Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

You asked for an Abbot quote
There it is

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

How can anyone associated with Baylor not know the difference between posting and being quoted?

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

How can anyone associated with Baylor not know the difference between posting and being quoted?

---

You're not the dumbest person to post on this board, but you need to pray the dumbest person doesn't die

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

How can anyone associated with Baylor not know the difference between posting and being quoted?

---

You're not the dumbest person to post on this board, but you need to pray the dumbest person doesn't die

---

You reached China and can now drop the shovel. Your hole is complete.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

How can anyone associated with Baylor not know the difference between posting and being quoted?

---

You're not the dumbest person to post on this board, but you need to pray the dumbest person doesn't die

---

Mothra said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://gov.texas.gov/news/post/governor-abbott-signs-law-banning-sharia-compounds-in-texas#:~:text=Webinar%20Library-,Governor%20Abbott%20Signs%20Law%20Banning%20Sharia%20Compounds%20In%20Texas,impose%20Sharia%20law%20onto%20Texans.

---

Again……you mislead.

That statute is a prohibition on restraint on alienation plus certain transaction disclosure requirements.
It doesn't ban any religious activity.

Does it bother you to be such a liar?
disclosing that the interest being sold is personal property not real property……
allowing people to sell what they own without restrictions……
these concepts aren't some crazy diabolical religious plan

---

I made no representations. I thought you were a lawyer, maybe you retired a long time ago

---

Stop playing games.

anyone, attorney or not, can see right through your games.
Simply putting your assertion (freedom of religion violation) in the form of a question is nothing more than elevating form over function.

what is next? Ask everyone if they beat their wife regularly?

---

Your problem is with the governor's representation

---

Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

We will wait.

---

"One of the issues at stake is the freedom of religion," said Governor Abbott. "Another issue at stake is what's called the right to contract. The fact is, religious freedom is a central part of the Texas Constitution. But bad actors like EPIC and EPIC City tried to use religion as a form of segregation. We will ensure that we have the laws and law enforcement in place to prevent attempts to build such discriminatory compounds in the state of Texas."

---

So you didn't have the guts to admit "none". Noted.

So an R statute to prevent religious discrimination in real property transactions (drafted in the same vein in which race based restrictions on real property transfers were shot down by SCOTUS in Shelley v Kraemer (1948)) is somehow a Constitutional violation?

Admit the obvious……you hate Rs, you love Islam, you scream constitutional violation without any basis, and you are big mad at living in Red Texas.

---

Stop playing games.
You said: Show us all where Abbott posted on this thread or any other thread on SicEm365.

I posted Abbott's quote from this thread.
For the record I'm a ticket splitting Independent who loves Texas.

---

You quoted your own post quoting someone else.

---

Abbott's quote is from this thread

---

How can anyone associated with Baylor not know the difference between posting and being quoted?

---

You're not the dumbest person to post on this board, but you need to pray the dumbest person doesn't die

---

Love that quote from senator kennedy

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Coming from an Islamofascist lefty like you it is high praise

I guess the dumbest poster died

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Coming from an Islamofascist lefty like you it is high praise

I guess the dumbest poster died

---

I don't regard Adriacus Peratuun as anything close to an 'Islamofascist'.

I also note how quickly you resorted to insulting him, rather than his point.

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Coming from an Islamofascist lefty like you it is high praise

I guess the dumbest poster died

---

I don't regard Adriacus Peratuun as anything close to an 'Islamofascist'.

I also note how quickly you resorted to insulting him, rather than his point.

---

I was answering the insult

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Seemed appropriate for AP

---

In Texas receiving the ire of a Leftist Tool is a Badge of Honor.

So Thanks.

---

Coming from an Islamofascist lefty like you it is high praise

I guess the dumbest poster died

---

I don't regard Adriacus Peratuun as anything close to an 'Islamofascist'.

I also note how quickly you resorted to insulting him, rather than his point.

---

I was answering the insult

---

That kind of thing always ends well, neh?

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Because every Cornyn supporter will bomb Paxton to make their guy more viable.
Because every Paxton supporter will bomb Cornyn to Mae their guy more viable.

but in the end all of the above will vote R because Talarico is (like you) a leftie nutjob.

---

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Who paid for this poll?

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Who paid for this poll?

---

The ladies on The View?

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Because every Cornyn supporter will bomb Paxton to make their guy more viable.
Because every Paxton supporter will bomb Cornyn to Mae their guy more viable.

but in the end all of the above will vote R because Talarico is (like you) a leftie nutjob.

---

What will ticket splitting independents do?
Talarico has a fighting chance against Paxton

---

whiterock said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Because every Cornyn supporter will bomb Paxton to make their guy more viable.
Because every Paxton supporter will bomb Cornyn to Mae their guy more viable.

but in the end all of the above will vote R because Talarico is (like you) a leftie nutjob.

---

What will ticket splitting independents do?
Talarico has a fighting chance against Paxton

---

yes, a chance. But he's crazier than Beto, and seems unlikely to perform any better.

---

whiterock said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

Oldbear83 said:

---

canoso said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Who paid for this poll?

---

The ladies on The View?

---

Not too far off, it turns out:

" TPOR is directed by Luke Warford, a former statewide Democratic candidate in Texas and Chief Strategy Officer of the Texas Democratic Party."

HOME | TPOR

---

Translation: Dem establishments are trying to create a more favorable environment for Talarico fundraising by showing him to be competitive.

---

🚨 WOW. Sen. John Cornyn is now facing MASSIVE BACKLASH from MAGA nationwide after posting “REPUBLICANS AGAINST TRUMP” during his TX GOP primary against John Cornyn

Trump himself is slated to endorse in the race soon

SCOTT PRESLER: “Speaking of Trump derangement syndrome — why… https://t.co/1KGGdxlSn2 pic.twitter.com/ePo9NoJMEu

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) May 10, 2026

I am proud to introduce legislation to rename US Highway 287 as Interstate 47 in honor of our 47th President @realDonaldTrump.

My bill will upgrade one of our nation’s longest highways to a future interstate and save more than $5 BILLION in travel costs, all while honoring the… https://t.co/Ua8lxoZUeN

— Senator John Cornyn (@JohnCornyn) May 12, 2026

Osodecentx said:

---

Adriacus Peratuun said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

https://share.google/vBR4pVrphfDRPp2Uc

Talarico leads Cornyn, Paxton in Texas Senate race, new poll shows

---

Because every Cornyn supporter will bomb Paxton to make their guy more viable.
Because every Paxton supporter will bomb Cornyn to Mae their guy more viable.

but in the end all of the above will vote R because Talarico is (like you) a leftie nutjob.

---

What will ticket splitting independents do?
Talarico has a fighting chance against Paxton

---