So, Matt Gaetz is in fact a d bag

8,072 Views | 168 Replies | Last: 5 hrs ago by Harrison Bergeron
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TexasScientist said:

Mothra said:

TexasScientist said:

Just the kind of guy with all the qualifications Trump wants in an AG.


And you know what's truly incredible about it? He's still 100 fold better than the disaster that was Biden.

But we all know you don't care about horrible democrats and their policies
Goes to show what you think is not always correct. I don't support Democrats nor their policies. I do try to be objective and fair in my opinions and assessments. A broken watch is correct twice per day.
Who is the last Democrat you've criticized on this board, when did it occur, and what was the substance of the critique?

If you are as fair and balanced as you maintain, shouldn't be difficult to point it out.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

"A broken watch is correct twice per day."

Not a watch that is broken because its battery is dead ...


or someone who only shows up to take the Left's side in an argument.
You are such a Donald Homer... You see it as taking the Left's side? Not that the guy has a real problem and broke ethics rules and laws. Baa, Baa...
I see a single young man who dabbled in hookers & blow on the WDC party scene. The rest of it is spin.

If he played the nice, milquetoast moderate, going along with everything GOP leadership asked for, we wouldn't even know his name.
Not exactly young. Would have been around 35 or 36 at the time he was banging the 17-year-old. May not have been illegal, but boy is it slimy.

Dabbling in hookers and blow as a middle-aged sex addict might speak to one's character and fitness for office during former times.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whiterock said:

FLBear5630 said:

Oldbear83 said:

"A broken watch is correct twice per day."

Not a watch that is broken because its battery is dead ...


or someone who only shows up to take the Left's side in an argument.
You are such a Donald Homer... You see it as taking the Left's side? Not that the guy has a real problem and broke ethics rules and laws. Baa, Baa...
I see a single young man who dabbled in hookers & blow on the WDC party scene. The rest of it is spin.

If he played the nice, milquetoast moderate, going along with everything GOP leadership asked for, we wouldn't even know his name.
Because he is MAGA. If Hunter...
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
It is amazing how if you like the Political Party we will go to all extents to rationalize. If this was a Dem and he wasn't prosecuted you would be going nuts. You guys love Trump, anything or anyone he promotes is OK no matter what. It is politics.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
It is amazing how if you like the Political Party we will go to all extents to rationalize. If this was a Dem and he wasn't prosecuted you would be going nuts. You guys love Trump, anything or anyone he promotes is OK no matter what. It is politics.
You democrats cried wolf one too many times. It's a matter of credibility of the accusers.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gaetz is a ****** bag.

Gaetz probably did a lot of inappropriate things.

There is no real credible case against him.

You TDSers need to get laid.
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
It is amazing how if you like the Political Party we will go to all extents to rationalize. If this was a Dem and he wasn't prosecuted you would be going nuts. You guys love Trump, anything or anyone he promotes is OK no matter what. It is politics.
You democrats cried wolf one too many times. It's a matter of credibility of the accusers.
You know there are non-Dems that agree Gaetz should not be AG and this report is problematic.

PS - I have never voted Dem in my life and am a Registered Independent. You?
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
It is amazing how if you like the Political Party we will go to all extents to rationalize. If this was a Dem and he wasn't prosecuted you would be going nuts. You guys love Trump, anything or anyone he promotes is OK no matter what. It is politics.
You democrats cried wolf one too many times. It's a matter of credibility of the accusers.
You know there are non-Dems that agree Gaetz should not be AG and this report is problematic.

PS - I have never voted Dem in my life and am a Registered Independent. You?
I'm just going off of your posting history. Always from the anti-Republican POV. You can claim you vote otherwise and are registered otherwise but you posting history is far more revealing.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

FLBear5630 said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
It is amazing how if you like the Political Party we will go to all extents to rationalize. If this was a Dem and he wasn't prosecuted you would be going nuts. You guys love Trump, anything or anyone he promotes is OK no matter what. It is politics.
You democrats cried wolf one too many times. It's a matter of credibility of the accusers.
You know there are non-Dems that agree Gaetz should not be AG and this report is problematic.

