Osodecentx said:

---

Assassin said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

xThe Texas Education Agency is investigating more than 280 complaints of teachers who posted or shared "reprehensible and inappropriate" content about the assassination of conservative influencer Charlie Kirk.

Education Commissioner Mike Morath announced last week that the agency is reviewing such social media posts to see whether they could constitute a violation of the Educators' Code of Ethics. He has said that he will recommend the State Board for Educator Certification suspend those teachers' licenses, making them ineligible to teach in a Texas public school.

---

Dang, it sounds like a great start.

Step 2 - the Universities

---

There is no "hate speech" exception to First Amendment protection.

Please focus on government action (teachers) vs private action (Kimmel)

---

Remember when you and your wife called Bob Iger to have me fired? https://t.co/w5BcJ1bsLC

— Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) September 18, 2025

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

historian said:

---

gtownbear said:

---

I expected some of the evil reaction by some of the depraved youth; the numbers have surprised me. However I have been shocked by the number of influential individuals in our society like Doctors, Nurses, the number of Teachers and Professors, Airline Pilots and the like openly cheering Charlie Kirk's assassination on social media and other platforms. The rot in our society is much deeper than I had imagined. Normal individuals and certainly Christians can never get along with these folks who rejoice at such evil.

---

At least they are being fired all over.

---

For every one going online with their outward hatred, there's another 10 that feel the same way as the fired individuals. They just aren't stupid enough to publish their hate.

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Christ died at the behest of the Jews. Not just the Pharisees. Not just the Sanhedrin. The Bible specifically says:

"And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

While nobody should use this as a cudgel to disparage Jewish people individually, it is an indictment of the Jewish religion, for what exists under the label of Judaism today is the continuation of the religion of the Pharisees.

No Christian should be a defender of Phariseeism under the label Judeo-Christian.

---

Indeed, the Pharisees had stirred up the crowd against Christ. But the idea that ALL Jews wanted Christ dead ignores the fact there were numerous converts among the Jews.

All religions that are opposed to Christ are wrong, not just the Jews. That does not mean Jews are still not a chosen people.

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Osodecentx said:

---

Assassin said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Coming soon to a blue campus near you… https://t.co/0j62yTwPru

— Alex Jones (@RealAlexJones) September 16, 2025

---

Alex Jones would be way down the list of folks I would want to replace Charlie

---

Terrible idea

---

Alex Jones needs to stay off college campuses.

He is nuts.

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Christ died at the behest of the Jews. Not just the Pharisees. Not just the Sanhedrin. The Bible specifically says:

"And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

While nobody should use this as a cudgel to disparage Jewish people individually, it is an indictment of the Jewish religion, for what exists under the label of Judaism today is the continuation of the religion of the Pharisees.

No Christian should be a defender of Phariseeism under the label Judeo-Christian.

---

Indeed, the Pharisees had stirred up the crowd against Christ. But the idea that ALL Jews wanted Christ dead ignores the fact there were numerous converts among the Jews.

All religions that are opposed to Christ are wrong, not just the Jews. That does not mean Jews are still not a chosen people.

---

historian said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

All anyone needs to do to understand that God had planned the crucifixion from the beginning is to look at Old Testament prophecies. Isaiah 53 is a great place to start since it contains several unmistakable references.

The Jews did not kill Jesus. The Romans did. Ultimately, however, it was God's plan because of His love for us. Who is responsible? All of us are because Christ died for all of our sins.

Blaming Jews is foolish and dishonest. Blaming Jews of today for an event 2,000 years ago is insane.

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Christ died at the behest of the Jews. Not just the Pharisees. Not just the Sanhedrin. The Bible specifically says:

"And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

While nobody should use this as a cudgel to disparage Jewish people individually, it is an indictment of the Jewish religion, for what exists under the label of Judaism today is the continuation of the religion of the Pharisees.

No Christian should be a defender of Phariseeism under the label Judeo-Christian.

---

Indeed, the Pharisees had stirred up the crowd against Christ. But the idea that ALL Jews wanted Christ dead ignores the fact there were numerous converts among the Jews.

All religions that are opposed to Christ are wrong, not just the Jews. That does not mean Jews are still not a chosen people.

---

They were chosen by God to receive the messiah and they had him killed. Those who realized that he was messiah and followed him were and are part of the chose body of Christ which is we Christians (obviously many were jews). Jews in their Talmud have nothing but blasphemy for Christ and Mary. This is why there is no such thing as Judeo Christian bc those terms are not compatible. Muslims at least consider Jesus as a prophet.

John chapter 8 tells us a lot about what Jesus thought about the pharisees.

