* * Epstein Files Being Released in the Next 10 Days

208,708 Views | 2429 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by FLBear5630
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to cowboycwr • 8:12p, 7/21/25
cowboycwr said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
Assassin said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
Assassin said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
boognish_bear said:
As time goes by I feel more and more sure all of this is going nowhere and we will never get any answers.

Unless the real answer is what we already have....that there is no list and nothing is there.

You have the answer. There's no scenario where you hang out with me for 15 years and see me with underage girls.

No need to debate whether Trump did or didn't date kids.

No need to debate means that you have proof one way or another. Please share


You're arguing for proof that Trump did it. I'm arguing there's proof that Trump nothing.

Yet you presented "no need to debate", not me. Prove it. There is no need to debate


So, in your world, Trump is smart enough to know that the world is ripping us off and implement tariffs of everyone.

But doesn't have instinct to know that a guy he pals around with for 15 years, who calls him him is "best friend," who introduced him to his wife, while married, is sleeping with underage girls?

This is t going away because the rest of us have to suspend belief.


Why is it so hard to believe people can be friends with someone and not know their dark secrets?

Did the wife of that CEO know he was having an affair before hand?

People have had secret families they have hidden away. People hide affairs all the time. People hide their dark sides (alcohol, drug abuse, child porn, sleeping with underage kids) all the time… until it comes out and then suddenly people say "I knew it." But never were the ones to turn them in or anything.


You can be. Until it's impossible. If you only see me at games, you have no way of knowing I'm a pervert.

But, if you're coming to my freakoffs and meeting the underaged girls (kinda documented)

If I'm having sex with my girlfriend on your airplane while I'm married to another woman, I've let my guard down. It's likely because we trust each other.

To your point, I 100% believe we do y know each other but I don't 100% believe it's because we had no way of knowing. Did the wife of the CEO know he'd cheat? Has he before? That's a big sign.
Reply Quote
2 edits
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:21p, 7/21/25
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/trump-epstein-friendship
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:19p, 7/21/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21p, 7/21/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:22p, 7/21/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:28p, 7/21/25
Reply Quote
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mitch Blood Green • 9:30p, 7/21/25
Mitch Blood Green said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/trump-epstein-friendship


Yet even Biden did not see fit to produce this 'evidence' against Trump during the 2024 election.

Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 9:38p, 7/21/25
KaiBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/trump-epstein-friendship

Yet even Biden did not see fit to produce this 'evidence' against Trump during the 2024 election.

Amazing. Who knew Joe like Donald that much. Must have been their old boy's club
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 9:53p, 7/21/25
KaiBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/trump-epstein-friendship


Yet even Biden did not see fit to produce this 'evidence' against Trump during the 2024 election.



Maybe a case of mutually assured destruction?
Reply Quote
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 6:55a, 7/22/25
boognish_bear said:
KaiBear said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/jul/18/trump-epstein-friendship


Yet even Biden did not see fit to produce this 'evidence' against Trump during the 2024 election.



Maybe a case of mutually assured destruction?


Possibly

Although I am beginning to believe that Epstein had been running a billion dollar blackmail operation on behalf of Israeli intelligence……and our politicians are loath to admit it.
Reply Quote
2 edits
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Mitch Blood Green • 7:06a, 7/22/25
Mitch Blood Green said:
whiterock said:
kinda funny to watch Trump toss the hot potato into the lap of the judiciary. If they don't release the grand jury testimony, they'll become a part of the conspiracy.


I don't get that. Seems to me that you take evidence to the grand jury. That's available, now. Getting a federal judge involved is only a delay tactic, IMO.

the evidence was already taken to the grand jury. and now, it is under seal. Requires a court order to release. Regardless of the merits/demerits of release, the fact that the judiciary has to approve it does "throw the issue into the lap" of the courts. And if they don't, odds are it will be a Democrat appointed judge who makes the ruling (ergo making the ruling partisan). And if it is a GOP appointed judge who makes the ruling not to release, then it is just more deep state resistance to what the public elected Trump to do.

Not making a call on any of that. Just noting the dynamic. Very good play by Trump. To the extent that the ploy is stalling for time, that helps the issue fade and allows the RussiaGate narrative to hog the stage. (which is what Trump is trying to do).
Reply Quote
Mitch Blood Green
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whiterock • 7:14a, 7/22/25
whiterock said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
whiterock said:
kinda funny to watch Trump toss the hot potato into the lap of the judiciary. If they don't release the grand jury testimony, they'll become a part of the conspiracy.