PS - I have never voted Dem in my life and am a Registered Independent. You?
I'm just going off of your posting history. Always from the anti-Republican POV. You can claim you vote otherwise and are registered otherwise but you posting history is far more revealing.
My posting history is that I call BS when I see BS, whether Dem, Ind or Rep. There really isn't much to say about Biden/Harris the worst President and Candidate ever. If he broke the law he should be prosecuted, same as Trump. There can only be one standard. Right now, Trump is in the limelight. He is making decisions, good and bad, about the future, so I am commenting.
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?
None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?
I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.
You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.
huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.
"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?
just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.
Yoi give the most emotional responses to people who treat you the same way you treat them. Newsflash; you aren't special. You don't get to insult people and run your mouth and then act aghast when it gets returned your direction. Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Your SicEm365 experience will greatly improve if you can learn it.
you and your ilk have turned this forum into a cesspool. and you would be how old? Curious what you do for a living if you're still not in college. don't know who would hire you.
That's what I thought. Ever the victim. Not even an ounce of accountability.
yeah, most definitely a victim. lol. you still didn't answer the question Maga kid.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DP
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
DP
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Wangchung said:

J.R. said:

Dude, you just don't get it. Do you have any daughters?
None that I am aware of. Does having daughters change the definition of evidence?
I didn't think you did or you and your MAGA arse wouldn't have the Trumpy Bear cavalier attitude to child rape. You good with coke and X use? You are pathetic.
You voted for Joe Biden. You unapologetically support actual child rape and incest. You have no room to talk about Gaetz allegedly consensually nailing a 17 year old. I'm old enough to recall when you claimed your only gripe with Orange Man Bad was his destruction of the Republican Party and ruining their chances of taking control in Washington.
You whined about Trump losing both Congress and the Senate. Pepperage Farms isn't the only one who remembers. Now that Trump's last election proves your theory to be bull**** here you are, still toeing the DNC line. What a shock.
huh? Show me where I ever said I voted for Biden. Also, please enlighten me relative to me supporting "actual child rape and incest"? That is crossing the line. You have lost your little mind, son. You are a bad dude without touch with reality.
"You support child rape because you support innocent until proven guilty!" "Yeah well you support child rape and incest because you campaign against anyone who runs against a man who literally molested his own daughter and sniffs children publicly." "DATS CROSSING DUH LINE!"

Lol, dude, just shut the hell up. You're embarrassing yourself. You been drinking tonight, Junior?
just how old are you? You out of college yet? You are out of control, and are giving timber and old for blindness to reality. Seriously, how old are you? You obviously don't have much life experience.
Yoi give the most emotional responses to people who treat you the same way you treat them. Newsflash; you aren't special. You don't get to insult people and run your mouth and then act aghast when it gets returned your direction. Read that as many times as it takes for it to sink in. Your SicEm365 experience will greatly improve if you can learn it.
you and your ilk have turned this forum into a cesspool. and you would be how old? Curious what you do for a living if you're still not in college. don't know who would hire you.
That's what I thought. Ever the victim. Not even an ounce of accountability.
yeah, most definitely a victim. lol. you still didn't answer the question Maga kid.
Because your question is asinine, Bidophile. You ran your mouth at me when I wasn't speaking to you, then you got your little panties in a twist because I responded to you the way you spoke to me. Now you're begging for personal information because your argument on the topic is ***** You lie about your credentials every time you get called out and then you start DMing when your lies aren't believed. The best thing you can do is remember that I will treat you the way you treat me, so if you can't act like an adult and have a civil conversation and your fragile little ego can't take being treated the same way you treat others then you should probably avoid engaging me in conversation. Somehow you think I'm still in school despite the fact you and I discussed posting on Austin360 back in the late 90s. Hilarious.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Harrison Bergeron said:

Gaetz is a ****** bag.

Gaetz probably did a lot of inappropriate things.

There is no real credible case against him.

You TDSers need to get laid.
... or just go to Arby's.

double beef n cheddar combo.

fountain drink, style of french fried potato and allotment of condiments (H,A,K) of your choosing.

- el KKM

Go Bears!

