President Trump announces military strikes on Iran: Operation Epic Fury

30,973 Views | 885 Replies | Last: 2 min ago by Redbrickbear
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.


And you know this how ?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.


And you know this how ?

There is so much wrong here with those posts...
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No, he means that having a lot of ships is not at all the same as having a lot of quality ships with well-trained crews. Back during the Cold War, one sign we were winning was when post Gorshkov the Soviets scaled back hard on ocean deployments. My Navy friends told me the Soviets no longer had a blue-water navy.

China wanted a legit navy, but soon discovered the cost, in ships and men, of making a true ocean fleet. China then defaulted to coastal patrols and a lot of trawlers .

FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.

We want them roll out their better missiles. It is a cat and mouse game. As soon as they are out, they are targets to destroy.
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

No, he means that having a lot of ships is not at all the same as having a lot of quality ships with well-trained crews. Back during the Cold War, one sign we were winning was when post Gorshkov the Soviets scaled back hard on ocean deployments. My Navy friends told me the Soviets no longer had a blue-water navy.

China wanted a legit navy, but soon discovered the cost, in ships and men, of making a true ocean fleet. China then defaulted to coastal patrols and a lot of trawlers .


China's Shipbuilding Capacity: 232 Times Greater Than United States

"A common response to the problem is to claim that while China may be able to build more ships, those ships are technologically inferior to those of the U.S. Navy.

Well, even that is wrong.

Chinese warships are increasingly technologically proficient. What's more, they are designed with the specific intention of overwhelming U.S. warships with superior firepower."
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Cool story, bro.

By the way, with all these wonder ships, remind me again why the PRC didn't invade Taiwan even while Autopen was in office?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian said:

ShooterTX said:

Oldbear83 said:

The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

There were other operations against Trump, which were attributed to Iran.

Either the USSS was good, the US had better than usual intel, or the guys sent by Iran were not very good.



Or the most logical choice - these operations are fake news propaganda spread by Israel and gobbled up by ******ed Boomers.

Least logical, and most batcrap, is your guess there, boyo.

That poor kid has let his hatred of the Jews take over to the degree that he believes the Iranian regime propaganda over all Western Civilized nations media, intelligence, independent reporters, etc.

I don't think I've ever seen antisemitism destroy a brain to that level. Amazing and sad at the same time.

Unfortunately, that level of antisemitism has existed for thousands of years among many different peoples. The difference is that we get to witness it first hand.


william
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RAW.
pro ecclesia, pro javelina
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
historian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
On the fears that the US is running out of ammo:

https://notthebee.com/article/my-favorite-thing-on-the-internet-today-are-the-replies-to-this-post
The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Doc Holliday said:

World War

World War 2
< you are here
World War 3

2 World 2 War

World War: Tokyo Drift

World and War

World 7

War 8


President Trump vs. Candidate Trump

The_barBEARian
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Semper Fi Marine!

GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Shameful.
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do not agree with his actions.

However IMO he has the right to express himself.


The bigger question is just how good is our congressional security ?

Good enough to fight off a squad of Iranian terrorists armed with AR's and suicide vests ?

boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630
How long do you want to ignore this user?
boognish_bear said:




whiterock, implications? Kurds trustworthy? I know they will fight, will they govern and work with the civilized Nations? Will the Iranians let them?
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.

You actually believe the Times...and to think the US doesn't have a backup plan is foolish as well..
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The_barBEARian said:

Oldbear83 said:

No, he means that having a lot of ships is not at all the same as having a lot of quality ships with well-trained crews. Back during the Cold War, one sign we were winning was when post Gorshkov the Soviets scaled back hard on ocean deployments. My Navy friends told me the Soviets no longer had a blue-water navy.

China wanted a legit navy, but soon discovered the cost, in ships and men, of making a true ocean fleet. China then defaulted to coastal patrols and a lot of trawlers .


China's Shipbuilding Capacity: 232 Times Greater Than United States

"A common response to the problem is to claim that while China may be able to build more ships, those ships are technologically inferior to those of the U.S. Navy.

Well, even that is wrong.

Chinese warships are increasingly technologically proficient. What's more, they are designed with the specific intention of overwhelming U.S. warships with superior firepower."


China won't be able to keep those ships moving for very long when 70% of their future oil reserves are gone (Iran and Venezuela)
BluesBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GrowlTowel said:

Shameful.

He speaks truth.....why are we quick to support a country that was created out of the brainchild of the Rothschilds back in 1948 - go look at the history. Are we still using the same scientists who told Bush that Iraq has WMDs?
GrowlTowel
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not his place to "speak the truth."

Disgusting
Your ideas are intriguing to me, and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
Sam Lowry
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BluesBear said:

Sam Lowry said:

Realitybites said:



And that was done using mostly cheap stuff. They've yet to roll out their better missiles with bigger payloads.

You actually believe the Times...and to think the US doesn't have a backup plan is foolish as well..

You mean the one where Jesus comes back to kill all the infidels and rapture us away to heaven?
Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Somali Sam has pivoted now from mocking the US arms stockpile to mocking Christ.

The first was foolish enough, but oh my.
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




whiterock, implications? Kurds trustworthy? I know they will fight, will they govern and work with the civilized Nations? Will the Iranians let them?

Amazing development.

Kurds will certainly fight....they have a lot of old scores to settle.

But they do not have the numbers to take on the Iranian army.

Suspect Israel has made a lot of promises to the Kurds to get them to make a rash move like this .
KaiBear
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oldbear83 said:

Somali Sam has pivoted now from mocking the US arms stockpile to mocking Christ.

The first was foolish enough, but oh my.

And within a couple of days Sam will claim, still again, that he is Catholic.

Oldbear83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

Oldbear83 said:

Somali Sam has pivoted now from mocking the US arms stockpile to mocking Christ.

The first was foolish enough, but oh my.

And within a couple of days Sam will claim, still again, that he is Catholic.



Somali Catholic?
trey3216
How long do you want to ignore this user?
KaiBear said:

FLBear5630 said:

boognish_bear said:




whiterock, implications? Kurds trustworthy? I know they will fight, will they govern and work with the civilized Nations? Will the Iranians let them?

Amazing development.

Kurds will certainly fight....they have a lot of old scores to settle.

But they do not have the numbers to take on the Iranian army.

Suspect Israel has made a lot of promises to the Kurds to get them to make a rash move like this .
they don't have to take on the Iranian army. They need to show the Iranian. Army it's ok to fight the IRGC
Mr. Treehorn treats objects like women, man.
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.