Harrison Bergeron said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.

---

are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

---

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

---

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.

---

Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................

---

I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.

---

His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.

---

all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

---

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.

---

that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

---

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.

---

we are NOT talking about Trump or anyone else.. You MAGA clowns are so proficient in deflection. You did not answer the question. How is Petey Qualified to run the govt's largest bureaucracy?

---

Tell us the qualifications Beeper Boy, and we'll tell you whether he has them .... oh yeah, specifics is your Kryptonite.

Remind us how the current Token is qualified ... the Token who was missing for weeks and no one noticed.

---

Deflection is for people with no plan, cognizant thoughts , ability to communicate the answer to the question. Deflection for your ilk is just par for the course. Admit it....you Hank, have a big bag of nothing, but the love of insult hurling. Love the Beeper Boy insults as it is so perplexing, I just don't understand. Please enlighten me, Sir Hank.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

I love how Beeper Boy runs from questions ... like all Democrats, he's a freaking rhegard. Not sure what's worse, Jr's hatred of Jews or Waco's love of little boys.

---

just tell me , little fella, which questions did I run? You straight up cannot and will not answer the question I posed. How is Petey qualified to run the DOD? You just deflect like the Meow you are. Beeper Boy? Hatred of Jews? Democrat? 0 for 3. My Jewish partner may have a bit to say about your assertion. My Jewish friends would just laugh at your smallness . . You are a piece of work with a bag of nothing.

J.R. said:

---

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

I love how Beeper Boy runs from questions ... like all Democrats, he's a freaking rhegard. Not sure what's worse, Jr's hatred of Jews or Waco's love of little boys.

---

just tell me , little fella, which questions did I run? You straight up cannot and will not answer the question I posed. How is Petey qualified to run the DOD? You just deflect like the Meow you are. Beeper Boy? Hatred of Jews? Democrat? 0 for 3. My Jewish partner may have a bit to say about your assertion. My Jewish friends would just laugh at your smallness . . You are a piece of work with a bag of nothing.

---

Hope your balls are better quash. Did you insure your beeper?

quash said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.

---

are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

---

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

---

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.

---

Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................

---

I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.

---

His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.

---

all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

---

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.

---

that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

---

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.

---

You need to retitle your thread to

Welcome to the Oligarchy

---

That's what we have now.

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.

---

are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

---

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

---

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.

---

Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................

---

I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.

---

His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.

---

all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

---

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.

---

that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

---

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.

---

we are NOT talking about Trump or anyone else.. You MAGA clowns are so proficient in deflection. You did not answer the question. How is Petey Qualified to run the govt's largest bureaucracy?

---

Yes I have. Repeatedly.

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

J.R. said:

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

historian said:

---

J.R. said:

---

historian said:

---

Hegseth is more qualified for DoD than ANYONE in the current administration, including Prez, VP, & EVERY member of the cabinet. He was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the military.

---

are you serious? what you just said just makes no sense.. "he was a soldier in combat and actually knows a lot about the Military. Huh? This statement utterly ridiculous. He is a drunken talk show host. He a financially mismanaged 2 non profits and was fired. So, you think that qualifies him to run the Pentagon? Sorry, but that statement is just laughable.

---

Maybe you pay too much attention to the fascist propaganda on MSNBC & CNN. Propagandists are notorious for leaving out important details in their reporting. Hegseth was a decorated soldier in the army national guard. He served at Gitmo and saw combat in Iraq & Afghanistan.

---

I also thought it's hilarious that Jr, who brags so often about his financial knowledge, somehow imagines that the Secretary of Defense is primarily a Controller rather than the guy who drives military strategy and builds the military's ability to fight. You know, the kind of things a combat veteran would be well-suited for. As opposed to, say, someone like Milley, who looks and sounds like he spent a lot more time at parties than in action.

---

Not that he has no accomplishments - Publisher of the Princeton Tory, BA from Princeton, Master of Public Policy from the JFK School at Harvard, analyst at Bear Stearns, contributor at the Manhattan Institute (think tank), two stints at 501c3s, finalist for Secretary of Veteran Affairs in 2016, contributor on CNN/MSNBC and host at Fox News. Dude keeps rising to the top, even when he stumbles.

Trump wants someone who has kicked out doors to restore warrior culture. To do that, he will need someone who is loyal, courageous, and good communicator. Hegseth is that.

JR regurgitates all the allegations & spin as if they were scrupulous truths, rather than putting rather more weight on the fact that the left always attacks hardest the things it fear most. Fact is, Hegseth is where he is because he's got some skills. He's taking flack because he's over the target. The pertinent question is, are his skills what is needed at the moment. I think so. He is what Trump (and a majority of Americans) want our military to be - a warrior. Who better to lead reforms to rebuild warrior culture? His communication skills will be a big asset. So, yeah. Apt choice. Very logical choice.