Beat the Tigers!!
dale 2028
william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dale 2028
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
Unless Ashley pressed charges there is no way to prosecute Biden, and wouldn't the statute of limitation be up anyway? You're in denial about Biden, but thankfully it's a non-issue now that he has been taken out by his own party. I give you credit for bringing yourself to admit the diary is real. But Biden can't be convicted if there is no investigation. Gaetz was investigated. No charges could be brought. At least one of the witnesses has been revealed as a liar. Accusing republicans of sex crimes is the Democrat playbook, chapter 1. It's happened over and over and over. I notice you didn't address the fact that Kavanaugh also had a witness testify under oath against him, but that's fine, that doesn't reveal anything other than an acknowledgment that political operatives will find people to lie under oath if they think they can take out a political opponent. That's what this looks like to me, one more in a long line of character assassination attempts by the swamp. But as I have said, repeatedly, Gaetz might be guilty of all those things he accused of doing, I don't know. Somehow you've twisted that into thinking I have an unwavering belief in his innocence.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
Unless Ashley pressed charges there is no way to prosecute Biden, and wouldn't the statute of limitation be up anyway? You're in denial about Biden, but thankfully it's a non-issue now that he has been taken out by his own party. I give you credit for bringing yourself to admit the diary is real. But Biden can't be convicted if there is no investigation. Gaetz was investigated. No charges could be brought. At least one of the witnesses has been revealed as a liar. Accusing republicans of sex crimes is the Democrat playbook, chapter 1. It's happened over and over and over. I notice you didn't address the fact that Kavanaugh also had a witness testify under oath against him, but that's fine, that doesn't reveal anything other than an acknowledgment that political operatives will find people to lie under oath if they think they can take out a political opponent. That's what this looks like to me, one more in a long line of character assassination attempts by the swamp. But as I have said, repeatedly, Gaetz might be guilty of all those things he accused of doing, I don't know. Somehow you've twisted that into thinking I have an unwavering belief in his innocence.
You need to read closer. I never foreclosed the possibility the diary is real. What I said is the statements therein don't prove anything, other than the Bidens may be a creepy family. They are certainly not evidence that Joe Biden is a pedo. He could be, certainly, but the diary in no way proves he is, contrary to your specious assertions.

I am not sure where you came up with the idea that Ashley would have to press charges for Biden to be prosecuted. That is simply erroneous. The police can act on their own accord if they feel they have sufficient evidence of a crime. They do it in the case of domestic violence all the time. And of course, no charges were ever brought.

With respect to Gaetz, if it was a he said, she said situation, and there was only one witness - the accuser - whose story was contradicted and could not be corroborated as there was in the Kavanaugh case, you might have a legitimate point. But in the case of Gaetz, there were multiple witnesses who testified about witnessing him having sex and doing drugs. There were also financial records that appeared to indicate payment for drugs and sex, the latter of which he essential admitted (paying "girlfriends"). So comparing his situation to Kavanaugh's is apples to bowling balls.

A bipartisan committee, with subpoena power, believed the evidence indicated illicit conduct on the part of Gaetz had been committed. But if you want to believe multiple people lied, and this was all one big conspiracy, so be it.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
Unless Ashley pressed charges there is no way to prosecute Biden, and wouldn't the statute of limitation be up anyway? You're in denial about Biden, but thankfully it's a non-issue now that he has been taken out by his own party. I give you credit for bringing yourself to admit the diary is real. But Biden can't be convicted if there is no investigation. Gaetz was investigated. No charges could be brought. At least one of the witnesses has been revealed as a liar. Accusing republicans of sex crimes is the Democrat playbook, chapter 1. It's happened over and over and over. I notice you didn't address the fact that Kavanaugh also had a witness testify under oath against him, but that's fine, that doesn't reveal anything other than an acknowledgment that political operatives will find people to lie under oath if they think they can take out a political opponent. That's what this looks like to me, one more in a long line of character assassination attempts by the swamp. But as I have said, repeatedly, Gaetz might be guilty of all those things he accused of doing, I don't know. Somehow you've twisted that into thinking I have an unwavering belief in his innocence.
You need to read closer. I never foreclosed the possibility the diary is real. What I said is the statements therein don't prove anything, other than the Bidens may be a creepy family. They are certainly not evidence that Joe Biden is a pedo. He could be, certainly, but the diary in no way proves he is, contrary to your specious assertions.

I am not sure where you came up with the idea that Ashley would have to press charges for Biden to be prosecuted. That is simply erroneous. The police can act on their own accord if they feel they have sufficient evidence of a crime. They do it in the case of domestic violence all the time. And of course, no charges were ever brought.

With respect to Gaetz, if it was a he said, she said situation, and there was only one witness - the accuser - whose story was contradicted and could not be corroborated as there was in the Kavanaugh case, you might have a legitimate point. But in the case of Gaetz, there were multiple witnesses who testified about witnessing him having sex and doing drugs. There were also financial records that appeared to indicate payment for drugs and sex, the latter of which he essential admitted (paying "girlfriends"). So comparing his situation to Kavanaugh's is apples to bowling balls.