---

Mothra said:

---

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Christ died at the behest of the Jews. Not just the Pharisees. Not just the Sanhedrin. The Bible specifically says:

"And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

While nobody should use this as a cudgel to disparage Jewish people individually, it is an indictment of the Jewish religion, for what exists under the label of Judaism today is the continuation of the religion of the Pharisees.

No Christian should be a defender of Phariseeism under the label Judeo-Christian.

---

Indeed, the Pharisees had stirred up the crowd against Christ. But the idea that ALL Jews wanted Christ dead ignores the fact there were numerous converts among the Jews.

All religions that are opposed to Christ are wrong, not just the Jews. That does not mean Jews are still not a chosen people.

---

They were chosen by God to receive the messiah and they had him killed. Those who realized that he was messiah and followed him were and are part of the chose body of Christ which is we Christians (obviously many were jews). Jews in their Talmud have nothing but blasphemy for Christ and Mary. This is why there is no such thing as Judeo Christian bc those terms are not compatible. Muslims at least consider Jesus as a prophet.

John chapter 8 tells us a lot about what Jesus thought about the pharisees.

---

Jews remain a chosen people, with a future role in God's plan . If you don't believe so, then you haven't studied Romans or Revelation very closely.

---

Doc Holliday said:

---

Remember when you and your wife called Bob Iger to have me fired? https://t.co/w5BcJ1bsLC

— Roseanne Barr (@therealroseanne) September 18, 2025

---

They are pretending like this didn’t happen…

pic.twitter.com/dCVKPV3jI4

— Defiant L’s (@DefiantLs) September 18, 2025

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

Mothra said:

---

Jews remain a chosen people, with a future role in God's plan . If you don't believe so, then you haven't studied Romans or Revelation very closely.

---

This is all I needed to see to know firing Jimmy Kimmel was the right move. pic.twitter.com/8C4gdMf4CY

— Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸 (@Bubblebathgirl) September 18, 2025

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

I don't want to hear the slanted garbage from you right now.

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

I don't want to hear the slanted garbage from you right now.

---

I want to be open to Kimmel's speech but **** like this makes me glad he's gone..

Eric Swalwell just appeared on CNN wearing a Jimmy Kimmel hat and said Jimmy “has a right” to air on ABC.

He continues that it “should shake every American” that he can’t make millions of dollars on TV anymore.

Dems have absolutely lost it lmao. pic.twitter.com/VJEEoO3v92

— johnny maga (@_johnnymaga) September 18, 2025

Jack Bauer said:

---

I want to be open to Kimmel's speech but **** like this makes me glad he's gone..

They are fighting 10x as hard about Kimmel being fired for his words than Charlie Kirk actually being k1lled for his words.

---

Assassin said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

I don't want to hear the slanted garbage from you right now.

---

47 doesn't come across as a man of character

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

I don't want to hear the slanted garbage from you right now.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

---

and it is not tone, deaf for you to blame radical left?

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Really this is not the time for the left to be pointing fingers. Trump has had multiple assasination attempts on him and Charlie was just now assasinated.

It is very tone death to point fingers right now.

The left foments hatred and anger continually and they have crazy followers to act on it.

In a recent survey the most conservative group of people only had 2% say political assassination could be somewhat justified.

On the far progressive left that number was 26% of people.

I don't want to hear the slanted garbage from you right now.

---

Words have consequences. His words are divisive. What is your source for the 20%? Besides, the ride is always talking about the coming soon Civil War.

---

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

ScottS said:

---

Democrats Still Believe Charlie Kirk's Killer Was Right-Wing HotAir

---

NPR plays dumb, reports that "little is still known" about Tyler Robinson's politics because we don't know what his stances are on labor and immigration issues. pic.twitter.com/9JMKzWRlbG

— Andrew Kerr (@AndrewKerrNC) September 18, 2025

Things feel very dark in America this morning. Very, very dark.

— Jo (@JoJoFromJerz) September 18, 2025

Leslie Hanzelka, a teacher at @GardnerEdgerton in Kansas, allegedly made a post online SMEARING and MOCKING Charlie Kirk after he was ass*ssinated

"[Charlie Kirk] the terrible person… so that inadequate white men can pose naked in front of a mirror with a machine gun.”

I’m… pic.twitter.com/EZK1R0WQzw

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) September 16, 2025

muddybrazos said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Realitybites said:

---

Quote:

---

Hell, one of your buddies blames them for Jesus's death.

---

That is a documented fact of history recorded in the God inspired words of the New Testament in Luke 23:13-23:

"Then Pilate, when he had called together the chief priests, the rulers, and the people, said to them, "You have brought this Man to me, as one who misleads the people. And indeed, having examined Him in your presence, I have found no fault in this Man concerning those things of which you accuse Him; no, neither did Herod, for I sent you back to him; and indeed nothing deserving of death has been done by Him. I will therefore chastise Him and release Him" (for it was necessary for him to release one to them at the feast).