I don't get that. Seems to me that you take evidence to the grand jury. That's available, now. Getting a federal judge involved is only a delay tactic, IMO.

the evidence was already taken to the grand jury. and now, it is under seal. Requires a court order to release. Regardless of the merits/demerits of release, the fact that the judiciary has to approve it does "throw the issue into the lap" of the courts. And if they don't, odds are it will be a Democrat appointed judge who makes the ruling (ergo making the ruling partisan). And if it is a GOP appointed judge who makes the ruling not to release, then it is just more deep state resistance to what the public elected Trump to do.

Not making a call on any of that. Just noting the dynamic. Very good play by Trump. To the extent that the ploy is stalling for time, that helps the issue fade and allows the RussiaGate narrative to hog the stage. (which is what Trump is trying to do).


Thank you for the explanation.
Reply Quote
1 edit
KaiBear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whiterock • 7:26a, 7/22/25
whiterock said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
whiterock said:
kinda funny to watch Trump toss the hot potato into the lap of the judiciary. If they don't release the grand jury testimony, they'll become a part of the conspiracy.


I don't get that. Seems to me that you take evidence to the grand jury. That's available, now. Getting a federal judge involved is only a delay tactic, IMO.

the evidence was already taken to the grand jury. and now, it is under seal. Requires a court order to release. Regardless of the merits/demerits of release, the fact that the judiciary has to approve it does "throw the issue into the lap" of the courts. And if they don't, odds are it will be a Democrat appointed judge who makes the ruling (ergo making the ruling partisan). And if it is a GOP appointed judge who makes the ruling not to release, then it is just more deep state resistance to what the public elected Trump to do.

Not making a call on any of that. Just noting the dynamic. Very good play by Trump. To the extent that the ploy is stalling for time, that helps the issue fade and allows the RussiaGate narrative to hog the stage. (which is what Trump is trying to do).


Then Trump will lose a lot of support from his base and forfeit the midterms.
Reply Quote
1 edit
Bestweekeverr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 11:13a, 7/22/25
boognish_bear said:


The longer this goes on and the harder Republicans fight to keep the files from being released the worse this looks for Trump. Shutting down the House, really??
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:26a, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:34a, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:41a, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
Realitybites
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 11:52a, 7/22/25
boognish_bear said:


Why do I have this funny feeling that Pam Bondi is meeting with her and saying "You say what we want you to say, and this whole thing goes away for you. Including the prison sentence."
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Realitybites • 11:56a, 7/22/25
Realitybites said:
boognish_bear said:


Why do I have this funny feeling that Pam Bondi is meeting with her and saying "You say what we want you to say, and this whole thing goes away for you. Including the prison sentence."


I can't help but feeling that way also. House GOP seems to want nothing to do with this... but now suddenly this move? They must feel confident this move would not hurt Trump.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
11:58a, 7/22/25
Maybe Ghislaine ends up with a pardon when the dust settles
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:00p, 7/22/25


Reply Quote
Harrison Bergeron
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:29p, 7/22/25
This story perfectly summarizes the stupidity of Congress and politics.
Reply Quote
Jack Bauer
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 2:23p, 7/22/25
boognish_bear said:

If I were you, I wouldn't try to start your car...
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:31p, 7/22/25
Senator from Hawaii

Reply Quote
Bestweekeverr
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to boognish_bear • 2:35p, 7/22/25
boognish_bear said:
Senator from Hawaii



I'm very anti conspiracy brained, and I didn't think there was anything crazy in the Epstein files until now. This is nuts.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:42p, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
1 edit
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:49p, 7/22/25
Wondering if this is a setup?

They know what's in there and they are setting table for big reveal?
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Reply Quote
Porteroso
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
2:50p, 7/22/25
He's totally in the files. Only question is how bad is it?

Thing is, Epstein didn't just pimp out minors, but adults too. If the woman who told the FBI to look into Trump can be believed, Epstein told Trump "she's not here for you," implying another girl had been there for Trump. Maybe she was an adult? I could believe that Trump isn't a pedophile, but banged some adult tail that Epstein procured.