A bipartisan committee, with subpoena power, believed the evidence indicated illicit conduct on the part of Gaetz had been committed. But if you want to believe multiple people lied, and this was all one big conspiracy, so be it.
If we start going down the path of listing all the things Joe should have been charged with we would be here for days. Somehow the lack of charges against Biden are used as a defense of the charges of pedophile but the lack of charges against Gaetz means nothing . Seems very convenient for your argument. "It could mean something else" is not a defense of what was explicitly written by Ashley and the context around the statement. Who would be in position to bring the hammer down on Joe for the crime at this point? Is there a statute of limitations? These are legitimate questions so don't be offended by me asking you.

Matt being seen doing drugs and having sex are definitely bad but not crimes in and of themselves. If he had sex with a minor, transported her across state lines(trafficked) and paid her then he would have been prosecuted. At this point, he has been charged with nothing. But that somehow opens the door to ALL accusations being repeated as fact. You want to act like it was such an open and shut case but not one charge was able to be prosecuted. Gaetz is hardly as protected from prosecution as Biden seems to have been for all these decades, but as I said, a daughter's testimony holds far more weight than that of strangers' gathered by others with ulterior motives, some of whom have been exposed for giving false testimony.


"There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses," Gaetz wrote on X, contending that many of the claims in the report were inaccurate. He has repeatedly denied having sex with anyone under 18 and said money he transferred to women was to compensate girlfriends or ex-girlfriends for their travel.

Chris Dorworth, the former Florida state representative at whose home Gaetz allegedly had sex with the 17-year-old, denounced the report and said its release was an act of retaliation against Gaetz for helping to bring down former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

"This is clearly a congressional hit job. It is painfully clear these women are lying," Dorworth wrote on X. "This is a shakedown that caught fire because Matt kicked Kevin McCarthy out of his job. This DID NOT HAPPEN. Every thing they said about me being there and witnessing any of it is a lie."

Zero charges. Your prosecution is lacking.


Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Firstly, having sex with a 17 year old that has been cooperated by witnesses (that is evidence, pal.) is Statutory Rape" and it is a crime. Secondly, I found it very telling that your know it all Maga self told one of the lawyers on the board that his "prosecution" as you called it, sucked. Now, what year did you graduate law school?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
brilliant retort. Keep showing your arse! having sex (consensual or not) a 17yr old infant of people is evidence.
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
brilliant retort. Keep showing your arse! having sex (consensual or not) a 17yr old infant of people is evidence.
JR repeating an unsupported charge reminds me of Christine Blasey Ford, whom he obviously admires since he uses the same tactics.

The only slimeball in this discussion is anyone willing to condemn without proof.
That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
J.R.
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
brilliant retort. Keep showing your arse! having sex (consensual or not) a 17yr old infant of people is evidence.
JR repeating an unsupported charge reminds me of Christine Blasey Ford, whom he obviously admires since he uses the same tactics.

The only slimeball in this discussion is anyone willing to condemn without proof.
unsupported. Can you read, you imbecile ? It is in the congressional report. What about that cannot your blind MAGA arse not understand about that. Fake news, Donald?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

J.R. said:

Oldbear83 said:

JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
brilliant retort. Keep showing your arse! having sex (consensual or not) a 17yr old infant of people is evidence.
JR repeating an unsupported charge reminds me of Christine Blasey Ford, whom he obviously admires since he uses the same tactics.

The only slimeball in this discussion is anyone willing to condemn without proof.
unsupported. Can you read, you imbecile ? It is in the congressional report. What about that cannot your blind MAGA arse not understand about that. Fake news, Donald?
Again, accusations are not evidence, and name-calling won't change the fact that even in this thread that report has been debunked by witnesses who said the report altered their testimony.

I get it, your hatred of how the election turned out has made it impossible for you to follow facts, let alone build a case on them.

But you are doing more harm to your position with your own posts than anything I could do, so thank you for debunking yourself.

Yet again.


That which does not kill me, will try again and get nastier
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
J.R. said:

Firstly, having sex with a 17 year old that has been cooperated by witnesses (that is evidence, pal.) is Statutory Rape" and it is a crime. Secondly, I found it very telling that your know it all Maga self told one of the lawyers on the board that his "prosecution" as you called it, sucked. Now, what year did you graduate law school?


Fair or unfair; Gaetz is finished on the national stage.

Going to disappear back into the sludge from which he came.
Harrison Bergeron
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

JR doesn't need evidence, it just slows down his lynchings.
He probably thinks Gaetz is Jewish.

