Daniel Penny trial

9,406 Views | 167 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by nein51
Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
While the election is going on, this man on trial for subduing a threat on the NYC subway

Jack Bauer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This might be the biggest injustice of 2024.

Amazing this is who NYC prosecutes.

I feel bad for him because I could see a TDS jury convicting him out of revenge for the 2024 election ...

The fact this case was prosecuted shows how corrupt is the authoritarian left.
BellCountyBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Daniel is guilty of having the wrong skin color…nothing more.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yep. If only he had been blek and killed a cop, he'd be a New York Congressman.
midgett
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The judge allowed the prosecutor to identify Penny as "the white man" throughout the trial.

It's a fair trail. Lol
Johnny Bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.
Fre3dombear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BellCountyBear said:

Daniel is guilty of having the wrong skin color…nothing more.


Another perfect example of how can white people vote D and vote their own destruction. It's insane.
Osodecentx
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Trump can't pardon someone convicted of a state crime, he can pardon people convicted of federal crimes
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fre3dombear said:

BellCountyBear said:

Daniel is guilty of having the wrong skin color…nothing more.


Another perfect example of how can white people vote D and vote their own destruction. It's insane.


Decades of anti white propaganda has been very effective with the weak minded.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Turn on the view. the average Didn't Earn It hire, jury member, etc., is a barely smarter than
Kamala.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BellCountyBear said:

Daniel is guilty of having the wrong skin color…nothing more.

And the wrong Sex

Male and White is a oppressor category
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Osodecentx said:

Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Trump can't pardon someone convicted of a state crime, he can pardon people convicted of federal crimes

It's a long shot, but the DoJ can take the state to court to protect his civil rights.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Osodecentx said:

Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Trump can't pardon someone convicted of a state crime, he can pardon people convicted of federal crimes

It's a long shot, but the DoJ can take the state to court to protect his civil rights.


Again

He is a White Male

The DOJ won't do anything to defend him
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
midgett said:

The judge allowed the prosecutor to identify Penny as "the white man" throughout the trial.

It's a fair trail. Lol
That's incredible. Talk about reversible error.

Once had a trial against a lady whose husband killed himself. Was a prominent plastic surgeon, and had purchased a multi-million dollar piece of equipment on credit. Well, after he passes, wife sells it and pockets the money without paying off our client's lien.

We filed suit against her, and her lawyer told the Court that throughout trial, he wanted to refer to his client as "the widow." I argued that was prejudicial, but if he did so, we would get to explain how she became a widow. We would get to explain that her husband learned she had been having a years long affair with his business partner, went to confront them one night, and shot the guy in the chest (but he survived). Husband then goes to his parents house and kills himself in the car. Business partner recovers, marries the widow, and then she cheats on him so they divorce.

Needless to say, her lawyer decided against referring to her as the widow.
BusyTarpDuster2017
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

midgett said:

The judge allowed the prosecutor to identify Penny as "the white man" throughout the trial.

It's a fair trail. Lol
That's incredible. Talk about reversible error.

Once had a trial against a lady whose husband killed himself. Was a prominent plastic surgeon, and had purchased a multi-million dollar piece of equipment on credit. Well, after he passes, wife sells it and pockets the money without paying off our client's lien.

We filed suit against her, and her lawyer told the Court that throughout trial, he wanted to refer to his client as "the widow." I argued that was prejudicial, but if he did so, we would get to explain how she became a widow. We would get to explain that her husband learned she had been having a years long affair with his business partner, went to confront them one night, and shot the guy in the chest (but he survived). Husband then goes to his parents house and kills himself in the car. Business partner recovers, marries the widow, and then she cheats on him so they divorce.

Needless to say, her lawyer decided against referring to her as the widow.
Lol. But since she remarried, doesn't that mean she isn't a widow anymore?
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BusyTarpDuster2017 said:

Mothra said:

midgett said:

The judge allowed the prosecutor to identify Penny as "the white man" throughout the trial.

It's a fair trail. Lol
That's incredible. Talk about reversible error.

Once had a trial against a lady whose husband killed himself. Was a prominent plastic surgeon, and had purchased a multi-million dollar piece of equipment on credit. Well, after he passes, wife sells it and pockets the money without paying off our client's lien.

We filed suit against her, and her lawyer told the Court that throughout trial, he wanted to refer to his client as "the widow." I argued that was prejudicial, but if he did so, we would get to explain how she became a widow. We would get to explain that her husband learned she had been having a years long affair with his business partner, went to confront them one night, and shot the guy in the chest (but he survived). Husband then goes to his parents house and kills himself in the car. Business partner recovers, marries the widow, and then she cheats on him so they divorce.