And they all cried out at once, saying, "Away with this Man, and release to us Barabbas" who had been thrown into prison for a certain rebellion made in the city, and for murder.

Pilate, therefore, wishing to release Jesus, again called out to them. But they shouted, saying, "Crucify Him, crucify Him!"

Then he said to them the third time, "Why, what evil has He done? I have found no reason for death in Him. I will therefore chastise Him and let Him go."

But they were insistent, demanding with loud voices that He be crucified. And the voices of these men and of the chief priests prevailed."

The Gospel of Matthew provides even more detail about their insistence, saying "And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

If that's not enough, Saint Paul reiterates this in Acts 13:

""Men and brethren, sons of the family of Abraham, and those among you who fear God, to you the word of this salvation has been sent. For those who dwell in Jerusalem, and their rulers, because they did not know Him, nor even the voices of the Prophets which are read every Sabbath, have fulfilled them in condemning Him. And though they found no cause for death in Him, they asked Pilate that He should be put to death."

---

Yes, Christ died at the behest of the Jewish Pharisees, but anyone who thinks that was not according to Christ's preordained plan, and that he did not choose to die in the way that he died, is likely not a Christian. Indeed, the poster in question admitted as much.

And therein lies the issue. Anyone focused on who killed Jesus and using it as a cudgel to disparage the Jewish people, as your buddy did, is an antisemitic person. Christ is God. He chose his own death, and who would kill him. And but for that death, you and I and the rest of the Gentiles would be in real trouble. (Let's also not forget that Christ and his disciples were Jewish).

Anyone attempting to hold that against the Jews is a bigot, plain and simple. It's kind of shocking that you are defending such bigotry.

---

Christ died at the behest of the Jews. Not just the Pharisees. Not just the Sanhedrin. The Bible specifically says:

"And all the people answered and said, "His blood be on us and on our children." (Matthew 27:25)

While nobody should use this as a cudgel to disparage Jewish people individually, it is an indictment of the Jewish religion, for what exists under the label of Judaism today is the continuation of the religion of the Pharisees.

No Christian should be a defender of Phariseeism under the label Judeo-Christian.

---

Indeed, the Pharisees had stirred up the crowd against Christ. But the idea that ALL Jews wanted Christ dead ignores the fact there were numerous converts among the Jews.

All religions that are opposed to Christ are wrong, not just the Jews. That does not mean Jews are still not a chosen people.

---

They were chosen by God to receive the messiah and they had him killed. Those who realized that he was messiah and followed him were and are part of the chose body of Christ which is we Christians (obviously many were jews). Jews in their Talmud have nothing but blasphemy for Christ and Mary. This is why there is no such thing as Judeo Christian bc those terms are not compatible. Muslims at least consider Jesus as a prophet.

John chapter 8 tells us a lot about what Jesus thought about the pharisees.

---

🚨 BREAKING: The U.S. Senate just UNANIMOUSLY established October 14, 2025 as "National Day of Remembrance for Charlie Kirk."

That's Charlie Kirk's birthday. ❤️🇺🇸 pic.twitter.com/dugeTDWuDv

— Eric Daugherty (@EricLDaugh) September 18, 2025

Waco1947 said:

---

Forest Bueller_bf said:

---

Waco1947 said:

---

During that interview, Trump told host Maria Bartiromo that California Rep. Adam Schiff and other Democrats were "lunatics" and a bigger threat to the U.S. than foreign adversaries like Russia or China.
"I always say, we have two enemies," Trump said, adding: "We have the outside enemy, and then we have the enemy from within, and the enemy from within, in my opinion, is more dangerous than China, Russia and all these countries."

---

I don't like Trumps rhetoric most of the time, he talks too much and goes on too much,
Trump is more than rhetoric because words have consequences. He foments hates and lifts up a new target every 10 minutes. He keeps his base stirred up with lies.

---

---

Realitybites said:

---

Mothra said:

---

Jews remain a chosen people, with a future role in God's plan . If you don't believe so, then you haven't studied Romans or Revelation very closely.

---

This is straight up heresy. What part of "New Covenant" and "Old Covenant" don't you understand? If Judaism has any part of the future, it is to welcome the antichrist into the world in a futile temple that is engaging in pointless animal sacrifices.

This false understanding comes from a misapplication of the unconditional Abrahamic covenant to national Israel, whose covenant was conditional and cancellled...a misunderstanding that is widespread in Evangelical circles.

---