People have had the tar and feathers ready for 10 years now, for Trump. If he had sex with anyone associated with Epstein, their age won't matter much. The GOP will lose big on this little Renaissance they've had.
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
3:22p, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
5:13p, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to KaiBear • 8:59p, 7/22/25
KaiBear said:
whiterock said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
whiterock said:
kinda funny to watch Trump toss the hot potato into the lap of the judiciary. If they don't release the grand jury testimony, they'll become a part of the conspiracy.


I don't get that. Seems to me that you take evidence to the grand jury. That's available, now. Getting a federal judge involved is only a delay tactic, IMO.

the evidence was already taken to the grand jury. and now, it is under seal. Requires a court order to release. Regardless of the merits/demerits of release, the fact that the judiciary has to approve it does "throw the issue into the lap" of the courts. And if they don't, odds are it will be a Democrat appointed judge who makes the ruling (ergo making the ruling partisan). And if it is a GOP appointed judge who makes the ruling not to release, then it is just more deep state resistance to what the public elected Trump to do.

Not making a call on any of that. Just noting the dynamic. Very good play by Trump. To the extent that the ploy is stalling for time, that helps the issue fade and allows the RussiaGate narrative to hog the stage. (which is what Trump is trying to do).


Then Trump will lose a lot of support from his base and forfeit the midterms.

Nope.
Reply Quote
whiterock
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Porteroso • 9:00p, 7/22/25
Porteroso said:
He's totally in the files. Only question is how bad is it?

Thing is, Epstein didn't just pimp out minors, but adults too. If the woman who told the FBI to look into Trump can be believed, Epstein told Trump "she's not here for you," implying another girl had been there for Trump. Maybe she was an adult? I could believe that Trump isn't a pedophile, but banged some adult tail that Epstein procured.

People have had the tar and feathers ready for 10 years now, for Trump. If he had sex with anyone associated with Epstein, their age won't matter much. The GOP will lose big on this little Renaissance they've had.

Cope.
Reply Quote
Assassin
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to whiterock • 9:17p, 7/22/25
whiterock said:
KaiBear said:
whiterock said:
Mitch Blood Green said:
whiterock said:
kinda funny to watch Trump toss the hot potato into the lap of the judiciary. If they don't release the grand jury testimony, they'll become a part of the conspiracy.


I don't get that. Seems to me that you take evidence to the grand jury. That's available, now. Getting a federal judge involved is only a delay tactic, IMO.

the evidence was already taken to the grand jury. and now, it is under seal. Requires a court order to release. Regardless of the merits/demerits of release, the fact that the judiciary has to approve it does "throw the issue into the lap" of the courts. And if they don't, odds are it will be a Democrat appointed judge who makes the ruling (ergo making the ruling partisan). And if it is a GOP appointed judge who makes the ruling not to release, then it is just more deep state resistance to what the public elected Trump to do.

Not making a call on any of that. Just noting the dynamic. Very good play by Trump. To the extent that the ploy is stalling for time, that helps the issue fade and allows the RussiaGate narrative to hog the stage. (which is what Trump is trying to do).


Then Trump will lose a lot of support from his base and forfeit the midterms.

Nope.

the way I see it, if there was anything that even slightly related to a Republican in there, the news starved liberal Legacy Media would been all over it in the four years they had it. Since the Republicans have not released it, possibly there is nothing the other way
Facebook Groups at; Memories of Dallas, Mem of Texas, Mem of Football in Texas, Mem Texas Music and Through a Texas Lens. Come visit! Over 100,000 members and 100,000 regular visitors
Reply Quote
boognish_bear
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:21p, 7/22/25
Reply Quote
Harrison Bergeron
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Porteroso • 9:23p, 7/22/25
Porteroso said:
He's totally in the files. Only question is how bad is it?

Thing is, Epstein didn't just pimp out minors, but adults too. If the woman who told the FBI to look into Trump can be believed, Epstein told Trump "she's not here for you," implying another girl had been there for Trump. Maybe she was an adult? I could believe that Trump isn't a pedophile, but banged some adult tail that Epstein procured.

People have had the tar and feathers ready for 10 years now, for Trump. If he had sex with anyone associated with Epstein, their age won't matter much. The GOP will lose big on this little Renaissance they've had.

Any idea when you'll be potty trained?
Reply Quote
1 edit
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.