Voters are not interested in establishmentarianism. They think establishments are broken....................

---

I never said Petey didn't have skills. I said he is NOT REMOTELY qualified to run the DOD. Please let us know how he is qualified. I guess you missed the point where he nearly bankrupted those 2 non profits. Running the DOD is hardly being a Controller (bean counter) Being a soldier doesn't count. Enlighten us, please.

---

His non-profit experience suggests he is not a gifted fundraiser/bean-counter, i.e. the controller function, which your own words clearly indicated is not a job requirement for SecDef. (your critique is logically conflicted, not that such is a surprise.)

If being a soldier does not count as a qualification for SecDef, then that means the current and several prior SecDefs on both sides of the aisle are/were not qualified. I haven't heard you criticize them. We've had some execs at SecDef, too, and the outcomes were, uh, mixed. So it's not exactly like what you appear to be advocating has a materially better record than the soldiers.

As you know, a good hire is a function of matching the right skill set with the the job requirement, which for a SecDef is not defending the institution but rather implementing what POTUS was elected to accomplish. And we know what is the national security agenda Trump ran on:
--focus on China as adversary #1.
--get the USA out of neverWars.
--get the military out of the cultureWars.
--strengthen traditional alliances (particularly in the Middle East.)
--rebuild warrior culture.
--rebuild inventories of lethal things.

Hegseth seems to be a good fit for that list.
--He agrees that China is the primary adversary, and that neverWars are out of hand.
--He is a warrior who has personally led troops in war, and buried comrades in arms afterwards.
--He has exactly the right positions on culture wars and warrior culture. (ex: no more drag shows at the elementary schools on our military bases, no more DEI nonsense, etc.....)
--He will be the best SecDef in decades in communicating that agenda within the military and to the American people, given his distinguished record in the media.

Sure, many will bloviate rather than analyze soberly, but they'll just miss the rather obvious reasons why Hegseth seems to be a logical choice, given the agenda the American people have ratified in the last election. The job is political, whether you like it or not. And if there is one thing that is clear from his resume, the guy keeps rising to the top in politics.

---

all that is well and good and just stuff. Stay on point. What qualifies Petey to manage/run the DOD? I still have not seen anyone detail why he is remotely qualified.

---

That has been posted at length. You choose to ignore those posts.

---

that is nothing but gobble gook. My question that you failed to answer is "What qualifies him to manage and incredibly large and complex organization . He has proven that he can run a small non profit without running it into the ground. And yes, he must have the financial ability to manage this little thing called a budget at DOD. Still waiting.

---

That question could be asked of any candidate snd the answers will often say more snout the person answering than the one asking.

I can say this categorically: Donald Trump is far more qualified for the job than Kamala Harris, Joe Biden, Barack Obama, or any other Democrat. His resume outshines all of theirs combined by a huge margin. Or maybe I should say "yuuuuuge"!

You Leftists keep forgetting that he had a 4 record of success during which literally everything was better off than the past 4 years. The contrast could not be starker.

---

we are NOT talking about Trump or anyone else.. You MAGA clowns are so proficient in deflection. You did not answer the question. How is Petey Qualified to run the govt's largest bureaucracy?

---

Yes I have. Repeatedly.

---

No you haven't . You listed mere subjective qualities, not qualifications . Think resume, Hist. Hank is just too dumb as he has shown. He resorts to insults. Quite a little man. You at least give it a shot.

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

Great historical reference!

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

I deal in facts sad, little man. Liars figure (many here), Figures don't lie. Spitefull and footstompting. wut? I think not. Clowns like you are just making chit up now. I just like to play devils advocate and it brings out the worst of your ilk. I think it is quite amusing and confounding that some of you went to BU and should be better educated.

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

I deal in facts sad, little man. Liars figure (many here), Figures don't lie. Spitefull and footstompting. wut? I think not. Clowns like you are just making chit up now. I just like to play devils advocate and it brings out the worst of your ilk. I think it is quite amusing and confounding that some of you went to BU and should be better educated.

---

No, you deal in spittle and name-calling JR. You ignore the reality that plenty of businesses will make drastic cuts when necessary, and tell department heads that the pain will be felt across all parts.

If you really had been successful in business you would know this, and so you would know it is well past time for the Federal Abomination to stop pretending they need more money and cut deep into their bloat.

The only real question is whether the department heads will love their country enough to put primary functions first, or whether they will sabotage their own department in spite of the elected President.

But the idea that you represent any exemplar of Reason or Evidence is a weak joke that fools no one, J.R.

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

historian said:

---

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.

---

Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?

---

---

Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.

---

Do you have any grasp , just what a mediocre life you have led; the people you have damaged ?

---

Hate does not serve you. Follow the first and greatest commandment and you will live.