The creepy TDS obsession is weird. Gaetz bowed out a month ago and the TDSers are still obsessed with him ... ignoring the fact the current POTUS is a credibly accused rapist and likely incestuious pedophile.
Mothra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
Unless Ashley pressed charges there is no way to prosecute Biden, and wouldn't the statute of limitation be up anyway? You're in denial about Biden, but thankfully it's a non-issue now that he has been taken out by his own party. I give you credit for bringing yourself to admit the diary is real. But Biden can't be convicted if there is no investigation. Gaetz was investigated. No charges could be brought. At least one of the witnesses has been revealed as a liar. Accusing republicans of sex crimes is the Democrat playbook, chapter 1. It's happened over and over and over. I notice you didn't address the fact that Kavanaugh also had a witness testify under oath against him, but that's fine, that doesn't reveal anything other than an acknowledgment that political operatives will find people to lie under oath if they think they can take out a political opponent. That's what this looks like to me, one more in a long line of character assassination attempts by the swamp. But as I have said, repeatedly, Gaetz might be guilty of all those things he accused of doing, I don't know. Somehow you've twisted that into thinking I have an unwavering belief in his innocence.
You need to read closer. I never foreclosed the possibility the diary is real. What I said is the statements therein don't prove anything, other than the Bidens may be a creepy family. They are certainly not evidence that Joe Biden is a pedo. He could be, certainly, but the diary in no way proves he is, contrary to your specious assertions.

I am not sure where you came up with the idea that Ashley would have to press charges for Biden to be prosecuted. That is simply erroneous. The police can act on their own accord if they feel they have sufficient evidence of a crime. They do it in the case of domestic violence all the time. And of course, no charges were ever brought.

With respect to Gaetz, if it was a he said, she said situation, and there was only one witness - the accuser - whose story was contradicted and could not be corroborated as there was in the Kavanaugh case, you might have a legitimate point. But in the case of Gaetz, there were multiple witnesses who testified about witnessing him having sex and doing drugs. There were also financial records that appeared to indicate payment for drugs and sex, the latter of which he essential admitted (paying "girlfriends"). So comparing his situation to Kavanaugh's is apples to bowling balls.

A bipartisan committee, with subpoena power, believed the evidence indicated illicit conduct on the part of Gaetz had been committed. But if you want to believe multiple people lied, and this was all one big conspiracy, so be it.
If we start going down the path of listing all the things Joe should have been charged with we would be here for days. Somehow the lack of charges against Biden are used as a defense of the charges of pedophile but the lack of charges against Gaetz means nothing . Seems very convenient for your argument. "It could mean something else" is not a defense of what was explicitly written by Ashley and the context around the statement. Who would be in position to bring the hammer down on Joe for the crime at this point? Is there a statute of limitations? These are legitimate questions so don't be offended by me asking you.

Matt being seen doing drugs and having sex are definitely bad but not crimes in and of themselves. If he had sex with a minor, transported her across state lines(trafficked) and paid her then he would have been prosecuted. At this point, he has been charged with nothing. But that somehow opens the door to ALL accusations being repeated as fact. You want to act like it was such an open and shut case but not one charge was able to be prosecuted. Gaetz is hardly as protected from prosecution as Biden seems to have been for all these decades, but as I said, a daughter's testimony holds far more weight than that of strangers' gathered by others with ulterior motives, some of whom have been exposed for giving false testimony.


"There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses," Gaetz wrote on X, contending that many of the claims in the report were inaccurate. He has repeatedly denied having sex with anyone under 18 and said money he transferred to women was to compensate girlfriends or ex-girlfriends for their travel.

Chris Dorworth, the former Florida state representative at whose home Gaetz allegedly had sex with the 17-year-old, denounced the report and said its release was an act of retaliation against Gaetz for helping to bring down former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

"This is clearly a congressional hit job. It is painfully clear these women are lying," Dorworth wrote on X. "This is a shakedown that caught fire because Matt kicked Kevin McCarthy out of his job. This DID NOT HAPPEN. Every thing they said about me being there and witnessing any of it is a lie."

Zero charges. Your prosecution is lacking.
Again, if I were making the allegation he needed to be charged with a crime, you might have a point. But I made no such allegation. You are the poster who keeps bringing that up.

I began this thread by stating Gaetz is a Grade A scumbag based on the substantial evidence included in the report. I of course realize Gaetz is going to attempt to spin the multiple witnesses' testimony and evidence of payments (tens of thousands for mere travel expenses? I have some ocean front property in AZ if you believe that one). And just FYI, in most states, using drugs remains a crime.
Wangchung
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Wangchung said:

Mothra said:

Redbrickbear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

LIB,MR BEARS said:

sombear said:

In the Trump era, it really doesn't matter. The vast majority of MAGA will defend him. Heck, Trump knew every letter of this and more and still nominated him for freaking AG.

