN anchor Chris Cuomo admits he now takes Ivermectin *everyday* to treat his Covid vaccine injury
— Joe Tippens (@JoeTippen) April 11, 2026
You can’t make this up
For years, he bashed Joe Rogan & others who took Ivermectin
He pushed everyone to get the jab
Now he’s a cheerleader for Ivermectin b/c it WORKS… pic.twitter.com/JRGakbI3Xk
Former CDC Director Robert Redfield confirms - BY OATH - that they were hiding the side effects of the Covid-19 vaccines. pic.twitter.com/ZHx0D8sCp8
— illuminatibot (@iluminatibot) April 13, 2026
https://www.nbcnews.com/health/cancer/pancreatic-cancer-mrna-vaccine-shows-lasting-results-early-trial-rcna331969
In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
LIB,MR BEARS said:In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
Yeah, Joe Scarborough is someone I'd trust with all his medical degrees!
Tempus Edax Rerum said:LIB,MR BEARS said:In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
Yeah, Joe Scarborough is someone I'd trust with all his medical degrees!
Pretend like you have some intelligence and recognize that he was speaking as a parent and a representative and not as a doctor.
Playing dumb is only cute for junior high girls.
In spite of recent evidence, I'm pretty sure your not in junior high.
Tempus Edax Rerum said:LIB,MR BEARS said:In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
Yeah, Joe Scarborough is someone I'd trust with all his medical degrees!
Is this who you'd prefer we trust?
JUSTICE IS FINALLY HERE
— Dr Sherri Tenpenny (@BusyDrT) May 11, 2026
After 14 years on the run, Poul Thorsen — the researcher behind the CDC’s cornerstone “no autism link” study — has been extradited from Germany and is now in U.S. custody.
Facing 22 felony counts of wire fraud and money laundering for stealing over $1… pic.twitter.com/RkR08j2Hnj
LIB,MR BEARS said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:LIB,MR BEARS said:In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
Yeah, Joe Scarborough is someone I'd trust with all his medical degrees!
Is this who you'd prefer we trust?JUSTICE IS FINALLY HERE
— Dr Sherri Tenpenny (@BusyDrT) May 11, 2026
After 14 years on the run, Poul Thorsen — the researcher behind the CDC’s cornerstone “no autism link” study — has been extradited from Germany and is now in U.S. custody.
Facing 22 felony counts of wire fraud and money laundering for stealing over $1… pic.twitter.com/RkR08j2Hnj
You know, you really need to stop embarrassing yourself. Taking anything "Dr. TenPenny" says at face value is simply stupid. She's so discredited except for those idiots like you that believe anything.
The extradition itself is real, but the framing around it is misleading in important ways. Here's what holds up and what doesn't:
What's accurate
Poul Thorsen was extradited from Germany and arraigned in Atlanta on May 8, 2026, roughly 15 years after his 2011 indictment. He was on the HHS Office of Inspector General's top ten most wanted fugitives list. The original 2011 indictment did include 13 counts of wire fraud and 9 counts of money laundering that's the "22 felony counts" figure. (Germany only extradited him on 11 of those counts.) The alleged theft of over $1 million in CDC grant money is also accurately reported. ABC News + 2
What's misleading
"The researcher behind the CDC's cornerstone 'no autism link' study" This is the post's central claim, and it doesn't survive scrutiny. Thorsen was a middle-listed co-author, not the lead. On the 2002 NEJM MMR-autism study, the authors were Madsen, Hviid, Vestergaard, Schendel, Wohlfahrt, Thorsen, Olsen, and Melbye Thorsen is sixth of eight. The first and corresponding author was Kreesten Madsen. Per analysts who've looked at this, Thorsen was not a lead author on either study, and his collaborators have said he did not have the ability to influence the scientific results. New England Journal of MedicineVAXOPEDIA
"The foundation of the safe and effective narrative cracking wide open" There is no single "cornerstone" study. The conclusion that childhood vaccines don't cause autism rests on dozens of independent studies across many countries and research teams. The 2002 Madsen paper is one data point in a much larger body of evidence, and its findings have been replicated repeatedly by researchers who had nothing to do with Thorsen.
The fraud-equals-fake-science inference This is the key logical leap the post wants you to make, and it doesn't follow. The alleged scheme ran from approximately February 2004 until February 2010, and it was about submitting fraudulent invoices to redirect grant money to personal bank accounts prosecutors allege Thorsen used the money to buy a home in Atlanta, a Harley Davidson motorcycle, and Audi and Honda cars. That's embezzlement of grant administration funds, not data manipulation. Notably, the 2002 MMR study was published before the alleged embezzlement period even began. HHS Office of Inspector GeneralDisability Scoop
The honest summary
Thorsen appears to be a thief who stole grant money. That's a real scandal about scientific grant oversight and worth prosecuting. But "co-author #6 on one of many replicated studies got indicted for invoice fraud six years after the study was published" is a very different claim than "the foundation of vaccine safety science is cracking." The post conflates the two, and that conflation is doing all the rhetorical work.
Tenpenny is a long-standing anti-vaccine advocate (she lost her Ohio medical license in 2023 over unrelated matters), and this kind of framing treating a financial-fraud case as if it discredits an entire body of replicated epidemiology is characteristic of how the Thorsen story has been used in those circles since 2011. The new development is the extradition; the framing isn't new.
LIB,MR BEARS said:Tempus Edax Rerum said:LIB,MR BEARS said:In 2005, Joe Scarborough said something you would never hear on TV news today.
— The Vigilant Fox 🦊 (@VigilantFox) April 29, 2026
Speaking with RFK Jr., he legitimized the belief that vaccines CAN cause autism.
“Something happened in 1989!” Scarborough declared firmly.
In his own words, he said: “Parents would CONSTANTLY come… pic.twitter.com/pD23WZlQWu
Yeah, Joe Scarborough is someone I'd trust with all his medical degrees!
Pretend like you have some intelligence and recognize that he was speaking as a parent and a representative and not as a doctor.
Playing dumb is only cute for junior high girls.
In spite of recent evidence, I'm pretty sure your not in junior high.
Doesn't change a damn thing.