Needless to say, her lawyer decided against referring to her as the widow.
Lol. But since she remarried, doesn't that mean she isn't a widow anymore?
You're probably not going to believe this, but this was discussed at length at our pretrial hearing. We made that argument, and opposing counsel got out the bible at the hearing and said it supports his version. I am not joking. Read portions of the Old Testament into evidence at the hearing.

Will never forget that. Lawyer on the other side was a nut. Calls himself, "the bulldog," and had a statue of a bulldog out in front of his office. He was once 500 pounds, and had lost about half of that weight, and actually looked like a bulldog with all the loose skin.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wow... This story reminded me of the guy, so I looked him up. Seems he's been busy the last ten or so years.

https://texasscorecard.com/citizen-profiles/eric-yollick-interesting-man-texas/

https://nypost.com/2020/06/09/texas-attorney-admits-egging-judges-car-over-stay-at-home-order/
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Trump can't pardon someone convicted of a state crime, he can pardon people convicted of federal crimes

It's a long shot, but the DoJ can take the state to court to protect his civil rights.


Again

He is a White Male

The DOJ won't do anything to defend him

After January 20 they might. The new DoJ won't be governed by identity politics & other fascist forms of bigotry.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Redbrickbear said:

historian said:

Osodecentx said:

Johnny Bear said:

If that jury is stupid enough to convict him, he needs to be at or near the top of the list for a presidential pardon on day one of Trump's 2nd term.


Trump can't pardon someone convicted of a state crime, he can pardon people convicted of federal crimes

It's a long shot, but the DoJ can take the state to court to protect his civil rights.


Again

He is a White Male

The DOJ won't do anything to defend him

After January 20 they might. The new DoJ won't be governed by identity politics & other fascist forms of bigotry.


I will believe it when I see it

You can't even fire many Federal bureaucrats

It will take years (if not decades) to bring sanity back to the Departments in DC
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lots of bureaucrats can be fired by eliminating their agencies.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

Lots of bureaucrats can be fired by eliminating their agencies.


Senate Republicans will not allow substantial change like that
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Unfortunately, that is likely true but it is possible.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No society can survive prioritizing criminals over honest citizens.

I am shocked but not shocked the morons in NYC decided to prosecute the guy.

Remember all the legacy media disinformation portraying the attacker as a sweet little Michael Jackson impersonator.

Amazing we have 1/3 of the country that basically believes the world is flat and birds aren't real.
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
…. and water is not wet.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?


The fascists will pervert justice at every opportunity.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?

“Incline my heart to your testimonies, and not to selfish gain!”
Psalm 119:36
Proud 1992 Alum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proud 1992 Alum said:

We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
Problem is, the mentally ill do not have to stay there. Addicts that are homeless prefer the street as well because most shelters do not allow substance abuse while on grounds.
Proud 1992 Alum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Proud 1992 Alum said:

We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
Problem is, the mentally ill do not have to stay there. Addicts that are homeless prefer the street as well because most shelters do not allow substance abuse while on grounds.


I am very aware. I think we should make it easier to have people involuntarily committed. I know there were abuses decades ago but we over-corrected as a society.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Proud 1992 Alum said:

We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
Agreed

But until the public ( and attorneys ) are finally willing to reform our current Patients Rights Laws.......the mentally ill are almost impossible to place ( and keep ) in hospitals against their will.

Cops are often completely aware of the dangers associated with certain individuals...but their hands are tied.
Redbrickbear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Proud 1992 Alum said:

We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
Agreed

But until the public ( and attorneys ) are finally willing to reform our current Patients Rights Laws.......the mentally ill are almost impossible to place ( and keep ) in hospitals against their will.

Cops are often completely aware of the dangers associated with certain individuals...but their hands are tied.


Closing down the insane asylums was another horrible progressive liberal passion project

They probably needed some reform…but God knows they did not need to be shut down whole sale across the country

[1955: There were 340 psychiatric hospital beds for every 100,000 US citizens
2005: There were 17 psychiatric hospital beds for every 100,000 US citizens]
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Redbrickbear said:

KaiBear said:

Proud 1992 Alum said:

We also need to get mentally ill people off the streets and into secure facilities. Both to protect the public and hopefully get the ill the help they need.
Agreed

But until the public ( and attorneys ) are finally willing to reform our current Patients Rights Laws.......the mentally ill are almost impossible to place ( and keep ) in hospitals against their will.

Cops are often completely aware of the dangers associated with certain individuals...but their hands are tied.


Closing down the insane asylums was another horrible progressive liberal passion project

They probably needed some reform…but God knows they did not need to be shut down whole sale across the country

[1955: There were 340 psychiatric hospital beds for every 100,000 US citizens
2005: There were 17 psychiatric hospital beds for every 100,000 US citizens]



Good point; had forgotten about all the closures.

As a result almost ever psych ward in every city is FULL.

Another part of the problem is the use of narcotics which cause brain damage. Even heavy pot use can cause dangerous paranoia symptoms.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.