Character matters or it doesn't.
since the news came out, I've yet to see anyone defend him. Have you?


Half the posters on here and virtually every MAGA influencer is either outright defending him, questioning the evidence, or playing whataboutism.
it's pointing out hypocrisy.


Sombear does not like it when you point out hypocrisy on the Left

I forget if he is still claiming on here to be a "principled conservative" or not

I get these Liz Cheney-Republican types confused all the time since they are indistinguishable from Clinton-Democrats
Don't agree with this. Sombear is one of the most consistent and principled members of this board.

He's correct that there is a double standard here. The same posters who decried Biden as a pedophile based on statements made in an alleged stolen diary are the posters questioning the evidence against Gaetz (when there is a mountain of evidence against Gaetz by comparison). I am no criminal lawyer, but I can say with certainty that the amount of sworn deposition testimony against him would be damning in any civil trial.

Gaetz is a POS. I may agree with a number of the things he believes, politically, but that doesn't change the fact he's a POS. Does it mean he committed a crime? Apparently not, but he's still a scumbag of the tallest order.
Alleged stolen diary? The one the FBI raided journalists to recover? The one Ashley admitted she left behind? The one we have photographs of the entry in question? That's a lot more than merely alleged.



Just so I am clear, you are convinced that is sufficient evidence to prove that Biden is a pedophile, but the scores of witnesses and deposition testimony that say Gaetz was using drugs, having sex with underage girls and paying off women for sex is not very credible?
I keep hearing about all the people who said they witnessed him having sex with under age girls but then only one 17 year old gets mentioned specifically and none of the accusers are listed. The accusations sound exactly the same as those levied by democrats every time the try to character assassinate a Republican. The accusations against Biden were levied BY HIS OWN DAUGHTER. That added to the hours of footage we all witnessed of Biden groping and sniffing every kid he could get his hands on and stories of getting kids to rub his legs when he was a lifeguard and it's not hard to believe Joe is a child predator. You want evidence of a partisan hack, find me someone who starts calling evidence that was verified years ago "alleged". Next you'll claim hunters laptop is merely alleged to exist.


Like I said, tell me you're a partisan hack without telling me you're a partisan hack. When you feel a diary that doesn't actually accuse Biden of being a pedophile is credible evidence of pedophilia but numerous sworn witnesses who witnessed Gaetz engaging in such behavior isn't, then you might be a partisan hack.
Yeah, I'm sure the inappropriate showers with her father were really just innocent fun that she got twisted in her memory as she tried to recover from a drug problem and wrote about in her recovery diary. A partisan hack would look at photographic evidence and still claim it's merely alleged to exist. Gaetz MIGHT be guilty of everything alleged, but for some reason there hasn't been enough evidence to bring forth charges from anyone. But you go on ignoring that in order to convict him for the sake of your argument. That's not partisan hack behavior at all...
So, you are ready to declare Biden a pedophile based on statements by his daughter with a drug problem in her diary but are defending Gaetz against numerous witnesses who said he they saw him having sex with a 17 year old and taking drugs (among other evidence) and paying "girlfriends" tens of thousands of dollars for sex, conduct which he essentially admitted. That, my friend, is indeed a partisan hack.

Everyone on this board knows that if Gaetz were a Dem, you'd be calling for him to be prosecuted - just like Biden. Take your blinders off and call bad behavior for what it is. It shouldn't matter whether they are an R or D.
The person making the accusation matters and who they are making that accusation to matters. One is the daughter of the accused writing in her personal diary that was meant for her eyes only. The other is unverified claims being used by political opponents that couldn't be verified by a department of justice investigation. Your apples will never be oranges. But again, as I have said repeatedly, Gaetz COULD BE guilty of all these crimes, the problem is his accusers haven't proven anything. The evidence was so weak the DOJ under Biden dropped the investigation. Now the accusations are brought back out to stop his nomination and we have clowns pretending that means he was found guilty of said accusations. That's not how things work.
So, in your mind, multiple witnesses testifying under oath they saw Gaetz having sex and using drugs is much less credible than the evidence of Biden's pedophilia based on his daughter saying that she was taking "showers with my dad (probably not appropriate)" at an unknown age in her diary? That's enough for you to say Biden is a pedophile, but multiple people testifying under oath regarding Gaetz isn't enough to suggest he did something, at the very least, that was inappropriate, if not borderline illegal?