---

You have advocated the murder of the unborn for years......intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process. Respecting a woman's right to choose. We are not "murdering babies" but rather ending a pregnancy by removing a fetus - a fetus is tissue not life.

You have exhibited blatant racism for years....intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process. What damn silly argument. You somehow feel that whites are suppressed and oppressed. That is simply not true. Reporting the history of oppression is not hating but remembering and asking for some recognition that whites understand racism as blacks experience it.

Don't even have the confidence to disclose exactly where you supposedly got your theology degree. M
Most likely because you have lied to your little circle that you obtained it at Baylor; when you have admitted here ( finally ) that in fact you did not is not hate but empathy.
Of course, I don't disclose colleges and graduate programs because of haters like you. I have all the confidence in the world that you would such disclosures into your incredibly demeaning attacks.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

KaiBear said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

4th and Inches said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

historian said:

---

Yes, Sullivan is an important decision with a huge impact. as much as it reports the news. The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job.

---

Unfortunately, much of that if negative as the MSM spreads more fascist lies, deception, & other forms of propaganda A rant without proof. You have only ideology.

The media have earned much blame for the problems plaguing American because they refuse to do their job. What job did MSM refuse?

---

---

Great picture your fail. You simply cannot deal in ideas.

---

Do you have any grasp , just what a mediocre life you have led; the people you have damaged ?

---

Hate does not serve you. Follow the first and greatest commandment and you will live.

---

You have advocated the murder of the unborn for years......intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process. Respecting a woman's right to choose. We are not "murdering babies" but rather ending a pregnancy by removing a fetus - a fetus is tissue not life.

You have exhibited blatant racism for years....intentionally ignoring Scripture in the process. What damn silly argument. You somehow feel that whites are suppressed and oppressed. That is simply not true. Reporting the history of oppression is not hating but remembering and asking for some recognition that whites understand racism as blacks experience it.

Don't even have the confidence to disclose exactly where you supposedly got your theology degree. M
Most likely because you have lied to your little circle that you obtained it at Baylor; when you have admitted here ( finally ) that in fact you did not is not hate but empathy.
Of course, I don't disclose colleges and graduate programs because of haters like you. I have all the confidence in the world that you would such disclosures into your incredibly demeaning attacks.

---

---

Amusing how worried you are should the details of your 'theology degree' becomes public knowledge.

The Nazis dehumanized Jews as well. No amount of lies and obfuscation can change the facts: a fetus is alive and human. This is fundamental science. We know the fetus is alive because of growth and development. That only happens to something that is living. Rocks don't grow, plants and animals do. Unless they are killed. The fetus is also 100% human because he or she has a unique DNA, the combination of that of his or her parents. We shouldn't need science to draw these conclusions because it's also common sense.

The pro death crowd's obsession with killing babies resembles the Nazis' obsession with killing Jews. It's scary and it's demonic.

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

---

quash/JR/sockpuppet du jour, your weak kneejerk evasion is noted.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

I was a little unsure about the Hegseth nomination at first, but the amount of butthurt it has caused among the military-industrial complex convinced me he is the right choice. They are clearly terrified of what he might do to shake up the corruption.

---

Agreed

We can't thank @TuckerCarlson and @DonaldJTrumpJr enough for this and other critical uses of political capital. https://t.co/donnG2QVM5

— ib (@Indian_Bronson) December 18, 2024

Oldbear83 said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

---

quash/JR/sockpuppet du jour, your weak kneejerk evasion is noted.

---

The accusation is the admission. Again

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

---

quash/JR/sockpuppet du jour, your weak kneejerk evasion is noted.

---

repeats a phrase he likes in hopes it will change things

---

Sure, puppet.

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

---

quash/JR/sockpuppet du jour, your weak kneejerk evasion is noted.

---

repeats a phrase he likes in hopes it will change things

---

Sure, puppet.

---

<yawn>

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

J.R. said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

quash said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Just let it go. JR will ignore any and all facts which prove him wrong, so he is increasingly spiteful and foot-stomping mad, as we have seen in this thread.

---

Once again the accusation is the admission

---

After denying he is JR, quash accidentally confirms he is.

---

ah, no he isn't , he just seems to be sane.

---

quash/JR/sockpuppet du jour, your weak kneejerk evasion is noted.

---

repeats a phrase he likes in hopes it will change things

---

Sure, puppet.

---

<yawn>

---

Yup, it must be tiring for you to keep up the act as you do.

Harrison Bergeron said:

---

I was a little unsure about the Hegseth nomination at first, but the amount of butthurt it has caused among the military-industrial complex convinced me he is the right choice. They are clearly terrified of what he might do to shake up the corruption.

---

Correct until the last five words. Hegseth could **** up a sunset

Trump names ‘Apprentice’ producer Mark Burnett as special envoy to the United Kingdom
https://t.co/NSzUttRme5

— Dallas Morning News (@dallasnews) December 22, 2024