LOL. You are certainly right that it's an apples to oranges comparison. There is a whole lot more evidence of Gaetz doing what he has been accused of than Biden being a pedophile.
Yes, the personal diary of Ashley Biden talking about inappropriate showers with her father while also talking about being a hypersexualized child etc is far more damning than witnesses put forth by political opponents.

I'm sure you believe Justice Kavanaugh is a serial rapist, too, right? After all, a witness under oath swore he was a serial rapist so it MUST be true. No witness has ever been found to be without credibility, right?
Previously mentioned context clues added below.

Can't believe that your statements are so ridiculous they're making me defend Biden. A few things...

1) We have no idea from her statement when and in what circumstances those alleged showers occurred, if at all. While I don't disagree that showering with your children in normal circumstances is creepy, that is not evidence that Biden is a pedophile, or that he sexually molested or assaulted his daughter. As for being hypersexualized, we once again have no context to understand what that means. Does it mean she was allowed to wear inappropriate things? Or does it mean something more sinister, such as someone in the household was grooming her? No clue, because we have no context. Yet that has not prevented you from declaring Biden a pedo. Of course, we all know that if these accusations had been leveled at Trump, you'd be defending him.

2) What evidence do you have that the numerous witnesses who testified under oath against Gaetz were "put forth by political opponents"? This was a bi-partisan committee, just FYI. What evidence do you have the witnesses had an axe to grind? Gaetz already admitted to paying numerous women he was having sex with.

Anyone who believes that the vague statements in Ashley Biden's diary are more damning than numerous witnesses who testified against Gaetz under oath is a dumb @ss.
The DOJ couldn't do anything to Gaetz with all that testimony you've swallowed as undeniable fact. Political opponents aren't necessarily members of the opposite party. You WANT their testimony to be fact, that is clear. But your desires and what actually is don't seem to be matching up. If Matt is guilty of these crimes he needs to be prosecuted, but for some reason there isn't enough evidence for that. Does that stop you or make you take a beat to consider that maybe he is being railroaded? Nope. Personally I hope you're wrong because I don't want some predator getting investigated by the Department of Justice and still getting away with his crimes.

We have witnessed Biden groping and sniffing kids, saying inappropriate things to them and even falling off his bike when he saw a little girl and rode straight to her. In addition to Biden's own words and actions, his daughter was driven to drug abuse and in her recovery she mentioned inappropriate showers with Joe while she mentioned being a hypersexualized child and listed other behaviors that went along with it. Her words, written to herself and no one else. At this point, only a dumbass would dismiss that as merely an "alleged diary".
A few things...

1) Never said Gaetz committed a crime. Doesn't mean the things he's been accused of are not accurate. The prosecutor's decision to prosecute or not prosecute is based on numerous factors. Thousands of crimes go unprosecuted each and every day. There is a notorious crime in my neck of the woods involving a Catholic priest who the DA has strong evidence committed sexual crimes against children. Do I think he's absolutely guilty of the crimes? Yes, considering I am good friends with one of his victims. But the case is never going to get prosecuted, for reasons I will not get into here.

2) Biden touching kids or sniffing their hair, while creepy, is not sexual assault, nor definitive evidence he is a pedo. Nor is Biden's daughter's comments evidence he is a pedo. Is he actually a pedo? Who knows? Might be. But the evidence you have presented thus far certainly doesn't prove same.

The difference between us is I have reached no conclusion on either Biden or Gaetz committing a crime, like you have. While I think the evidence is pretty overwhelmingly in favor of the idea that Gaetz is a scumbag based on his admitted conduct, I've reached no conclusion he committed a crime. You on the other hand believe Biden is a pedo who should be prosecuted based on the flimsy evidence in his daughter's diary. No doubt, if Biden were a Republican, you would be singing a different tune, biased partisan hack that you are.
Unless Ashley pressed charges there is no way to prosecute Biden, and wouldn't the statute of limitation be up anyway? You're in denial about Biden, but thankfully it's a non-issue now that he has been taken out by his own party. I give you credit for bringing yourself to admit the diary is real. But Biden can't be convicted if there is no investigation. Gaetz was investigated. No charges could be brought. At least one of the witnesses has been revealed as a liar. Accusing republicans of sex crimes is the Democrat playbook, chapter 1. It's happened over and over and over. I notice you didn't address the fact that Kavanaugh also had a witness testify under oath against him, but that's fine, that doesn't reveal anything other than an acknowledgment that political operatives will find people to lie under oath if they think they can take out a political opponent. That's what this looks like to me, one more in a long line of character assassination attempts by the swamp. But as I have said, repeatedly, Gaetz might be guilty of all those things he accused of doing, I don't know. Somehow you've twisted that into thinking I have an unwavering belief in his innocence.
You need to read closer. I never foreclosed the possibility the diary is real. What I said is the statements therein don't prove anything, other than the Bidens may be a creepy family. They are certainly not evidence that Joe Biden is a pedo. He could be, certainly, but the diary in no way proves he is, contrary to your specious assertions.

I am not sure where you came up with the idea that Ashley would have to press charges for Biden to be prosecuted. That is simply erroneous. The police can act on their own accord if they feel they have sufficient evidence of a crime. They do it in the case of domestic violence all the time. And of course, no charges were ever brought.

With respect to Gaetz, if it was a he said, she said situation, and there was only one witness - the accuser - whose story was contradicted and could not be corroborated as there was in the Kavanaugh case, you might have a legitimate point. But in the case of Gaetz, there were multiple witnesses who testified about witnessing him having sex and doing drugs. There were also financial records that appeared to indicate payment for drugs and sex, the latter of which he essential admitted (paying "girlfriends"). So comparing his situation to Kavanaugh's is apples to bowling balls.

A bipartisan committee, with subpoena power, believed the evidence indicated illicit conduct on the part of Gaetz had been committed. But if you want to believe multiple people lied, and this was all one big conspiracy, so be it.
If we start going down the path of listing all the things Joe should have been charged with we would be here for days. Somehow the lack of charges against Biden are used as a defense of the charges of pedophile but the lack of charges against Gaetz means nothing . Seems very convenient for your argument. "It could mean something else" is not a defense of what was explicitly written by Ashley and the context around the statement. Who would be in position to bring the hammer down on Joe for the crime at this point? Is there a statute of limitations? These are legitimate questions so don't be offended by me asking you.

Matt being seen doing drugs and having sex are definitely bad but not crimes in and of themselves. If he had sex with a minor, transported her across state lines(trafficked) and paid her then he would have been prosecuted. At this point, he has been charged with nothing. But that somehow opens the door to ALL accusations being repeated as fact. You want to act like it was such an open and shut case but not one charge was able to be prosecuted. Gaetz is hardly as protected from prosecution as Biden seems to have been for all these decades, but as I said, a daughter's testimony holds far more weight than that of strangers' gathered by others with ulterior motives, some of whom have been exposed for giving false testimony.


"There is a reason they did this to me in a Christmas Eve-Eve report and not in a courtroom of any kind where I could present evidence and challenge witnesses," Gaetz wrote on X, contending that many of the claims in the report were inaccurate. He has repeatedly denied having sex with anyone under 18 and said money he transferred to women was to compensate girlfriends or ex-girlfriends for their travel.

Chris Dorworth, the former Florida state representative at whose home Gaetz allegedly had sex with the 17-year-old, denounced the report and said its release was an act of retaliation against Gaetz for helping to bring down former Speaker Kevin McCarthy.

"This is clearly a congressional hit job. It is painfully clear these women are lying," Dorworth wrote on X. "This is a shakedown that caught fire because Matt kicked Kevin McCarthy out of his job. This DID NOT HAPPEN. Every thing they said about me being there and witnessing any of it is a lie."

Zero charges. Your prosecution is lacking.
Again, if I were making the allegation he needed to be charged with a crime, you might have a point. But I made no such allegation. You are the poster who keeps bringing that up.

I began this thread by stating Gaetz is a Grade A scumbag based on the substantial evidence included in the report. I of course realize Gaetz is going to attempt to spin the multiple witnesses' testimony and evidence of payments (tens of thousands for mere travel expenses? I have some ocean front property in AZ if you believe that one). And just FYI, in most states, using drugs remains a crime.
I rolled my eyes at the "travel expenses" excuse, too. My problem is that allegations were made, a DOJ investigation commenced and did not find enough for him to be charged and no local authorities brought any charges. That somehow makes it acceptable for an American citizen to be called guilty of crimes he was never even charged with by his political opponents, the media and anyone else who wants to pile on. That's not how our justice system works. Defend Biden all you want but he was never investigated by any authority over his daughter's claims.
Our vibrations were getting nasty. But why? I was puzzled, frustrated... Had we deteriorated to the level of dumb beasts?

 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.